Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Bras, R. L., 1990: Hydrology: An Introduction to Hydrologic Science. Addison-Wesley, 643 pp.

  • Brooks, H. E., M. Kay, and J. A. Hart, 1998: Objective limits on forecasting skill of rare events. Preprints, 19th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Minneapolis, MN, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 552–555.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cherubini, T., A. Gheli, and F. Lalaurette, 2002: Verification of precipitation forecasts over the Alpine region using a high-density observing network. Wea. Forecasting, 17 , 238–249.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Colle, B. A., and C. F. Mass, 2000: The 5–9 February 1996 flooding event over the Pacific Northwest: Sensitivity studies and evaluation of the MM5 precipitation forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev, 128 , 593–617.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Colle, B. A., C. F. Mass, and K. J. Westrick, 2000: MM5 precipitation verification over the Pacific Northwest during the 1997–99 cool seasons. Wea. Forecasting, 15 , 730–744.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dudhia, J., 1989: Numerical study of convection observed during the Winter Monsoon Experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J. Atmos. Sci, 46 , 3077–3107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dudhia, J., 1993: A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State–NCAR Mesoscale Model: Validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front. Mon. Wea. Rev, 121 , 1493–1513.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dudhia, J., 1996: A multi-layer soil temperature model for MM5. Preprints, Sixth Annual MM5 Users Workshop 1996, Boulder, CO, NCAR, 49–50.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dudhia, J., and J. F. Bresch, 2002: A global version of the PSU–NCAR Mesoscale Model. Mon. Wea. Rev, 130 , 2989–3007.

  • Georgakakos, K. P., 2003: Probabilistic climate-model diagnostics for hydrologic and water resources impact studies. J. Hydrometeor, 4 , 92–105.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Goodison, B. E., H. L. Ferguson, and G. A. Mckay, 1981: Comparison of point snowfall measurement techniques. Handbook of Snow, D. M. Gary and M. D. Male, Eds., Pergamon Press, 200–210.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Groisman, P. V., and D. R. Legates, 1994: The accuracy of United States precipitation data. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 75 , 215–227.

  • Hevesi, J. A., A. L. Flint, and J. D. Istok, 1992: Precipitation estimation in mountainous terrain using multivariate geostatistics. Part II: Isohyetal maps. J. Appl. Meteor, 31 , 677–688.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kain, J. S., and J. M. Fritsch, 1993: Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: The Kain–Fritsch scheme. The Representation of Cumulus Convection in Numerical Models, Meteor. Monogr., No. 46, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 165–170.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kuligowski, R. J., and A. P. Barros, 1999: High-resolution short-term quantitative precipitation forecasting in mountainous regions using a nested model. J. Geophys. Res, 104 (D24) 31553–31564.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lin, Y-L., R. D. Farley, and H. D. Orville, 1983: Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model. J. Climate Appl. Meteor, 22 , 1065–1092.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Locatelli, J. D., and P. V. Hobbs, 1974: Fall speeds and masses of solid precipitation particles. J. Geophys. Res, 79 , 2185–2197.

  • Medina, J. G., 1992: Simulation of winter precipitation in western mountain watersheds with a local-scale model. Managing Water Resources during Global Change, R. Herrmann, Ed., American Water Resources Association, 661–670.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mellor, G. L., and T. Yamada, 1982: Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys, 20 , 851–875.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Meyers, M. P., and W. R. Cotton, 1992: Evaluation of the potential for wintertime quantitative precipitation forecasting over mountainous terrain with an explicit cloud model. Part I: Two-dimensional sensitivity experiments. J. Appl. Meteor, 31 , 26–50.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • National Research Council, 1988: Estimating Probabilities of Extreme Floods: Methods and Recommended Research. National Academy Press, 141 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • National Research Council, 1991: Managing Water Resources in the West under Conditions of Climate Uncertainty: Proceedings of a Colloquium, November 14–16, 1990, Scottsdale, Arizona. National Academy Press, 344 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • National Research Council, 1995: Flood Risks Management and the American River Basin: An Evaluation. National Academy Press, 235 pp.

  • Pandey, G. R., D. R. Cayan, M. D. Dettinger, and K. P. Georgakakos, 2000: A hybrid model for interpolating daily precipitation in the mountainous regions of California during winter. J. Hydrometeor, 1 , 491–506.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Reisner, J., R. M. Rasmussen, and R. T. Bruintjes, 1998: Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MMS mesoscale model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 124 , 1071–1107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schultz, P., 1995: An explicit cloud physics parameterization for operational numerical weather prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev, 123 , 3331–3343.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sharratt, B. S., J. Zandlo, and G. Spoden, 2001: Frequency of precipitation across the northern U.S. Corn Belt. J. Appl. Meteor, 40 , 183–191.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Smith, R. B., 1979: The influence of mountains on the atmosphere. Advances in Geophysics, Vol. 21, Academic Press, 87–137.

