Cluster Analysis of Multimodel Ensemble Data from SAMEX

Ahmad Alhamed School of Computer Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Ahmad Alhamed in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S. Lakshmivarahan School of Computer Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by S. Lakshmivarahan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
David J. Stensrud NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by David J. Stensrud in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Short-range ensemble forecasts from the Storm and Mesoscale Ensemble Experiment (SAMEX) are examined to explore the importance of model diversity in short-range ensemble forecasting systems. Two basic techniques from multivariate data analysis are used: cluster analysis and principal component analysis. This 25-member ensemble is constructed of 36-h forecasts from four different numerical weather prediction models, including the Eta Model, the Regional Spectral Model (RSM), the Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS), and the Pennsylvania State University–National Center for Atmospheric Research fifth-generation Mesoscale Model (MM5). The Eta Model and RSM forecasts are initialized using the breeding of growing modes approach, the ARPS model forecasts are initialized using a scaled lagged average forecasting approach, and the MM5 forecasts are initialized using a random coherent structures approach. The MM5 forecasts also include different model physical parameterization schemes, allowing us to examine the role of intramodel physics differences in the ensemble forecasting process.

Cluster analyses of the 3-h accumulated precipitation, mean sea level pressure, convective available potential energy, 500-hPa geopotential height, and 250-hPa wind speed forecasts started at 0000 UTC 29 May 1998 indicate that the forecasts cluster largely by model, with few intermodel clusters found. This clustering occurs within the first few hours of the forecast and persists throughout the entire forecast period, even though the perturbed initial conditions from some of the models are very similar. This result further highlights the important role played by model physics in determining the resulting forecasts and the need for model diversity in short-range ensemble forecasting systems.

Corresponding author address: S. Lakshmivarahan, School of Computer Science, University of Oklahoma, 200 Felgar St., Rm. 114, Norman, OK 73019-0631. Email: varahan@ou.edu

Abstract

Short-range ensemble forecasts from the Storm and Mesoscale Ensemble Experiment (SAMEX) are examined to explore the importance of model diversity in short-range ensemble forecasting systems. Two basic techniques from multivariate data analysis are used: cluster analysis and principal component analysis. This 25-member ensemble is constructed of 36-h forecasts from four different numerical weather prediction models, including the Eta Model, the Regional Spectral Model (RSM), the Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS), and the Pennsylvania State University–National Center for Atmospheric Research fifth-generation Mesoscale Model (MM5). The Eta Model and RSM forecasts are initialized using the breeding of growing modes approach, the ARPS model forecasts are initialized using a scaled lagged average forecasting approach, and the MM5 forecasts are initialized using a random coherent structures approach. The MM5 forecasts also include different model physical parameterization schemes, allowing us to examine the role of intramodel physics differences in the ensemble forecasting process.

Cluster analyses of the 3-h accumulated precipitation, mean sea level pressure, convective available potential energy, 500-hPa geopotential height, and 250-hPa wind speed forecasts started at 0000 UTC 29 May 1998 indicate that the forecasts cluster largely by model, with few intermodel clusters found. This clustering occurs within the first few hours of the forecast and persists throughout the entire forecast period, even though the perturbed initial conditions from some of the models are very similar. This result further highlights the important role played by model physics in determining the resulting forecasts and the need for model diversity in short-range ensemble forecasting systems.

Corresponding author address: S. Lakshmivarahan, School of Computer Science, University of Oklahoma, 200 Felgar St., Rm. 114, Norman, OK 73019-0631. Email: varahan@ou.edu

Save
  • Alhamed, A., and S. Lakshmivarahan, 2000: Clustering methodologies applied to short-term ensemble forecasting. Preprints, Second Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, Long Beach, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 49–55.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anderberg, M. R., 1973: Cluster Analysis for Applications. Academic Press, 359 pp.

  • Atger, F., 1999: The skill of ensemble prediction systems. Mon. Wea. Rev, 127 , 19411953.

  • Betts, A. K., and M. J. Miller, 1986: A new convective adjustment scheme. Part II: Single column tests using GATE wave, BOMEX, and arctic air-mass data sets. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 112 , 693709.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Black, T. L., 1994: The new NMC mesoscale Eta Model: Description and forecast examples. Wea. Forecasting, 9 , 26578.

