Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Evaluation of the Ensemble Transform Analysis Perturbation Scheme at NRL

Justin G. McLay NRC/Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, California

Search for other papers by Justin G. McLay in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Craig H. Bishop Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, California

Search for other papers by Craig H. Bishop in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Carolyn A. Reynolds Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, California

Search for other papers by Carolyn A. Reynolds in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Mar 2008
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007MWR2010.1
Page(s):
1093–1108
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

The ensemble transform (ET) scheme changes forecast perturbations into analysis perturbations whose amplitudes and directions are consistent with a user-provided estimate of analysis error covariance. A practical demonstration of the ET scheme was undertaken using Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) Atmospheric Variational Data Assimilation System (NAVDAS) analysis error variance estimates and the Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System (NOGAPS) numerical weather prediction (NWP) model. It was found that the ET scheme produced forecast ensembles that were comparable to or better in a variety of measures than those produced by the Fleet Numerical and Oceanography Center (FNMOC) bred-growing modes (BGM) scheme. Also, the demonstration showed that the introduction of stochastic perturbations into the ET forecast ensembles led to a substantial improvement in the agreement between the ET and NAVDAS analysis error variances. This finding is strong evidence that even a small-sized ET ensemble is capable of obtaining good agreement between the ET and NAVDAS analysis error variances, provided that NWP model deficiencies are accounted for. Last, since the NAVDAS analysis error covariance estimate is diagonal and hence ignores multivariate correlations, it was of interest to examine the ET analysis perturbations’ spatial correlation. Tests showed that the ET analysis perturbations exhibited statistically significant, realistic multivariate correlations.

Corresponding author address: Justin G. McLay, Naval Research Laboratory, 7 Grace Hopper Ave., Stop 2, Monterey, CA 93943-5502. Email: mclay@nrlmry.navy.mil

Abstract

The ensemble transform (ET) scheme changes forecast perturbations into analysis perturbations whose amplitudes and directions are consistent with a user-provided estimate of analysis error covariance. A practical demonstration of the ET scheme was undertaken using Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) Atmospheric Variational Data Assimilation System (NAVDAS) analysis error variance estimates and the Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System (NOGAPS) numerical weather prediction (NWP) model. It was found that the ET scheme produced forecast ensembles that were comparable to or better in a variety of measures than those produced by the Fleet Numerical and Oceanography Center (FNMOC) bred-growing modes (BGM) scheme. Also, the demonstration showed that the introduction of stochastic perturbations into the ET forecast ensembles led to a substantial improvement in the agreement between the ET and NAVDAS analysis error variances. This finding is strong evidence that even a small-sized ET ensemble is capable of obtaining good agreement between the ET and NAVDAS analysis error variances, provided that NWP model deficiencies are accounted for. Last, since the NAVDAS analysis error covariance estimate is diagonal and hence ignores multivariate correlations, it was of interest to examine the ET analysis perturbations’ spatial correlation. Tests showed that the ET analysis perturbations exhibited statistically significant, realistic multivariate correlations.

Corresponding author address: Justin G. McLay, Naval Research Laboratory, 7 Grace Hopper Ave., Stop 2, Monterey, CA 93943-5502. Email: mclay@nrlmry.navy.mil

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Anderson, J. L., 1997: The impact of dynamical constraints on the selection of initial conditions for ensemble predictions: Low-order perfect model results. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125 , 2969–2983.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bishop, C. H., and Z. Toth, 1999: Ensemble transformation and adaptive observations. J. Atmos. Sci., 56 , 1748–1765.

  • Daley, R., and E. Barker, 2001: NAVDAS source book 2001. Naval Research Laboratory Rep. NRL/PU/7530–01-441, 161 pp.

  • Ehrendorfer, M., and J. J. Tribbia, 1997: Optimal prediction of forecast error covariances through singular vectors. J. Atmos. Sci., 54 , 286–313.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Emanuel, K. A., and M. Zivkovic-Rothman, 1999: Development and evaluation of a convection scheme for use in climate models. J. Atmos. Sci., 56 , 1766–1782.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gelaro, R., T. Rosmond, and R. Daley, 2002: Singular vector calculations with an analysis error variance metric. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130 , 1166–1186.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Harshvardhan, R. Davies, D. A. Randall, and T. G. Corsetti, 1987: A fast radiation parameterization for atmospheric circulation models. J. Geophys. Res., 92 , 1009–1016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hodur, R. M., 1997: The Naval Research Laboratory’s Coupled Ocean/Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS). Mon. Wea. Rev., 125 , 1414–1430.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hogan, T. F., and T. E. Rosmond, 1991: The description of the Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System’s spectral forecast model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 119 , 1786–1815.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Houtekamer, P. L., and J. Derome, 1995: Methods for ensemble prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123 , 2181–2196.

  • Houtekamer, P. L., L. Lefaivre, J. Derome, H. Ritchie, and H. L. Mitchell, 1996: A system simulation approach to ensemble prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124 , 1225–1242.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Leith, C. E., 1974: Theoretical skill of Monte Carlo forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 102 , 409–418.

  • Louis, J. F., M. Tiedtke, and J. F. Geleyn, 1982: A short history of the operational PBL parameterization at ECMWF. Proc. ECMWF Workshop on Planetary Boundary Parameterization, Reading, United Kingdom, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, 59–79.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McLay, J. G., C. H. Bishop, and C. A. Reynolds, 2007: The ensemble-transform scheme adapted for the generation of stochastic forecast perturbations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133 , 1257–1266.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Molteni, F., R. Buizza, T. N. Palmer, and T. Petroliagis, 1996: The ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System: Methodology and validation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122 , 73–119.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Reynolds, C. A., R. Gelaro, and T. E. Rosmond, 2005: A comparison of variance and total-energy singular vectors. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131 , 1955–1973.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Teixeira, J., and T. F. Hogan, 2002: Boundary layer clouds in a global atmospheric model: Simple cloud cover parameterizations. J. Climate, 15 , 1261–1276.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Toth, Z., and E. Kalnay, 1997: Ensemble forecasting at NCEP and the breeding method. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125 , 3297–3319.

  • Vautard, R., K. C. Mo, and M. Ghil, 1990: Statistical significance test for transition matrices of atmospheric Markov chains. J. Atmos. Sci., 47 , 1926–1931.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wang, X., and C. H. Bishop, 2003: A comparison of breeding and ensemble transform Kalman filter ensemble forecast schemes. J. Atmos. Sci., 60 , 1140–1158.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wang, X., C. H. Bishop, and S. J. Julier, 2004: Which is better, an ensemble of positive–negative pairs or a centered spherical simplex ensemble? Mon. Wea. Rev., 132 , 1590–1605.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wei, M., Z. Toth, R. Wobus, Y. Zhu, and C. H. Bishop, 2004: Initial perturbations for the NCEP ensemble forecast system. Proc. First THORPEX Int. Science Symp., Montreal, QC, Canada, World Meteorological Organization, 227–230.

  • Wei, M., Z. Toth, R. Wobus, and Y. Zhu, 2006: Initial perturbations based on the ensemble transform (ET) technique in the NCEP global ensemble forecast system. NOAA/NCEP Office Note 453, 33 pp.

  • Wilks, D. S., 2006: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences. 2nd ed. Academic Press, 627 pp.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1046 792 447
PDF Downloads 110 39 3