Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Using Data and Intermediate Coupled Models for Seasonal-to-Interannual Forecasts

Claire M. Perigaud Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

Search for other papers by Claire M. Perigaud in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Christophe Cassou Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

Search for other papers by Christophe Cassou in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Boris Dewitte Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

Search for other papers by Boris Dewitte in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Lee-Lueng Fu Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

Search for other papers by Lee-Lueng Fu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
J. David Neelin Department of Atmospheric Sciences and Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

Search for other papers by J. David Neelin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Sep 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<3025:UDAICM>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
3025–3049
Restricted access

Abstract

This paper provides a detailed illustration that it is beneficial for ENSO forecasting to improve in priority the model parameterizations, instead of increasing only the consistency of the initial conditions with the coupled model. Moreover it is shown that the latter can lead to misleading results. Using sea level data in addition to wind to initialize the Cane and Zebiak model does not improve El Niño forecasts. Nudging the observed wind to the model one to initialize the forecasts as proposed by Chen et al. also fails to correct the model deficiencies and degrades the initial conditions of the ocean and atmosphere. These failures are explained by large model errors in the off-equatorial sea level and wind anomalies that play a key role in the coupled behavior. The use of data to estimate new model parameterizations allows for significantly improving both the initial conditions and the forecasts up to 6-month lead time. This success holds for all the various initialization procedures used in this study. Because of erroneous winds simulated by the atmospheric component in the eastern Pacific, errors grow fast though. Replacing the atmospheric model by a statistical one results in more reliable predictions over 1980–98. For lead times up to 1 yr, the model predicts well the observed anomalies between 1984 and 1993, including the sea level rises along the ITCZ after warm events and their subsequent equatorward migration. This success is attributed to the consistency between the observed anomalies over this period and the mechanisms involved in maintaining the oscillatory behavior of the model, including the off-equatorial meridional wind anomalies.

Corresponding author address: Claire Perigaud, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, MS 300/323, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109.

Email: cp@pacific.jpl.nasa.gov

Abstract

This paper provides a detailed illustration that it is beneficial for ENSO forecasting to improve in priority the model parameterizations, instead of increasing only the consistency of the initial conditions with the coupled model. Moreover it is shown that the latter can lead to misleading results. Using sea level data in addition to wind to initialize the Cane and Zebiak model does not improve El Niño forecasts. Nudging the observed wind to the model one to initialize the forecasts as proposed by Chen et al. also fails to correct the model deficiencies and degrades the initial conditions of the ocean and atmosphere. These failures are explained by large model errors in the off-equatorial sea level and wind anomalies that play a key role in the coupled behavior. The use of data to estimate new model parameterizations allows for significantly improving both the initial conditions and the forecasts up to 6-month lead time. This success holds for all the various initialization procedures used in this study. Because of erroneous winds simulated by the atmospheric component in the eastern Pacific, errors grow fast though. Replacing the atmospheric model by a statistical one results in more reliable predictions over 1980–98. For lead times up to 1 yr, the model predicts well the observed anomalies between 1984 and 1993, including the sea level rises along the ITCZ after warm events and their subsequent equatorward migration. This success is attributed to the consistency between the observed anomalies over this period and the mechanisms involved in maintaining the oscillatory behavior of the model, including the off-equatorial meridional wind anomalies.

Corresponding author address: Claire Perigaud, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, MS 300/323, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109.

Email: cp@pacific.jpl.nasa.gov

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Bennett, A. F., B. S. Chua, D. E. Harrison, and M. J. McPhaden, 1998: Generalized inversion of Tropical Atmosphere–Ocean (TAO) data and a couple model of the tropical Pacific. J. Climate,11, 1768–1792.

  • Cane, M. A., S. E. Zebiak, and S. C. Dolan, 1986: Experimental forecasts of El Niño. Nature,321, 827–832.

  • Cassou, C., and C. Perigaud, 2000: ENSO simulated by intermediate coupled models and evaluated with observations over 1970–96. Part II: Role of the off-equatorial ocean and meridional winds. J. Climate,13, 1095–1123.

  • Chen, D., S. E. Zebiak, A. J. Busalacchi, and M. A. Cane, 1995: An improved procedure for El Niño forecasting. Science,269, 1699–1702.

  • ——, ——, M. A. Cane, and A. J. Busalacchi, 1997: Initialization and predictability of a coupled ENSO forecast model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 773–788.

  • ——, M. A. Cane, S. E. Zebiak, and A. Kaplan, 1998: The impact of sea-level data assimilation on the Lamont model prediction of the 1997/98 El Niño. Geophys. Res. Lett.,25, 2837–2840.

  • Chen Y. Q., D. S. Battisti, and E. S. Sarachick, 1995: A new ocean model for studying the tropical oceanic aspects of ENSO. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,25, 2065–2089.

