The Life Cycle of a Mesoscale Gravity Wave as Observed by a Network of Doppler Wind Profilers

C. Michael Trexler Department of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina

Search for other papers by C. Michael Trexler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Steven E. Koch Department of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Steven E. Koch in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

For the first time, an analysis has been made of the evolving vertical structure of a long-lived mesoscale gravity wave that exerted a strong influence upon the precipitation distribution across a large area. This paper describes this gravity wave system on 14 February 1992, which was observed using a combination of a surface mesonetwork, digital satellite and radar imagery, and several Doppler wind profilers. The resulting vertical structures are compared to the predictions of linear stability theory.

Since the signature of the gravity waves in the profiler vertical beam data was often complicated by the presence of precipitation, a kinematic method was developed for estimating the vertical air motions during these periods. The resultant time–height fields show vertical and horizontal winds that are consistent with a gravity wave conceptual model, the microbarograph traces, and the cloud and precipitation patterns. In the early stages of development, a strong vertically erect wave of depression was observed in southwestern Kansas. A few hours later, in central Kansas, a distinct discontinuity had developed at the 4-km level. This phase shift and the vertical motion profiles are both shown to be consistent with linear theory, as well as the notion that the critical level at 5.4 km acted as a nodal surface for a complex ducted wave mode.

Precipitation patterns were strongly affected by the waves. According to the profiler analysis, the sharp back edge to the associated rainband was provided by strong low-level subsidence ahead of the wave of depression. The waves and precipitation strengthened in a synergistic fashion—as strong convection developed along the wave, the wave of depression evolved into a wave train in which the leading wave crest eventually dominated over the initial wave of depression. The profiler results reveal the existence of the incipient wave (and other waves) at midlevels several hours before the surface mesonet stations detected the presence of the waves. Thus, an important and unexpected finding from the profiler analysis is that surface microbarograph detection of mesoscale gravity waves may be limited to those waves that primarily affect the lower troposphere.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Steven E. Koch, Department of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 8208, Raleigh, NC 27695-8208.

Abstract

For the first time, an analysis has been made of the evolving vertical structure of a long-lived mesoscale gravity wave that exerted a strong influence upon the precipitation distribution across a large area. This paper describes this gravity wave system on 14 February 1992, which was observed using a combination of a surface mesonetwork, digital satellite and radar imagery, and several Doppler wind profilers. The resulting vertical structures are compared to the predictions of linear stability theory.

Since the signature of the gravity waves in the profiler vertical beam data was often complicated by the presence of precipitation, a kinematic method was developed for estimating the vertical air motions during these periods. The resultant time–height fields show vertical and horizontal winds that are consistent with a gravity wave conceptual model, the microbarograph traces, and the cloud and precipitation patterns. In the early stages of development, a strong vertically erect wave of depression was observed in southwestern Kansas. A few hours later, in central Kansas, a distinct discontinuity had developed at the 4-km level. This phase shift and the vertical motion profiles are both shown to be consistent with linear theory, as well as the notion that the critical level at 5.4 km acted as a nodal surface for a complex ducted wave mode.

Precipitation patterns were strongly affected by the waves. According to the profiler analysis, the sharp back edge to the associated rainband was provided by strong low-level subsidence ahead of the wave of depression. The waves and precipitation strengthened in a synergistic fashion—as strong convection developed along the wave, the wave of depression evolved into a wave train in which the leading wave crest eventually dominated over the initial wave of depression. The profiler results reveal the existence of the incipient wave (and other waves) at midlevels several hours before the surface mesonet stations detected the presence of the waves. Thus, an important and unexpected finding from the profiler analysis is that surface microbarograph detection of mesoscale gravity waves may be limited to those waves that primarily affect the lower troposphere.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Steven E. Koch, Department of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 8208, Raleigh, NC 27695-8208.

Save
  • Balsley, B. B., W. L. Ecklund, D. A. Carter, and P. E. Johnson, 1980:The MST radar at Poker Flat, Alaska. Radio Sci.,15, 113–213.

  • Barnes, S. L., 1964: A technique for maximizing details in numerical weather map analysis. J. Appl. Meteor.,3, 396–409.

  • Bedard, A. J., Jr., F. Canavero, and F. Einaudi, 1986: Atmospheric gravity waves and aircraft turbulence encounters. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 2838–2844.

