Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Sea Surface Temperature–Precipitation Relationship in Different Reanalyses

Arun Kumar Climate Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Arun Kumar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Li Zhang Climate Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, College Park, Maryland, and Wyle Science, Technology, and Engineering, McLean, Virginia

Search for other papers by Li Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Wanqiu Wang Climate Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Wanqiu Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Mar 2013
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00214.1
Page(s):
1118–1123
Restricted access

Abstract

The focus of this investigation is how the relationship at intraseasonal time scales between sea surface temperature and precipitation (SST–P) varies among different reanalyses. The motivation for this work was spurred by a recent report that documented that the SST–P relationship in Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) was much closer to that in the observation than it was for the older generation of reanalyses [i.e., NCEP–NCAR reanalysis (R1) and NCEP–Department of Energy (DOE) reanalysis (R2)]. Further, the reason was attributed either to the fact that the CFSR is a partially coupled reanalysis, while R1 and R2 are atmospheric-alone reanalyses, or that R1 and R2 use the observed weekly-averaged SST.

The authors repeated the comparison of the SST–P relationship among R1, R2, and CFSR, as well as two recent generations of atmosphere-alone reanalyses, the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) and the ECMWF Re-Analysis Interim (ERA-Interim). The results clearly demonstrate that the differences in the SST–P relationship at intraseasonal time scales across different reanalyses are not due to whether the reanalysis system is coupled or atmosphere alone, but are due to the specification of different SSTs. The SST–P relationship in different reanalyses, when computed against a single SST for the benchmark, demonstrates a relationship that is common across all of the reanalyses and observations.

Corresponding author address: Arun Kumar, 5830 University Research Court, Room 3000, College Park, MD 20740. E-mail: arun.kumar@noaa.gov

Abstract

The focus of this investigation is how the relationship at intraseasonal time scales between sea surface temperature and precipitation (SST–P) varies among different reanalyses. The motivation for this work was spurred by a recent report that documented that the SST–P relationship in Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) was much closer to that in the observation than it was for the older generation of reanalyses [i.e., NCEP–NCAR reanalysis (R1) and NCEP–Department of Energy (DOE) reanalysis (R2)]. Further, the reason was attributed either to the fact that the CFSR is a partially coupled reanalysis, while R1 and R2 are atmospheric-alone reanalyses, or that R1 and R2 use the observed weekly-averaged SST.

The authors repeated the comparison of the SST–P relationship among R1, R2, and CFSR, as well as two recent generations of atmosphere-alone reanalyses, the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) and the ECMWF Re-Analysis Interim (ERA-Interim). The results clearly demonstrate that the differences in the SST–P relationship at intraseasonal time scales across different reanalyses are not due to whether the reanalysis system is coupled or atmosphere alone, but are due to the specification of different SSTs. The SST–P relationship in different reanalyses, when computed against a single SST for the benchmark, demonstrates a relationship that is common across all of the reanalyses and observations.

Corresponding author address: Arun Kumar, 5830 University Research Court, Room 3000, College Park, MD 20740. E-mail: arun.kumar@noaa.gov
Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Chelliah, M., W. Ebisuzaki, S. Weaver, and A. Kumar, 2011: Evaluating the tropospheric variability in National Centers for Environmental Prediction’s climate forecast system reanalysis. J. Geophys. Res., 116, D17107, doi:10.1029/2011JD015707.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chen, M., W. Wang, A. Kumar, H. Wang, and B. Jha, 2012: Ocean surface impacts on the seasonal precipitation over the tropical Indian Ocean. J. Climate, 25, 3566–3582.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dee, D. P., and Coauthors, 2011: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Flatau, M., P. J. Flatau, P. Phoebus, and P. P. Niiler, 1997: The feedback between equatorial convection and local radiative and evaporative process: The implication for intraseasonal oscillations. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 2373–2386.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Huffman, G. J., R. F. Adler, M. Morrissey, D. Bolvin, S. Curtis, R. Joyce, B. McGavock, and J. Susskind, 2001: Global precipitation at one-degree daily resolution from multi-satellite observations. J. Hydrometeor., 2, 36–50.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Inness, P. M., and J. M. Slingo, 2003: Simulation of the Madden–Julian Oscillation in a coupled general circulation model. Part I: Comparisons with observations and an atmosphere-only GCM. J. Climate, 16, 345–364.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jha, B., and A. Kumar, 2009: A comparison of the atmospheric response to ENSO in coupled and uncoupled model simulations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 479–487.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 437–471.

  • Kanamitsu, M., W. Ebisuzaki, J. Woolen, S. K. Yang, J. Hnilo, M. Fiorino, and G. L. Potter, 2002: NCEP–DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83, 1631–1643.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kumar, A., and M. P. Hoerling, 1998: Specification of regional sea surface temperatures in atmospheric general circulation model simulations. J. Geophys. Res., 103 (D8), 8901–8907.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Pegion, K., and B. P. Kirtman, 2008: The impact of air–sea interactions on the simulation of tropical intraseasonal variability. J. Climate, 21, 6616–6635.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Reynolds, R. W., N. A. Rayner, T. M. Smoth, D. C. Stokes, and W. Wang, 2002: An improved in situ and satellite SST analysis for climate. J. Climate, 15, 1609–1625.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Reynolds, R. W., T. M. Smith, C. Liu, D. B. Chelton, K. S. Casey, and M. G. Schlax, 2007: Daily high-resolution blended analyses for sea surface temperature. J. Climate, 20, 5473–5496.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rienecker, M. M., and Coauthors, 2011: MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications. J. Climate, 24, 3624–3648.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Saha, S., and Coauthors, 2010: The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, 1015–1057.

  • Saravanan, R., 1998: Atmospheric low-frequency variability and its relationship to midlatitude SST variability: Studies using the NCAR Climate System Model. J. Climate, 11, 1386–1404.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Seo, K.-H., J.-K. E. Schemm, W. Wang, and A. Kumar, 2007: The boreal summer intraseasonal oscillation simulated in the NCEP Climate Forecast System: The effect of sea surface temperature. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 1807–1827.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Taylor, K. E., D. Williamson, and F. Zwiers, 2000: The sea surface temperature and sea ice concentration boundary conditions for AMIP II simulations. PCMDI Rep. 60, 20 pp. [Available from National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161.]

  • Woolnough, S. J., J. M. Slingo, and B. J. Hoskins, 2000: The relationship between convection and sea surface temperature on intraseasonal timescales. J. Climate, 13, 2086–2104.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wu, M. L. C., S. Schubert, I. S. Kang, and D. E. Waliser, 2002: Forced and free intraseasonal variability over the South Asian Monsoon region simulated by 10 AGCMs. J. Climate, 15, 2862–2880.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wu, R., B. P. Kirtman, and K. Pegion, 2006: Local air–sea relationship in observations and model simulations. J. Climate, 19, 4914–4932.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wu, R., B. P. Kirtman, and K. Pegion, 2008: Local rainfall–SST relationship on subseasonal time scales in satellite observations and CFS. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L22706, doi:10.1029/2008GL035883.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 776 306 23
PDF Downloads 605 167 20