Development of an Automated Classification Procedure for Rainfall Systems

Michael E. Baldwin Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Michael E. Baldwin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
John S. Kain Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by John S. Kain in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
S. Lakshmivarahan School of Computer Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by S. Lakshmivarahan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

An automated procedure for classifying rainfall systems (meso-α scale and larger) was developed using an operational analysis of hourly precipitation estimates from radar and rain gauge data. The development process followed two main phases: a training phase and a testing phase. First, 48 hand-selected cases were used to create a training dataset, from which a set of attributes related to morphological aspects of rainfall systems were extracted. A hierarchy of classes for rainfall systems, in which the systems are separated into general convective (heavy rain) and nonconvective (light rain) classes, was envisioned. At the next level of classification hierarchy, convective events are divided into linear and cellular subclasses, and nonconvective events belong to the stratiform subclass. Essential attributes of precipitating systems, related to the rainfall intensity and degree of linear organization, were determined during the training phase. The attributes related to the rainfall intensity were chosen to be the parameters of the gamma probability distribution fit to observed rainfall amount frequency distributions using the generalized method of moments. Attributes related to the degree of spatial continuity of each rainfall system were acquired from correlogram analysis. Rainfall systems were categorized using hierarchical cluster analysis experiments with various combinations of these attributes. The combination of attributes that resulted in the best match between cluster analysis results and an expert classification were used as the basis for an automated classification procedure.

The development process shifted into the testing phase, where automated procedures for identifying and classifying rainfall systems were used to analyze every rainfall system in the contiguous 48 states during 2002. To allow for a feasible validation, a testing dataset was extracted from the 2002 data. The testing dataset consisted of 100 randomly selected rainfall systems larger than 40 000 km2 as identified by an automated identification system. This subset was shown to be representative of the full 2002 dataset. Finally, the automated classification procedure classified the testing dataset into stratiform, linear, and cellular classes with 85% accuracy, as compared to an expert classification.

* Additional affiliation: NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Corresponding author address: Michael E. Baldwin, OU/CIMMS, 1313 Halley Circle, Norman, OK 73069. Email: mbaldwin@ou.edu

Abstract

An automated procedure for classifying rainfall systems (meso-α scale and larger) was developed using an operational analysis of hourly precipitation estimates from radar and rain gauge data. The development process followed two main phases: a training phase and a testing phase. First, 48 hand-selected cases were used to create a training dataset, from which a set of attributes related to morphological aspects of rainfall systems were extracted. A hierarchy of classes for rainfall systems, in which the systems are separated into general convective (heavy rain) and nonconvective (light rain) classes, was envisioned. At the next level of classification hierarchy, convective events are divided into linear and cellular subclasses, and nonconvective events belong to the stratiform subclass. Essential attributes of precipitating systems, related to the rainfall intensity and degree of linear organization, were determined during the training phase. The attributes related to the rainfall intensity were chosen to be the parameters of the gamma probability distribution fit to observed rainfall amount frequency distributions using the generalized method of moments. Attributes related to the degree of spatial continuity of each rainfall system were acquired from correlogram analysis. Rainfall systems were categorized using hierarchical cluster analysis experiments with various combinations of these attributes. The combination of attributes that resulted in the best match between cluster analysis results and an expert classification were used as the basis for an automated classification procedure.

The development process shifted into the testing phase, where automated procedures for identifying and classifying rainfall systems were used to analyze every rainfall system in the contiguous 48 states during 2002. To allow for a feasible validation, a testing dataset was extracted from the 2002 data. The testing dataset consisted of 100 randomly selected rainfall systems larger than 40 000 km2 as identified by an automated identification system. This subset was shown to be representative of the full 2002 dataset. Finally, the automated classification procedure classified the testing dataset into stratiform, linear, and cellular classes with 85% accuracy, as compared to an expert classification.

