An Analysis of the Nonstationarity in the Bias of Sea Surface Temperature Forecasts for the NCEP Climate Forecast System (CFS) Version 2

A. Kumar Climate Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, Camp Springs, Maryland

Search for other papers by A. Kumar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. Chen Climate Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, Camp Springs, Maryland

Search for other papers by M. Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
L. Zhang Climate Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, Camp Springs, Maryland, and WYLE STE, McLean, Virginia

Search for other papers by L. Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
W. Wang Climate Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, Camp Springs, Maryland

Search for other papers by W. Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Y. Xue Climate Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, Camp Springs, Maryland

Search for other papers by Y. Xue in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
C. Wen Climate Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, Camp Springs, Maryland, and WYLE STE, McLean, Virginia

Search for other papers by C. Wen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
L. Marx COLA, Calverton, Maryland

Search for other papers by L. Marx in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
B. Huang COLA, Calverton, Maryland

Search for other papers by B. Huang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

For long-range predictions (e.g., seasonal), it is a common practice for retrospective forecasts (also referred to as the hindcasts) to accompany real-time predictions. The necessity for the hindcasts stems from the fact that real-time predictions need to be calibrated in an attempt to remove the influence of model biases on the predicted anomalies. A fundamental assumption behind forecast calibration is the long-term stationarity of forecast bias that is derived based on hindcasts.

Hindcasts require specification of initial conditions for various components of the prediction system (e.g., ocean, atmosphere) that are generally taken from a long reanalysis. Trends and discontinuities in the reanalysis that are either real or spurious can arise due to several reasons, for example, the changing observing system. If changes in initial conditions were to persist during the forecast, there is a potential for forecast bias to depend over the period it is computed, making calibration even more of a challenging task. In this study such a case is discussed for the recently implemented seasonal prediction system at the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), the Climate Forecast System version 2 (CFS.v2).

Based on the analysis of the CFS.v2 for 1981–2009, it is demonstrated that the characteristics of the forecast bias for sea surface temperature (SST) in the equatorial Pacific had a dramatic change around 1999. Furthermore, change in the SST forecast bias, and its relationship to changes in the ocean reanalysis from which the ocean initial conditions for hindcasts are taken is described. Implications for seasonal and other long-range predictions are discussed.

Corresponding author address: Arun Kumar, 5200 Auth Rd., Room 605, Camp Springs, MD 20746. E-mail: arun.kumar@noaa.gov

Abstract

For long-range predictions (e.g., seasonal), it is a common practice for retrospective forecasts (also referred to as the hindcasts) to accompany real-time predictions. The necessity for the hindcasts stems from the fact that real-time predictions need to be calibrated in an attempt to remove the influence of model biases on the predicted anomalies. A fundamental assumption behind forecast calibration is the long-term stationarity of forecast bias that is derived based on hindcasts.

Hindcasts require specification of initial conditions for various components of the prediction system (e.g., ocean, atmosphere) that are generally taken from a long reanalysis. Trends and discontinuities in the reanalysis that are either real or spurious can arise due to several reasons, for example, the changing observing system. If changes in initial conditions were to persist during the forecast, there is a potential for forecast bias to depend over the period it is computed, making calibration even more of a challenging task. In this study such a case is discussed for the recently implemented seasonal prediction system at the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), the Climate Forecast System version 2 (CFS.v2).

Based on the analysis of the CFS.v2 for 1981–2009, it is demonstrated that the characteristics of the forecast bias for sea surface temperature (SST) in the equatorial Pacific had a dramatic change around 1999. Furthermore, change in the SST forecast bias, and its relationship to changes in the ocean reanalysis from which the ocean initial conditions for hindcasts are taken is described. Implications for seasonal and other long-range predictions are discussed.

Corresponding author address: Arun Kumar, 5200 Auth Rd., Room 605, Camp Springs, MD 20746. E-mail: arun.kumar@noaa.gov
Save
  • Behringer, D. W., and Y. Xue, 2004: Evaluation of the global ocean data assimilation system at NCEP: The Pacific Ocean. Preprints, Eighth Symp. on Integrated Observing and Assimilation System for Atmosphere, Ocean, and Land Surface, Seattle, WA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 2.3. [Available online at ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/70720.pdf.]

