Article Type:
Research Article

Northern High-Latitude Precipitation as Depicted by Atmospheric Reanalyses and Satellite Retrievals

Mark C. Serreze Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Mark C. Serreze in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Andrew P. Barrett Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Andrew P. Barrett in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Fiona Lo Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Fiona Lo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Dec 2005
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3047.1
Page(s):
3407–3430
Restricted access

Abstract

Monthly precipitation based on forecasts from the new 40-yr ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-40) is evaluated for the north polar region (the region north of 45°N), the terrestrial Arctic drainage, and its four major watersheds: the Ob, Yenisey, Lena, and Mackenzie basins. Corresponding evaluations are performed for precipitation from the NCEP–NCAR reanalysis, the earlier 15-yr ERA (ERA-15), and satellite-derived estimates from the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP). Evaluations rely on an improved gridded dataset of precipitation derived from monthly gauge data during the period 1979–93. The available number of gauges has declined since 1993, making it difficult to perform evaluations for later years. ERA-40 depicts monthly precipitation much better than NCEP–NCAR. This is with respect to both lower mean biases and higher squared correlations between modeled and observed grid-cell time series. Squared correlations between monthly time series of ERA-40 and observed precipitation, averaged over the four major Arctic watersheds, typically range from 0.60 to 0.90. Performance over the central Arctic Ocean is poor in winter and spring, but improves in summer and autumn when precipitation amounts are higher. While the overall performance of ERA-40 is better than NCEP–NCAR, it offers no obvious improvement over ERA-15. In some respects, ERA-15 performs slightly better in summer. This lack of improvement may relate to difficulties in assimilating satellite radiances. All of the reanalyses provide better depictions of monthly precipitation than do the GPCP satellite retrievals. This applies to both land areas and the Arctic Ocean. There is no clear improvement in the GPCP estimates after 1987 when the Television Infrared Observational Satellite (TIROS) Operational Vertical Sounder (TOVS) data began to be used. The GPCP estimates are best in summer.

Corresponding author address: Mark C. Serreze, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Campus Box 449, Boulder, CO 80309-0449. Email: serreze@kryos.colorado.edu

Abstract

Monthly precipitation based on forecasts from the new 40-yr ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-40) is evaluated for the north polar region (the region north of 45°N), the terrestrial Arctic drainage, and its four major watersheds: the Ob, Yenisey, Lena, and Mackenzie basins. Corresponding evaluations are performed for precipitation from the NCEP–NCAR reanalysis, the earlier 15-yr ERA (ERA-15), and satellite-derived estimates from the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP). Evaluations rely on an improved gridded dataset of precipitation derived from monthly gauge data during the period 1979–93. The available number of gauges has declined since 1993, making it difficult to perform evaluations for later years. ERA-40 depicts monthly precipitation much better than NCEP–NCAR. This is with respect to both lower mean biases and higher squared correlations between modeled and observed grid-cell time series. Squared correlations between monthly time series of ERA-40 and observed precipitation, averaged over the four major Arctic watersheds, typically range from 0.60 to 0.90. Performance over the central Arctic Ocean is poor in winter and spring, but improves in summer and autumn when precipitation amounts are higher. While the overall performance of ERA-40 is better than NCEP–NCAR, it offers no obvious improvement over ERA-15. In some respects, ERA-15 performs slightly better in summer. This lack of improvement may relate to difficulties in assimilating satellite radiances. All of the reanalyses provide better depictions of monthly precipitation than do the GPCP satellite retrievals. This applies to both land areas and the Arctic Ocean. There is no clear improvement in the GPCP estimates after 1987 when the Television Infrared Observational Satellite (TIROS) Operational Vertical Sounder (TOVS) data began to be used. The GPCP estimates are best in summer.

Corresponding author address: Mark C. Serreze, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Campus Box 449, Boulder, CO 80309-0449. Email: serreze@kryos.colorado.edu

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Armstrong, R. L., and M. J. Brodzik, 1995: An earth-gridded SSM/I data set for cryospheric studies and global change monitoring. Adv. Space Res., 16 , 155–163.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Betts, A. K., J. H. Ball, and P. Viterbo, 2003: Evaluation of the ERA-40 surface water budget and surface temperature for the Mackenzie River basin. J. Hydrometeor., 4 , 1194–1211.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bromwich, D. H., S-H. Wang, and A. J. Monaghan, 2002: ERA-40 representation of the Arctic atmospheric moisture budget. Proc. ERA-40 Project Report Series 3: Workshop on Re-Analysis, Reading, United Kingdom, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, 287–297.

  • Cressman, G. P., 1959: An operational objective analysis system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 87 , 367–374.

