Climate Modeling with Spectral Elements

Ferdinand Baer Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Ferdinand Baer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Houjun Wang Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Houjun Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Joseph J. Tribbia National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Joseph J. Tribbia in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Aimé Fournier National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, and Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Aimé Fournier in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

As an effort toward improving climate model–component performance and accuracy, an atmospheric-component climate model has been developed, entitled the Spectral Element Atmospheric Climate Model and denoted as CAM_SEM. CAM_SEM includes a unique dynamical core coupled at this time to the physics component of the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) as well as the Community Land Model. This model allows the inclusion of local mesh refinement to seamlessly study imbedded higher-resolution regional climate concurrently with the global climate. Additionally, the numerical structure of the model based on spectral elements allows for application of state-of-the-art computing hardware most effectively and economically to produce the best prediction/simulation results with minimal expenditure of computing resources. The model has been tested under various conditions beginning with the shallow water equations and ending with an Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP)-style run that uses initial conditions and physics comparable to the CAM2 (version 2 of the NCAR CAM climate model) experiments. For uniform resolution, the output of the model compares favorably with the published output from the CAM2 experiments. Further integrations with local mesh refinement included indicate that while greater detail in the prediction of mesh-refined regions—that is, regional climate—is observed, the remaining coarse-grid results are similar to results obtained from a uniform-grid integration of the model with identical conditions. It should be noted that in addition to spectral elements, other efficient schemes have lately been considered, in particular the finite-volume scheme. This scheme has not yet been incorporated into CAM_SEM. The two schemes—finite volume and spectral element—are quasi-independent and generally compatible, dealing with different aspects of the integration process. Their impact can be assessed separately and the omission of the finite-volume process herein will not detract from the evaluation of the results using the spectral-element method alone.

Corresponding author address: Ferdinand Baer, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD 20742. Email: baer@atmos.umd.edu

Abstract

As an effort toward improving climate model–component performance and accuracy, an atmospheric-component climate model has been developed, entitled the Spectral Element Atmospheric Climate Model and denoted as CAM_SEM. CAM_SEM includes a unique dynamical core coupled at this time to the physics component of the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) as well as the Community Land Model. This model allows the inclusion of local mesh refinement to seamlessly study imbedded higher-resolution regional climate concurrently with the global climate. Additionally, the numerical structure of the model based on spectral elements allows for application of state-of-the-art computing hardware most effectively and economically to produce the best prediction/simulation results with minimal expenditure of computing resources. The model has been tested under various conditions beginning with the shallow water equations and ending with an Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP)-style run that uses initial conditions and physics comparable to the CAM2 (version 2 of the NCAR CAM climate model) experiments. For uniform resolution, the output of the model compares favorably with the published output from the CAM2 experiments. Further integrations with local mesh refinement included indicate that while greater detail in the prediction of mesh-refined regions—that is, regional climate—is observed, the remaining coarse-grid results are similar to results obtained from a uniform-grid integration of the model with identical conditions. It should be noted that in addition to spectral elements, other efficient schemes have lately been considered, in particular the finite-volume scheme. This scheme has not yet been incorporated into CAM_SEM. The two schemes—finite volume and spectral element—are quasi-independent and generally compatible, dealing with different aspects of the integration process. Their impact can be assessed separately and the omission of the finite-volume process herein will not detract from the evaluation of the results using the spectral-element method alone.

Corresponding author address: Ferdinand Baer, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD 20742. Email: baer@atmos.umd.edu

Save
  • Baer, F., J. J. Tribbia, and M. Taylor, 2001: Global and regional atmospheric modeling using spectral elements. IUTAM Symposium on Advances in Mathematical Modeling of Atmosphere and Ocean Dynamics, P. F. Hodnett, Ed., Kluwer Academic, 81–86.

  • Collins, W. D., and Coauthors, cited. 2003: Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM2). [Available online at http://www.ccsm.ucar.edu/models/atm-cam/docs/description/.].

  • Cullen, M. J. P., 1979: The finite element method. Numerical Methods Used in Atmospheric Models, Vol. II, A. Kasahara, Ed., WMO GARP Publication 17, 302–337.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deville, M. O., P. F. Fischer, and E. H. Mund, 2002: High-Order Methods for Incompressible Fluid Flow. Cambridge Monogr. on Applied and Computational Mathematics, No. 9, Cambridge University Press, 528 pp.

  • Fournier, A., M. A. Taylor, and J. Tribbia, 2000a: Spectral element method. Part 1: Numerical algorithms. Proc. Eighth Annual Conf. of the CFD Society, Montreal, QC, Canada, CFD Society of Canada, 173–180. [Available online at ftp://ftp.cgd.ucar.edu/pub/fournier/publications/AlNu.ps.gz.].

  • Fournier, A., M. A. Taylor, L. M. Polvani, and R. Saravanan, 2000b: Spectral element method. Part 2: Numerical simulations. Proc. Eighth Annual Conf. of the CFD Society, Montreal, QC, Canada, CFD Society of Canada, 181–188. [Available online at ftp://ftp.cgd.ucar.edu/pub/fournier/publications/NuSi.ps.gz.].

