Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

The Role of Sea Surface Temperature in Reanalysis

Masao Kanamitsu Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California

Search for other papers by Masao Kanamitsu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Seung-On Hwang Korea Meteorological Administration, Seoul, South Korea

Search for other papers by Seung-On Hwang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Feb 2006
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3084.1
Page(s):
532–552
Restricted access

Abstract

With the aim of understanding the role of SST in the reanalysis for the preradiosonde, presatellite, and satellite eras, a number of observation system experiments were performed using the NCEP/Department of Energy (DOE) reanalysis system. Five pairs of experiments were conducted using observed and climatological SSTs for cases 1) without any observation, 2) surface pressure observation only with the observation density of 1915, 3) surface pressure observation with the observation density of 1997, 4) surface observation and radiosondes, and 5) all observations, including satellite retrievals. The analyses were run for 4 months in 1997 (strong El Niño) and 1993 (near-normal SST). The impact of SST and the various observation systems on the analysis of near-surface parameters, the upper-level field, and several diagnostic fields were compared against the control analysis with observed SST and all available observations.

The most important finding of this study is that the impact of SST varies with the time scale of the analysis, which is most apparent in the surface-pressure-only observation experiments. The impact of SST is largest for the low-frequency (seasonal) analyses and smaller for the high-frequency (daily) analyses. This is particularly apparent for near-surface temperature and upper-level height field analyses. In the extreme case of the strong El Niño year, the simulation with observed SST without any observations [Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP)-type run] produced seasonal mean 2-m temperature (T2M) and 500-hPa height fields that agreed better with the control analysis than the analysis with surface pressure observation only with climatological SST. On the contrary, the impact of surface pressure observation is greater on higher-frequency analyses, and lower on low-frequency analyses.

Generally speaking, accurate analysis of SST is important when limited atmospheric observation is available. But even for the full atmospheric observation system, climatological SST produces inferior analysis over ocean as well as land.

The introduction of radiosonde data drastically reduces errors in the analyses and diagnostic fields; thus, radiosonde data are indispensable for accurate estimation of the atmospheric state in both short and long time scales.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Masao Kanamitsu, Mail Code 0224, CRD/SIO/UCSD, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0224. Email: mkanamitsu@ucsd.edu

Abstract

With the aim of understanding the role of SST in the reanalysis for the preradiosonde, presatellite, and satellite eras, a number of observation system experiments were performed using the NCEP/Department of Energy (DOE) reanalysis system. Five pairs of experiments were conducted using observed and climatological SSTs for cases 1) without any observation, 2) surface pressure observation only with the observation density of 1915, 3) surface pressure observation with the observation density of 1997, 4) surface observation and radiosondes, and 5) all observations, including satellite retrievals. The analyses were run for 4 months in 1997 (strong El Niño) and 1993 (near-normal SST). The impact of SST and the various observation systems on the analysis of near-surface parameters, the upper-level field, and several diagnostic fields were compared against the control analysis with observed SST and all available observations.

The most important finding of this study is that the impact of SST varies with the time scale of the analysis, which is most apparent in the surface-pressure-only observation experiments. The impact of SST is largest for the low-frequency (seasonal) analyses and smaller for the high-frequency (daily) analyses. This is particularly apparent for near-surface temperature and upper-level height field analyses. In the extreme case of the strong El Niño year, the simulation with observed SST without any observations [Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP)-type run] produced seasonal mean 2-m temperature (T2M) and 500-hPa height fields that agreed better with the control analysis than the analysis with surface pressure observation only with climatological SST. On the contrary, the impact of surface pressure observation is greater on higher-frequency analyses, and lower on low-frequency analyses.

Generally speaking, accurate analysis of SST is important when limited atmospheric observation is available. But even for the full atmospheric observation system, climatological SST produces inferior analysis over ocean as well as land.