  • Cullather, R. I., D. H. Bromwich, and M. C. Serreze, 2000: The atmospheric hydrologic cycle over the Arctic basin from reanalyses. Part I: Comparisons with observations and previous studies. J. Climate, 13 , 923–937.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • ECMWF, 2002: Proc. ERA-40 Project Report Series 3: Workshop on Re-Analysis. Reading, United Kingdom, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, 443 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gibson, J. K., P. Kallberg, A. Hernandez, S. Uppala, A. Nomura, and E. Serrano, 1997: : ERA Description. Vol. 1, ECMWF Re-Analysis Project Report Series, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, 72 pp.

  • Gleason, B. E., 2002: Data documentation for data set 9101. Global Daily Climatology Network, V1.0, National Climatic Data Center, 25 pp.

  • Goodison, B. E., P. Y. T. Louie, and D. Yang, 1998: WMO solid precipitation measurement intercomparison. Final Rep. WMO TD-872, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 212 pp.

  • Groisman, P. Y., 1998: National Climatic Data Center data documentation for TD-9816: Canadian monthly precipitation. National Climatic Data Center, 21 pp.

  • Groisman, P. Y., V. V. Koknaeva, T. A. Belokrylova, and T. R. Karl, 1991: Overcoming biases of precipitation: A history of the USSR experience. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 72 , 1725–1733.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Huffman, G. J., and Coauthors, 1997: The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) combined precipitation data set. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78 , 5–20.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77 , 437–471.

  • Kistler, R., and Coauthors, 2001: The NCEP-NCAR 50-Year Reanalysis: Monthly means CD-ROM and documentation. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 82 , 247–267.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Legates, D. R., and C. J. Willmott, 1990: Mean seasonal and spatial variability in gauge-corrected, global precipitation. Int. J. Climatol., 10 , 111–127.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mekis, E., and W. D. Hogg, 1999: Rehabilitation and analysis of Canadian daily precipitation time series. Atmos.–Ocean, 37 , 53–85.

  • Panofsky, H. A., and G. W. Brier, 1963: Some Applications of Statistics to Meteorology. Mineral Industries Continuing Education, College of Mineral Industries, The Pennsylvania State University, 224 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rogers, A. N., D. H. Bromwich, E. N. Sinclair, and R. I. Cullather, 2001: The atmospheric hydrologic cycle over the Arctic basin from reanalyses. Part II: Interannual variability. J. Climate, 14 , 2414–2429.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • SEARCH SSC, 2001: Study of Environmental Arctic Change, Science Plan. Polar Science Center, Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, 91 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Serreze, M. C., and C. M. Hurst, 2000: Representation of mean Arctic precipitation from NCEP–NCAR and ERA Reanalyses. J. Climate, 13 , 182–201.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Serreze, M. C., and A. J. Etringer, 2002: Representation of Arctic precipitation in ERA-40. Proc. ERA-40 Project Report Series 3: Workshop on Re-Analysis, Reading, United Kingdom, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, 317–331.

  • Serreze, M. C., and A. J. Etringer, 2003: Precipitation characteristics of the Eurasian Arctic drainage system. Int. J. Climatol., 23 , 1267–1291.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Serreze, M. C., J. R. Key, J. C. Box, J. A. Maslanik, and K. Steffen, 1998: A new monthly climatology of global radiation for the Arctic and comparisons with NCEP–NCAR reanalysis and ISCCP-C2 fields. J. Climate, 11 , 121–136.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Serreze, M. C., M. P. Clark, and D. H. Bromwich, 2003: Monitoring precipitation over the Arctic terrestrial drainage system: Data requirements, shortcomings, and applications of atmospheric reanalysis. J. Hydrometeor., 4 , 387–407.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Shepard, D., 1984: Computer mapping: The SYSMAP interpolation algorithm. Spatial Statistics and Models, G. L. Gaile and C. J. Willmott, Eds., D. Reidel, 133–145.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Vose, R. S., R. L. Schmoyer, P. M. Steurer, T. C. Peterson, R. Heim, T. R. Karl, and J. Eischeid, 1992: The global historical climatology network: Long-term monthly temperature, precipitation, sea level pressure, and station pressure data. ORNL Tech. Rep. CDIAC-53, NDP-041, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 99 pp. plus appendixes.

  • Wilks, D. S., 1995: Statistical Methods in Atmospheric Sciences: An Introduction. Academic Press, 467 pp.

  • Willmott, C. J., C. M. Rowe, and W. D. Philpot, 1985: Small-scale climate maps: A sensitivity analysis of some common assumptions associated with grid-point interpolation and contouring. Amer. Cartographer, 12 , 5–16.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Xie, P., and P. A. Arkin, 1997: Global precipitation: A 17-year monthly analysis based on gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model output. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78 , 2539–2558.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Yang, D., 1999: An improved precipitation climatology for the Arctic Ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett., 26 , 1625–1628.

  • Yang, D., and Coauthors, 2001: Compatability evaluation of national precipitation gauge measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 106 , D2,. 1481–1491.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 454 214 6
PDF Downloads 190 46 1