Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

3DVAR and Cloud Analysis with WSR-88D Level-II Data for the Prediction of the Fort Worth, Texas, Tornadic Thunderstorms. Part I: Cloud Analysis and Its Impact

Ming Hu Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms, and School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Ming Hu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Ming Xue Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms, and School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Ming Xue in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Keith Brewster Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Keith Brewster in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Feb 2006
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3092.1
Page(s):
675–698
Restricted access

Abstract

In this two-part paper, the impact of level-II Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) reflectivity and radial velocity data on the prediction of a cluster of tornadic thunderstorms in the Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) model are studied. Radar reflectivity data are used primarily in a cloud analysis procedure that retrieves the amount of hydrometeors and adjusts in-cloud temperature, moisture, and cloud fields, while radial velocity data are analyzed through a three-dimensional variational (3DVAR) scheme that contains a mass divergence constraint in the cost function. In Part I, the impact of the cloud analysis and modifications to the scheme are examined while Part II focuses on the impact of radial velocity and the mass divergence constraint.

The case studied is that of the 28 March 2000 Fort Worth, Texas, tornado outbreaks. The same case was studied by Xue et al. using the ARPS Data Analysis System (ADAS) and an earlier version of the cloud analysis procedure with WSR-88D level-III data. Since then, several modifications to the cloud analysis procedure, including those to the in-cloud temperature adjustment and the analysis of precipitation species, have been made. They are described in detail with examples.

The assimilation and predictions use a 3-km grid nested inside a 9-km one. The level-II reflectivity data are assimilated, through the cloud analysis, at 10-min intervals in a 1-h period that ends a little over 1 h preceding the first tornado outbreak. Experiments with different settings within the cloud analysis procedure are examined. It is found that the experiment using the improved cloud analysis procedure with reflectivity data can capture the important characteristics of the main tornadic thunderstorm more accurately than the experiment using the early version of cloud analysis. The contributions of different modifications to the above improvements are investigated.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Ming Xue, School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, 100 East Boyd, Norman, OK 73019. Email: mxue@ou.edu

Abstract

In this two-part paper, the impact of level-II Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) reflectivity and radial velocity data on the prediction of a cluster of tornadic thunderstorms in the Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) model are studied. Radar reflectivity data are used primarily in a cloud analysis procedure that retrieves the amount of hydrometeors and adjusts in-cloud temperature, moisture, and cloud fields, while radial velocity data are analyzed through a three-dimensional variational (3DVAR) scheme that contains a mass divergence constraint in the cost function. In Part I, the impact of the cloud analysis and modifications to the scheme are examined while Part II focuses on the impact of radial velocity and the mass divergence constraint.

The case studied is that of the 28 March 2000 Fort Worth, Texas, tornado outbreaks. The same case was studied by Xue et al. using the ARPS Data Analysis System (ADAS) and an earlier version of the cloud analysis procedure with WSR-88D level-III data. Since then, several modifications to the cloud analysis procedure, including those to the in-cloud temperature adjustment and the analysis of precipitation species, have been made. They are described in detail with examples.

The assimilation and predictions use a 3-km grid nested inside a 9-km one. The level-II reflectivity data are assimilated, through the cloud analysis, at 10-min intervals in a 1-h period that ends a little over 1 h preceding the first tornado outbreak. Experiments with different settings within the cloud analysis procedure are examined. It is found that the experiment using the improved cloud analysis procedure with reflectivity data can capture the important characteristics of the main tornadic thunderstorm more accurately than the experiment using the early version of cloud analysis. The contributions of different modifications to the above improvements are investigated.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Ming Xue, School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, 100 East Boyd, Norman, OK 73019. Email: mxue@ou.edu

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Albers, S. C., J. A. McGinley, D. A. Birkenheuer, and J. R. Smart, 1996: The local analysis and prediction system (LAPS): Analysis of clouds, precipitation and temperature. Wea. Forecasting, 11 , 273–287.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Baldwin, M. E., S. Lakshmivarahan, and J. S. Kain, 2002: Development of an “events-oriented” approach to forecast verification. Preprints, 15th Conf on Numerical Weather Prediction/21st Conf. on Severe Local Storms, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, 7B.3.

  • Bratseth, A. M., 1986: Statistical interpolation by means of successive corrections. Tellus, 38A , 439–447.

  • Brewster, K., 1996: Application of a Bratseth analysis scheme including Doppler radar data. Preprints, 15th Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, Norfolk, VA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 92–95.

  • Brewster, K., 2002: Recent advances in the diabatic initialization of a non-hydrostatic numerical model. Preprints, 15th Conf on Numerical Weather Prediction/21st Conf. on Severe Local Storms, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, J6.3.

  • Crum, T. D., and R. L. Alberty, 1993: The WSR-88D and the WSR-88D operational support facility. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 74 , 1669–1687.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Droegemeier, K. K., 1990: Toward a science of storm-scale prediction. Preprints, 16th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Kananaskis Park, AB, Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 256–262.

  • Droegemeier, K. K., 1997: The numerical prediction of thunderstorms: Challenges, potential benefits, and results from real time operational tests. WMO Bull, 46 , 324–336.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gal-Chen, T., 1978: A method for the initialization of the anelastic equations: Implications for matching models with observations. Mon. Wea. Rev, 106 , 587–606.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gao, J., M. Xue, A. Shapiro, Q. Xu, and K. K. Droegemeier, 2001: Three-dimensional simple adjoint velocity retrievals from single Doppler radar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol, 18 , 26–38.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gao, J., M. Xue, K. Brewster, F. Carr, and K. K. Droegemeier, 2002: New development of a 3DVAR system for a nonhydrostatic NWP model. Preprints, 15th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction/19th Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 339–341, P12.4.