* Additional affiliation: NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Corresponding author address: Michael E. Baldwin, OU/CIMMS, 1313 Halley Circle, Norman, OK 73069. Email: mbaldwin@ou.edu

Save
  • Alhamed, A., S. Lakshmivarahan, and D. J. Stensrud, 2002: Cluster analysis of multimodel ensemble data from SAMEX. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130 , 226256.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anderson, C. J., and R. W. Arritt, 1998: Mesoscale convective complexes and persistent elongated convective systems over the United States during 1992 and 1993. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126 , 578599.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anthes, R. A., 1983: Regional models of the atmosphere in middle latitudes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 111 , 13061335.

  • Austin, P. M., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1972: Analysis of the structure of precipitation patterns in New England. J. Appl. Meteor., 11 , 926935.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baldwin, M. E., and K. E. Mitchell, 1998: Progress on the NCEP hourly multi-sensor U.S. precipitation analysis for operations and GCIP research. Preprints, Second Symp. on Integrated Observing Systems, Phoenix, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 10–11.

  • Baldwin, M. E., and S. Lakshmivarahan, 2002: Rainfall classification using histogram analysis: An example of data mining in meteorology. Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks, Vol. 12, C. H. Dagli et al., Eds., ASME Press, 429–434.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baldwin, M. E., and S. Lakshmivarahan, 2003: Spatial characterization of rainfall patterns for use in a classification system. Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks, Vol. 13, C. H. Dagli et al., Eds., ASME Press, 683–688.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Benjamin, S. G., K. J. Brundage, P. A. Miller, T. L. Smith, G. A. Grell, D. Kim, J. M. Brown, and T. W. Schlatter, 1994: The Rapid Update Cycle at NMC. Preprints, 10th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Portland, OR, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 566–568.

  • Biggerstaff, M. I., and S. A. Listemaa, 2000: An improved scheme for convective/stratiform echo classification using radar reflectivity. J. Appl. Meteor., 39 , 21292150.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blanchard, D. O., 1990: Mesoscale convective patterns of the southern high plains. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 71 , 9941005.

  • Bluestein, H. B., and M. H. Jain, 1985: Formation of mesoscale lines of precipitation: Severe squall lines in Oklahoma during the spring. J. Atmos. Sci., 42 , 17111732.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bluestein, H. B., G. T. Marx, and M. H. Jain, 1987: Formation of mesoscale lines of precipitation: Nonsevere squall lines in Oklahoma during the spring. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115 , 27192727.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davies, E. R., 1997: Machine Vision: Theory, Algorithms, Practicalities. Academic Press, 750 pp.

  • Deutsch, C. V., and A. G. Journel, 1998: GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User’s Guide. 2d ed. Oxford University Press, 369 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doswell, C. A., 1991: Comments on “Mesoscale convective patterns of the southern high plains.”. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 72 , 389390.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Duda, R. O., P. E. Hart, and D. G. Stork, 2000: Pattern Classification. 2d ed. Wiley Interscience, 654 pp.

  • Ebert, E. E., and J. L. McBride, 2000: Verification of precipitation in weather systems: Determination of systematic errors. J. Hydrol., 239 , 179202.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Evans, J. L., and R. E. Shemo, 1996: A procedure for automated satellite-based identification and climatology development of various classes of organized convection. J. Appl. Meteor., 35 , 638652.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fulton, R. A., J. P. Breidenbach, D. J. Seo, D. A. Miller, and T. O’Bannon, 1998: The WSR-88D rainfall algorithm. Wea. Forecasting, 13 , 377395.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gamache, J. F., and R. A. Houze, 1983: Water budget of a mesoscale convective system in the Tropics. J. Atmos. Sci., 40 , 18351850.

  • Geerts, B., 1998: Mesoscale convective systems in the southeast United States during 1994–95: A survey. Wea. Forecasting, 13 , 860869.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hamilton, J. D., 1994: Time Series Analysis. Princeton University Press, 799 pp.

  • Hansen, L. P., 1982: Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50 , 10291054.

  • Hosking, J. G., and C. D. Stow, 1987: Ground-based, high resolution measurements of the spatial and temporal distribution of rainfall. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 26 , 15301539.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Houghton, H. G., 1968: On precipitation mechanisms and their artificial modification. J. Appl. Meteor., 7 , 851859.

