Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

A New Boundary Layer Mixing Scheme. Part II: Tests in Climate and Mesoscale Models

G. M. Martin The Met. Office, Bracknell, Berkshire, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by G. M. Martin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
M. R. Bush The Met. Office, Bracknell, Berkshire, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by M. R. Bush in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
A. R. Brown The Met. Office, Bracknell, Berkshire, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by A. R. Brown in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
A. P. Lock The Met. Office, Bracknell, Berkshire, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by A. P. Lock in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
R. N. B. Smith The Met. Office, Bracknell, Berkshire, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by R. N. B. Smith in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Sep 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<3200:ANBLMS>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
3200–3217
Restricted access

Abstract

A new turbulent mixing scheme, described in Part I of this paper, is tested in the climate and mesoscale configurations of the U.K. Met. Office’s Unified Model (UM). In climate configuration, the scheme is implemented along with increased vertical resolution below 700 hPa (the same as that in the mesoscale model), in order to allow the different boundary layer types and processes to be identified and treated properly. In both configurations, the new boundary layer (PBL-N) mixing scheme produces some improvement over the current boundary layer (PBL-C) scheme. The PBL-N scheme is able to diagnose different boundary layer types that appear to be consistent with the observed conditions, and the boundary layer structure is improved in comparison with observations. In the climate model, the boundary layer and cloud structure in the semipermanent stratocumulus regions of the eastern subtropical oceans are noticeably improved with the PBL-N scheme. The deepening and decoupling of the boundary layer toward the trade cumulus regime is also simulated more realistically. However, the cloud amounts in the stratocumulus regions, which were underestimated with the PBL-C scheme, are reduced further when the PBL-N scheme is included. Tests of the PBL-N scheme in the UM single-column model and in a development version of the UM, where the dynamics, time stepping, and vertical grid are different from the standard version, both show that realistic stratocumulus cloud amounts can be achieved. Thus, it is thought that the performance of the PBL-N scheme in the standard UM may be being limited by other aspects of that model. In the mesoscale model, improvements in the simulation of a convective case are achieved with the PBL-N scheme through reductions in layer cloud amount, while the simulation of a stratocumulus case is improved through better representation of the cloud and boundary layer structure. Other mesoscale model case studies show that there is a consistent improvement in fog probabilities and forecasts of cloud-base height. The root-mean-square errors in screen-level temperature are also reduced slightly. The weak daytime bias in wind strength is improved greatly through a systematic increase in the 10-m wind speed in unstable conditions. As a result of these trials, the scheme has been implemented operationally in the mesoscale model.

Corresponding author address: Dr. G. M. Martin, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, The Met. Office, London Road, Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 2SY, United Kingdom.

Email: gmmartin@meto.gov.uk

Abstract

A new turbulent mixing scheme, described in Part I of this paper, is tested in the climate and mesoscale configurations of the U.K. Met. Office’s Unified Model (UM). In climate configuration, the scheme is implemented along with increased vertical resolution below 700 hPa (the same as that in the mesoscale model), in order to allow the different boundary layer types and processes to be identified and treated properly. In both configurations, the new boundary layer (PBL-N) mixing scheme produces some improvement over the current boundary layer (PBL-C) scheme. The PBL-N scheme is able to diagnose different boundary layer types that appear to be consistent with the observed conditions, and the boundary layer structure is improved in comparison with observations. In the climate model, the boundary layer and cloud structure in the semipermanent stratocumulus regions of the eastern subtropical oceans are noticeably improved with the PBL-N scheme. The deepening and decoupling of the boundary layer toward the trade cumulus regime is also simulated more realistically. However, the cloud amounts in the stratocumulus regions, which were underestimated with the PBL-C scheme, are reduced further when the PBL-N scheme is included. Tests of the PBL-N scheme in the UM single-column model and in a development version of the UM, where the dynamics, time stepping, and vertical grid are different from the standard version, both show that realistic stratocumulus cloud amounts can be achieved. Thus, it is thought that the performance of the PBL-N scheme in the standard UM may be being limited by other aspects of that model. In the mesoscale model, improvements in the simulation of a convective case are achieved with the PBL-N scheme through reductions in layer cloud amount, while the simulation of a stratocumulus case is improved through better representation of the cloud and boundary layer structure. Other mesoscale model case studies show that there is a consistent improvement in fog probabilities and forecasts of cloud-base height. The root-mean-square errors in screen-level temperature are also reduced slightly. The weak daytime bias in wind strength is improved greatly through a systematic increase in the 10-m wind speed in unstable conditions. As a result of these trials, the scheme has been implemented operationally in the mesoscale model.

Corresponding author address: Dr. G. M. Martin, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, The Met. Office, London Road, Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 2SY, United Kingdom.