  • Gao, J-D., M. Xue, K. Brewster, and K. K. Droegemeier, 2004: A three-dimensional variational data analysis method with recursive filter for Doppler radars. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol, 21 , 457–469.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hu, M., M. Xue, J. Gao, and K. Brewster, 2006: 3DVAR and cloud analysis with WSR-88D level-II data for the prediction of Fort Worth, Texas, tornadic thunderstorms. Part II: Impact of radial velocity analysis via 3DVAR. Mon. Wea. Rev, 134 , 699–721.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kessler, E., 1969: On the Distribution and Continuity of Water Substance in Atmospheric Circulations. Meteor. Monogr., No. 32, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84 pp.

  • Lilly, D. K., 1990: Numerical prediction of thunderstorms—Has its time come? Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 116 , 779–798.

  • Lin, Y-L., R. D. Farley, and H. D. Orville, 1983: Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model. J. Climate Appl. Meteor, 22 , 1065–1092.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Qiu, C., and Q. Xu, 1992: A simple adjoint method of wind analysis for single-Doppler data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol, 9 , 588–598.

  • Qiu, C., and Q. Xu, 1994: A spectral simple adjoint method for retrieving low-altitude winds from single-Doppler data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol, 11 , 927–936.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rogers, R. R., and M. K. Yau, 1989: A Short Course in Cloud Physics. 3d ed. Pergamon Press, 293 pp.

  • Schaefer, J. T., 1990: The critical success index as an indicator of warning skill. Wea. Forecasting, 5 , 570–575.

  • Shapiro, A., S. Ellis, and J. Shaw, 1995: Single-Doppler radar retrievals with Phoenix II data: Clear air and microburst wind retrievals in the planetary boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci, 52 , 1265–1287.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Smith Jr., P. L., C. G. Myers, and H. D. Orville, 1975: Radar reflectivity factor calculations in numerical cloud models using bulk parameterization of precipitation processes. J. Appl. Meteor, 14 , 1156–1165.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Snyder, C., and F. Zhang, 2003: Assimilation of simulated Doppler radar observations with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev, 131 , 1663–1677.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sun, J., and N. A. Crook, 1997: Dynamical and microphysical retrieval from Doppler radar observations using a cloud model and its adjoint. Part I: Model development and simulated data experiments. J. Atmos. Sci, 54 , 1642–1661.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sun, J., and N. A. Crook, 1998: Dynamical and microphysical retrieval from Doppler radar observations using a cloud model and its adjoint. Part II: Retrieval experiments of an observed Florida convective storm. J. Atmos. Sci, 55 , 835–852.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sun, J., D. W. Flicker, and D. K. Lilly, 1991: Recovery of three-dimensional wind and temperature fields from simulated single-Doppler radar data. J. Atmos. Sci, 48 , 876–890.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Tong, M., and M. Xue, 2005: Ensemble Kalman filter assimilation of Doppler radar data with a compressible nonhydrostatic model: OSS experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev, 133 , 1789–1807.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Warner, J., 1970: On steady-state one-dimensional models of cumulus convection. J. Atmos. Sci, 27 , 1035–1040.

  • Weygandt, S. S., A. Shapiro, and K. K. Droegemeier, 2002a: Retrieval of model initial fields from single-Doppler observations of a supercell thunderstorm. Part I: Single-Doppler velocity retrieval. Mon. Wea. Rev, 130 , 433–453.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weygandt, S. S., A. Shapiro, and K. K. Droegemeier, 2002b: Retrieval of model initial fields from single-Doppler observations of a supercell thunderstorm. Part II: Thermodynamic retrieval and numerical prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev, 130 , 454–476.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Xu, Q., C. Qiu, and J. Yu, 1994: Adjoint-method retrievals of low-altitude wind fields from single-Doppler reflectivity measured during Phoenix II. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol, 11 , 275–288.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Xue, M., K. K. Droegemeier, V. Wong, A. Shapiro, and K. Brewster, 1995: ARPS Version 4.0 User's Guide. 380 pp. [Available online at http://www.caps.ou.edu/ARPS.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Xue, M., K. K. Droegemeier, and V. Wong, 2000: The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS)—A multiscale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction tool. Part I: Model dynamics and verification. Meteor. Atmos. Phys, 75 , 161–193.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Xue, M., and Coauthors, 2001: The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS)—A multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction tool. Part II: Model physics and applications. Meteor. Atmos. Phys, 76 , 143–166.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Xue, M., D-H. Wang, J-D. Gao, K. Brewster, and K. K. Droegemeier, 2003: The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS), storm-scale numerical weather prediction and data assimilation. Meteor. Atmos. Phys, 82 , 139–170.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, F., C. Snyder, and J. Sun, 2004: Impacts of initial estimate and observations on the convective-scale data assimilation with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev, 132 , 1238–1253.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, J., 1999: Moisture and diabatic initialization based on radar and satellite observation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oklahoma, 194 pp.

  • Zhang, J., F. Carr, and K. Brewster, 1998: ADAS cloud analysis. Preprints, 12th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Phoenix, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 185–188.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1557 953 94
PDF Downloads 390 128 4