Article Type:
Research Article

Can Gradient Information Be Used to Improve Variational Objective Analysis?

Phillip L. Spencer Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Phillip L. Spencer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Jidong Gao Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Jidong Gao in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Dec 2004
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2833.1
Page(s):
2977–2994
Restricted access

Abstract

A variational scheme for the analysis of scalar variables is developed and compared to two-pass and three-pass versions of the Barnes analysis scheme. The variational scheme, appropriate for diagnostic studies, is similar to a previously developed variational method in that scalar gradient “observations”—derived directly from the scalar observations—are used in addition to the scalar observations themselves. The current scheme is different in that the cost function does not require analyses of the scalar field and its gradient; it simply requires scalar and gradient observations at their native locations. For the evaluation, randomly selected model gridpoint data are chosen to serve as pseudo-observations for the analysis schemes. By choosing appropriate model gridpoint data to serve as pseudo-observations, artificial data networks can be generated so as to mimic the spatial characteristics of real observational networks.

Results indicate that the proposed variational scheme is superior to both two-pass and three-pass Barnes schemes, increasingly so as the observations become more irregularly spaced. This is true even when the gradient information is not allowed to affect the variational analyses. When the observations are relatively sparse and irregularly distributed, further improvements in the variational analyses occur when the gradient information is properly included within the analysis scheme.

Additional affiliation: NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Corresponding author address: Phillip L. Spencer, National Severe Storms Laboratory, 1313 Halley Circle, Norman, OK 73069. Email: phillip.spencer@noaa.gov

Abstract

A variational scheme for the analysis of scalar variables is developed and compared to two-pass and three-pass versions of the Barnes analysis scheme. The variational scheme, appropriate for diagnostic studies, is similar to a previously developed variational method in that scalar gradient “observations”—derived directly from the scalar observations—are used in addition to the scalar observations themselves. The current scheme is different in that the cost function does not require analyses of the scalar field and its gradient; it simply requires scalar and gradient observations at their native locations. For the evaluation, randomly selected model gridpoint data are chosen to serve as pseudo-observations for the analysis schemes. By choosing appropriate model gridpoint data to serve as pseudo-observations, artificial data networks can be generated so as to mimic the spatial characteristics of real observational networks.

Results indicate that the proposed variational scheme is superior to both two-pass and three-pass Barnes schemes, increasingly so as the observations become more irregularly spaced. This is true even when the gradient information is not allowed to affect the variational analyses. When the observations are relatively sparse and irregularly distributed, further improvements in the variational analyses occur when the gradient information is properly included within the analysis scheme.

Additional affiliation: NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Corresponding author address: Phillip L. Spencer, National Severe Storms Laboratory, 1313 Halley Circle, Norman, OK 73069. Email: phillip.spencer@noaa.gov

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Achtemeier, G. L., 1987: On the concept of varying influence radii for a successive corrections objective analysis. Mon. Wea. Rev, 115 , 1760–1771.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Achtemeier, G. L., 1989: Modification of a successive corrections objective analysis for improved derivative calculations. Mon. Wea. Rev, 117 , 78–86.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Askelson, M. A., J. P. Aubagnac, and J. M. Straka, 2000: An adaptation of the Barnes filter applied to the objective analysis of radar data. Mon. Wea. Rev, 128 , 3050–3082.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Barnes, S. L., 1964: A technique for maximizing details in numerical weather map analysis. J. Appl. Meteor, 3 , 396–409.

  • Barnes, S. L., 1973: Mesoscale objective analysis using weighted time-series observations. NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL NSSL-62, National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, OK, 41 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Barnes, S. L., 1994: Applications of the Barnes objective analysis scheme. Part I: Effects of undersampling, wave position, and station randomness. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol, 11 , 1433–1448.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Barnes, S. L., F. Caracena, and A. Marroquin, 1996: Extracting synoptic-scale diagnostic information from mesoscale models: The Eta Model, gravity waves, and quasigeostrophic diagnostics. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 77 , 519–528.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bellamy, J. C., 1949: Objective calculations of divergence, vertical velocity and vorticity. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 30 , 45–49.

  • Benjamin, S. G., J. M. Brown, K. J. Brundage, B. Schwartz, T. Smirnova, T. L. Smith, L. L. Morone, and G. J. DiMego, 1998: The operational RUC-2. Preprints, 16th Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, Phoenix, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 249–252.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bergthórsson, P., and B. R. Döös, 1955: Numerical weather map analysis. Tellus, 7 , 329–340.