  • Buizza, R., and T. N. Palmer, 1995: The singular-vector structure of the atmospheric general circulation. J. Atmos. Sci, 52 , 14341456.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buizza, R., M. Miller, and T. N. Palmer, 1999: Stochastic representation of model uncertainties in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 125 , 28872908.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burk, S. D., and W. T. Thompson, 1989: A vertically nested regional numerical weather prediction model with second-order closure physics. Mon. Wea. Rev, 117 , 23052324.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dudhia, J., 1993: A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State–NCAR mesoscale model: Validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front. Mon. Wea. Rev, 121 , 14931513.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Elmore, K. L., and M. B. Richman, 2001: Euclidean distance as a similarity metric for principal component analysis,. Mon. Wea. Rev, 129 , 540549.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Errico, R., and D. P. Baumhefner, 1987: Predictability experiments using a high-resolution limited-area model. Mon. Wea. Rev, 115 , 488504.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Evans, R. E., M. S. J. Harrison, R. J. Graham, and K. R. Mylne, 2000: Joint medium-range ensembles from The Met. Office and ECMWF systems. Mon. Wea. Rev, 128 , 31043127.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fritsch, J. M., J. Hilliker, J. Ross, and R. L. Vislocky, 2000: Model consensus. Wea. Forecasting, 15 , 571582.

  • Gong, X., and M. B. Richman, 1995: On the application of cluster analysis to growing season precipitation data in North America east of the Rockies. J. Climate, 8 , 897931.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grell, G. A., 1993: Prognostic evaluation of assumptions used by cumulus parameterizations. Mon. Wea. Rev, 121 , 764787.

  • Grell, G. A., J. Dudhia, and D. R. Stauffer, 1994: A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR/TN-398+STR, 121 pp. [Available from MMM Division, NCAR, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harrison, M. S. J., T. N. Palmer, D. S. Richardson, and R. Buizza, 1999: Analysis and model dependencies in medium-range ensembles: Two transplant case studies. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 125 , 24872516.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hendrickson, A. E., and P. O. White, 1964: Promax: A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. Br. J. Stat. Psychol, 17 , 6570.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoffman, R. N., and E. Kalnay, 1983: Lagged average forecasting, analternative to Monte Carlo forecasting. Tellus, 35A , 100118.

  • Houtekamer, P. L., and J. Derome, 1995: Methods for ensemble prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev, 123 , 21812196.

  • Hou, D., E. Kalnay, and K. Drogemeier, 2001: Objective verification of the SAMEX98 ensemble forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev, 129 , 7391.

  • Jain, A. J., and R. C. Dubes, 1988: Algorithms for Clustering Data. Prentice-Hall, 320 pp.

  • Jolliffe, I. T., 1986: Principal Component Analysis. Springer-Verlag, 271 pp.

  • Juang, H-M., and M. Kanamitsu, 1994: The NMC nested regional spectral model. Mon. Wea. Rev, 122 , 326.

  • Kain, J. S., and J. M. Fritsch, 1990: A one-dimensional entraining/detraining plume model and its application in convective parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci, 47 , 27842802.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaiser, H. F., 1958: The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23 , 187200.

  • Mather, P. M., 1976: Computational Methods of Multivariate Analysis in Physical Geography. John Wiley and Sons, 532 pp.

  • Molteni, F., R. Buizza, T. N. Palmer, and T. Petroliagis, 1996: The ECMWF ensemble prediction system: Methodology and validation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 122 , 73119.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mullen, S. L., and D. P. Baumhefner, 1988: Sensitivity to numerical simulations of explosive oceanic cyclogenesis to changes in physical parameterizations. Mon. Wea. Rev, 116 , 22892329.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Richman, M. B., 1986: Rotation of principal components. J. Climatol, 6 , 293335.

  • Romesburg, C. H., 1984: Cluster Analysis for Researchers. Life Time Learning, 334 pp.

  • Stensrud, D. J., J-W. Bao, and T. T. Warner, 2000: Using initial condition and model physics perturbations in short-range ensembles simulations of mesoscale convective systems. Mon. Wea. Rev, 128 , 20772107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Toth, Z., and E. Kalnay, 1993: Ensemble forecasting at NMC: The generation of perturbations. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 74 , 23172330.

  • Toth, Z., and E. Kalnay, 1997: Ensemble forecasting at NCEP and the breeding method. Mon. Wea. Rev, 125 , 32973319.

  • Wandishin, M. S., S. L. Mullen, D. J. Stensrud, and H. E. Brooks, 2001: Evaluation of a short-range multimodel ensemble system. Mon. Wea. Rev, 129 , 729747.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilks, D. S., 1995: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences: An Introduction. Academic Press, 467 pp.

  • Xue, M., K. Droegemeier, V. Wong, and A. Shapiro, 2000: The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS)—A multiscale nonhydrostatic atmosphericsimulation and prediction tool. Part I: Model dynamics and verification. Meteor. Atmos. Phys, 75 , 161193.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, D-L., and R. A. Anthes, 1982: A high-resolution model of the planetary boundary layer—Sensitivity tests and comparisons with SESAME-79 data. J. Appl. Meteor, 21 , 15941609.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ziehmann, C., 2000: Comparison of single-model EPS with a multi-model ensemble consisting of a few operational models. Tellus, 52A , 280299.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 522 141 38
PDF Downloads 216 42 6