Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

An Evaluation of WRF Simulations of Clouds over the Southern Ocean with A-Train Observations

Yi Huang Monash Weather and Climate, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Search for other papers by Yi Huang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Steven T. Siems Monash Weather and Climate, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Search for other papers by Steven T. Siems in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Michael J. Manton Monash Weather and Climate, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Search for other papers by Michael J. Manton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Gregory Thompson National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Gregory Thompson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Feb 2014
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00128.1
Page(s):
647–667
Restricted access

Abstract

The representation of the marine boundary layer (BL) clouds remains a formidable challenge for state-of-the-art simulations. A recent study by Bodas-Salcedo et al. using the Met Office Unified Model highlights that the underprediction of the low/midlevel postfrontal clouds contributes to the largest bias of the surface downwelling shortwave radiation over the Southern Ocean (SO). A-Train observations and limited in situ measurements have been used to evaluate the Weather Research and Forecasting Model, version 3.3.1 (WRFV3.3.1), in simulating the postfrontal clouds over Tasmania and the SO. The simulated cloud macro/microphysical properties are compared against the observations. Experiments are also undertaken to test the sensitivity of model resolution, microphysical (MP) schemes, planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes, and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentration. The simulations demonstrate a considerable level of skill in representing the clouds during the frontal passages and, to a lesser extent, in the postfrontal environment. The simulations, however, have great difficulties in portraying the widespread marine BL clouds that are not immediately associated with fronts. This shortcoming is persistent to the changes of model configuration and physical parameterization. The representation of large-scale conditions and their connections with the BL clouds are discussed. A lack of BL moisture is the most obvious explanation for the shortcoming, which may be a consequence of either strong entrainment or weak surface fluxes. It is speculated that the BL wind shear/turbulence may be an issue over the SO. More comprehensive observations are necessary to fully investigate the deficiency of the simulations.

Corresponding author address: Yi Huang, Monash School of Mathematical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton Campus,Wellington Rd., Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia. E-mail: vivian.huang@monash.edu

Abstract

The representation of the marine boundary layer (BL) clouds remains a formidable challenge for state-of-the-art simulations. A recent study by Bodas-Salcedo et al. using the Met Office Unified Model highlights that the underprediction of the low/midlevel postfrontal clouds contributes to the largest bias of the surface downwelling shortwave radiation over the Southern Ocean (SO). A-Train observations and limited in situ measurements have been used to evaluate the Weather Research and Forecasting Model, version 3.3.1 (WRFV3.3.1), in simulating the postfrontal clouds over Tasmania and the SO. The simulated cloud macro/microphysical properties are compared against the observations. Experiments are also undertaken to test the sensitivity of model resolution, microphysical (MP) schemes, planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes, and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentration. The simulations demonstrate a considerable level of skill in representing the clouds during the frontal passages and, to a lesser extent, in the postfrontal environment. The simulations, however, have great difficulties in portraying the widespread marine BL clouds that are not immediately associated with fronts. This shortcoming is persistent to the changes of model configuration and physical parameterization. The representation of large-scale conditions and their connections with the BL clouds are discussed. A lack of BL moisture is the most obvious explanation for the shortcoming, which may be a consequence of either strong entrainment or weak surface fluxes. It is speculated that the BL wind shear/turbulence may be an issue over the SO. More comprehensive observations are necessary to fully investigate the deficiency of the simulations.

Corresponding author address: Yi Huang, Monash School of Mathematical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton Campus,Wellington Rd., Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia. E-mail: vivian.huang@monash.edu
Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Bates, T. S., B. J. Huebert, J. L. Gras, F. B. Griffiths, and P. A. Durkee, 1998: International Global Atmospheric Chemistry (IGAC) Project's First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE 1): Overview. J. Geophys. Res., 103 (D13), 16 297–16 318.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bennartz, R., 2007: Global assessment of marine boundary layer cloud droplet number concentration from satellite. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D02201, doi:10.1029/2006JD007547.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bodas-Salcedo, A., K. Williams, P. Field, and A. Lock, 2012: The surface downwelling solar radiation surplus over the Southern Ocean in the Met Office model: The role of midlatitude cyclone clouds. J. Climate, 25, 7467–7486.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Boers, R., J. B. Jensen, and P. B. Krummel, 1998: Microphysical and short-wave radiative structure of marine stratocumulus clouds over the Southern Ocean: Summer results and seasonal differences. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124, 151–168.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bretherton, C. S., and Coauthors, 1999: An intercomparison of radiatively driven entrainment and turbulence in a smoke cloud, as simulated by different numerical models. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 391–423, doi:10.1002/qj.49712555402.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chen, F., and J. Dudhia, 2001: Coupling an advanced land-surface/hydrology model with the Penn State/NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model description and implementation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 569–585.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Choi, Y., C. Ho, S. Kim, and R. S. Lindzen, 2010: Observational diagnosis of cloud phase in the winter Antarctic atmosphere for parameterizations in climate models. Adv. Atmos. Sci.,27 (6), 1233–1245.