  • Fournier, A., M. A. Taylor, and J. J. Tribbia, 2004: The Spectral Element Atmospheric Model: High-resolution parallel computation and response to regional forcing. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132 , 726748.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fox-Rabinovitz, M. S., 2000: Regional climate simulation of the anomalous U.S. summer events using a variable-resolution stretched-grid GCM. J. Geophys. Res., 105 , D24. 2963529646.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fox-Rabinovitz, M. S., G. L. Stenchikov, M. J. Suarez, and L. L. Takacs, 1997: A finite-difference GCM dynamical core with a variable resolution stretched grid. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125 , 29432968.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fox-Rabinovitz, M. S., G. L. Stenchikov, M. J. Suarez, L. L. Takacs, and R. C. Govindaraju, 2000: A uniform and variable resolution GCM dynamical core with realistic orography. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128 , 18831898.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fox-Rabinovitz, M. S., L. L. Takacs, M. J. Suarez, and R. C. Govindaraju, 2001: A variable resolution stretched grid GCM: Regional climate simulation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129 , 453469.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gates, W. L., 1992: AMIP: The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 73 , 19621970.

  • Haidvogel, D. B., E. N. Curchitser, M. Iskandarani, R. Hughes, and M. Taylor, 1997: Global modeling of the ocean and atmosphere using the spectral element method. Ocean–Atmos., 35 , 505531.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Held, I., and M. Suarez, 1994: A proposal for the intercomparison of the dynamical cores of atmospheric general circulation models. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 75 , 18251830.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Krasnopolsky, V., M. S. Fox-Rabinovitz, and D. Chalikov, 2005: New approach to calculation of atmospheric model physics: Accurate and fast neural network emulation of long wave radiation in a climate model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133 , 13701383.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lilly, D. K., 1973: Lectures in sub-synoptic scales of motions and two-dimensional turbulence. Dynamic Meteorology, P. Morel, Ed., D. Reidel, 353–418.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Phillips, N. A., 1957: A coordinate system having some special advantages for numerical forecasting. J. Atmos. Sci., 14 , 184185.

  • Randall, D., M. Khairoutdinov, A. Arakawa, and W. Grabowski, 2003: Breaking the cloud-parameterization deadlock. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84 , 15471564.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • St-Cyr, A., and S. J. Thomas, 2005: Nonlinear operator integration factor splitting for the shallow water equations. App. Numer. Math., 52 , 4. 429448.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, M., J. J. Tribbia, and M. Iskandarani, 1997: The spectral element method for the shallow water equations on the sphere. J. Comput. Phys., 130 , 92108.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, M., R. Loft, and J. Tribbia, 1998: Performance of a spectral element atmospheric model (SEAM) on the HP Exemplar SPP2000. NCAR Tech. Rep. TN-439+EDD, 16 pp.

  • Thomas, S. J., and R. D. Loft, 2002: Semi-implicit spectral element atmospheric model. J. Sci. Comput., 17 , 339350.

  • Thomas, S. J., and R. D. Loft, 2005: The NCAR spectral element climate dynamical core: Semi-implicit, Eulerian formulation. J. Sci. Comput., 25 , 307322.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thomas, S. J., R. D. Loft, W. Spotz, and A. Fournier, 2000: Semi-implicit scheme for the spectral element atmospheric model. Proc. Eighth Annual Conf. of the CFD Society, Montreal, QC, Canada, CFD Society of Canada, 231–238.

  • Thomas, S. J., R. D. Loft, A. Fournier, and J. Tribbia, 2001: Parallel spectral element dynamical core for atmospheric general circulation models. Proc. Ninth Annual Conf. of the CFD Society, Waterloo, ON, Canada, CFD Society of Canada, 69–74.

  • Thomas, S. J., J. M. Dennis, H. M. Tufo, and P. Fischer, 2003: A Schwarz preconditioner for the cubed-sphere. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 25 , 442453.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, H., J. Tribbia, F. Baer, A. Fournier, and M. Taylor, cited. 2004: Recent development and applications of a spectral element dynamical core. [Available online at http://www. ccsm.ucar.edu/working_groups/Atmosphere/Presentations/20040309/04.pdf.].

  • Warren, S. G., C. J. Hahn, J. London, R. M. Chervin, and R. L. Jenne, 1986: Global distribution of total cloud cover and cloud type amounts over land. NCAR Tech. Note TN-273+STR, 29 pp. + 199 maps.

  • Warren, S. G., C. J. Hahn, J. London, R. M. Chervin, and R. L. Jenne, 1988: Global distribution of total cloud cover and cloud type amounts over the ocean. NCAR Tech. Note TN-317+STR, 42 pp. + 170 maps.

  • Williamson, D., and Coauthors, 1992: A standard test set for numerical approximations to the shallow water equations in spherical geometry. J. Comput. Phys., 102 , 211224.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1991 1601 58
PDF Downloads 261 56 3