  • Brown, E. H., and F. F. Hall, 1978: Advances in atmospheric acoustics. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys.,16, 47–110.

  • Canavero, F. G., F. Einaudi, E. R. Westwater, M. J. Falls, J. A. Schroeder, and A. J. Bedard, 1990: Interpretation of ground-based radiometric observations in terms of a gravity wave model. J. Geophys. Res.,95, 7637–7652.

  • Carr, F. H., P. L. Spencer, C. A. Doswell III, and J. D. Powell, 1995:A comparison of two objective analysis techniques for profiler time–height data. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 2161–2180.

  • Carter, D. A., B. B. Balsley, W. L. Ecklund, K. S. Gage, A. C. Riddle, R. Garello, and M. Crochet, 1989: Investigations of internal gravity waves using three vertically directed closely spaced wind profilers. J. Geophys. Res.,94, 8633–8642.

  • Cunning, J. B., and S. F. Williams, 1993: STORM Fronts Experiment systems test operations summary and data inventory. USWRP STORM-FEST, 389 pp. [Available from U.S. Weather Research Program, NOAA, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80303.].

  • Doviak, R. J., and R. Ge, 1984: An atmospheric solitary gust observed with a Doppler radar, a tall tower, and a surface network. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 2559–2573.

  • Ecklund, W. L., K. S. Gage, and A. C. Riddle, 1981: Gravity wave activity in vertical winds observed by the Poker Flat MST radar. Geophys. Res. Lett.,8, 285–288.

  • Eom, J. K., 1975: Analysis of the internal gravity wave occurrence of 19 April 1970 in the Midwest. Mon. Wea. Rev.,103, 217–226.

  • Ferretti, R., F. Einaudi, and L. W. Uccellini, 1988: Wave disturbances associated with the Red River Valley severe weather outbreak of 10–11 April 1979. Meteor. Atmos. Phys.,39, 132–168.

  • Fukao, S., K. Wakasugi, T. Sato, S. Morimoto, T. Tsuda, I. Kimura, and S. Kato, 1985: Direct measurement of air and precipitation particle motion by very high frequency Doppler radar. Nature,316, 712–714.

  • Gossard, E. E., 1988: Measuring drop-size distributions in clouds with clear-air sensing Doppler radar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,5, 640–649.

  • ——, and W. B. Sweezy, 1974: Dispersion and spectra of gravity waves in the atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci.,31, 1540–1548.

  • ——, and W. H. Hooke, 1975: Waves in the atmosphere. Developments in the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 2, Elsevier, 456 pp.

  • Holton, J. R., 1992: An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology. 3d ed. Academic Press, 511 pp.

  • Jin, Y., 1997: A numerical model study of the role of mesoscale gravity waves in rainband dynamics in the central United States during STORM-FEST. Ph.D. dissertation, North Carolina State University, 318 pp. [Available from North Carolina State University Libraries, Box 7111, Raleigh, NC 27695-7111.].

  • Koch, S. E., and P. B. Dorian, 1988: A mesoscale gravity wave event observed during CCOPE. Part III: Wave environment and probable source mechanisms. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 2570–2592.

  • ——, and C. O’Handley, 1997: Operational forecasting and detection of mesoscale gravity waves. Wea. Forecasting,12, 253–281.

  • ——, and L. Siedlarz, 1999: Mesoscale gravity waves and their environment in the central United States during STORM-FEST. Mon. Wea. Rev.,127, 2854–2879.

  • ——, R. E. Golus, and P. B. Dorian, 1988: A mesoscale gravity wave event observed during CCOPE. Part II: Interactions between mesoscale convective systems and the antecedent waves. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 2544–2569.

  • ——, P. B. Dorian, R. Ferrare, S. H. Melfi, W. C. Skillman, and D. Whiteman, 1991: Structure of an internal bore and dissipating gravity current as revealed by Raman lidar. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 857–887.

  • ——, F. Einaudi, P. B. Dorian, S. Lang, and G. M. Heymsfield, 1993:A mesoscale gravity wave event observed during CCOPE. Part IV: Stability analysis and Doppler-derived wave vertical structure. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 2483–2510.

  • Lalas, D. P., and F. Einaudi, 1976: On the characteristics of gravity waves generated by atmospheric shear layers. J. Atmos. Sci.,33, 1248–1259.

  • Lindzen, R. S., and K. K. Tung, 1976: Banded convection activity and ducted gravity waves. Mon. Wea. Rev.,104, 1602–1617.

