Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

3DVAR and Cloud Analysis with WSR-88D Level-II Data for the Prediction of the Fort Worth, Texas, Tornadic Thunderstorms. Part II: Impact of Radial Velocity Analysis via 3DVAR

Ming Hu Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms, and School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Ming Hu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Ming Xue Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms, and School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Ming Xue in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Jidong Gao Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Jidong Gao in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Keith Brewster Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Keith Brewster in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Feb 2006
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3093.1
Page(s):
699–721
Restricted access

Abstract

In this two-part paper, the impact of level-II Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) radar reflectivity and radial velocity data on the prediction of a cluster of tornadic thunderstorms in the Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) model is studied. Radar reflectivity data are used primarily in a cloud analysis procedure that retrieves the amount of hydrometeors and adjusts in-cloud temperature, moisture, and cloud fields, while radial velocity data are analyzed through a three-dimensional variational (3DVAR) data assimilation scheme that contains a 3D mass divergence constraint in the cost function. In Part I, the impact of the cloud analysis and modifications to the scheme are discussed. In this part, the impact of radial velocity data and the mass divergence constraint in the 3DVAR cost function are studied.

The case studied is that of the 28 March 2000 Fort Worth tornadoes. The addition of the radial velocity improves the forecasts beyond that experienced with the cloud analysis alone. The prediction is able to forecast the morphology of individual storm cells on the 3-km grid up to 2 h; the rotating supercell characteristics of the storm that spawned two tornadoes are well captured; timing errors in the forecast are less than 15 min and location errors are less than 10 km at the time of the tornadoes.

When forecasts were made with radial velocity assimilation but not reflectivity, they failed to predict nearly all storm cells. Using the current 3DVAR and cloud analysis procedure with 10-min intermittent assimilation cycles, reflectivity data are found to have a greater positive impact than radial velocity. The use of radial velocity does improve the storm forecast when combined with reflectivity assimilation, by, for example, improving the forecasting of the strong low-level vorticity centers associated with the tornadoes. Positive effects of including a mass divergence constraint in the 3DVAR cost function are also documented.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Ming Xue, School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, 100 East Boyd, Norman, OK 73019. Email: mxue@ou.edu

Abstract

In this two-part paper, the impact of level-II Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) radar reflectivity and radial velocity data on the prediction of a cluster of tornadic thunderstorms in the Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) model is studied. Radar reflectivity data are used primarily in a cloud analysis procedure that retrieves the amount of hydrometeors and adjusts in-cloud temperature, moisture, and cloud fields, while radial velocity data are analyzed through a three-dimensional variational (3DVAR) data assimilation scheme that contains a 3D mass divergence constraint in the cost function. In Part I, the impact of the cloud analysis and modifications to the scheme are discussed. In this part, the impact of radial velocity data and the mass divergence constraint in the 3DVAR cost function are studied.

The case studied is that of the 28 March 2000 Fort Worth tornadoes. The addition of the radial velocity improves the forecasts beyond that experienced with the cloud analysis alone. The prediction is able to forecast the morphology of individual storm cells on the 3-km grid up to 2 h; the rotating supercell characteristics of the storm that spawned two tornadoes are well captured; timing errors in the forecast are less than 15 min and location errors are less than 10 km at the time of the tornadoes.

When forecasts were made with radial velocity assimilation but not reflectivity, they failed to predict nearly all storm cells. Using the current 3DVAR and cloud analysis procedure with 10-min intermittent assimilation cycles, reflectivity data are found to have a greater positive impact than radial velocity. The use of radial velocity does improve the storm forecast when combined with reflectivity assimilation, by, for example, improving the forecasting of the strong low-level vorticity centers associated with the tornadoes. Positive effects of including a mass divergence constraint in the 3DVAR cost function are also documented.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Ming Xue, School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, 100 East Boyd, Norman, OK 73019. Email: mxue@ou.edu

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Albers, S. C., J. A. McGinley, D. A. Birkenheuer, and J. R. Smart, 1996: The local analysis and prediction system (LAPS): Analysis of clouds, precipitation and temperature. Wea. Forecasting, 11 , 273–287.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brewster, K., 1996: Application of a Bratseth analysis scheme including Doppler radar data. Preprints, 15th Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, Norfolk, VA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 92–95.

  • Davies-Jones, R., R. J. Trapp, and H. B. Bluestein, 2001: Tornadoes and tornadic storms. Severe Convective Storms, C. A. Doswell, Ed., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 167–221.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gao, J., M. Xue, A. Shapiro, and K. K. Droegemeier, 1999: A variational method for the analysis of three-dimensional wind fields from two Doppler radars. Mon. Wea. Rev, 127 , 2128–2142.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gao, J., M. Xue, K. Brewster, F. Carr, and K. K. Droegemeier, 2002: New development of a 3DVAR system for a nonhydrostatic NWP model. Preprints, 15th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction/19th Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 339–341.

  • Gao, J-D., M. Xue, K. Brewster, and K. K. Droegemeier, 2004: A three-dimensional variational data analysis method with recursive filter for Doppler radars. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol, 21 , 457–469.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Harris, B. A., and G. Kelly, 2001: A satellite radiance-bias correction scheme for data assimilation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 127 , 1453–1468.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hu, M., M. Xue, and K. Brewster, 2006: 3DVAR and cloud analysis with WSR-88D level-II data for the prediction of the Fort Worth, Texas, tornadic thunderstorms. Part I: Cloud analysis and its impact. Mon. Wea. Rev, 134 , 675–698.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schaefer, J. T., 1990: The critical success index as an indicator of warning skill. Wea. Forecasting, 5 , 570–575.

  • Smith Jr., P. L., C. G. Myers, and H. D. Orville, 1975: Radar reflectivity factor calculations in numerical cloud models using bulk parameterization of precipitation processes. J. Appl. Meteor, 14 , 1156–1165.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sun, J., and N. A. Crook, 1997: Dynamical and microphysical retrieval from Doppler radar observations using a cloud model and its adjoint. Part I: Model development and simulated data experiments. J. Atmos. Sci, 54 , 1642–1661.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Tong, M., and M. Xue, 2005: Ensemble Kalman filter assimilation of Doppler radar data with a compressible nonhydrostatic model: OSSE experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev, 133 , 1789–1807.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Xue, M., K. K. Droegemeier, V. Wong, A. Shapiro, and K. Brewster, 1995: ARPS Version 4.0 User's Guide. 380 pp. [Available online at http://www.caps.ou.edu/ARPS.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Xue, M., K. K. Droegemeier, and V. Wong, 2000: The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS)—A multiscale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction tool. Part I: Model dynamics and verification. Meteor. Atmos. Phys, 75 , 161–193.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Xue, M., and Coauthors, 2001: The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS)—A multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction tool. Part II: Model physics and applications. Meteor. Atmos. Phys, 76 , 143–166.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Xue, M., D-H. Wang, J-D. Gao, K. Brewster, and K. K. Droegemeier, 2003: The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS), storm-scale numerical weather prediction and data assimilation. Meteor. Atmos. Phys, 82 , 139–170.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, J., 1999: Moisture and diabatic initialization based on radar and satellite observation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oklahoma, 194 pp.

  • Zhang, J., F. Carr, and K. Brewster, 1998: ADAS cloud analysis. Preprints, 12th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Phoenix, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 185–188.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 721 399 24
PDF Downloads 222 77 6