Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Reducing Forecast Errors Due to Model Imperfections Using Ensemble Kalman Filtering

Hiroshi Koyama Graduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, and Center for Climate System Research, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan

Search for other papers by Hiroshi Koyama in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Masahiro Watanabe Center for Climate System Research, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan

Search for other papers by Masahiro Watanabe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Aug 2010
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010MWR3067.1
Page(s):
3316–3332
Restricted access

Abstract

A method is introduced for reducing forecast errors in an extended-range to one-month forecast based on an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF). The prediction skill in such a forecast is typically affected not only by the accuracy of initial conditions but also by the model imperfections. Hence, to improve the forecast in imperfect models, the framework of EnKF is modified by using a state augmentation method. The method includes an adaptive parameter estimation that optimizes mismatched model parameters and a model ensemble initialized with the perturbed model parameter. The main features are the combined ensemble forecast of the initial condition and the parameter, and the assimilation for time-varying parameters with a theoretical basis.

First, the method is validated in the imperfect Lorenz ’96 model constructed by parameterizing the small-scale variable of the perfect model. The results indicate a reduction in the ensemble-mean forecast error and the optimization of the ensemble spread. It is found that the time-dependent parameter estimation contributes to reduce the forecast error with a lead time shorter than one week, whereas the model ensemble is effective for improving a forecast with a longer lead time. Moreover, the parameter assimilation is useful when model imperfections have a longer time scale than the forecast lead time, and the model ensemble appears to be relevant in any time scale. Preliminary results using a low-resolution atmospheric general circulation model that implements this method support some of the above findings.

Corresponding author address: Hiroshi Koyama, Center for Climate System Research, University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8568, Japan. Email: koyama@ccsr.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Abstract

A method is introduced for reducing forecast errors in an extended-range to one-month forecast based on an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF). The prediction skill in such a forecast is typically affected not only by the accuracy of initial conditions but also by the model imperfections. Hence, to improve the forecast in imperfect models, the framework of EnKF is modified by using a state augmentation method. The method includes an adaptive parameter estimation that optimizes mismatched model parameters and a model ensemble initialized with the perturbed model parameter. The main features are the combined ensemble forecast of the initial condition and the parameter, and the assimilation for time-varying parameters with a theoretical basis.

First, the method is validated in the imperfect Lorenz ’96 model constructed by parameterizing the small-scale variable of the perfect model. The results indicate a reduction in the ensemble-mean forecast error and the optimization of the ensemble spread. It is found that the time-dependent parameter estimation contributes to reduce the forecast error with a lead time shorter than one week, whereas the model ensemble is effective for improving a forecast with a longer lead time. Moreover, the parameter assimilation is useful when model imperfections have a longer time scale than the forecast lead time, and the model ensemble appears to be relevant in any time scale. Preliminary results using a low-resolution atmospheric general circulation model that implements this method support some of the above findings.

Corresponding author address: Hiroshi Koyama, Center for Climate System Research, University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8568, Japan. Email: koyama@ccsr.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Anderson, J. L., and S. L. Anderson, 1999: A Monte Carlo implementation of the nonlinear filtering problem to produce ensemble assimilations and forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127 , 2741–2758.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Annan, J. D., and J. C. Hargreaves, 2004: Efficient parameter estimation for a highly chaotic system. Tellus, 56A , 520–526.

  • Annan, J. D., D. J. Lunt, J. C. Hargreaves, and P. J. Valdes, 2005: Parameter estimation in an atmospheric GCM using the ensemble Kalman filter. Nonlinear Processes Geophys., 12 , 363–371.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Baek, S-J., B. R. Hunt, E. Kalnay, E. Ott, and I. Szunyogh, 2006: Local ensemble Kalman filtering in the presence of model bias. Tellus, 58A , 293–306.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cohn, S. E., 1997: An introduction to estimation theory. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 75 , 257–288.

  • Dee, D., and A. M. da Silva, 1998: Data assimilation in the presence of forecast bias. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124 , 269–295.

  • Evensen, G., 1994: Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics. J. Geophys. Res., 99 , (C5). 10143–10162.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fertig, E. J., and Coauthors, 2009: Observation bias correction with an ensemble Kalman filter. Tellus, 61A , 210–226.

  • Fujita, T., D. J. Stensrud, and D. C. Dowell, 2007: Surface data assimilation using an ensemble Kalman filter approach with initial condition and model physics uncertainties. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135 , 1846–1868.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gaspari, G., and S. E. Cohn, 1999: Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125 , 723–757.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gillijns, S., and B. De Moor, 2007: Model error estimation in ensemble data assimilation. Nonlinear Processes Geophys., 14 , 59–71.

  • Hamill, T. M., J. S. Whitaker, and C. Snyder, 2001: Distance-dependent filtering of background error covariance estimates in an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129 , 2776–2790.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hasumi, H., and S. Emori, 2004: K-1 coupled model (MIROC) description. K-1 Tech. Rep. 1, Center for Climate System Research, University of Tokyo, 34 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hunt, B. R., E. J. Kostelich, and I. Szunyogh, 2007: Efficient data assimilation for spatiotemporal chaos: A local ensemble transform Kalman filter. Physica D, 230 , 112–126.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kondrashov, D., C. J. Sun, and M. Ghil, 2008: Data assimilation for a coupled ocean-atmosphere model. Part II: Parameter estimation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136 , 5062–5076.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lorenz, E. N., 1963: Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci., 20 , 130–141.

  • Lorenz, E. N., 1996: Predictability: A problem partly solved. Proc. Seminar on Predictability, Vol. 1, Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom, ECMWF, 1–18.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lorenz, E. N., and K. A. Emanuel, 1998: Optimal sites for supplementary observation sites: Simulation with a small model. J. Atmos. Sci., 55 , 399–414.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Miyoshi, T., and S. Yamane, 2007: Local ensemble transform Kalman filtering with an AGCM at a T159/L48 resolution. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135 , 3841–3861.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Miyoshi, T., S. Yamane, and T. Enomoto, 2007: Localizing the error covariance by physical distances within a local ensemble transform Kalman filter (LETKF). SOLA, 3 , 89–92.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Orrell, D., 2003: Model error and predictability over different timescales in the Lorenz ’96 systems. J. Atmos. Sci., 60 , 2219–2228.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rodwell, M. J., and T. N. Palmer, 2007: Using numerical weather prediction to assess climate models. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133 , 129–146.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Roulston, M. S., and L. A. Smith, 2003: Combining dynamical and statistical ensembles. Tellus, 55A , 16–30.

  • Smith, L. A., 2000: Disentangling uncertainty and error: On the predictability of nonlinear systems. Nonlinear Dynamics and Statistics, A. Mees, Ed., Birkhauser, 31–64.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Whitaker, J. S., and T. M. Hamill, 2002: Ensemble data assimilation without perturbed observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130 , 1913–1924.

  • Ziehmann, C., 2000: Comparison of a single-model EPS with a multi-model ensemble consisting of a few operational models. Tellus, 52A , 280–299.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zupanski, D., and M. Zupanski, 2006: Model error estimation employing ensemble data assimilation approach. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134 , 1337–1354.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 450 110 7
PDF Downloads 316 74 9