Article Type:
Research Article

Mesoscale Cloud State Estimation from Visible and Infrared Satellite Radiances

T. Vukicevic Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by T. Vukicevic in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
T. Greenwald Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by T. Greenwald in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
M. Zupanski Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by M. Zupanski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
D. Zupanski Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by D. Zupanski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
T. Vonder Haar Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by T. Vonder Haar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
A. S. Jones Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by A. S. Jones in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Dec 2004
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2837.1
Page(s):
3066–3077
Restricted access

Abstract

This study focuses on cloudy atmosphere state estimation from high-resolution visible and infrared satellite remote sensing measurements and a mesoscale model with explicit cloud prediction. The cloud state is defined as 3D spatially distributed hydrometeors characterized with microphysical properties: mixing ratio, number concentration, and size distribution. The Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite-9 (GOES-9) imager visible and infrared measurements were used in a new four-dimensional variational data assimilation (4DVAR) mesoscale algorithm for a warm continental stratus cloud system case to test the impact of these observations on the cloud simulation. The new data assimilation algorithm includes the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS) with explicit cloud state prediction, the associated adjoint system, and an observational operator for forward and adjoint integrations of the GOES radiances. The results show positive impact of GOES imager measurements on the 3D cloud short-term simulation during and after the assimilation. The impact was achieved through sensitivity of the radiances to the cloud droplet mixing ratio at observation time and a 4D correlation between the cloud and atmospheric thermal and dynamical environment in the forecast model. The dynamical response to the radiance observations was through enhanced large mesoscale vertical mixing while horizontal advection was weak in the case of stable continental stratus evolution.

Although the current experiments show measurable positive impact of the cloudy radiance measurements on the stratus cloud simulation, they clearly suggest the need to further address the problem of negative cloud cover forecast errors. These errors were only weakly corrected in the current study because of the small sensitivity of the visible and infrared window radiances to the cloud-free atmosphere.

Current affiliation: SSEC/CIMSS, University of Wisconsin— Madison, Madison, Wisconsin

Corresponding author address: Dr. Tomislava Vukicevic, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Foothills Campus, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1375. Email: tomi@cira.colostate.edu

Abstract

This study focuses on cloudy atmosphere state estimation from high-resolution visible and infrared satellite remote sensing measurements and a mesoscale model with explicit cloud prediction. The cloud state is defined as 3D spatially distributed hydrometeors characterized with microphysical properties: mixing ratio, number concentration, and size distribution. The Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite-9 (GOES-9) imager visible and infrared measurements were used in a new four-dimensional variational data assimilation (4DVAR) mesoscale algorithm for a warm continental stratus cloud system case to test the impact of these observations on the cloud simulation. The new data assimilation algorithm includes the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS) with explicit cloud state prediction, the associated adjoint system, and an observational operator for forward and adjoint integrations of the GOES radiances. The results show positive impact of GOES imager measurements on the 3D cloud short-term simulation during and after the assimilation. The impact was achieved through sensitivity of the radiances to the cloud droplet mixing ratio at observation time and a 4D correlation between the cloud and atmospheric thermal and dynamical environment in the forecast model. The dynamical response to the radiance observations was through enhanced large mesoscale vertical mixing while horizontal advection was weak in the case of stable continental stratus evolution.

Although the current experiments show measurable positive impact of the cloudy radiance measurements on the stratus cloud simulation, they clearly suggest the need to further address the problem of negative cloud cover forecast errors. These errors were only weakly corrected in the current study because of the small sensitivity of the visible and infrared window radiances to the cloud-free atmosphere.

Current affiliation: SSEC/CIMSS, University of Wisconsin— Madison, Madison, Wisconsin

Corresponding author address: Dr. Tomislava Vukicevic, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Foothills Campus, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1375. Email: tomi@cira.colostate.edu

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Bayler, G. M., R. M. Aune, and W. H. Raymond, 2000: NWP cloud initialization using GOES sounder data and improved modeling of nonprecipitating clouds. Mon. Wea. Rev, 128 , 3911–3920.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Benedetti, A., T. Vukicevic, and G. L. Stephens, 2003: Variational assimilation or radar reflectivities in a cirrus model. Part II: Optimal initialization and model bias estimation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 129 , 301–319.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chevallier, F., and G. Kelly, 2002: Model clouds as seen from space: Comparison with geostationary imagery in the 11-μm window channel. Mon. Wea. Rev, 130 , 712–722.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cohn, S. E., 1997: An introduction to estimation theory. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 75 , 257–288.

  • Cotton, W. R., and Coauthors,, 2003: RAMS 2001: Current status and future directions. Meteor. Atmos. Phys, 82 , 5–29.

  • Deeter, M., and K. F. Evans, 1998: A hybrid Eddington-single scattering radiative transfer model for computing radiances from thermally emitting atmospheres. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 60 , 635–648.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Errico, R. M., T. Vukicevic, and K. Raeder, 1993: Examination of the accuracy of a tangent linear model. Tellus, 45A , 462–477.

