Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

A Study on the Reduction of Forecast Error Variance by Three Adaptive Observation Approaches for Tropical Cyclone Prediction

Xiaohao Qin LASG, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Search for other papers by Xiaohao Qin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Mu Mu Key Laboratory of Ocean Circulation and Wave, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China

Search for other papers by Mu Mu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jul 2011
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010MWR3327.1
Page(s):
2218–2232
Restricted access

Abstract

Three adaptive approaches for tropical cyclone prediction are compared in this study: the conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation (CNOP) method, the first singular vector (FSV) method, and the ensemble transform Kalman filter (ETKF) method. These approaches are compared for 36-h forecasts of three northwest Pacific tropical cyclones (TCs): Matsa (2005), Nock-Ten (2004), and Morakot (2009). The sensitive regions identified by each method are obtained. The CNOPs form an annulus around the storm at the targeting time, the FSV targets areas north of the storm, and the ETKF closely targets the typhoon location itself. The sensitive results of both the CNOPs and FSV collocate well with the steering flow between the subtropical high and the TCs. Furthermore, the regions where the convection is strong are targeted by the CNOPs. Relatively speaking, the ETKF sensitive results reflect the large-scale flow.

To identify the most effective adaptive observational network, numerous probes or flights were tested arbitrarily for the ETKF method or according to the calculated sensitive regions of the CNOP and FSV methods. The results show that the sensitive regions identified by these three methods are more effective for adaptive observations than the other regions. In all three cases, the optimal adaptive observational network identified by the CNOP and ETKF methods results in similar forecast improvements in the verification region at the verification time, while the improvement using the FSV method is minor.

Corresponding author address: Mu Mu, Key Laboratory of Ocean Circulation and Wave, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China. E-mail: mumu@lasg.iap.ac.cn

Abstract

Three adaptive approaches for tropical cyclone prediction are compared in this study: the conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation (CNOP) method, the first singular vector (FSV) method, and the ensemble transform Kalman filter (ETKF) method. These approaches are compared for 36-h forecasts of three northwest Pacific tropical cyclones (TCs): Matsa (2005), Nock-Ten (2004), and Morakot (2009). The sensitive regions identified by each method are obtained. The CNOPs form an annulus around the storm at the targeting time, the FSV targets areas north of the storm, and the ETKF closely targets the typhoon location itself. The sensitive results of both the CNOPs and FSV collocate well with the steering flow between the subtropical high and the TCs. Furthermore, the regions where the convection is strong are targeted by the CNOPs. Relatively speaking, the ETKF sensitive results reflect the large-scale flow.

To identify the most effective adaptive observational network, numerous probes or flights were tested arbitrarily for the ETKF method or according to the calculated sensitive regions of the CNOP and FSV methods. The results show that the sensitive regions identified by these three methods are more effective for adaptive observations than the other regions. In all three cases, the optimal adaptive observational network identified by the CNOP and ETKF methods results in similar forecast improvements in the verification region at the verification time, while the improvement using the FSV method is minor.

Corresponding author address: Mu Mu, Key Laboratory of Ocean Circulation and Wave, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China. E-mail: mumu@lasg.iap.ac.cn
Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Aberson, S. D., 2002: Two years of operational hurricane synoptic surveillance. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 1101–1110.

  • Aberson, S. D., 2003: Targeted observations to improve operational tropical cyclone track forecast guidance. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 1613–1628.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Aberson, S. D., S. J. Majumdar, C. A. Reynolds, and B. J. Etherton, 2011: An observing system experiment for tropical cyclone targeting techniques using the Global Forecast System. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 895–907.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bergot, T., 1999: Adaptive observations during FASTEX: A systematic survey of upstream flights. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 3271–3298.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Birgin, E. G., J. E. Martinez, and R. Marcos, 2001: Algorithm 813: SPG—Software for convex-constrained optimization. ACM Trans. Math. Software, 27, 340–349.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bishop, C. H., and Z. Toth, 1999: Ensemble transformation and adaptive observations. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 1748–1765.

  • Bishop, C. H., B. J. Etherton, and S. J. Majumdar, 2001: Adaptive sampling with the ensemble transform Kalman filter. Part I: Theoretical aspects. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 420–436.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Buizza, R., and A. Montani, 1999: Targeting observations using singular vectors. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 2965–2985.

