Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Predictability Characteristics of Landfalling Cyclones along the North American West Coast

Lynn A. McMurdie Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by Lynn A. McMurdie in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Brian Ancell Department of Geosciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas

Search for other papers by Brian Ancell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jan 2014
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00141.1
Page(s):
301–319
Restricted access

Abstract

The predictability of North Pacific cyclones can vary widely, from highly accurate prediction of storm intensity and location to forecast position errors of hundreds of kilometers and central pressure errors of tens of hectopascals. In this study, a Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) ensemble Kalman filter is used to investigate predictability of landfalling cyclones on the west coast of North America over two winter seasons (2008/09 and 2009/10). Predictability is defined as the ensemble spread of cyclone central pressure at the final forecast time (24 h) where large spread means low predictability. Both ensemble spread and ensemble initial-condition sensitivity are examined for a wide variety of cyclones that occurred during the two seasons. Storms that are deepening and track from the southwest exhibit the largest ensemble initial-condition sensitivity and highest ensemble spread compared to decaying storms and storms that track from other directions. Storms that end south of 40°N, typically slow moving storms from the northwest, exhibit higher predictability regardless of whether or not they are deepening or decaying. Cyclones with large ensemble spread and low sensitivity are mature cyclones whose low predictability likely results from large initial-condition spread instead of large perturbation growth. These results highlight particular synoptic situations and cyclone characteristics that are associated with low predictability and can potentially be used to improve forecasts through improved observational coverage.

Corresponding author address: Lynn McMurdie, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Box 351640, Seattle, WA 98195. E-mail: mcmurdie@atmos.washington.edu

Abstract

The predictability of North Pacific cyclones can vary widely, from highly accurate prediction of storm intensity and location to forecast position errors of hundreds of kilometers and central pressure errors of tens of hectopascals. In this study, a Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) ensemble Kalman filter is used to investigate predictability of landfalling cyclones on the west coast of North America over two winter seasons (2008/09 and 2009/10). Predictability is defined as the ensemble spread of cyclone central pressure at the final forecast time (24 h) where large spread means low predictability. Both ensemble spread and ensemble initial-condition sensitivity are examined for a wide variety of cyclones that occurred during the two seasons. Storms that are deepening and track from the southwest exhibit the largest ensemble initial-condition sensitivity and highest ensemble spread compared to decaying storms and storms that track from other directions. Storms that end south of 40°N, typically slow moving storms from the northwest, exhibit higher predictability regardless of whether or not they are deepening or decaying. Cyclones with large ensemble spread and low sensitivity are mature cyclones whose low predictability likely results from large initial-condition spread instead of large perturbation growth. These results highlight particular synoptic situations and cyclone characteristics that are associated with low predictability and can potentially be used to improve forecasts through improved observational coverage.

Corresponding author address: Lynn McMurdie, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Box 351640, Seattle, WA 98195. E-mail: mcmurdie@atmos.washington.edu
Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Ancell, B. C., 2013: Nonlinear characteristics of ensemble perturbation evolution and their application to forecasting high-impact events. Wea. Forecasting, in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ancell, B. C., and C. F. Mass, 2006: Structure, growth rates, and tangent linear accuracy of adjoint sensitivities with respect to horizontal and vertical resolution. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2971–2988.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ancell, B. C., and G. J. Hakim, 2007: Comparing ensemble and adjoint sensitivity analysis with applications to observation targeting. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 4117–4134.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ancell, B. C., and L. A. McMurdie, 2013: Ensemble adaptive data assimilation techniques applied to land-falling North American cyclones. Data Assimilation, L. Xu and S. Park, Eds., Vol. 2, Springer, 555–576.

  • Anderson, J. L., and S. L. Anderson, 1999: A Monte Carlo implementation of the nonlinear filtering problem to produce ensemble assimilations and forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127, 2741–2758.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Badger, J., and B. J. Hoskins, 2001: Simple initial value problems and mechanisms for baroclinic growth. J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 38–49.

  • Barker, D., and Coauthors, 2012: The Weather Research and Forecasting Model's Community Variational/Ensemble Data Assimilation System: WRFDA. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 831–843.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chang, E. K. M., M. Zheng, and K. Raeder, 2013: Medium-range ensemble sensitivity analysis of two extreme Pacific extratropical cyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 211–231.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Charles, M. E., and B. A. Colle, 2009: Verification of extratropical cyclones within the NCEP operational models. Part I: Analysis errors and short-term NAM and GFS forecasts. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 1173–1190.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chen, F., and J. Dudhia, 2001: Coupling an advanced land-surface/hydrology model with the Penn State/NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model description and implementation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 569–585.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Colle, B. A., and M. E. Charles, 2011: Spatial distribution and evolution of extratropical cyclone errors over North America and its adjacent oceans in the NCEP global forecast system model. Wea. Forecasting, 26, 129–149.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dudhia, J., 1989: Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 3077–3107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Errico, R. M., 1997: What is an adjoint model? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78, 2577–2591.