  • Dewitte, B., 2000: Sensitivity of an intermediate ocean–atmosphere coupled model of the tropical Pacific to its oceanic vertical structure. J. Climate,13, 2363–2388.

  • ——, and C. Perigaud, 1996: El Niño–La Niña events simulated with Cane and Zebiak’s model and observed with satellite and in situ data. Part II: Model forced with observations. J. Climate,9, 1188–1207.

  • Fischer M., M. Latif, M. Flugel, and M. Ji, 1997: The impact of data assimilation on ENSO simulations and predictions. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 819–829.

  • Fukumori, I., 1995: Assimilation of TOPEX sea-level measurements with a reduced gravity, shallow-water model of the tropical Pacific Ocean. J. Geophys. Res.,100, 25 027–25 039.

  • Gill, A. E., 1980: Some simple solutions for heat induced tropical circulation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,106, 447–462.

  • Ji, M., and A. Leetma, 1997: Impact of data assimilation on ocean initialization and El Niño predictions. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 742–753.

  • ——, D. W. Berhinger, and A. Leetmaa, 1998: An improved coupled model for ENSO prediction and implications for ocean initialization. Part II: The coupled model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,126, 1022–1034.

  • Kirtman, B., and S. E. Zebiak, 1997: ENSO simulation and prediction with a hybrid coupled model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 2620–2640.

  • Kleeman, R., 1991: A simple model of the atmospheric response to ENSO SST anomalies. J. Atmos. Sci.,48, 3–18.

  • ——, A. M. Moore, and N. R. Smith, 1995: Assimilation of subsurface thermal data into an intermediate tropical coupled ocean–atmosphere model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 3103–3113.

  • Latif, M., and Coauthors, 1998: A review of the predictability and prediction of ENSO. J. Geophys. Res.,103, 14 375–14 393.

  • Mantua, N. J., and D. S. Battisti, 1995: Aperiodic variability in the Cane–Zebiak coupled ocean–atmosphere model: Ocean atmosphere interactions in the western equatorial Pacific. J. Climate,8, 2897–2927.

  • Neelin, J. D., and F. F. Jin, 1993: Modes of interannual tropical ocean–atmosphere interaction—A unified view. Part II: Analytical results in the weak-coupling limit. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 3504–3522.

  • ——, and N. Zeng, 2000: A quasi-equilibrium tropical circulation model—Formulation. J. Atmos. Sci.,57, 1741–1766.

  • Penland C., M. Flugel, and P. Chang, 2000: Identification of dynamical regimes in an intermediate coupled ocean–atmosphere model. J. Climate,13, 2105–2115.

  • Perigaud, C., and B. Dewitte, 1996: El Niño–La Niña events simulated with Cane and Zebiak’s model and observed with satellite and in situ data. Part I: Model data comparison. J. Climate,9, 66–84.

  • ——, and C. Cassou, 2000: Importance of oceanic decadal trends and westerly wind bursts for forecasting El Nino. Geophys. Res. Lett.,27, 389–392.

  • ——, S. Zebiak, F. Melin, J. P. Boulanger, and B. Dewitte, 1997: On the role of meridional wind anomalies in a coupled model of ENSO. J. Climate,10, 761–773.

  • ——, F. Melin, and C. Cassou, 2000: ENSO simulated by intermediate coupled models and evaluated with observations over 1970–96. Part I: Role of the off-equatorial variability. J. Climate,13, 1065–1094.

  • Rosati, A., K. Miyakoda, and R. Gudgel, 1997: The impact of ocean initial conditions on ENSO forecasting with a coupled model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 754–772.

  • Schneider, E. K., B. Huang, Z. Zhu, D. G. DeWitt, J. L. Kinter III, B. Kirtman, and J. Shukla, 1998: Ocean data assimilation, initialization, and predictions of ENSO with a coupled GCM. Mon. Wea. Rev.,127, 1187–1207.

  • Smith, N. R., 1995: An improved system for tropical ocean subsurface temperature analyses. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,12, 850–870.

  • Syu, H. H., and J. D. Neelin, 2000: ENSO in a hybrid coupled model. Part II: Prediction with piggyback data assimilation. Climate Dyn.,16, 19–34.

  • Wang, B., and and T. Li, 1993: A simple tropical atmosphere model of relevance to short-term climate variations. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 260–284.

  • Xue, Y., M. A. Cane, and S. E. Zebiak, 1997: Predictability of a coupled model of ENSO using singular vector analysis. Part II:Optimal growth and forecast skill. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 2074–2093.

  • Zebiak, S. E., 1986: Atmospheric convergence feedback in a simple model for El Niño. Mon Wea. Rev.,114, 1263–1271.

  • ——, and M. A. Cane, 1987: A model El Niño–Southern Oscillation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 2262–2278.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 50 18 1
PDF Downloads 17 5 1