  • Cravette, S., T. Delcroix, D. Zhang, M. McPhaden, and J. Leloup, 2009: Observed freshening and warming of the western Pacific Warm Pool. Climate Dyn., 33, 565589, doi:10.1007/s00382-009-0526-7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deser, C., A. S. Philips, and M. A. Alexander, 2010: Twentieth century tropical sea surface temperature trends revisited. Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L10701, doi:10.1029/2010GL043321.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Durack, P. J., and S. E. Wijffels, 2010: Fifty-year trends in global ocean salinities and their relationship to broad-scale warming. J. Climate, 23, 43424362.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoerling, M. P., and A. Kumar, 2002: Atmospheric response patterns associated with tropical forcing. J. Climate, 15, 21842203.

  • Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 437471.

  • Kanamitsu, M., W. Ebisuzaki, J. Woollen, S.-K. Yang, J. J. Hnilo, M. Fiorino, and G. L. Potter, 2002: NCEP-DEO AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83, 16311643.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kumar, A., 2007: On the interpretation of skill information for seasonal climate predictions. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 19741984.

  • Kumar, A., F. Yang, L. Goddard, and S. Schubert, 2004: Differing trends in the tropical surface temperatures and precipitation over land and oceans. J. Climate, 17, 653664.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kumar, A., J. Bhaskar, and M. L’heureux, 2010: Are tropical SST trends changing the global teleconnection during La Niña? Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L12702, doi:10.1029/2010GL043394.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Levitus, S., J. I. Antonov, T. P. Boyer, R. A. Locarnini, H. E. Garcia, and A. V. Mishonov, 2009: Global ocean heat content 1955–2008 in light of recently revealed instrumentation problems. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L07608, doi:10.1029/2008GL037155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lloyd, J., E. Guilyardi, H. Weller, and J. Slingo, 2009: The role of atmosphere feedbacks during ENSO in the CMIP3 models. Atmos. Sci. Lett., 10, 170176.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lloyd, J., E. Guilyardi, and H. Weller, 2011: The role of atmosphere feedbacks during ENSO in the CMIP3 models. Part II: Using AMIP runs to understand the heat flux feedback mechanisms. Climate Dyn., 37, 12711292, doi:10.1007/s00382-010-0895-y.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Merrifield, M. A., 2011: A shift in western tropical Pacific sea level trends during the 1990s. J. Climate, 24, 41264138.

  • Onogi, K., and Coauthors, 2007: The JRA-25 Reanalysis. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 85, 369432.

  • Reynolds, R. W., N. A. Rayner, T. M. Smoth, D. C. Stokes, and W. Wang, 2002: An improved in situ and satellite SST analysis for climate. J. Climate, 15, 16091625.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reynolds, R. W., T. M. Smith, C. Liu, D. B. Chelton, K. S. Casey, and M. G. Schlax, 2007: Daily high-resolution blended analyses for sea surface temperature. J. Climate, 20, 54735496.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saha, S., and Coauthors, 2006: The NCEP Climate Forecast System. J. Climate, 19, 34833517.

  • Saha, S., and Coauthors, 2010: The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, 10151057.

  • Uppala, S. M., and Coauthors, 2005: The ERA-40 Re-Analysis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 29613012.

  • Wang, W., and M. J. McPhaden, 1999: The surface layer heat balance in the equatorial Pacific Ocean. Part I: Mean seasonal cycle. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 29, 18121831.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, W., M. Chen, and A. Kumar, 2010: An assessment of the CFS real-time seasonal forecasts. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 950969.

  • Wang, W., P. Xie, S. H. Yo, Y. Xue, A. Kumar, and X. Wu, 2011: An assessment of the surface climate in the NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis. Climate Dyn., 37, 16011620, doi:10.1007/s00382-010-0935-7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xue, Y., B. Huang, Z.-Z. Hu, A. Kumar, C. Wen, D. Behringer, and S. Nadiga, 2011: An assessment of oceanic variability in the NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Climate Dyn., 37, 25112539, doi:10.1007/s00382-010-0954-4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yu, X. R., and M. J. McPhaden, 1999: Dynamical analysis of seasonal and interannual variability in the equatorial Pacific. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 29, 23502369.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, L., A. Kumar, and W. Wang, 2012: Influence of changes in observations on precipitation: A case study for the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR). J. Geophys. Res., 117, D08105, doi:10.1029/2011JD017347.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 756 341 125
PDF Downloads 307 88 7