  • Houze, R. A., 1997: Stratiform precipitation in regions of convection: A meteorological paradox? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78 , 21792196.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Houze, R. A., B. F. Smull, and P. Dodge, 1990: Mesoscale organization of springtime rainstorms in Oklahoma. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118 , 613654.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Isaaks, E. H., and R. M. Srivastava, 1989: An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, 561 pp.

  • Johnson, R. H., and P. J. Hamilton, 1988: The relationship of surface pressure features to the precipitation and airflow structure of an intense midlatitude squall line. Mon. Wea. Rev., 116 , 14441473.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jirak, I. L., W. R. Cotton, and R. L. McAnelly, 2003: Satellite and radar survey of mesoscale convective system development. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131 , 24282449.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kessler, E., 1966: Computer program for calculating average lengths of weather radar echoes and pattern bandedness. J. Atmos. Sci., 23 , 569574.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kessler, E., and J. A. Russo Jr., 1963: Statistical properties of weather radar echoes. Proc. 10th Weather Radar Conf., Washington, DC, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 25–33.

  • Klette, R., and P. Zamperoni, 1996: Handbook of Image Processing Operators. John Wiley and Sons, 397 pp.

  • Lakshmanan, V., 2001: A Hierarchical, Multiscale Texture Segmentation Algorithm for Real-World Scenes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oklahoma, 115 pp.

  • Locatelli, J. D., and P. V. Hobbs, 1974: Fall speeds and masses of solid precipitation particles. J. Geophys. Res., 79 , 21852197.

  • Nash, S. G., 1984: Newton-type minimization via the Lanczos method. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 21 , 770778.

  • Newey, W. K., and K. D. West, 1987: A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55 , 703708.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Orlanski, I., 1975: A rational subdivision of scales for atmospheric processes. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 56 , 527530.

  • Parker, M. D., and R. H. Johnson, 2000: Organizational modes of midlatitude mesoscale convective systems. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128 , 34133436.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peak, J. E., and P. M. Tag, 1994: Segmentation of satellite imagery using hierarchical thresholding and neural networks. J. Appl. Meteor., 33 , 605616.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Perica, S., and E. Foufoula-Georgiou, 1996: Linkage of scaling and thermodynamic parameters of rainfall: Results from midlatitude mesoscale convective systems. J. Geophys. Res., 101 , 74317448.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Romesburg, C. H., 1984: Cluster Analysis for Researchers. Life Time Learning, 334 pp.

  • Seo, D. J., 1998: Real-time estimation of rainfall fields using radar rainfall and rain gauge data. J. Hydrol., 208 , 3752.

  • Steiner, M., R. A. Houze Jr., and S. E. Yuter, 1995: Climatological characteristics of three-dimensional storm structure from operational radar and rain gauge data. J. Appl. Meteor., 34 , 19782007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tsakraklides, G., and J. L. Evans, 2003: Global and regional diurnal variations in organized convection. J. Climate, 16 , 15621572.

  • Ward, J. H., 1963: Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 58 , 236244.

  • Wilks, D. S., 1990: Maximum likelihood estimation for the gamma distribution using data containing zeros. J. Climate, 3 , 14951501.

  • Wilks, D. S., 1995: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences. Academic Press, 467 pp.

  • Wilson, J. W., N. A. Crook, C. K. Mueller, J. Sun, and M. Dixon, 1998: Nowcasting thunderstorms: A status report. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 79 , 20792099.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yuter, S. E., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1997: Measurements of raindrop size distributions over the Pacific warm pool and implications for Z–R relations. J. Appl. Meteor., 36 , 847867.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zawadzki, I. I., 1973: Statistical properties of precipitation patterns. J. Appl. Meteor., 12 , 459472.

  • Zhang, D-L., and K. Gao, 1989: Numerical simulation of an intense squall line during 10–11 June 1985 PRE-STORM. Part II: Rear inflow, surface pressure perturbations, and stratiform precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117 , 20672094.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1576 916 240
PDF Downloads 444 112 7