  • Evans, K. F., 1998: The spherical harmonics discrete ordinate method for three-dimensional atmospheric radiative transfer. J. Atmos. Sci, 55 , 429–446.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Feingold, G., B. Stevens, W. R. Cotton, and A. S. Frisch, 1996: The relationship between drop in-cloud residence time and drizzle production in stratocumulus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci, 53 , 1108–1122.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Freedman, J. M., D. R. Fitzjarrald, K. E. Moore, and R. K. Sakai, 2001: Boundary layer clouds and vegetation–atmosphere feedbacks. J. Climate, 14 , 180–197.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Greenwald, T. J., R. Hertenstein, and T. Vukicevic, 2002: An all-weather observational operator for radiance data assimilation with mesoscale forecast models. Mon. Wea. Rev, 130 , 1882–1897.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Greenwald, T. J., T. Vukicevic, and L. D. Grasso, 2004: Adjoint sensitivity analysis of an observational operator for cloudy visible and infrared radiance assimilation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 130 , 685–705.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Guyot, A., J. Testud, and T. P. Ackerman, 2000: Determination of the radiative properties of stratiform clouds from a nadir-looking 95-GHz radar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol, 17 , 38–50.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Han, Q., W. B. Rossow, J. Zeng, and R. Welch, 2002: Three different behaviors of liquid water path of water clouds in aerosol–cloud interactions. J. Atmos. Sci, 59 , 726–735.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Harrington, J. Y., G. Feingold, and W. R. Cotton, 2000: Radiative impacts on the growth of population of drops within simulated summertime Arctic stratus. J. Atmos. Sci, 57 , 766–785.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kalnay, E., 2003: Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation and Predictability. Cambridge University Press, 341 pp.

  • Kidder, S. Q., and T. H. Vonder Haar, 1995: Satellite Meteorology: An Introduction. Academic Press, 466 pp.

  • Kummerow, C., W. S. Olson, and L. Giglio, 1996: A simplified scheme for obtaining precipitation and vertical hydrometeor profiles from passive microwave sensors. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens, 34 , 1213–1232.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McMillin, L. M., L. J. Crone, M. D. Goldberg, and T. J. Kleespies, 1995: Atmospheric transmittance of an absorbing gas. 4. OPTRAN: A computationally fast and accurate transmittance model for absorbing gases with fixed and variable mixing ratios at variable viewing angles. Appl. Opt, 34 , 6269–6274.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mellor, G. L., and T. Yamada, 1974: A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers. J. Atmos. Sci, 31 , 1791–1806.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Meyers, M. P., R. L. Walko, J. Y. Harrington, and W. R. Cotton, 1997: New RAMS cloud microphysics parameterization.Part II: The two-moment scheme. Atmos. Res, 45 , 3–39.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nocedal, J., 1980: Updating quasi Newton matrices with limited storage. Math. Comput, 35 , 773–782.

  • Rabier, F., H. Jarvinen, E. Klinker, J-F. Mahfouf, and A. Simmons, 2000: The ECMWF operational implementation of four-dimensional varational assimilation. Part I: Experiment results with simplified physics. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 126 , 1143–1170.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rossow, W. B., and L. C. Garder, 1993: Coud detection using satellite measurements of infrared and visible radiances for ISCCP. J. Climate, 6 , 2341–2369.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rossow, W. B., and A. Schiffer, 1999: Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 80 , 2261–2287.

  • Rossow, W. B., C. Delo, and B. Cairns, 2002: Implications of the observed mesoscale variations of clouds for the Earth's radiation budget. J. Climate, 15 , 557–585.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Shanno, D. F., 1985: Globally convergent conjugate gradient algorithms. Math. Programm, 33 , 61–67.

  • Stephens, G. L., 2002: The CloudSat mission and the A-Train. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 83 , 1771–1790.

  • Sun, J., and N. A. Crook, 1998: Dynamical and microphysical retrieval from Doppler radar observations using a cloud model and its adjoint. Part II: Retrieval experiments of an observed Florida convective storm. J. Atmos. Sci, 55 , 835–852.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Vukicevic, T., and J-W. Bao, 1998: The effect of linearization errors on 4DVAR data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev, 126 , 1695–1706.

  • Vukicevic, T., M. Zupanski, D. Zupanski, T. Greenwald, A. Jones, and T. Vonder Haar, 2002: An overview of a mesoscale 4DVAR system: RAMDAS. Preprints, Symp. on Observations, Data Assimilation, and Probabilistic Prediction, Orlando, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., P3.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Walko, R. L., W. R. Cotton, M. P. Meyers, and J. Y. Harrington, 1995: New RAMS cloud microphysics parameterization. Part I: The single moment scheme. Atmos. Res, 38 , 29–62.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weare, B. C., 2000: Near-global observations of low clouds. J. Climate, 13 , 1255–1268.

  • Wetzel, M. A., S. K. Cai, M. J. Szumowski, W. T. Thompson, T. Haack, G. Vali, and R. Kelly, 2001: Evaluation of COAMPS forecasts of coastal stratus using satellite microphysical retrievals and aircraft measurements. Wea. Forecasting, 16 , 588–599.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wu, B., J. Verlinde, and J. Sun, 2000: Dynamical and microphysical retrievals from Doppler radar observations of a deep convective cloud. J. Atmos. Sci, 57 , 262–283.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wu, T., W. R. Cotton, and Y. Cheng, 2000: Radiative effects on the diffusional growth of ice particles in cirrus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci, 57 , 2892–2904.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wu, W-S., and Coauthors,, 2001: The WRF 3D-VAR analysis system. Preprints, 18th Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/14th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 584–586.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zupanski, M., 1996: A preconditioning algorithm for four-dimensional variational data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev, 124 , 2562–2573.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zupanski, M., D. Zupanski, T. Vukicevic, K. Eis, and T. Vonder Haar, 2005: CIRA/CSU four-dimensional variational data assimilation system. Mon. Wea. Rev., in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1278 986 284
PDF Downloads 243 74 3