The introduction of radiosonde data drastically reduces errors in the analyses and diagnostic fields; thus, radiosonde data are indispensable for accurate estimation of the atmospheric state in both short and long time scales.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Masao Kanamitsu, Mail Code 0224, CRD/SIO/UCSD, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0224. Email: mkanamitsu@ucsd.edu

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Arkin, P., E. Kalnay, J. Laver, S. Schubert, and K. Trenberth, 2003: Ongoing analysis of the climate system: A workshop report. Rep. 18020, UCAR, Boulder, CO. [Available online at http://www.joss.ucar.edu/joss_psg/meetings/climatesystem/FinalWorkshopReport.pdf.].

  • Barnston, A. G., A. Leetmaa, V. E. Kousky, R. E. Livezey, E. A. O'Lenic, H. Van den Dool, A. J. Wagner, and D. A. Unger, 1999: NCEP Forecasts of the El Nino of 1997–98 and its U.S. impacts. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 80 , 1829–1852.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bengtsson, L., K. I. Hodges, and S. Hagemann, 2004: Sensitivity of the ERA40 reanalysis to the observing system: Determination of the global atmospheric circulation from reduced observations. Tellus, 56A , 456–471.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chelliah, M., and C. F. Ropelewski, 2000: Reanalyses-based tropospheric temperature estimates: Uncertainties in the context of global climate change detection. J. Climate, 13 , 3187–3205.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gates, W. L., and Coauthors, 1999: An overview of the results of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP I). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 80 , 29–55.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gibson, J. K., P. Kallberg, S. Uppala, A. Nomura, A. Hernandez, and E. Serrano, 1997: ERA description. ECMWF Re-Analysis Final Report Series 1, Shinfield Park, Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom, 71 pp.

  • Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 77 , 437–471.

  • Kanamitsu, M., and Coauthors, 2002a: NCEP Dynamical Seasonal Forecast System 2000. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 83 , 1019–1037.

  • Kanamitsu, M., W. Ebisuzaki, J. Woolen, J. Potter, and M. Fiorino, 2002b: NCEP/DOE AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 83 , 1631–1643.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kistler, R., and Coauthors, 2001: The NCEP–NCAR 50-year reanalysis: Monthly means CD-ROM and documentation. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 82 , 247–268.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Parrish, D. F., and J. C. Derber, 1992: The National Meteorological Center's Spectral Statistical–Interpolation Analysis System. Mon. Wea. Rev, 120 , 1747–1763.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rayner, N. A., D. E. Parker, E. B. Horton, C. K. Folland, L. V. Alexander, and D. P. Rowell, 2003: Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J. Geophys. Res, 108 .4407, doi:10.1029/2002JD002670.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Reynolds, R. W., 1988: A real-time global sea surface temperature analysis. J. Climate, 1 , 75–86.

  • Reynolds, R. W., 1993: Impact of Mount Pinatubo aerosols on satellite-derived sea surface temperatures. J. Climate, 6 , 768–774.

  • Reynolds, R. W., and T. M. Smith, 1994: Improved global sea surface temperature analyses using optimum interpolation. J. Climate, 7 , 929–948.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Servain, J., M. Seva, and P. Rual, 1990: Climatology comparison and long-term variations of sea surface temperature over the tropical Atlantic Ocean. J. Geophys. Res, 95 , 9421–9431.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Simmons, A. J., and J. K. Gibson, 2000: The ERA-40 project plan. ERA-40 Project Report Series, ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom, 62 pp.

  • Smith, T. M., and R. W. Reynolds, 2004: Improved extended reconstruction of SST (1854–1997). J. Climate, 17 , 2466–2477.

  • Smith, T. M., R. W. Reynolds, R. E. Livezey, and D. C. Stokes, 1996: Reconstruction of historical sea surface temperatures using empirical orthogonal functions. J. Climate, 9 , 1403–1420.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stammer, D., and Coauthors, 2002: Global ocean circulation during 1992–1997, estimated from ocean observations and a general circulation model. J. Geophys. Res, 107 , 1–27.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sturaro, G., 2003: A closer look at the climatological discontinuities present in the NCEP/NMCAR reanalysis temperature due to the introduction of satellite data. Climate Dyn, 21 , 309–316.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Whitaker, J. S., G. P. Compo, X. Wei, and T. M. Hamill, 2004: Reanalysis without radiosondes using ensemble data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev, 132 , 1190–1200.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 105 27 2
PDF Downloads 26 11 2