Email: gmmartin@meto.gov.uk

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Albrecht, B. A., D. A. Randall, and S. Nicholls, 1988: Observations of marine stratocumulus during FIRE. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,69, 618–626.

  • Brown, A. R., 1995: Modelling turbulent sheared convection. Ph.D. thesis, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom, 192 pp. [Available from Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.].

  • Bushell, A. C., and G. M. Martin, 1999: The impact of vertical resolution upon GCM simulations of marine stratocumulus. Climate Dyn.,15, 293–318.

  • Cox, P. M., R. A. Betts, C. Bunton, R. L. H. Essery, P. R. Rowntree, and J. Smith, 1999: The impact of new land surface physics on the GCM simulation of climate and climate sensitivity. Climate Dyn.,15, 183–203.

  • Cullen, M. J. P., 1993: The unified forecast/climate model. Meteor. Mag.,122, 81–94.

  • ——, and T. Davies, 1991: A conservative split-explicit integration scheme with fourth-order horizontal advection. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,117, 993–1002.

  • Duynkerke, P. G., and P. Hignett, 1993: Simulation of diurnal variation in a stratocumulus-capped marine boundary layer during FIRE. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 3291–3300.

  • Edwards, J., and A. Slingo, 1996: Studies with a flexible new radiation code. I: Choosing a configuration for a large-scale model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,122, 689–720.

  • Gates, L. W., 1992: AMIP: The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc,73, 1962–1970.

  • Gordon, C., C. Cooper, C. Senior, H. Banks, J. Gregory, T. Johns, J. Mitchell, and R. Wood, 1999: The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments. Climate Dyn.,16, 147–168.

  • Gregory, D., and P. R. Rowntree, 1990: A mass flux convection scheme with representation of cloud ensemble characteristics and stability dependent closure. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 1483–1506.

  • ——, and S. Allen, 1991: The effect of convective scale downdraughts upon NWP and climate simulations. Preprints, Ninth Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Denver, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 122–123.

  • ——, R. Kershaw, and P. M. Inness, 1997: Parametrization of momentum transport by convection. II: Tests in single-column and general circulation models. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,123, 1153–1183.

  • ——, G. J. Shutts, and J. R. Mitchell, 1998: A new gravity-wave-drag scheme incorporating anisotropic orography and low-level wave breaking: Impact upon the climate of the UK Meteorological Office Unified Model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,124, 463–494.

  • Jones, C. D., and B. Macpherson, 1997: A latent heat nudging scheme for the assimilation of precipitation data into an operational mesoscale model. Meteor. Appl.,4, 269–277.

  • Lock, A. P., A. R. Brown, M. R. Bush, G. M. Martin, and R. N. B. Smith, 2000: A new boundary layer mixing scheme. Part I: Scheme description and single column model tests. Mon. Wea. Rev.,128, 3187–3199.

  • Lorenc, A. C., R. S. Bell, and B. Macpherson, 1991: The Meteorological Office analysis correction data assimilation scheme. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,117, 59–89.

  • Macpherson, B., B. J. Wright, W. H. Hand, and A. J. Maycock, 1996:The impact of MOPS moisture data in the UK Meteorological Office Mesoscale Data Assimilation Scheme. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 1746–1766.

  • Milton, S. F., and C. A. Wilson, 1996: The impact of subgrid-scale orographic forcing on systematic errors in a global NWP model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 2023–2045.

  • Norris, J. R., 1998: Low cloud type over the ocean from surface observations. Part II: Geographical and seasonal variations. J. Climate,11, 383–403.

  • Pope, V. D., M. Gallani, P. R. Rowntree, and R. A. Stratton, 2000: The impact of new physical parametrizations in the Hadley Centre climate model—HadAM3. Climate Dyn.,16, 123–146.

  • Senior, C. A., and J. F. B. Mitchell, 1993: Carbon dioxide and climate:Impact of cloud parameterization. J. Climate,6, 393–418.

  • Slingo, A., 1989: A GCM parameterization for the shortwave radiative properties of water clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 1419–1427.

  • ——, and R. Wilderspin, 1986: Development of a revised longwave radiation scheme for an atmospheric general circulation model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,112, 371–386.

  • Smith, R. N. B., 1990: A scheme for predicting layer clouds and their water content in a general circulation model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,116, 435–460.

  • Weare, B. C., I. I. Mokhov, and Project Members: 1995: Evaluation of total cloudiness and its variability in the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project. J. Climate,8, 2224–2238.

  • Wilson, D. R., and S. P. Ballard, 1999: A microphysically based precipitation scheme for the Meteorological Office Unified Model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,125, 1607–1636.

  • Xie, P., and P. A. Arkin, 1997: Global precipitation: A 17-year monthly analysis based on gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model outputs. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,78, 2539–2558.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 251 60 6
PDF Downloads 135 34 1