Is Buoyancy a Relative Quantity?

Charles A. Doswell III Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Charles A. Doswell III in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Paul M. Markowski Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Paul M. Markowski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Basic concepts of buoyancy are reviewed and considered first in light of simple parcel theory and then in a more complete form. It is shown that parcel theory is generally developed in terms of the density (temperature) difference between an ascending parcel and an “environment” surrounding that parcel. That is, buoyancy is often understood as a relative quantity that apparently depends on the choice of a base-state environmental profile. However, parcel theory is most appropriately understood as a probe of the static stability of a sounding to finite vertical displacements of hypothetical parcels within the sounding rather than as a useful model of deep convection.

The thermal buoyancy force, as measured by the temperature difference between a parcel and the base state, and vertical perturbation pressure gradient force together must remain independent of the base state. The vertical perturbation pressure gradient force can be decomposed to include a term due to thermal buoyancy and another due to the properties of motion in the flow. Some thought experiments are presented to illustrate the ambiguous relevance of the base state.

It is concluded that buoyancy is not a relative quantity in that it cannot be dependent on the choice of an essentially arbitrary reference state. Buoyancy is the static part of an unbalanced vertical pressure gradient force and, as such, is determined locally, not relative to some arbitrary base state outside of a parcel. This has direct application to the diagnosis of buoyancy from numerical simulations—done properly, such a diagnosis must include not only the thermal buoyancy term but also the perturbation pressure gradient force due to buoyancy.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Charles A. Doswell III, Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, 100 East Boyd St., Room 1110, Norman, OK 73019. Email: cdoswell@hoth.gcn.ou.edu

Abstract

Basic concepts of buoyancy are reviewed and considered first in light of simple parcel theory and then in a more complete form. It is shown that parcel theory is generally developed in terms of the density (temperature) difference between an ascending parcel and an “environment” surrounding that parcel. That is, buoyancy is often understood as a relative quantity that apparently depends on the choice of a base-state environmental profile. However, parcel theory is most appropriately understood as a probe of the static stability of a sounding to finite vertical displacements of hypothetical parcels within the sounding rather than as a useful model of deep convection.

The thermal buoyancy force, as measured by the temperature difference between a parcel and the base state, and vertical perturbation pressure gradient force together must remain independent of the base state. The vertical perturbation pressure gradient force can be decomposed to include a term due to thermal buoyancy and another due to the properties of motion in the flow. Some thought experiments are presented to illustrate the ambiguous relevance of the base state.

It is concluded that buoyancy is not a relative quantity in that it cannot be dependent on the choice of an essentially arbitrary reference state. Buoyancy is the static part of an unbalanced vertical pressure gradient force and, as such, is determined locally, not relative to some arbitrary base state outside of a parcel. This has direct application to the diagnosis of buoyancy from numerical simulations—done properly, such a diagnosis must include not only the thermal buoyancy term but also the perturbation pressure gradient force due to buoyancy.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Charles A. Doswell III, Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, 100 East Boyd St., Room 1110, Norman, OK 73019. Email: cdoswell@hoth.gcn.ou.edu

Save
  • Batchelor, G. K., 1967: An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, 615 pp.

  • Brooks, H. E., C. A. Doswell III, and J. Cooper, 1994: On the environment of tornadic and nontornadic mesocyclones. Wea. Forecasting, 9 , 606618.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bryan, G. H., and J. M. Fritsch, 2000: Moist absolute instability: The sixth static stability state. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 81 , 12071230.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Das, P., 1979: A non-Archimedean approach to the equations of convection dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci, 36 , 21832190.

  • Davies-Jones, R., 2003: An expression for effective buoyancy in surroundings with horizontal density gradients. J. Atmos. Sci, 60 , 29222925.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doswell III, C. A., and E. N. Rasmussen, 1994: The effect of neglecting the virtual temperature correction on CAPE calculations. Wea. Forecasting, 9 , 619623.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dutton, J. A., 1976: The Ceaseless Wind. McGraw-Hill, 579 pp.

