Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Tests of an Ensemble Kalman Filter for Mesoscale and Regional-Scale Data Assimilation. Part II: Imperfect Model Experiments

Zhiyong Meng Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

Search for other papers by Zhiyong Meng in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Fuqing Zhang Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

Search for other papers by Fuqing Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Apr 2007
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3352.1
Page(s):
1403–1423
Restricted access

Abstract

In Part I of this two-part work, the feasibility of using an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) for mesoscale and regional-scale data assimilation through various observing system simulation experiments was demonstrated assuming a perfect forecast model for a winter snowstorm event that occurred on 24–26 January 2000. The current study seeks to explore the performance of the EnKF for the same event in the presence of significant model errors due to physical parameterizations by assimilating synthetic sounding and surface observations with typical temporal and spatial resolutions. The EnKF performance with imperfect models is also examined for a warm-season mesoscale convective vortex (MCV) event that occurred on 10–13 June 2003. The significance of model error in both warm- and cold-season events is demonstrated when the use of different cumulus parameterization schemes within different ensembles results in significantly different forecasts in terms of both ensemble mean and spread. Nevertheless, the EnKF performed reasonably well in most experiments with the imperfect model assumption (though its performance can sometimes be significantly degraded). As in Part I, where the perfect model assumption was utilized, most analysis error reduction comes from larger scales. Results show that using a combination of different physical parameterization schemes in the ensemble forecast can significantly improve filter performance. A multischeme ensemble has the potential to provide better background error covariance estimation and a smaller ensemble bias. There are noticeable differences in the performance of the EnKF for different flow regimes. In the imperfect scenarios considered, the improvement over the reference ensembles (pure ensemble forecasts without data assimilation) after 24 h of assimilation for the winter snowstorm event ranges from 36% to 67%. This is higher than the 26%–45% improvement noted after 36 h of assimilation for the warm-season MCV event. Scale- and flow-dependent error growth dynamics and predictability are possible causes for the differences in improvement. Compared to the power spectrum analyses for the snowstorm, it is found that forecast errors and ensemble spreads in the warm-season MCV event have relatively smaller power at larger scales and an overall smaller growth rate.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Fuqing Zhang, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845-3150. Email: fzhang@tamu.edu

Abstract

In Part I of this two-part work, the feasibility of using an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) for mesoscale and regional-scale data assimilation through various observing system simulation experiments was demonstrated assuming a perfect forecast model for a winter snowstorm event that occurred on 24–26 January 2000. The current study seeks to explore the performance of the EnKF for the same event in the presence of significant model errors due to physical parameterizations by assimilating synthetic sounding and surface observations with typical temporal and spatial resolutions. The EnKF performance with imperfect models is also examined for a warm-season mesoscale convective vortex (MCV) event that occurred on 10–13 June 2003. The significance of model error in both warm- and cold-season events is demonstrated when the use of different cumulus parameterization schemes within different ensembles results in significantly different forecasts in terms of both ensemble mean and spread. Nevertheless, the EnKF performed reasonably well in most experiments with the imperfect model assumption (though its performance can sometimes be significantly degraded). As in Part I, where the perfect model assumption was utilized, most analysis error reduction comes from larger scales. Results show that using a combination of different physical parameterization schemes in the ensemble forecast can significantly improve filter performance. A multischeme ensemble has the potential to provide better background error covariance estimation and a smaller ensemble bias. There are noticeable differences in the performance of the EnKF for different flow regimes. In the imperfect scenarios considered, the improvement over the reference ensembles (pure ensemble forecasts without data assimilation) after 24 h of assimilation for the winter snowstorm event ranges from 36% to 67%. This is higher than the 26%–45% improvement noted after 36 h of assimilation for the warm-season MCV event. Scale- and flow-dependent error growth dynamics and predictability are possible causes for the differences in improvement. Compared to the power spectrum analyses for the snowstorm, it is found that forecast errors and ensemble spreads in the warm-season MCV event have relatively smaller power at larger scales and an overall smaller growth rate.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Fuqing Zhang, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845-3150. Email: fzhang@tamu.edu

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Aksoy, A., F. Zhang, J. W. Nielsen-Gammon, and C. C. Epifanio, 2005: Data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter for thermally forced circulations. J. Geophys. Res., 110 .D16105, doi:10.1029/2004JD005718.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Aksoy, A., F. Zhang, and J. W. Nielsen-Gammon, 2006a: Ensemble-based simultaneous state and parameter estimation in a two-dimensional sea-breeze model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134 , 2951–2970.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Aksoy, A., F. Zhang, and J. W. Nielsen-Gammon, 2006b: Ensemble-based simultaneous state and parameter estimation with MM5. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33 .L12801, doi:10.1029/2006GL026186.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Anderson, J. L., 2001: An ensemble adjustment Kalman filter for data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129 , 2884–2903.

