Intercomparison of an Ensemble Kalman Filter with Three- and Four-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation Methods in a Limited-Area Model over the Month of June 2003

Meng Zhang Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Meng Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Fuqing Zhang Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Fuqing Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Xiang-Yu Huang National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Xiang-Yu Huang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Xin Zhang National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Xin Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This study compares the performance of an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) with both the three-dimensional and four-dimensional variational data assimilation (3DVar and 4DVar) methods of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model over the contiguous United States in a warm-season month (June) of 2003. The data assimilated every 6 h include conventional sounding and surface observations as well as data from wind profilers, ships and aircraft, and the cloud-tracked winds from satellites. The performances of these methods are evaluated through verifying the 12- to 72-h forecasts initialized twice daily from the analysis of each method against the standard sounding observations. It is found that 4DVar has consistently smaller error than that of 3DVar for winds and temperature at all forecast lead times except at 60 and 72 h when their forecast errors become comparable in amplitude, while the two schemes have similar performance in moisture at all lead times. The forecast error of the EnKF is comparable to that of the 4DVar at 12–36-h lead times, both of which are substantially smaller than that of the 3DVar, despite the fact that 3DVar fits the sounding observations much more closely at the analysis time. The advantage of the EnKF becomes even more evident at 48–72-h lead times; the 72-h forecast error of the EnKF is comparable in magnitude to the 48-h error of 3DVar/4DVar.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Fuqing Zhang, Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802. Email: fzhang@psu.edu

Abstract

This study compares the performance of an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) with both the three-dimensional and four-dimensional variational data assimilation (3DVar and 4DVar) methods of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model over the contiguous United States in a warm-season month (June) of 2003. The data assimilated every 6 h include conventional sounding and surface observations as well as data from wind profilers, ships and aircraft, and the cloud-tracked winds from satellites. The performances of these methods are evaluated through verifying the 12- to 72-h forecasts initialized twice daily from the analysis of each method against the standard sounding observations. It is found that 4DVar has consistently smaller error than that of 3DVar for winds and temperature at all forecast lead times except at 60 and 72 h when their forecast errors become comparable in amplitude, while the two schemes have similar performance in moisture at all lead times. The forecast error of the EnKF is comparable to that of the 4DVar at 12–36-h lead times, both of which are substantially smaller than that of the 3DVar, despite the fact that 3DVar fits the sounding observations much more closely at the analysis time. The advantage of the EnKF becomes even more evident at 48–72-h lead times; the 72-h forecast error of the EnKF is comparable in magnitude to the 48-h error of 3DVar/4DVar.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Fuqing Zhang, Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802. Email: fzhang@psu.edu

Save
  • Barker, D. M. , W. Huang , Y.-R. Guo , A. Bourgeois , and Q. N. Xiao , 2004: A three-dimensional variational data assimilation system for MM5: Implementation and initial results. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132 , 897914.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buehner, M. , P. L. Houtekamer , C. Charette , H. L. Mitchell , and B. He , 2010a: Intercomparison of variational data assimilation and the ensemble Kalman filter for global deterministic NWP. Part I: Description and single-observation experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138 , 15501566.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buehner, M. , P. L. Houtekamer , C. Charette , H. L. Mitchell , and B. He , 2010b: Intercomparison of variational data assimilation and the ensemble Kalman filter for global deterministic NWP. Part II: One-month experiments with real observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138 , 15671586.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Caya, A. , J. Sun , and C. Snyder , 2005: A comparison between the 4DVAR and the ensemble Kalman filter techniques for radar data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133 , 30813094.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davis, C. , and Coauthors , 2004: The Bow-Echo and MCV Experiment: Observations and opportunities. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 85 , 10751093.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Evensen, G. , 1994: Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics. J. Geophys. Res., 99 , 1014310162.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gaspari, G. , and S. E. Cohn , 1999: Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125 , 723757.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hawblitzel, D. P. , F. Zhang , Z. Meng , and C. A. Davis , 2007: Probabilistic evaluation of the dynamics and predictability of a mesoscale convective vortex of 10–13 June 2003. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135 , 15441563.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Houtekamer, P. L. , H. L. Mitchell , G. Pellerin , M. Buehner , M. Charron , L. Spacek , and B. Hansen , 2005: Atmospheric data assimilation with an ensemble Kalman filter: Results with real observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133 , 604620.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huang, X.-Y. , and Coauthors , 2009: Four-dimensional variational data assimilation for WRF: Formulation and preliminary results. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137 , 299314.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meng, Z. , and F. Zhang , 2008a: Tests of an ensemble Kalman filter for mesoscale and regional-scale data assimilation. Part III: Comparison with 3DVAR in a real-data case study. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136 , 522540.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meng, Z. , and F. Zhang , 2008b: Tests of an ensemble Kalman filter for mesoscale and regional-scale data assimilation. Part IV: Comparison with 3DVAR in a month-long experiment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136 , 36713682.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miyoshi, T. , Y. Sato , and T. Kadowaki , 2010: Ensemble Kalman filter and 4D-Var intercomparison with the Japanese operational global analysis and prediction system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138 , 28462866.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parrish, D. F. , and J. C. Derber , 1992: The National Meteorological Center’s spectral statistical-interpolation analysis system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120 , 17471763.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Skamarock, W. C. , J. B. Klemp , J. Dudhia , D. O. Gill , D. M. Barker , W. Wang , and J. G. Powers , 2005: A description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2. NCAR Tech. Note 468+STR, 88 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Torn, R. D. , and G. J. Hakim , 2008: Performance characteristics of a pseudo-operational ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136 , 39473963.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, X. , D. M. Barker , C. Snyder , and T. M. Hamill , 2008: A hybrid ETKF–3DVAR data assimilation scheme for the WRF model. Part II: Real observation experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136 , 51325147.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Whitaker, J. S. , T. M. Hamill , X. Wei , Y. Song , and Z. Toth , 2008: Ensemble data assimilation with the NCEP global forecast system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136 , 463482.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yang, S.-C. , M. Corazza , A. Carrassi , E. Kalnay , and T. Miyoshi , 2009: Comparison of local ensemble transform Kalman filter, 3DVAR, and 4DVAR in a quasigeostrophic model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137 , 693709.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, F. , C. Snyder , and J. Sun , 2004: Impacts of initial estimate and observation availability on convective-scale data assimilation with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132 , 12381253.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, F. , M. Zhang , and J. A. Hansen , 2009: Coupling ensemble Kalman filter with four-dimensional variational data assimilation. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 26 , 18.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 431 178 34
PDF Downloads 271 95 5