  • Caracena, F., 1987: Analytic approximation of discrete field samples with weighted sums and the gridless computation of field derivatives. J. Atmos. Sci, 44 , 3753–3768.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ceselski, B. F., and L. L. Sapp, 1975: Objective wind field analysis using line integrals. Mon. Wea. Rev, 103 , 89–100.

  • Chien, H., and P. J. Smith, 1973: On the estimation of kinematic parameters in the atmosphere from radiosonde wind data. Mon. Wea. Rev, 101 , 252–261.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Courtier, P., and Coauthors, 1998: The ECMWF implementation of three-dimensional variational assimilation (3D-Var). I: Formulation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 124 , 1783–1807.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cressman, G., 1959: An operational objective analysis system. Mon. Wea. Rev, 87 , 367–374.

  • Doswell III, C. A., and F. Caracena, 1988: Derivative estimation from marginally sampled vector point functions. J. Atmos. Sci, 45 , 242–253.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Doswell III, C. A., and S. Lasher-Trapp, 1997: On measuring the degree of irregularity in an observing network. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol, 14 , 120–132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Endlich, R. M., and J. R. Clark, 1963: Objective computation of some meteorological quantities. J. Appl. Meteor, 2 , 66–81.

  • Gao, J., M. Xue, K. Brewster, and K. K. Droegemeier, 2004: A three-dimensional variational data analysis method with recursive filter for Doppler radars. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol, 21 , 457–469.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gilchrist, B., and G. P. Cressman, 1954: An experiment in objective analysis. Tellus, 6 , 309–318.

  • Gill, P. E., W. Murray, and M. H. Wright, 1981: Practical Optimization. Academic Press, 401 pp.

  • Hayden, C. M., and R. J. Purser, 1995: Recursive filter objective analysis of meteorological fields: Applications to NESDIS operational processing. J. Appl. Meteor, 34 , 3–15.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Koch, S. E., M. desJardins, and P. J. Kocin, 1983: An interactive Barnes objective map analysis scheme for use with satellite and conventional data. J. Climate Appl. Meteor, 22 , 1487–1503.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Liu, D. C., and J. Nocedal, 1989: On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization. Math. Programm, 45 , 503–528.

  • Lorenc, A. C., 1992: Iterative analysis using covariance functions and filters. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 118 , 569–591.

  • Lorenc, A. C., 1986: Analysis methods for numerical weather prediction. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 112 , 1177–1194.

  • Panofsky, H. A., 1949: Objective weather-map analysis. J. Meteor, 6 , 386–392.

  • Parsons, D. B., and J. Dudhia, 1997: Observing system simulation experiments and objective analysis tests in support of the goals of the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program. Mon. Wea. Rev, 125 , 2353–2381.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Purser, R. J., and R. McQuigg, 1982: A successive correction analysis scheme using recursive numerical filters. Met. Office Tech. Note 154, British Meteorological Service, 17 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Purser, R. J., W-S. Wu, D. F. Parrish, and N. M. Roberts, 2003: Numerical aspects of the application of recursive filters to variational statistical analysis. Part I: Spatially homogeneous and isotropic Gaussian covariances. Mon. Wea. Rev, 131 , 1524–1535.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ripley, B. D., 1981: Spatial Statistics. John Wiley and Sons, 252 pp.

  • Schaefer, J. T., and C. A. Doswell III, 1979: On the interpolation of a vector field. Mon. Wea. Rev, 107 , 458–476.

  • Spencer, P. L., and C. A. Doswell III, 2001: A quantitative comparison between traditional and line integral methods of derivative estimation. Mon. Wea. Rev, 129 , 2538–2554.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Spencer, P. L., D. J. Stensrud, and J. M. Fritsch, 2003: A method for improved analyses of scalars and their derivatives. Mon. Wea. Rev, 131 , 2555–2576.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Talagrand, O., and P. Courtier, 1987: Variational assimilation of meteorological observations with the adjoint vorticity equation. Part I: Theory. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 113 , 1311–1328.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Trapp, R. J., and C. A. Doswell III, 2000: Radar data objective analysis. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol, 17 , 105–120.

  • Zamora, R. J., M. A. Shapiro, and C. A. Doswell III, 1987: The diagnosis of upper tropospheric divergence and ageostrophic wind using profiler wind observations. Mon. Wea. Rev, 115 , 871–884.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 406 238 54
PDF Downloads 89 47 2