  • Emanuel, K. A., 1994: Atmospheric Convection. Oxford University Press, 580 pp.

  • Ferrier, B. S., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1989: One-dimensional time- dependent modeling of GATE cumulonimbus convection. J. Atmos. Sci, 46 , 330352.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fiedler, B. H., 2002: A wind transform for acoustic adjustment in compressible models. Mon. Wea. Rev, 130 , 741746.

  • Glickman, T. S., Ed.,. 2000: Glossary of Meteorology. 2d ed. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 855 pp.

  • Hane, C. E., R. B. Wilhelmson, and T. Gal-Chen, 1981: Retrieval of thermodynamic variables within deep convective clouds: Experiments in three dimensions. Mon. Wea. Rev, 109 , 564576.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hess, S. L., 1959: Introduction to Theoretical Meteorology. Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, 362 pp.

  • Holton, J. R., 1973: A one-dimensional cumulus model including pressure perturbations. Mon. Wea. Rev, 101 , 201205.

  • Holton, J. R., 1992: An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology. 3d ed. Academic Press, 511 pp.

  • Houze Jr., R. A., 1993: Cloud Dynamics. Academic Press, 573 pp.

  • Kessler, E., 1985: Severe weather. Handbook of Applied Meteorology, D. Houghton, Ed., John Wiley and Sons, 133–204.

  • Musil, D. J., A. J. Heymsfield, and P. L. Smith, 1986: Microphysical characteristics of a well developed weak echo regions in a High Plains supercell thunderstorm. J. Climate Appl. Meteor, 25 , 10371051.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rotunno, R., and J. B. Klemp, 1982: The influence of the shear- induced vertical pressure gradient on thunderstorm motion. Mon. Wea. Rev, 110 , 136151.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rotunno, R., and J. B. Klemp, 1985: On the rotation and propagation of simulated supercell thunderstorms. J. Atmos. Sci, 42 , 271292.

  • Ryan, B. F., and P. Lalousis, 1979: A one-dimensional time-dependent model for cumulus. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 105 , 615628.

  • Salby, M., 2003: Fundamental forces and governing equations. Handbook of Weather, Climate, and Water: Dynamics, Climate, Physical Meteorology, Weather Systems, and Measurements, T. D. Potter and B. R. Colman, Eds., John Wiley and Sons, 7–20.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schlesinger, R. E., 1975: A three-dimensional numerical model of an isolated deep convective cloud: Preliminary results. J. Atmos. Sci, 32 , 934957.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schultz, D. M., P. N. Schumacher, and C. A. Doswell III, 2000: The intricacies of instabilities. Mon. Wea. Rev, 128 , 41434148.

  • Sherwood, S. C., 2000: On moist instability. Mon. Wea. Rev, 128 , 41394142.

  • van Delden, A., 2000: Linear dynamics of hydrostatic adjustment to horizontally homogeneous heating. Tellus, 52A , 380390.

  • Wang, J., and D. A. Randall, 1996: A cumulus parameterization based on the generalized convective available potential energy. J. Atmos. Sci, 53 , 716727.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Warner, J., 1970: On steady-state one-dimensional models of cumulus convection. J. Atmos. Sci, 27 , 10351040.

  • Weisman, M. L., and J. B. Klemp, 1982: The dependence of numerically simulated convective storms on vertical wind shear and buoyancy. Mon. Wea. Rev, 110 , 504520.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weisman, M. L., and J. B. Klemp, 1984: The structure and classification of numerically simulated convective storms in directionally varying wind shears. Mon. Wea. Rev, 112 , 24792498.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weisman, M. L., M. S. Gilmore, and L. J. Wicker, 1998: The impact of convective storms on their local environment: What is an appropriate ambient sounding? Preprints, 19th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Minneapolis, MN, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 238–241.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilhemson, R. B., and J. B. Klemp, 1978: The simulation of three- dimensional convective storm dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci, 35 , 10701096.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1194 402 47
PDF Downloads 926 340 64