Abstract
In radar data assimilation, statistically optimal analyses are sought by minimizing a cost function in which the variance and covariance of background and observation errors are correctly represented. Radar observations are particular in that they are often available at spatial resolution comparable to that of background estimates. Because of computational constraints and lack of information, it is impossible to perfectly represent the correlation of errors. In this study, the authors characterize the impact of such misrepresentations in an idealized framework where the spatial correlations of background and observation errors are each described by a homogeneous and isotropic exponential decay. Analyses obtained with perfect representation of correlations are compared to others obtained by neglecting correlations altogether. These two sets of analyses are examined from a theoretical and an experimental perspective. The authors show that if the spatial correlations of background and observation errors are similar, then neglecting the correlation of errors has a small impact on the quality of analyses. They suggest that the sampling noise, related to the precision with which analysis errors may be estimated, could be used as a criterion for determining when the correlations of errors may be omitted. Neglecting correlations altogether also yields better analyses than representing correlations for only one term in the cost function or through the use of data thinning. These results suggest that the computational costs of data assimilation could be reduced by neglecting the correlations of errors in areas where dense radar observations are available.
