The Evolution of Low-Level Rotation in the 29 May 1994 Newcastle–Graham, Texas, Storm Complex during VORTEX

Conrad L. Ziegler NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Conrad L. Ziegler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Erik N. Rasmussen NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Erik N. Rasmussen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tom R. Shepherd NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Tom R. Shepherd in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Andrew I. Watson NOAA/National Weather Service, Tallahassee, Florida

Search for other papers by Andrew I. Watson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Jerry M. Straka School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Jerry M. Straka in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This paper reports the results of an analysis of airflow evolution in the tornadic Newcastle–Graham, Texas, storm complex of 29 May 1994. A series of seven pseudo-dual-Doppler analyses from 2242 to 2315 are performed from tail radar observations by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration P-3 aircraft. Subjective analyses of quasi-horizontal single-Doppler radar observations provide a detailed look at structure and evolution of the hook echo and the low-level Newcastle mesocyclone. Special emphasis is placed on the evolution of low-level [i.e., below 1 km above ground level (AGL)] rotation of the parent mesoscale circulation of the Newcastle tornado and the origins of mesoscale rotation preceding tornadogenesis. The structure and evolution of the Newcastle and Graham mesocyclones are compared and contrasted.

The airborne Doppler analyses reveal that the tornadic Newcastle cell had supercell characteristics and that the Newcastle storm circulation could be classified as a mesocyclone based on commonly accepted criteria of circulation amplitude, spatial scale, and persistence. The Newcastle mesocyclone initially developed downward from midlevels (i.e., 2–5 km AGL), then transitioned into a subsequent period of rapid low-level stretching intensification and upward growth just prior to the development of an F3 tornado. Single-radar analysis reveals the stretching contraction and intensification of the Newcastle mesocyclone and an embedded tornado cyclone prior to and after tornadogenesis. In contrast, the nontornadic Graham mesocyclone ultimately became rain-filled and transitioned from moderate stretching growth to negative stretching after the development of a central downdraft in low levels, possibly contributing to tornadogenesis failure. Using a hybrid, two-supercell schematic diagram to depict the Newcastle–Graham storm complex, it was concluded that the Newcastle tornado occurred at the traditionally accepted location of a supercell tornado at the point of the warm sector occlusion in the westernmost cell.

Computed trajectories based on a Lagrangian solution of the vertical vorticity equation suggested that the midlevel Newcastle mesocyclone was formed by a sequence of tilting of ambient horizontal vorticity followed by stretching intensification in the rotating updrafts. The air parcels that entered the low-level Newcastle mesocyclone initially possessed vertical vorticity of order 10−3 s−1, which was subsequently concentrated by stretching upon entering the Newcastle updraft to form the low-level mesocyclone. Though the vorticity dynamical origin of the weak ambient rotation could not be identified, the spatial origins of low-level trajectories that entered the Newcastle mesocyclone were determined to be from a broad area of low-level rainy easterly outflow from the Graham storm. The present findings were compared and contrasted with results of an earlier study of the Newcastle storm.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Conrad L. Ziegler, National Severe Storms Laboratory, Mesoscale Research/Applications Division, 1313 Halley Circle, Norman, OK 73069.Email: Ziegler@nssl.noaa.gov

Abstract

This paper reports the results of an analysis of airflow evolution in the tornadic Newcastle–Graham, Texas, storm complex of 29 May 1994. A series of seven pseudo-dual-Doppler analyses from 2242 to 2315 are performed from tail radar observations by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration P-3 aircraft. Subjective analyses of quasi-horizontal single-Doppler radar observations provide a detailed look at structure and evolution of the hook echo and the low-level Newcastle mesocyclone. Special emphasis is placed on the evolution of low-level [i.e., below 1 km above ground level (AGL)] rotation of the parent mesoscale circulation of the Newcastle tornado and the origins of mesoscale rotation preceding tornadogenesis. The structure and evolution of the Newcastle and Graham mesocyclones are compared and contrasted.

The airborne Doppler analyses reveal that the tornadic Newcastle cell had supercell characteristics and that the Newcastle storm circulation could be classified as a mesocyclone based on commonly accepted criteria of circulation amplitude, spatial scale, and persistence. The Newcastle mesocyclone initially developed downward from midlevels (i.e., 2–5 km AGL), then transitioned into a subsequent period of rapid low-level stretching intensification and upward growth just prior to the development of an F3 tornado. Single-radar analysis reveals the stretching contraction and intensification of the Newcastle mesocyclone and an embedded tornado cyclone prior to and after tornadogenesis. In contrast, the nontornadic Graham mesocyclone ultimately became rain-filled and transitioned from moderate stretching growth to negative stretching after the development of a central downdraft in low levels, possibly contributing to tornadogenesis failure. Using a hybrid, two-supercell schematic diagram to depict the Newcastle–Graham storm complex, it was concluded that the Newcastle tornado occurred at the traditionally accepted location of a supercell tornado at the point of the warm sector occlusion in the westernmost cell.