  • Cardinali, C., and R. Buizza, 2003: Forecast skill of targeted observations: A singular-vector-based diagnostic. J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 1927–1940.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chen, J. H., M. S. Peng, C. A. Reynolds, and C. C. Wu, 2009: Interpretation of tropical cyclone forecast sensitivity from the singular vector perspective. J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 3383–3400.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Duan, W. S., and H. Y. Luo, 2010: A new strategy for solving a class of constrained nonlinear optimization problems related to weather and climate predictability. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 27 (4), 741–749.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Duan, W. S., and R. Zhang, 2010: Is model parameter error related to a significant spring predictability barrier for El Niño events? Results from a theoretical model. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 27 (5), 1003–1013.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Duan, W. S., M. Mu, and B. Wang, 2004: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation as the optimal precursors for El Niño–Southern Oscillation events. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D23105, doi:10.1029/2004JD004756.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Duan, W. S., H. Xu, and M. Mu, 2008: Decisive role of nonlinear temperature advection in El Niño and La Niña amplitude asymmetry. J. Geophys. Res., 113, C01014, doi:10.1029/2006JC003974.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Duan, W. S., F. Xue, and M. Mu, 2009: Investigating a nonlinear characteristic of El Niño events by conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation. Atmos. Res., 94, 10–18.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dudhia, J., 1993: A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model: Validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 1493–1513.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ehrendorfer, M., and J. J. Tribbia, 1997: Optimal prediction of forecast error covariances through singular vectors. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 286–313.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Elsberry, R. L., and P. A. Harr, 2008: Tropical cyclone structure (TCS08) field experiment science basis, observational platforms, and strategy. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 209–231.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gelaro, R., C. A. Reynolds, R. H. Langland, and G. D. Rohaly, 2000: A predictability study using geostationary satellite wind observations during NORPEX. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 3789–3807.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jiang, Z. N., and M. Mu, 2009: A comparison study of the methods of conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations and singular vectors in ensemble prediction. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 26 (3), 465–470.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Joly, A., and Coauthors, 1997: The Fronts and Atlantic Storm-Track Experiment (FASTEX): Scientific objectives and experimental design. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78, 1917–1940.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kim, H. M., M. C. Morgan, and R. E. Morss, 2004: Evolution of analysis error and adjoint-based sensitivities: Implications for adaptive observation. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 795–812.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Langland, R. H., 2005: Observation impact during the North Atlantic TReC-2003. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 2297–2309.

  • Langland, R. H., and Coauthors, 1999: The North Pacific Experiment (NORPEX-98):Targeted observations for improved North American weather forecasts. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 80, 1363–1384.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Liu, K. S., and J. C. L. Chan, 2008: Interdecadal variability of western North Pacific tropical cyclones tracks. J. Climate, 21, 4464–4476.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lorenz, E. N., and K. A. Emanuel, 1998: Optimal sites for supplementary observation sites: Simulation with a small model. J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 399–414.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Majumdar, S. J., C. H. Bishop, B. J. Etherton, and Z. Toth, 2002: Adaptive sampling with the ensemble transform Kalman filter. Part II: Field program implementation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 1356–1369.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Majumdar, S. J., S. D. Aberson, C. H. Bishop, R. Buizza, M. S. Peng, and C. A. Reynolds, 2006: A comparison of adaptive observing guidance for Atlantic tropical cyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2354–2372.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Montani, A., A. J. Thorpe, R. Buizza, and P. Unden, 1999: Forecast skill of the ECMWF model using targeted observations during FASTEX. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 3219–3240.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mu, M., and Z. Y. Zhang, 2006: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations of a barotropic model. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1587–1604.

  • Mu, M., W. S. Duan, and B. Wang, 2003: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation and its applications. Nonlinear Processes Geophys., 10, 493–501.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mu, M., L. Sun, and D. A. Hank, 2004: The sensitivity and stability of the ocean’s thermocline circulation to finite amplitude fresh water perturbations. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 34, 2305–2315.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mu, M., F. Zhou, and H. Wang, 2009: A method for identifying the sensitive areas in targeted observations for tropical cyclone prediction: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 1623–1639.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Palmer, T. N., R. Gelaro, J. Barkmeijer, and R. Buizza, 1998: singular vectors, metrics, and adaptive observations. J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 633–653.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Peng, M. S., and C. A. Reynolds, 2006: Sensitivity of tropical cyclone forecasts as revealed by singular vectors. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 2508–2528.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Peng, M. S., B.-F. Jeng, and C.-P. Chang, 1993: Forecast of typhoon motion in the vicinity of Taiwan during 1989–90 using a dynamical model. Wea. Forecasting, 8, 309–325.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Peng, Y. H., and W. S. Duan, 2011: Effect of stochastic MJO forcing on ENSO predictability. Adv. Atmos. Sci., in press, doi:10.1007/s00376-011-0126-4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Reynolds, C. A., R. Gelaro, and T. E. Rosmond, 2005: A comparison of variance and total-energy singular-vectors. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 1955–1973.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Reynolds, C. A., M. S. Peng, S. J. Majumdar, S. D. Aberson, C. H. Bishop, and R. Buizza, 2007: Interpretation of adaptive observing guidance for Atlantic tropical cyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 4006–4029.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sun, L., M. Mu, D. J. Sun, and X. Y. Yin, 2005: Passive mechanism of decadal variation of thermohaline circulation. J. Geophys. Res., 110, C07025, doi:10.1029/2005JC002897.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Szunyogh, I., Z. Toth, A. Zimin, S. J. Majumdar, and A. Persson, 2002: On the propagation of the effect of targeted observations: The 2000 Winter Storm Reconnaissance Program. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 1144–1165.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wu, C. C., and Coauthors, 2005: Dropwindsonde Observations for Typhoon Surveillance near the Taiwan Region (DOSTAR): An overview. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 86, 787–790.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wu, C. C., J. H. Chen, P. H. Lin, and K. H. Chou, 2007: Targeted observations of tropical cyclone movement based on the adjoint-derived sensitivity steering vector. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 2611–2626.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wu, C. C., and Coauthors, 2009: Intercomparison of targeted observation guidance for tropical cyclones in the northwestern Pacific. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 2471–2492.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhou, F. F., 2009: The application of conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation to the tropical cyclone targeted observations. Ph.D. dissertation, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 126 pp.

  • Zou, X., F. Vandenberghe, M. Pondeca, and Y.-H. Kuo, 1997: Introduction to adjoint techniques and the MM5 adjoint modeling system. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-435 STR, Boulder, CO, 111 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 438 250 14
PDF Downloads 141 38 3