  • Evensen, G., 1994: Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics. J. Geophys. Res., 99 (C5), 10 143–10 162.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gaspari, G., and S. E. Cohn, 1999: Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 723–757.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gelaro, R., R. Buizza, T. N. Palmer, and E. Klinker, 1998: Sensitivity analysis of forecast errors and the construction of optimal perturbations using singular vectors. J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 1012–1037.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gilmour, I., L. A. Smith, and R. Buizza, 2001: Linear regime duration: Is 24 hours a long time in synoptic weather forecasting? J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 3525–3539.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hakim, G. J., and R. D. Torn, 2008: Ensemble synoptic analysis. Synoptic-Dynamic Meteorology and Weather Analysis and Forecasting: A Tribute to Fred Sanders, Meteor. Monogr., No. 55, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 147–161.

  • Hong, S.-Y., J. Dudhia, and S.-H. Chen, 2004: A revised approach to ice microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of clouds and precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 103–120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hoskins, B. J., R. Buizza, and J. Badger, 2000: The nature of singular vector growth and structure. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126, 1565–1580.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Houtekamer, P. L., H. L. Mitchell, G. Pellerin, M. Buehner, M. Charron, L. Spacek, and B. Hansen, 2005: Atmospheric data assimilation with an ensemble Kalman filter: Results with real observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 604–620.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Janjic, Z. I., 1990: The step-mountain coordinate: Physical package. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118, 1429–1443.

  • Janjic, Z. I., 1996: The surface layer in the NCEP Eta Model. Preprints, 11th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Norfolk, VA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 354–355.

  • Janjic, Z. I., 2002: Nonsingular implementation of the Mellor–Yamada Level 2.5 scheme in the NCEP Meso model. NCEP Office Note 437, 61 pp.

  • Kain, J. S., and J. M. Fritsch, 1990: A one-dimensional entraining/detraining plume model and its application in convective parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 2784–2802.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kain, J. S., and J. M. Fritsch, 1993: Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: The Kain–Fritsch scheme. The Representation of Cumulus Convection in Numerical Models, Meteor. Monogr., No. 24, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 165–170.

  • Kalnay, E., 2002: Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation, and Predictability. Cambridge University Press, 364 pp.

  • Klinker, E., F. Rabier, and R. Gelaro, 1998: Estimation of key analysis errors using the adjoint technique. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124, 1909–1933.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Langland, R. H., R. L. Elsberry, and R. M. Errico, 1995: Evaluation of physical processes in an idealized extratropical cyclone using adjoint sensitivity. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 121, 1349–1386.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mass, C. F., and B. Dotson, 2010: Major extratropical cyclones of the northwest United States: Historical review, climatology, and synoptic environment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 2499–2527.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Matsueda, M., M. Kyouda, Z. Toth, H. L. Tanaka, and T. Tsuyuki, 2011: Predictability of an atmospheric blocking event that occurred on 15 December 2005. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 2455–2470.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McMurdie, L., and C. F. Mass, 2004: Major numerical forecast failures over the northeast Pacific. Wea. Forecasting, 19, 338–356.

  • McMurdie, L., and J. H. Casola, 2009: Weather regimes and forecast errors in the Pacific Northwest. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 829–842.

  • Mlawer, E. J., S. J. Taubman, P. D. Brown, M. J. Iacono, and S. A. Clough, 1997: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmosphere: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J. Geophys. Res., 102 (D14), 16 663–16 682.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Murphy, J. M., 1988: The impact of ensemble forecasts on predictability. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 114, 463–493.

  • Piccolo, C., 2011: Growth of forecast errors from covariances modeled by 4DVAR and ETKF methods. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 1505–1518.

  • Reynolds, C. A., and R. Gelaro, 2001: Remarks on Northern Hemisphere forecast error sensitivity from 1996 to 2000. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 2145–2153.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Shapiro, M. A., H. Wernli, N. A. Bond, and R. Langland, 2001: The influence of the 1997–99 El Niño–Southern Oscillation on extratropical baroclinic life cycles over the eastern North Pacific. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127, 331–342.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Skamarock, W. C., and Coauthors, 2008: A description of the Advanced Research WRF version 3. NCAR Tech. Note TN-475, 113 pp.

  • Torn, R. D., 2010: Ensemble-based sensitivity analysis applied to African easterly waves. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 61–78.

  • Torn, R. D., and G. J. Hakim, 2008a: Performance characteristics of a pseudo-operational ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 3947–3963.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Torn, R. D., and G. J. Hakim, 2008b: Ensemble-based sensitivity analysis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 663–677.

  • Torn, R. D., G. J. Hakim, and C. Snyder, 2006: Boundary conditions for limited-area ensemble Kalman filters. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2490–2502.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wedam, G. B., L. A. McMurdie, and C. F. Mass, 2009: Comparison of model forecast skill of sea level pressure along the East and West Coasts of the United States. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 843–854.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Whitaker, J. S., and T. M. Hamill, 2002: Ensemble data assimilation without perturbed observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 1913–1924.

  • Zheng, M., E. K. M. Chang, and B. Colle, 2013: Ensemble sensitivity tools for assessing extratropical cyclone intensity and track predictability. Wea. Forecasting, 28, 1133–1156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 212 63 2
PDF Downloads 103 25 1