Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

The Analysis and Prediction of Microphysical States and Polarimetric Radar Variables in a Mesoscale Convective System Using Double-Moment Microphysics, Multinetwork Radar Data, and the Ensemble Kalman Filter

Bryan J. Putnam Center for Analysis and Predication of Storms, and Advanced Radar Research Center, and School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Bryan J. Putnam in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Ming Xue Center for Analysis and Predication of Storms, and Advanced Radar Research Center, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Ming Xue in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Youngsun Jung Center for Analysis and Predication of Storms, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Youngsun Jung in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Nathan Snook Center for Analysis and Predication of Storms, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Nathan Snook in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Guifu Zhang Advanced Radar Research Center, and School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Guifu Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jan 2014
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00042.1
Page(s):
141–162
Restricted access

Abstract

Doppler radar data are assimilated with an ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) in combination with a double-moment (DM) microphysics scheme in order to improve the analysis and forecast of microphysical states and precipitation structures within a mesoscale convective system (MCS) that passed over western Oklahoma on 8–9 May 2007. Reflectivity and radial velocity data from five operational Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) S-band radars as well as four experimental Collaborative and Adaptive Sensing of the Atmosphere (CASA) X-band radars are assimilated over a 1-h period using either single-moment (SM) or DM microphysics schemes within the forecast ensemble. Three-hour deterministic forecasts are initialized from the final ensemble mean analyses using a SM or DM scheme, respectively. Polarimetric radar variables are simulated from the analyses and compared with polarimetric WSR-88D observations for verification. EnKF assimilation of radar data using a multimoment microphysics scheme for an MCS case has not previously been documented in the literature. The use of DM microphysics during data assimilation improves simulated polarimetric variables through differentiation of particle size distributions (PSDs) within the stratiform and convective regions. The DM forecast initiated from the DM analysis shows significant qualitative improvement over the assimilation and forecast using SM microphysics in terms of the location and structure of the MCS precipitation. Quantitative precipitation forecasting skills are also improved in the DM forecast. Better handling of the PSDs by the DM scheme is believed to be responsible for the improved prediction of the surface cold pool, a stronger leading convective line, and improved areal extent of stratiform precipitation.

Corresponding author address: Ming Xue, Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms, University of Oklahoma, 120 David Boren Blvd., Norman, OK 73072. E-mail: mxue@ou.edu

Abstract

Doppler radar data are assimilated with an ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) in combination with a double-moment (DM) microphysics scheme in order to improve the analysis and forecast of microphysical states and precipitation structures within a mesoscale convective system (MCS) that passed over western Oklahoma on 8–9 May 2007. Reflectivity and radial velocity data from five operational Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) S-band radars as well as four experimental Collaborative and Adaptive Sensing of the Atmosphere (CASA) X-band radars are assimilated over a 1-h period using either single-moment (SM) or DM microphysics schemes within the forecast ensemble. Three-hour deterministic forecasts are initialized from the final ensemble mean analyses using a SM or DM scheme, respectively. Polarimetric radar variables are simulated from the analyses and compared with polarimetric WSR-88D observations for verification. EnKF assimilation of radar data using a multimoment microphysics scheme for an MCS case has not previously been documented in the literature. The use of DM microphysics during data assimilation improves simulated polarimetric variables through differentiation of particle size distributions (PSDs) within the stratiform and convective regions. The DM forecast initiated from the DM analysis shows significant qualitative improvement over the assimilation and forecast using SM microphysics in terms of the location and structure of the MCS precipitation. Quantitative precipitation forecasting skills are also improved in the DM forecast. Better handling of the PSDs by the DM scheme is believed to be responsible for the improved prediction of the surface cold pool, a stronger leading convective line, and improved areal extent of stratiform precipitation.

Corresponding author address: Ming Xue, Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms, University of Oklahoma, 120 David Boren Blvd., Norman, OK 73072. E-mail: mxue@ou.edu
Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Aksoy, A., D. C. Dowell, and C. Snyder, 2009: A multicase comparative assessment of the ensemble Kalman filter for assimilation of radar observations. Part I: Storm-scale analysis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 1805–1824.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Aksoy, A., D. C. Dowell, and C. Snyder, 2010: A multicase comparative assessment of the ensemble Kalman filter for assimilation of radar observations. Part II: Short-range ensemble forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 1273–1292.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Anderson, J. L., 2001: An ensemble adjustment Kalman filter for data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 2884–2903.

  • Bharadwaj, N., V. Chandrasekar, and F. Junyent, 2010: Signal processing system for the CASA integrated project I radars. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 27, 1400–1460.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Biggerstaff, M. I., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1991: Kinematic and precipitation structure of the 10–11 June 1985 squall line. Mon. Wea. Rev., 119, 3034–3065.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brewster, K., M. Hu, M. Xue, and J. Gao, 2005: Efficient assimilation of radar data at high resolution for short-range numerical weather prediction. Extended abstracts, WWRP Int. Symp. Nowcasting Very Short Range Forecasting, Toulouse, France, Météo-France, 3.06.