Computed trajectories based on a Lagrangian solution of the vertical vorticity equation suggested that the midlevel Newcastle mesocyclone was formed by a sequence of tilting of ambient horizontal vorticity followed by stretching intensification in the rotating updrafts. The air parcels that entered the low-level Newcastle mesocyclone initially possessed vertical vorticity of order 10−3 s−1, which was subsequently concentrated by stretching upon entering the Newcastle updraft to form the low-level mesocyclone. Though the vorticity dynamical origin of the weak ambient rotation could not be identified, the spatial origins of low-level trajectories that entered the Newcastle mesocyclone were determined to be from a broad area of low-level rainy easterly outflow from the Graham storm. The present findings were compared and contrasted with results of an earlier study of the Newcastle storm.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Conrad L. Ziegler, National Severe Storms Laboratory, Mesoscale Research/Applications Division, 1313 Halley Circle, Norman, OK 73069.Email: Ziegler@nssl.noaa.gov

Save
  • Barnes, S. L., 1964: A technique for maximum detail in numerical weather map analysis. J. Appl. Meteor., 3 , 396409.

  • Brady, R. H., and E. J. Szoke, 1989: A case study of nonmesocyclone tornado development in northeast Colorado: Similarities to waterspout formation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117 , 843856.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brandes, E. A., 1984: Vertical vorticity generation and mesocyclone sustenance in tornadic thunderstorms: The observational evidence. Mon. Wea. Rev., 112 , 22532269.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brown, R. A., and V. T. Wood, 1991: On the interpretation of single-Doppler velocity patterns within severe thunderstorms. Wea. Forecasting, 6 , 3248.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ——, Lemon, L. R., and D. W. Burgess, 1978: Tornado detection by pulsed Doppler radar. Mon. Wea. Rev., 106 , 2938.

  • Burgess, D. W., and L. R. Lemon, 1990: Severe thunderstorm detection by radar. Radar in Meteorology, D. Atlas, Ed., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 619–647.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ——, and ——,. 1991: Characteristics of mesocyclones detected during a NEXRAD test. Preprints, 25th Int. Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Paris, France, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 39–42.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ——, Donaldson, R. J., T. Sieland, and J. Hinkelman, 1979: Final report on the Joint Doppler Operational Project (JDOP 1976–1978). Part I: Meteorological applications. NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL NSSL-86, NOAA, Boulder, CO, 84 pp. [NTIS PB80-107/88/AS.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ——, ——, and Desrochers, P. R., 1993: Tornado detection and warning by radar. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards, Geophys. Monogr., No. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 203–221.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crawford, T. M., and H. B. Bluestein, 1997: Characteristics of dryline passage during COPS-91. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125 , 463477.

  • Davies-Jones, R. P., 1982: Observational and theoretical aspects of tornadogenesis. Topics in Atmospheric and Oceanographic Sciences: Intense Atmospheric Vortices, L. Bengtsson and J. Lighthill, Eds., Springer-Verlag, 175–189.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ——,. 1984: Streamwise vorticity: The origin of updraft rotation in supercell storms. J. Atmos. Sci., 41 , 29913006.

  • ——,. 1985: Tornado dynamics. The Thunderstorm: A Social, Scientific, and Technological Documentary. Vol. 2, Thunderstorm Morphology and Dynamics, E. Kessler, Ed., University of Oklahoma Press, 197–236.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ——,. 1996: Single Doppler radar vortex recognition. Part I—Mesocyclone signatures. Preprints, Seventh Conf. on Mesoscale Processes, Reading, United Kingdom, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 14–16.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ——, and Brooks, H., 1993: Mesocyclogenesis from a theoretical perspective. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards, Geophys. Monogr., No. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 105–114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doviak, R. J., and D. S. Zrnic, 1984: Doppler Radar and Weather Observations. Academic Press, 458 pp.

  • ——, Ray, P. S., R. G. Strauch, and L. J. Miller, 1976: Error estimation in wind fields derived from dual-Doppler radar measurement. J. Appl. Meteor., 15 , 868878.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hess, S. L., 1959: Introduction to Theoretical Meteorology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 362 pp.