  • Staudenmaier, M., and J. Mittelstadt, 1997: Results of the Western Region evaluation of the Eta-10 model. WR Tech. Attachment 97-18, National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Camp Springs, MD, 4 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Tao, W-K., and J. Simpson, 1993: Goddard Cumulus Ensemble Model. Part I: Model description. Terr. Atmos. Oceanic Sci, 4 , 35–72.

  • Tao, W-K., J. Simpson, and M. McCumber, 1989: Ice–water saturation adjustment. Mon. Wea. Rev, 117 , 231–235.

  • Tsintikidis, D., K. P. Georgakakos, J. S. Sperfslage, D. E. Smith, and T. M. Carpenter, 2002: Precipitation uncertainty and raingauge network design within the Folsom Lake watershed. ASCE J. Hydrol. Eng, 7 , 175–184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Vellore, R. K., V. Grubisic, and A. W. Huggins, 2002: Quantitiative precipitation forecasting of wintertime precipitation in the Sierra Nevada. Preprints, 10th Conf. on Mountain Meteorology and MAP Meeting 2002, Park City, UT, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, 2.21.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1 1 1
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Validation and Sensitivities of Dynamic Precipitation Simulation for Winter Events over the Folsom Lake Watershed: 1964–99

Jianzhong Wang1 and Konstantine P. Georgakakos1
View More View Less
  • 1 Hydrologic Research Center, San Diego, California
Print Publication:
01 Jan 2005
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-2814.1
Page(s):
3–19
Restricted access

Abstract

A total of 62 winter-storm events in the period 1964–99 over the Folsom Lake watershed located at the windward slope of the Sierra Nevada were simulated with a 9-km resolution using the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University–NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). Mean areal precipitation (MAP) over the entire watershed and each of four subbasins was estimated based on gridded simulated precipitation. The simulated MAP was verified with MAP estimated (a) by the California Nevada River Forecast Center (CNRFC) for the four subbasins based on eight operational precipitation stations, and (b) for the period from 1980 to 1986, on the basis of a denser precipitation observing network deployed by the Sierra Cooperative Pilot Project (SCPP). A number of sensitivity runs were performed to understand the dependence of model precipitation on boundary and initial fields, cold versus warm start, and microphysical parameterization. The principal findings of the validation analysis are that (a) MM5 achieves a good percentage bias score of 103% in simulating Folsom basin MAP when compared to MAP derived from dense precipitation gauge networks; (b) spatial grid resolution higher than 9 km is necessary to reproduce the spatial MAP pattern among subbasins of the Folsom basin; and (c) the model performs better for heavy than for light and moderate precipitation. The analysis also showed significant simulation dependence on the spatial resolution of the boundary and initial fields and on the microphysical scheme used.

Corresponding author address: Konstantine P. Georgakakos, Hydrologic Research Center, 12780 High Bluff Drive, Suite 250, San Diego, CA 92130. Email: KGeorgakakos@hrc-lab.org

Abstract

A total of 62 winter-storm events in the period 1964–99 over the Folsom Lake watershed located at the windward slope of the Sierra Nevada were simulated with a 9-km resolution using the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University–NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). Mean areal precipitation (MAP) over the entire watershed and each of four subbasins was estimated based on gridded simulated precipitation. The simulated MAP was verified with MAP estimated (a) by the California Nevada River Forecast Center (CNRFC) for the four subbasins based on eight operational precipitation stations, and (b) for the period from 1980 to 1986, on the basis of a denser precipitation observing network deployed by the Sierra Cooperative Pilot Project (SCPP). A number of sensitivity runs were performed to understand the dependence of model precipitation on boundary and initial fields, cold versus warm start, and microphysical parameterization. The principal findings of the validation analysis are that (a) MM5 achieves a good percentage bias score of 103% in simulating Folsom basin MAP when compared to MAP derived from dense precipitation gauge networks; (b) spatial grid resolution higher than 9 km is necessary to reproduce the spatial MAP pattern among subbasins of the Folsom basin; and (c) the model performs better for heavy than for light and moderate precipitation. The analysis also showed significant simulation dependence on the spatial resolution of the boundary and initial fields and on the microphysical scheme used.

Corresponding author address: Konstantine P. Georgakakos, Hydrologic Research Center, 12780 High Bluff Drive, Suite 250, San Diego, CA 92130. Email: KGeorgakakos@hrc-lab.org

Save