Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

The Spatial Variability of Moisture in the Boundary Layer and Its Effect on Convection Initiation: Project-Long Characterization

Frédéric Fabry Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Search for other papers by Frédéric Fabry in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jan 2006
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3055.1
Page(s):
79–91
Restricted access

Abstract

An attempt was made to statistically gauge the importance of moisture variability on convection initiation by analyzing data collected by radar, surface stations, soundings, and airborne in situ sensors over the 7 weeks of the International H2O Project (IHOP_2002). Based on radar refractivity data, the spatial structure of humidity near the surface proved to be very anisotropic, crosswind variability being typically twice as large as along-wind variability, in part as a result of the west-to-east climatological gradient in moisture across the Oklahoma panhandle. Variability in humidity was largest from the afternoon to sunset and smallest a few hours before and after sunrise. At the surface, variograms of refractivity increase almost linearly with scale in the crosswind direction, suggesting that the field of moisture shows little in terms of local maxima and minima. Higher in the boundary layer, moisture variability increases at small scales because of the entrainment of dry capping stable layer air as the daytime boundary layer grows, and the rate of that dry-air entrainment could be used to calculate surface moisture variability.

The effect of the observed variability in moisture and temperature in the upper boundary layer on convective inhibition was quantified and contrasted with the effect expected from boundary layer updrafts. At synoptic scales and at the upper end of the mesoscale, the location of convection initiation is most sensitive to the variability in temperature. At smaller scales, storm development becomes extremely sensitive to the strength of updrafts; however, those same updrafts also magnify the effect of moisture and temperature variability, as a result of which the effect of small-scale moisture variability cannot be ignored. Some of the consequences of these findings on the representativeness of radiosonde measurements in the boundary layer and instrumentation needs for convection initiation forecasting are surveyed.

Corresponding author address: Frédéric Fabry, Dept. of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, 805 Sherbrooke St. W., Montreal, QC H3A 2K6, Canada. Email: frederic.fabry@mcgill.ca

Abstract

An attempt was made to statistically gauge the importance of moisture variability on convection initiation by analyzing data collected by radar, surface stations, soundings, and airborne in situ sensors over the 7 weeks of the International H2O Project (IHOP_2002). Based on radar refractivity data, the spatial structure of humidity near the surface proved to be very anisotropic, crosswind variability being typically twice as large as along-wind variability, in part as a result of the west-to-east climatological gradient in moisture across the Oklahoma panhandle. Variability in humidity was largest from the afternoon to sunset and smallest a few hours before and after sunrise. At the surface, variograms of refractivity increase almost linearly with scale in the crosswind direction, suggesting that the field of moisture shows little in terms of local maxima and minima. Higher in the boundary layer, moisture variability increases at small scales because of the entrainment of dry capping stable layer air as the daytime boundary layer grows, and the rate of that dry-air entrainment could be used to calculate surface moisture variability.

The effect of the observed variability in moisture and temperature in the upper boundary layer on convective inhibition was quantified and contrasted with the effect expected from boundary layer updrafts. At synoptic scales and at the upper end of the mesoscale, the location of convection initiation is most sensitive to the variability in temperature. At smaller scales, storm development becomes extremely sensitive to the strength of updrafts; however, those same updrafts also magnify the effect of moisture and temperature variability, as a result of which the effect of small-scale moisture variability cannot be ignored. Some of the consequences of these findings on the representativeness of radiosonde measurements in the boundary layer and instrumentation needs for convection initiation forecasting are surveyed.

Corresponding author address: Frédéric Fabry, Dept. of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, 805 Sherbrooke St. W., Montreal, QC H3A 2K6, Canada. Email: frederic.fabry@mcgill.ca

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Bean, B. R., and E. J. Dutton, 1968: Radio Meteorology.National Bureau of Standards Monogr., No. 92, National Bureau of Standards, 435 pp.

  • Crook, N. A., 1996: Sensitivity of moist convection forced by boundary layer processes to low-level thermodynamic fields. Mon. Wea. Rev, 124 , 1767–1785.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Crook, N. A., and J. B. Klemp, 2000: Lifting by convergence lines. J. Atmos. Sci, 57 , 873–890.

  • Fabry, F., 2004: Meteorological value of ground target measurements by radar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol, 21 , 560–573.

  • Fabry, F., and C. Creese, 1999: If fine lines fail, try ground targets. Preprints, 29th Int. Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Montreal, QC, Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 21–23.

  • Koch, S. E., and Coauthors, 2003: Multisensor study of a dual bore event observed during IHOP. Preprints, 10th Conf. on Mesoscale Processes, Portland OR, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, 14.3.

  • Lee, B. D., R. D. Farley, and M. R. Hjelmfelt, 1991: A numerical case study of convection initiation along colliding convergence boundaries in northeast Colorado. J. Atmos. Sci, 48 , 2350–2366.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • National Research Council, 1998: The Atmospheric Sciences: Entering the Twenty-first Century. National Academy Press, 364 pp.

  • Rhea, J. O., 1966: A study of thunderstorm formation along dry lines. J. Appl. Meteor, 5 , 59–63.

  • Stull, R. B., 1988: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Kluwer Academic, 666 pp.

  • Taylor, G. I., 1938: The spectrum of turbulence. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A164 , 476–490.

  • Uccellini, L. W., P. J. Kocin, and J. M. Sienkiewicz, 1999: Advances in forecasting extratropical cyclogenesis at the National Meteorological Center. The Lifecycles of Extratropical Cyclones, M. A. Shapiro and S. Grønås, Eds, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 317–336.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weckwerth, T. M., J. W. Wilson, and R. M. Wakimoto, 1996: Thermodynamic variability within the convective boundary layer due to horizontal convective rolls. Mon. Wea. Rev, 124 , 769–784.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weckwerth, T. M., and Coauthors, 2004: An overview of the International H2O Project (IHOP_2002) and some preliminary highlights. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 85 , 253–277.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weckwerth, T. M., C. R. Pettet, F. Fabry, S. Park, and J. W. Wilson, 2005: Radar refractivity retrieval: Validation and application to short-term forecasting. J. Appl. Meteor, 44 , 285–300.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wilson, J. W., and W. E. Schreiber, 1986: Initiation of convective storms at radar-observed boundary-layer convergence lines. Mon. Wea. Rev, 114 , 2516–2536.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zawadzki, I., E. Torlaschi, and R. Sauvageau, 1981: The relationship between mesoscale thermodynamic variables and convective precipitation. J. Atmos. Sci, 38 , 1535–1540.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 471 203 18
PDF Downloads 282 76 8