Evaluation of Storm Structure from the Operational HWRF during 2012 Implementation

Vijay Tallapragada Environmental Modeling Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Vijay Tallapragada in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Chanh Kieu Environmental Modeling Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Chanh Kieu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Young Kwon Environmental Modeling Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Young Kwon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Samuel Trahan Environmental Modeling Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Samuel Trahan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Qingfu Liu Environmental Modeling Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Qingfu Liu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Zhan Zhang Environmental Modeling Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Zhan Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
In-Hyuk Kwon Environmental Modeling Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by In-Hyuk Kwon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

In this work, a high-resolution triple-nested implementation of the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) operational Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting Model (HWRF) for the 2012 hurricane season is evaluated. Statistics of retrospective experiments for the 2010–11 hurricane seasons show that the new configuration demonstrates significant improvement compared to the 2011 operational HWRF in terms of storm track, intensity, size, dynamical constraints between mass and wind field, and initial vortex imbalance. Specifically, the 5-day track and intensify forecast errors are improved by about 19% and 7% for the North Atlantic basin, and by 9% and 30% for the eastern Pacific basin, respectively. Verifications of storm size in terms of wind radii at 34-, 50-, and 64-kt (17.5, 25.7, and 32.9 m s−1) thresholds at different quadrants show dramatic improvement with most of the overestimation of the storm size in previous operational HWRF versions removed at all forecast times. In addition, dynamical constraints between the storm intensity and the outermost radius in the new configuration are consistent with the best track data. The relationship between minimum sea level pressure and maximum 10-m wind is also improved in both basins, indicating that the storm dynamics and structure have been improved in the 2012 HWRF compared to the previous versions. These significant improvements obtained with the new HWRF implementation are attributed to a number of major changes including a new higher-resolution nest, improved vortex initialization, improved planetary boundary layer and turbulence physics, and some critical bug fixes related to the moving nest. Such improvements show that the new HWRF implementation is a promising upgrade for future hurricane seasons.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Vijay Tallapragada, Environmental Modeling Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, 5830 University Research Court, College Park, MD 20740. E-mail: vijay.tallapragada@noaa.gov

Abstract

In this work, a high-resolution triple-nested implementation of the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) operational Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting Model (HWRF) for the 2012 hurricane season is evaluated. Statistics of retrospective experiments for the 2010–11 hurricane seasons show that the new configuration demonstrates significant improvement compared to the 2011 operational HWRF in terms of storm track, intensity, size, dynamical constraints between mass and wind field, and initial vortex imbalance. Specifically, the 5-day track and intensify forecast errors are improved by about 19% and 7% for the North Atlantic basin, and by 9% and 30% for the eastern Pacific basin, respectively. Verifications of storm size in terms of wind radii at 34-, 50-, and 64-kt (17.5, 25.7, and 32.9 m s−1) thresholds at different quadrants show dramatic improvement with most of the overestimation of the storm size in previous operational HWRF versions removed at all forecast times. In addition, dynamical constraints between the storm intensity and the outermost radius in the new configuration are consistent with the best track data. The relationship between minimum sea level pressure and maximum 10-m wind is also improved in both basins, indicating that the storm dynamics and structure have been improved in the 2012 HWRF compared to the previous versions. These significant improvements obtained with the new HWRF implementation are attributed to a number of major changes including a new higher-resolution nest, improved vortex initialization, improved planetary boundary layer and turbulence physics, and some critical bug fixes related to the moving nest. Such improvements show that the new HWRF implementation is a promising upgrade for future hurricane seasons.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Vijay Tallapragada, Environmental Modeling Center, NOAA/NWS/NCEP, 5830 University Research Court, College Park, MD 20740. E-mail: vijay.tallapragada@noaa.gov
Save
  • Arakawa, A., and V. R. Lamb, 1977: Computational design of the basic dynamical processes of the UCLA general circulation model. Methods in Computational Physics, J. Chang, Ed., Vol. 17, Academic Press, 173–265.