  • Arakawa, A., 2004: The cumulus parameterization problem: Past, present and future. J. Climate, 17 , 2493–2525.

  • Barker, D. M., W. Huang, Y-R. Guo, A. J. Bourgeois, and Q. N. Xiao, 2004: A three-dimensional variational data assimilation system for MM5: Implementation and initial results. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132 , 897–914.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Caya, A., J. Sun, and C. Snyder, 2005: A comparison between the 4DVAR and the ensemble Kalman filter techniques for radar data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133 , 3081–3094.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cotton, W. R., and R. A. Anthes, 1989: Storm and Cloud Dynamics. Academic Press, 883 pp.

  • Daley, R., and R. Menard, 1993: Spectral characteristics of Kalman filter systems for atmospheric data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121 , 1554–1565.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dirren, S., R. D. Torn, and G. J. Hakim, 2007: A data assimilation case study using a limited-area ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135 , 1455–1473.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dowell, D., F. Zhang, L. J. Wicker, C. Snyder, and N. A. Crook, 2004: Wind and temperature retrievals in the 17 May 1981 Arcadia, Oklahoma, supercell: Ensemble Kalman filter experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132 , 1982–2005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dudhia, J., 1993: A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State–NCAR mesoscale model: Validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121 , 1493–1513.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Evans, R. E., M. S. J. Harrison, R. J. Graham, and K. R. Mylne, 2000: Joint medium-range ensembles from the Met Office and ECMWF systems. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128 , 3104–3127.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Evensen, G., 1994: Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics. J. Geophys. Res., 99 , 10143–10162.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Evensen, G., 2003: The ensemble Kalman filter: Theoretical formulation and practical implementation. Ocean Dyn., 53 , 343–367.

  • Fujita, T., D. J. Stensrud, and D. C. Dowell, 2005: Surface data assimilation using an ensemble Kalman filter approach with initial condition and model physics uncertainties. Preprints, 11th Conf. on Mesoscale Processes, Alberqueque, NM, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, 1M.3.

  • Gaspari, G., and S. E. Cohn, 1999: Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125 , 723–757.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Grell, G. A., and D. Devenyi, 2002: A generalized approach to parameterizing convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniques. Geophys. Res. Lett., 29 .1693, doi:10.1029/2002GL015311.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Grell, G. A., J. Dudhia, and D. R. Stauffer, 1994: A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-398+STR, 117 pp.

  • Hamill, T. M., 2006: Ensemble-based atmospheric data assimilation. Predictability of Weather and Climate, T. Palmer and R. Hagedorn, Eds., Cambridge University Press, 124–156.

  • Hamill, T. M., and C. Snyder, 2000: A hybrid ensemble Kalman filter—3D variational analysis scheme. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128 , 2905–2919.

  • Hamill, T. M., and J. S. Whitaker, 2005: Accounting for the error due to unresolved scales in ensemble data assimilation: A comparison of different approaches. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133 , 3132–3147.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hansen, J. A., 2002: Accounting for model error in ensemble-based state estimation and forecasting. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130 , 2373–2391.

  • Hawblitzel, D. P., F. Zhang, Z. Meng, and C. A. Davis, 2007: Probabilistic evaluation of the dynamics and predictability of the meoscale convective vortex of 10–13 June 2003. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135 , 1544–1563.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Houtekamer, P. L., and L. Lefaivre, 1997: Using ensemble forecasts for model validation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125 , 2416–2426.