  • Jorgensen, D. P., P. H. Hildebrand, and C. L. Frush, 1983: Feasibility test of an airborne pulse-Doppler meteorological radar. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 22 , 744757.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ——, Matejka, T., and J. D. DuGranrut, 1996: Multi-beam techniques for deriving wind fields from airborne Doppler radars. J. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 59 , 83104.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kessinger, C. J., P. S. Ray, and C. E. Hane, 1987: The Oklahoma squall line of 19 May 1977. Part I: A multiple Doppler analysis of convective and stratiform structure. J. Atmos. Sci., 44 , 28402864.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klemp, J. B., 1987: Dynamics of tornadic thunderstorms. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 19 , 369402.

  • Koch, S. E., M. DesJardins, and P. J. Kocin, 1983: An interactive Barnes objective map analysis scheme for use with satellite and conventional data. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 22 , 14871503.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leise, J. A., 1982: A multidimensional scale-telescoped filter and data extension package. NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL WPL-82, 19 pp. [Available from NOAA ERL, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80303.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lemon, L. R., and C. A. Doswell III, 1979: Severe thunderstorm evolution and mesocyclone structure as related to tornadogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 107 , 11841197.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mohr, C. G., L. J. Miller, R. L. Vaughan, and H. W. Frank, 1986: The merger of mesoscale datasets into a common Cartesian format for efficient and systematic analyses. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 3 , 144161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Oye, R., C. Mueller, and S. Smith, 1995: Software for radar translation, visualization, editing, and interpolation. Preprints, 27th Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Vail, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 359–361.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parker, S., and S. Keighton, 1994: Observations of a strong tornado on the northwest flank of a supercell storm in the absence of a strong mesocyclone. Preprints, First WSR-88D Users' Conference, Norman, OK, National Weather Service, 393–404.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rasmussen, E. N., J. M. Straka, R. Davies-Jones, C. A. Doswell III, F. H. Carr, M. D. Eilts, and D. R. MacGorman, 1994: Verification of the origins of rotation in tornadoes experiment: VORTEX. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 75 , 9951006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ray, P. S., C. L. Ziegler, W. J. Bumgarner, and R. J. Serafin, 1980: Single- and multiple-Doppler radar observations of tornadic storms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 108 , 16071625.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roberts, R. D., and J. W. Wilson, 1995: The genesis of three non-supercell tornadoes observed with Doppler radar. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123 , 34083436.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rotunno, R., 1981: On the evolution of thunderstorm rotation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 109 , 577586.

  • ——, and Klemp, J. B., 1982: The influence of the shear-induced pressure gradient on thunderstorm motion. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110 , 136151.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ——, and ——,. 1985: On the rotation and propagation of simulated supercell thunderstorms. J. Atmos. Sci., 42 , 271292.

  • Rust, W. D., R. P. Davies-Jones, D. W. Burgess, R. A. Maddox, L. C. Showell, T. C. Marshall, and D. K. Lauritsen, 1990: Testing a mobile version of a cross-chain Loran atmospheric sounding system (M-CLASS). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 71 , 173180.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Trapp, R. J., 1999: Observations of nontornadic low-level mesocyclones and attendant tornadogenesis failure during VORTEX. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127 , 16931705.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ——, and Doswell III, C. A., . 2000: Radar data objective analysis. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 17 , 105120.

  • U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 1990: Morphology of individual thunderstorms and attendant phenomena. Doppler Radar Meteorological Observations (Part B): Doppler Radar Theory and Meteorology, Federal Meteorological Handbook 11, 8.1–8.42.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vasiloff, S. V., 1993: Single-Doppler radar study of a variety of tornado types. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards, Geophys. Monogr., No. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 223–231.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wakimoto, R. M., and J. W. Wilson, 1989: Non-supercell tornadoes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117 , 11131140.

  • ——,and Atkins, N. T., 1996: Observations of the origins of rotation: The Newcastle tornado during VORTEX 94. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124 , 384407.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ——, Liu, C., and H. Cai, 1998: The Garden City, Kansas, storm during VORTEX 95. Part I: Overview of the storm's life cycle and mesocyclogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126 , 372392.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ziegler, C. L., and E. N. Rasmussen, 1998: The initiation of moist convection at the dryline: Forecasting issues from a case study perspective. Wea. Forecasting, 13 , 11061131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1966 1631 110
PDF Downloads 284 80 2