  • Bao, J.-W., S. G. Gopalakrishnan, S. A. Michelson, F. D. Marks, and M. T. Montgomery, 2012: Impact of physics representations in the HWRFX on simulated hurricane structure and pressure–wind relationships. Mon. Wea. Rev.,140, 3278–3299, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-11-00332.1

  • Bell, G. D., and Coauthors, 2000: Climate assessment for 1999. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81, 13281378, doi:10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<1328:CAF>2.3.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Black, M. L., J. F. Gamache, H. E. Willoughby, C. E. Samsury, F. D. Marks, and R. W. Burpee, 1997: Airborne radar observations of shear-induced asymmetries in the convective structure of Hurricane Olivia (1994). Preprints, 28th Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Austin, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 577578.

  • DeMaria, M., 2010: Tropical cyclone intensity change predictability estimates using a statistical-dynamical model. 29th Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Tucson, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 9C.5. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/29Hurricanes/techprogram/paper_167916.htm.]

  • DeMaria, M., J. A. Knaff, and C. Sampson, 2007: Evaluation of long-term trends in tropical cyclone intensity forecasts. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 97, 1928, doi:10.1007/s00703-006-0241-4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Drake, L., 2012: Scientific prerequisites to comprehension of the tropical cyclone forecast: Intensity, track, and size. Wea. Forecasting, 27, 462472, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-11-00041.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Emanuel, K. A., 2005: Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years. Nature, 436, 686688, doi:10.1038/nature03906.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Emanuel, K. A., 2008: The hurricane–climate connection. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89, ES10ES20, doi:10.1175/BAMS-89-5-Emanuel.

  • Ferrier, B. S., 1994: A double-moment multiple-phase four-class bulk ice scheme. Part I: Description. J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 249280, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<0249:ADMMPF>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gall, R., J. Franklin, F. Marks, E. N. Rappaport, and F. Toepfer, 2013: The Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,94, 329–343, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00071.1

  • Gopalakrishnan, S., and Coauthors, 2012: Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (HWRF) Model: 2012 scientific documentation. NCAR Development Testbed Center Report, NCAR, 96 pp. [Available online at http://www.dtcenter.org/HurrWRF/users/docs/index.php.]

  • Holland, G., 2008: A revised hurricane pressure–wind model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 34323445, doi:10.1175/2008MWR2395.1.

  • Hong, S.-Y., and H.-L. Pan, 1996: Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 23222339, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<2322:NBLVDI>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Irish, J. L., D. T. Resio, and J. J. Ratcliff, 2008: The influence of storm size on hurricane surge. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,38, 2003–2013, doi:10.1175/2008JPO3727.1.

  • Janjic, Z., 2003: A nonhydrostatic model based on a new approach. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 82, 271285, doi:10.1007/s00703-001-0587-6.

  • Janjic, Z., J. P. Gerrity Jr., and S. Nickovic, 2001: An alternative approach to nonhydrostatic modeling. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 11641178, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<1164:AAATNM>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Janjic, Z., R. Gall, and M. E. Pyle, 2010: Scientific documentation for the NMM solver. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-477+STR, 54 pp.

  • Kieu, C. Q., H. Chen, and D.-L. Zhang, 2010: An examination of the pressure–wind relationship for intense tropical cyclones. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 895907, doi:10.1175/2010WAF2222344.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kleist, D. T., D. F. Parrish, J. C. Derber, R. Treadon, W.-S. Wu, and S. Lord, 2009: Introduction of the GSI into the NCEP Global Data Assimilation System. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 16911705, doi:10.1175/2009WAF2222201.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knaff, J. A., and R. M. Zehr, 2007: Reexamination of tropical cyclone wind–pressure relationships. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 7188, doi:10.1175/WAF965.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Landsea, C. W., and J. L. Franklin, 2013: Atlantic hurricane database uncertainty and presentation of a new database format. Mon. Wea. Rev.,141, 3576–3592, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-12-00254.1.