  • Dawson, D. T., II, M. Xue, J. A. Milbrandt, and M. K. Yau, 2010: Comparison of evaporation and cold pool development between single-moment and multi-moment bulk microphysics schemes in idealized simulations of tornadic thunderstorms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 1152–1171.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dee, D. P., 1995: On-line estimation of error covariance parameters for atmospheric data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123, 1128–1145.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dowell, D. C., and L. J. Wicker, 2009: Additive noise for storm-scale ensemble data assimilation. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 911–927.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dowell, D. C., F. Zhang, L. J. Wicker, C. Snyder, and N. A. Crook, 2004: Wind and temperature retrievals in the 17 May 1981 Arcadia, Oklahoma, supercell: Ensemble Kalman filter experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 1982–2005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dowell, D. C., L. J. Wicker, and C. Snyder, 2011: Ensemble Kalman filter assimilation of radar observations of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City supercell: Influence of reflectivity observations on storm-scale analysis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 272–294.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Evensen, G., 1994: Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics. J. Geophys. Res., 99 (C5), 10 143–10 162.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Evensen, G., 2003: The ensemble Kalman filter: Theoretical formulation and practical implementation. Ocean Dyn., 53, 343–367.

  • Fritsch, J. M., and G. S. Forbes, 2001: Mesoscale convective systems. Severe Convective Storms, Meteor. Monogr., No. 50, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 323–358.

  • Gaspari, G., and S. E. Cohn, 1999: Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 723–757.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hong, S.-Y., and J.-O. J. Lim, 2006: The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics scheme (WSM6). J. Korean Meteor. Soc., 42, 129–151.

  • Houtekamer, P. L., H. L. Mitchell, G. Pellerin, M. Buehner, M. Charron, L. Spacek, and B. Hansen, 2005: Atmospheric data assimilation with an ensemble Kalman filter: Results with real observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 604–620.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hu, M., M. Xue, J. Gao, and K. Brewster, 2006: 3DVAR and cloud analysis with WSR-88D level-II data for the prediction of Fort Worth tornadic thunderstorms. Part II: Impact of radial velocity analysis via 3DVAR. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 699–721.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jung, Y., G. Zhang, and M. Xue, 2008: Assimilation of simulated polarimetric radar data for a convective storm using ensemble Kalman filter. Part I: Observation operators for reflectivity and polarimetric variables. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 2228–2245.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jung, Y., M. Xue, and G. Zhang, 2010: Simulations of polarimetric radar signatures of a supercell storm using a two-moment bulk microphysics scheme. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 49, 146–163.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jung, Y., M. Xue, and M. Tong, 2012: Ensemble Kalman filter analyses of the 29–30 May 2004 Oklahoma tornadic thunderstorm using one- and two-moment bulk microphysics schemes, with verification against polarimetric radar data. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 1457–1475.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kalnay, E., 2002: Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation, and Predictability. Cambridge University Press, 341 pp.

  • Khain, A., A. Pokrovsky, M. Pinsky, A. Seifert, and V. Phillips, 2004: Simulation of effects of atmospheric aerosols on deep turbulent convective clouds using a spectral microphysics mixed-phase cumulus cloud model. Part I: Model description and possible applications. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 2963–2982.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kumjian, M. R., and A. V. Ryzhkov, 2008: Polarimetric signatures in supercell thunderstorms. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 47, 1940–1961.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kumjian, M. R., and A. V. Ryzhkov, 2012: The impact of size sorting on the polarimetric radar variables. J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 2042–2060.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Larson, V. E., J.-C. Golaz, H. Jiang, and W. R. Cotton, 2005: Supplying local microphysics parameterizations with information about subgrid variability: Latin hypercube sampling. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 4010–4026.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lei, T., M. Xue, and T. Yu, 2009: Multi-scale analysis and prediction of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City tornadic supercell storm assimilating radar and surface network data using EnKF. Preprints, 13th Conf. on Integrated Observing and Assimilation Systems for Atmospheres, Oceans, and Land Surface (IOAS-AOLS), Phoenix, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 6.4. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/89annual/techprogram/paper_150404.htm.]

  • Lin, Y.-L., R. D. Farley, and H. D. Orville, 1983: Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 22, 1065–1092.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lorenz, E. N., 1969: Atmospheric predictability as revealed by naturally occurring analogues. J. Atmos. Sci., 26, 636–646.