  • Madden, R. E., E. Zipser, E. Danielsen, D. Joseph, and R. Gall, 1971:Rawinsonde data obtained during the Line Island Experiment. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR-TN/STR-55, Boulder, CO, 29 pp.

  • Mahapatra, P. R., R. J. Doviak, and D. S. Zrnic, 1991: Multisensor observation of an atmospheric undular bore. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,72, 1468–1480.

  • Mastrantonio, G., F. Einaudi, D. Fua, and D. P. Lalas, 1976: Generation of gravity waves by jet streams in the atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci.,33, 1730–1738.

  • Mohr, C. G., L. J. Miller, R. L. Vaughan, and H. W. Frank, 1986: The merger of mesoscale datasets into a common Cartesian format for efficient and systematic analyses. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,3, 143–161.

  • Nastrom, G. D., M. R. Peterson, J. L. Green, K. S. Gage, and T. E. VanZandt, 1990: Sources of gravity wave activity seen in the vertical velocities observed by the Flatland VHF radar. J. Appl. Meteor.,29, 783–792.

  • O’Brien, J. J., 1970: Alternative solutions to the classical vertical velocity problem. J. Appl. Meteor.,9, 197–203.

  • Ralph, F. M., 1995: Using radar-measured radial vertical velocities to distinguish precipitation scattering from clear-air scattering. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol,12, 257–267.

  • ——, M. Crochet, and S. V. Venkateswaran, 1992: A study of mountain lee waves using clear-air radar. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,118, 597–627.

  • ——, ——, and ——, 1993a: Observations of a mesoscale ducted gravity wave. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 3277–3291.

  • ——, C. Mazaudier, M. Crochet, and S. V. Venkateswaran, 1993b: Doppler sodar and radar wind-profiler observations of gravity-wave activity associated with a gravity current. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 444–463.

  • ——, P. J. Neiman, D. W. van de Kamp, and D. C. Law, 1995: Using spectral moment data from NOAA’s 404-Mhz radar wind profilers to observe precipitation. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,76, 1717–1739.

  • ——, P. J. Neiman, and D. Ruffieux, 1996: Precipitation identification from radar wind profiler spectral moment data: Vertical velocity histograms, velocity variance, and signal power-vertical velocity correlations. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,13, 545–559.

  • Ramamurthy, M. K., R. M. Rauber, B. P. Collins, and N. K. Malhotra, 1993: A comparative study of large-amplitude gravity wave events. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 2951–2974.

  • Rottman, J. W., and F. Einaudi, 1993: Solitary waves in the atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 2116–2136.

  • Schneider, R. S., 1990: Large-amplitude mesoscale wave disturbances within the intense Midwest extratropical cyclone of 15 December 1987. Wea. Forecasting,5, 533–557.

  • Strauch, R. G., B. C. Weber, A. S. Frisch, C. G. Little, D. A. Merritt, K. P. Moran, and P. C. Welsh, 1987: The precision and relative accuracy of profile wind measurements. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,4, 563–571.

  • Trexler, C. M., 1997: Vertical structure of a mesoscale gravity wave event observed during STORM-FEST: A comparative analysis between in situ and remote sensing observations, numerical simulation, and linear theory predictions. M.S. thesis, North Carolina State University, 223 pp. [Available from North Carolina State University Libraries, Box 7111, Raleigh, NC 27695-7111.].

  • Uccellini, L. W., and S. E. Koch, 1987: The synoptic setting and possible energy sources for mesoscale wave disturbances. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 721–729.

  • Wakasugi, K., A. Mizutani, M. Matsuo, S. Fukao, and S. Kato, 1987:Further discussion on deriving drop-size distribution and vertical air velocities directly from VHF Doppler radar spectra. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,4, 170–179.

  • Weber, B. L., D. B. Wuertz, D. C. Welsh, and R. McPeek, 1993: Quality controls for profiler measurements of winds and RASS temperatures. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,10, 452–464.

  • Yang, M., R. M. Rauber, and M. K. Ramamurthy, 1999: Origin, maintenance and fine-scale structure of the St. Valentine’s Day mesoscale gravity wave observed during STORM-FEST. Preprints, Eighth Conf. on Mesoscale Processes, Boulder, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 97–100.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2808 2628 89
PDF Downloads 133 40 8