  • Houtekamer, P. L., and H. L. Mitchell, 1998: Data assimilation using an ensemble Kalman filter technique. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126 , 796–811.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Houtekamer, P. L., L. Lefaivre, J. Derome, H. Ritchie, and H. L. Mitchell, 1996: A system simulation approach to ensemble prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124 , 1225–1242.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Houtekamer, P. L., H. L. Mitchell, G. Pellerin, M. Buehner, M. Charron, L. Spacek, and B. Hansen, 2005: Atmospheric data assimilation with an ensemble Kalman filter: Results with real observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133 , 604–620.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Keppenne, C. L., 2000: Data assimilation into a primitive-equation model with a parallel ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128 , 1971–1981.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Keppenne, C. L., and M. M. Rienecker, 2003: Assimilation of temperature into an isopycnal ocean general circulation model using a parallel Ensemble Kalman Filter. J. Mar. Syst., 40–41 , 363–380.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Krishnamurti, T. N., C. M. Krishtawal, Z. Zhang, T. LaRow, D. Bachiochi, E. Williford, S. Gadgil, and S. Surendran, 2000: Multimodel ensemble forecasts for weather and seasonal climate. J. Climate, 13 , 4196–4216.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lorenc, A. C., 2003: The potential of the ensemble Kalman filter for NWP—A comparison with 4Dvar. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129 , 3183–3203.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mitchell, H. L., P. L. Houtekamer, and G. Pellerin, 2002: Ensemble size, balance, and model-error representation in an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130 , 2791–2808.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Molinari, J., and T. Corsetti, 1985: Incorporation of cloud-scale and mesoscale downdrafts into a cumulus parameterization: Results of one- and three-dimensional integrations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 113 , 485–501.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Molinari, J., and M. Dudek, 1992: Parameterization of convective precipitation in mesoscale numerical models: A critical review. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120 , 326–344.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Orrell, D., 2002: Role of the metric in forecast error growth: How chaotic is the weather? Tellus, 54A , 350–362.

  • Orrell, D., L. A. Smith, J. Barkmeijer, and T. N. Palmer, 2001: Model error in weather forecasting. Nonlinear Proc. Geophys., 8 , 357–371.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Palmer, T. N., 2001: A nonlinear dynamical perspective on model error: A proposal for non-local stochastic-dynamic parameterization in weather and climate prediction models. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127 , 279–304.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Simmons, A. J., and A. Hollingsworth, 2002: Some aspects of the improvement in skill of numerical weather prediction. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128 , 647–677.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Snyder, C., and F. Zhang, 2003: Assimilation of simulated Doppler radar observations with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131 , 1663–1677.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stensrud, D. J., J-W. Bao, and T. T. Warner, 2000: Using initial condition and model physics perturbations in short-range ensemble simulations of mesoscale convective systems. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128 , 2077–2107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Tong, M., and M. Xue, 2005: Ensemble Kalman filter assimilation of Doppler radar data with a compressible nonhydrostatic model: OSS experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133 , 1789–1807.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wang, W., and N. L. Seaman, 1997: A comparison study of convective parameterization schemes in a mesoscale model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125 , 252–278.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Whitaker, J. S., and T. M. Hamill, 2002: Ensemble data assimilation without perturbed observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130 , 1913–1924.

  • Whitaker, J. S., G. P. Compo, X. Wei, and T. M. Hamill, 2004: Reanalysis without radiosondes using ensemble data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132 , 1190–1200.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, F., 2005: Dynamics and structure of mesoscale error covariance of a winter cyclone estimated through short-range ensemble forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133 , 2876–2893.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, F., C. Snyder, and R. Rotunno, 2002: Mesoscale predictability of the “surprise” snowstorm of 24–25 January 2000. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130 , 1617–1632.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, F., C. Snyder, and R. Rotunno, 2003: Effects of moist convection on mesoscale predictability. J. Atmos. Sci., 60 , 1173–1185.

  • Zhang, F., C. Snyder, and J. Sun, 2004: Impacts of initial estimate and observation availability on convective-scale data assimilation with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132 , 1238–1253.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, F., Z. Meng, and A. Aksoy, 2006a: Tests of an ensemble Kalman filter for mesoscale and regional-scale data assimilation. Part I: Perfect model experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134 , 722–736.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, F., A. Odins, and J. W. Nielsen-Gammon, 2006b: Mesoscale predictability of an extreme warm-season precipitation event. Wea. Forecasting, 21 , 149–166.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, S., and J. L. Anderson, 2003: Impact of spatially and temporally varying estimates of error covariance on assimilation in a simple atmospheric model. Tellus, 55A , 126–147.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 771 252 15
PDF Downloads 317 81 4