  • Li, Y., X. Wang, M. Xue, and M. Tong, 2013: Assimilation of airborne radar radial velocity data with the GSI based EnKF-3DVAR hybrid system for the prediction of Hurricane Irene (2011). 17th Conf. on Integrated Observing and Assimilation Systems for the Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land Surface (IOAS–AOLS), Austin, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 12.2. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/93Annual/webprogram/Paper219932.html.]

  • Liu, Q., 2009: HWRF pressure-wind relationship. NOAA NCEP Environmental Modeling Center HWRF model development Rep. [Available online at http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/HWRF/weeklies/JAN09/Pressure_Wind_Relationship.ppt.]

  • Liu, Q., X. Zhang, S. Trahan, and V. Tallapragada, 2012: Extending operational HWRF initialization to triple-nest HWRF system. 30th Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 14A.6. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/30Hurricane/webprogram/Paper204853.html.]

  • Marchok, T. P., 2002: How the NCEP tropical cyclone tracker works. Preprints, 25th Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, San Diego, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., P1.13. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/25HURR/techprogram/paper_37628.htm.]

  • Marks, F. D., P. G. Black, M. T. Montgomery, and R. W. Burpee, 2008: Structure of the eye and eyewall of Hurricane Hugo (1989). Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 12371259, doi:10.1175/2007MWR2073.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Powell, M. D., and T. A. Reinhold, 2007: Tropical cyclone destructive potential by integrated kinetic energy. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 88, 513526, doi:10.1175/BAMS-88-4-513.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rogers, R., S. Lorsolo, P. Reasor, J. Gamache, and F. D. Marks, 2012: Multiscale analysis of tropical cyclone kinematic structure from airborne Doppler radar composites. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 7799, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-10-05075.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sangster, W. E., 1960: A method of representing the horizontal pressure force without reduction of station pressures to sea level. J. Meteor., 17, 166176, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1960)017<0166:AMORTH>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schenkel, B. A., and R. E. Hart, 2012: An examination of tropical cyclone position, intensity, and intensity life cycle within atmospheric reanalysis datasets. J. Climate, 25, 34533475, doi:10.1175/2011JCLI4208.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tallapragada, V., and Coauthors, 2012: Operational implementation of high-resolution triple-nested HWRF at NCEP/EMC—A major step towards addressing intensity forecast problem. 30th Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 14A.2. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/30Hurricane/webprogram/Paper205287.html.]

  • Torn, R. D., and C. Snyder, 2012: Uncertainty of tropical cyclone best-track information. Wea. Forecasting, 27, 715729, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-11-00085.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Trahan, S., 2012: Revised centroid method. NCEP Office Note, 3 pp. [Available online at http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/HWRF/weeklies/JAN12/revised-centroid-method-draft2.pdf.]

  • Wang, X., D. Parrish, D. Kleist, and J. Whitaker, 2013: GSI 3DVar-based ensemble–variational hybrid data assimilation for NCEP global forecast system: Single-resolution experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 40984117, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-12-00141.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Webster, P. J., G. J. Holland, J. A. Curry, and H.-R. Chang, 2005: Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment. Science, 309, 18441846, doi:10.1126/science.1116448.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Willoughby, H. E., and M. E. Rahn, 2004: Parametric representation of the primary hurricane vortex. Part I: Observations and evaluation of the Holland (1980) model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 30333048, doi:10.1175/MWR2831.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yablonsky, R. M., and I. Ginis, 2009: Limitation of one-dimensional ocean models for coupled hurricane–ocean model forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 44104419, doi:10.1175/2009MWR2863.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, J. A., S. Gopalakrishnan, F. D. Marks, R. F. Rogers, and V. Tallapragada, 2012: A developmental framework for improving hurricane model physical parameterizations using aircraft observations. Trop. Cyclone Res. Rev., 1, 419429, doi:10.6057/2012tcrr04.01.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1305 265 30
PDF Downloads 425 88 7