  • Luo, Y., Y. Wang, H. Wang, Y. Zheng, and H. Morrison, 2010: Modeling convective-stratiform precipitation processes on a Mei-Yu front with the Weather Research and Forecasting model: Comparison with observations and sensitivity to cloud microphysics parameterizations. J. Geophys. Res., 115, D18117, doi:10.1029/2010JD013873.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McLaughlin, D., and Coauthors, 2009: Short-wavelength technology and the potential for distributed networks of small radar systems. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 90, 1797–1817.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Milbrandt, J. A., and M. K. Yau, 2005a: A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part I: Analysis of the role of the spectral shape parameter. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3051–3064.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Milbrandt, J. A., and M. K. Yau, 2005b: A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part II: A proposed three-moment closure and scheme description. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3065–3081.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Morrison, H., G. Thompson, and V. Tatarskii, 2009: Impact of cloud microphysics on the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall line: Comparison of one- and two-moment schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 991–1007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • NWS, cited 2012: Storm data and unusual weather phenomena—May 2007. NOAA, 20 pp. [Available online at http://www.srh.noaa.gov/media/oun/stormdata/oun200705.pdf.]

  • Park, H., A. V. Ryzhkov, D. S. Zrnic, and K.-E. Kim, 2009: The hydrometeor classification algorithm for the polarimetric WSR-88D: Description and application to an MCS. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 730–748.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schenkman, A., M. Xue, A. Shapiro, K. Brewster, and J. Gao, 2011: The analysis and prediction of the 8–9 May 2007 Oklahoma tornadic mesoscale convective system by assimilating WSR-88D and CASA radar data using 3DVAR. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 224–246.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schultz, P., 1995: An explicit cloud physics parameterization for operational numerical weather prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123, 3331–3343.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Snook, N., and M. Xue, 2008: Effects of microphysical drop size distribution on tornadogenesis in supercell thunderstorms. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L24803, doi:10.1029/2008GL035866.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Snook, N., M. Xue, and J. Jung, 2011: Analysis of a tornadic meoscale convective vortex based on ensemble Kalman filter assimilation of CASA X-band and WSR-88D radar data. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 3446–3468.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Snook, N., M. Xue, and Y. Jung, 2012: Ensemble probabilistic forecasts of a tornadic mesoscale convective system from ensemble Kalman filter analyses using WSR-88D and CASA radar data. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 2126–2146.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Snyder, C., and F. Zhang, 2003: Assimilation of simulated Doppler radar observations with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 1663–1677.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • SPC, cited 2012a: May 8, 2007 1630 UTC day 1 convective outlook. [Available online at http://spc.noaa.gov/products/outlook/archive/2007/day1otlk_20070508_1630.html.]

  • SPC, cited 2012b: May 9, 2007 0100 UTC day 1 convective outlook. [Available online at http://spc.noaa.gov/products/outlook/archive/2007/day1otlk_20070509_0100.html.]

  • Tong, M., and M. Xue, 2005: Ensemble Kalman filter assimilation of Doppler radar data with a compressible nonhydrostatic model: OSS experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 1789–1807.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Tong, M., and M. Xue, 2008: Simultaneous estimation of microphysical parameters and atmospheric state with radar data and ensemble square-root Kalman filter. Part II: Parameter estimation experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 1649–1668.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ulbrich, C. W., 1983: Natural variations in the analytical form of the raindrop size distributions. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 22, 1764–1775.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wang, H., T. Auligne, and H. Morrison, 2012: Impact of microphysics scheme complexity on the propagation of initial perturbations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 2287–2296.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Whitaker, J. S., and T. M. Hamill, 2002: Ensemble data assimilation without perturbed observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 1913–1924.

  • Wilks, D. S., 2006: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences. 2nd ed. Academic Press, 676 pp.

  • Xue, M., K. K. Droegemeier, and V. Wong, 2000: The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS)—A multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction tool. Part I: Model dynamics and verification. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 75, 161–193.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Xue, M., and Coauthors, 2001: The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS)—A multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction tool. Part II: Model physics and applications. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 76, 143–166.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Xue, M., D.-H. Wang, J.-D. Gao, K. Brewster, and K. K. Droegemeier, 2003: The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS): Storm-scale numerical weather prediction and data assimilation. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 82, 139–170.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Xue, M., M. Tong, and K. K. Droegemeier, 2006: An OSSE framework based on the ensemble square-root Kalman filter for evaluating impact of data from radar networks on thunderstorm analysis and forecast. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 23, 46–66.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Xue, M., Y. Jung, and G. Zhang, 2010: State estimation of convective storms with a two-moment microphysics scheme and an ensemble Kalman filter: Experiments with simulated radar data. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, 685–700.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Yussouf, N., E. R. Mansell, L. J. Wicker, D. M. Wheatley, and D. J. Stensrud, 2013: The ensemble Kalman filter analyses and forecasts of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City tornado supercell storm using single- and double-moment microphysics schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 3388–3412.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, F., C. Snyder, and J. Sun, 2004: Impacts of initial estimate and observations on the convective-scale data assimilation with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 1238–1253.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, G., M. Xue, and D. Dawson, 2008: Diagnosing the intercept parameter for exponential rain drop size distribution based on video disdrometer observations and tests with squall-line simulations. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 47, 2983–2992.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 340 110 9
PDF Downloads 280 92 5