The Characteristics of Key Analysis Errors. Part III: A Diagnosis of Their Evolution

Jean-François Caron Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada

Search for other papers by Jean-François Caron in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. K. Yau Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada

Search for other papers by M. K. Yau in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Stéphane Laroche Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Environment Canada, Dorval, Québec, Canada

Search for other papers by Stéphane Laroche in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This paper presents a diagnostic study of the evolution of initial corrections obtained from the key analysis error algorithm that minimizes the short-range (24 h) forecast errors for four specific events poorly forecasted over the eastern part of North America. A potential vorticity (PV) perspective is employed. It is shown that the modification to the low-level structure at the initial time is mainly attributed to the modification of the low-level PV distribution, while changes in the upper-level structure are attributed to the modification of the upper-level PV distribution. The low-level corrections grow mainly through background surface potential temperature advection by the wind corrections attributable to the interior PV corrections. Changes in the diabatic processes and the vertical alignment of low-level PV corrections by differential PV advection also increase the magnitude of the low-level corrections with time. The upper-level corrections grow by advection of background PV from wind corrections. However, the cause of these latter wind corrections responsible for upper-level background PV advection varies from case to case. An investigation of the relative importance of the low-level and of the upper-level initial corrections to produce the final-time corrections also reveals strong variability between cases. Finally, comparison of two cases in which the key analysis errors propagate vertically with two others without significant vertical propagation shows how the relative position of the key analysis errors with respect to the structure of the background flow can influence the evolution of the initial corrections.

Corresponding author address: Jean-François Caron, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Environment Canada, 2121 route Transcanadienne, Dorval, QC H9P 1J3, Canada. Email: jean-francois.caron@ec.gc.ca

Abstract

This paper presents a diagnostic study of the evolution of initial corrections obtained from the key analysis error algorithm that minimizes the short-range (24 h) forecast errors for four specific events poorly forecasted over the eastern part of North America. A potential vorticity (PV) perspective is employed. It is shown that the modification to the low-level structure at the initial time is mainly attributed to the modification of the low-level PV distribution, while changes in the upper-level structure are attributed to the modification of the upper-level PV distribution. The low-level corrections grow mainly through background surface potential temperature advection by the wind corrections attributable to the interior PV corrections. Changes in the diabatic processes and the vertical alignment of low-level PV corrections by differential PV advection also increase the magnitude of the low-level corrections with time. The upper-level corrections grow by advection of background PV from wind corrections. However, the cause of these latter wind corrections responsible for upper-level background PV advection varies from case to case. An investigation of the relative importance of the low-level and of the upper-level initial corrections to produce the final-time corrections also reveals strong variability between cases. Finally, comparison of two cases in which the key analysis errors propagate vertically with two others without significant vertical propagation shows how the relative position of the key analysis errors with respect to the structure of the background flow can influence the evolution of the initial corrections.

Corresponding author address: Jean-François Caron, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Environment Canada, 2121 route Transcanadienne, Dorval, QC H9P 1J3, Canada. Email: jean-francois.caron@ec.gc.ca

Save
  • Badger, J., and B. J. Hoskins, 2001: Simple initial value problems and mechanisms for baroclinic growth. J. Atmos. Sci., 58 , 3849.

  • Balasubramanian, G., and M. K. Yau, 1994: The effects of convection on a simulated marine cyclone. J. Atmos. Sci., 51 , 23972417.

  • Buizza, R., and T. N. Palmer, 1995: The singular-vector structure of the atmospheric global circulation. J. Atmos. Sci., 52 , 14341456.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Caron, J-F., P. Zwack, and C. Pagé, cited. 2005: DIONYSOS: A diagnostic tool for numerically-simulated weather systems. Tech. Memo., 45 pp. [Available online at http://www.dionysos.uqam.ca/doc/Dionysos.pdf.].

  • Caron, J-F., M. K. Yau, S. Laroche, and P. Zwack, 2007a: The characteristics of key analysis errors. Part I: Dynamical balance and comparison with observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135 , 249266.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Caron, J-F., M. K. Yau, S. Laroche, and P. Zwack, 2007b: The characteristics of key analysis errors. Part II: The importance of the PV corrections and the impact of balance. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135 , 267280.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Charney, J., 1955: The use of the primitive equations of motion in numerical prediction. Tellus, 7 , 2226.

  • Côté, J., S. Gravel, A. Méthot, A. Patoine, M. Roch, and A. Staniforth, 1998: The operational CMC–MRB global environmental multiscale (GEM) model. Part I: Design considerations and formulation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126 , 13731395.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davis, C. A., 1992: Piecewise potential vorticity inversion. J. Atmos. Sci., 49 , 13971411.

  • Davis, C. A., and K. A. Emanuel, 1991: Potential vorticity diagnostics of cyclogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 119 , 19291953.

  • Davis, C. A., M. T. Stoelinga, and Y-H. Kuo, 1993: The integrated effect of condensation in numerical simulations of extratropical cyclogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121 , 23092330.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ertel, H., 1942: Ein neuer hydrodynamisher wirbelsatz. Meteor. Z., 59 , 271281.

  • Gauthier, P., C. Charette, L. Fillion, P. Koclas, and S. Laroche, 1999: Implementation of a 3D variational data assimilation system at the Canadian Meteorological Centre. Part I: The global analysis. Atmos.–Ocean, 37 , 103156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gelaro, R., R. Buizza, T. N. Palmer, and E. Klinker, 1998: Sensitivity analysis of forecast errors and the construction of optimal perturbations using singular vectors. J. Atmos. Sci., 55 , 10121037.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoskins, B. J., M. E. McIntyre, and A. W. Robertson, 1985: On the use and significance of isentropic potential vorticity maps. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 111 , 877946.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoskins, B. J., R. Buizza, and J. Badger, 2000: The nature of singular vector growth and structure. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126 , 15651580.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huo, Z., D-L. Zhang, and J. R. Gyakum, 1999: Interaction of potential vorticity anomalies in extratropical cyclogenesis. Part I: Static piecewise inversion. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127 , 25462562.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Isaksen, L., M. Fisher, E. Andersson, and J. Barkmeijer, 2005: The structure and realism of sensitivity perturbations and their interpretation as “key analysis errors.”. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131 , 30533078.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jones, S. C., 1995: The evolution of vortices in vertical shear. I: Initially barotropic vortices. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 121 , 821851.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klinker, E., F. Rabier, and R. Gelaro, 1998: Estimation of key analysis errors using the adjoint technique. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124 , 19091933.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Laroche, S., M. Tanguay, A. Zadra, and J. Morneau, 2002: Use of adjoint sensitivity to diagnose the CMC global analysis performance. Atmos.–Ocean, 40 , 423443.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Montani, A., and A. J. Thorpe, 2002: Mechanism leading to singular-vector growth for FASTEX cyclones. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128 , 131148.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morgan, M. C., 2001: A potential vorticity and wave activity diagnosis of optimal perturbation evolution. J. Atmos. Sci., 58 , 25182544.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pu, Z-X., E. Kalnay, J. Sela, and I. Szunyogh, 1997: Sensitivity of forecast errors to initial conditions with a quasi-inverse linear model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125 , 24792503.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reynolds, C. A., R. Gelaro, and J. D. Doyle, 2001: Relationship between singular vectors and transient features in the background flow. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127 , 17311760.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 86 39 0
PDF Downloads 48 18 0