  • Curry, J. A., and E. E. Ebert, 1992: Annual cycle of radiation fluxes over the Arctic Ocean: Sensitivity to cloud optical properties. J. Climate, 5, 1267–1280.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Delanoë, J., and R. J. Hogan, 2010: Combined CloudSat-CALIPSO-MODIS retrievals of the properties of ice clouds. J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00H29, doi:10.1029/2009JD012346.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dudhia, J., 1989: Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 3007–3107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Franklin, C. N., Z. Sun, B. Bi, M. Dix, H. Yan, and A. Bodas-Salcedo, 2013: Evaluation of clouds in ACCESS using the satellite simulator package COSP: Global, seasonal, and regional cloud properties. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 732–748, doi:10.1029/2012JD018469.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Garrett, T. J., and C. Zhao, 2006: Increased Arctic cloud longwave emissivity associated with pollution from mid-latitudes. Nature, 440, 787–789, doi:10.1038/nature04636.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gettelman, A., H. Morrison, and S. J. Ghan, 2008: A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, version 3 (CAM3). Part II: Single-column and global results. J. Climate, 21, 3660–3679.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gras, J. L., 1995: CN, CCN and particle size in Southern Ocean air at Cape Grim. Atmos. Res., 35, 233–251.

  • Greenwald, T. J., 2009: A 2 year comparison of AMSR-E and MODIS cloud liquid water path observations. Geophys. Res. Lett.,36, L20805, doi:10.1029/2009GL040394.

  • Guan, H., S. G. Cober, and G. A. Isaac, 2001: Verification of supercooled cloud forecasts with in situ aircraft measurements. Wea. Forecasting, 16, 145–155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Han, Q. Y., W. B. Rossow, J. Chou, and R. M. Welch, 1998: Global survey of the relationships of cloud albedo and liquid water path with droplet size using ISCCP. J. Climate, 11, 1516–1528.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hande, L. B., S. T. Siems, M. J. Manton, and D. Belusic, 2012: Observations of wind shear over the Southern Ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 117, D12206, doi:10.1029/2012JD017488.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hannay, C., D. L. Williamson, J. J. Hack, J. T. Kiehl, J. G. Olson, S. A. Klein, C. S. Bretherton, and M. Köhler, 2009: Evaluation of forecasted southeast Pacific stratocumulus in the NCAR, GFDL, and ECMWF models. J. Climate, 22, 2871–2889.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Haynes, J. M., Z. Luo, G. L. Stephens, R. T. Marchand, A. Bodas-Salcedo, 2007: A multipurpose radar simulation package: QuickBeam. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 88, 1723–1727.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Haynes, J. M., C. Jakob, W. B. Rossow, G. Tselioudis, and J. Brown, 2011: Major characteristics of Southern Ocean cloud regimes and their effects on the energy budget. J. Climate, 24, 5061–5080.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Holz, R. E., S. A. Ackerman, F. W. Nagle, R. Frey, S. Dutcher, R. E. Kuehn, M. A. Vaughan, and B. Baum, 2008: Global Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) cloud detection and height evaluation using CALIOP. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D00A19, doi:10.1029/2008JD009837.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hong, S. Y., and J. O. Lin, 2006: The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics scheme (WSM6). J. Korean Meteor. Soc., 42 (2), 129–151.

  • Hong, S. Y., Y. Noh, and J. Dudhia, 2006: A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2318–2341.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hu, Y., and Coauthors, 2009: CALIPSO/CALIOP cloud phase discrimination algorithm. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 2293–2309.

  • Hu, Y., S. Rodier, K. Xu, W. Sun, J. Huang, B. Lin, P. Zhai, and D. Josset, 2010: Occurrence, liquid water content, and fraction of supercooled water clouds from combined CALIOP/IIR/MODIS measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00H34, doi:10.1029/2009JD012384.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Huang, Y., S. T. Siems, M. J. Manton, A. Protat, and J. Delanoë, 2012a: A study on the low-altitude clouds over the Southern Ocean using the DARDAR-MASK. J. Geophys. Res., 117, D18204, doi:10.1029/2012JD017800.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Huang, Y., S. T. Siems, M. J. Manton, L. B. Hande, and J. M. Haynes, 2012b: The structure of low-altitude clouds over the Southern Ocean as seen by CloudSat. J. Climate, 25, 2535–2546.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Iacono, M. J., J. S. Delamere, E. J. Mlawer, M. W. Shephard, S. A. Clough, and W. D. Collins, 2008: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D13103, doi:10.1029/2008JD009944.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jacobson, M., 2006: Effects of externally-through-internally-mixed soot inclusions within clouds and precipitation on global climate. J. Phys. Chem., 110, 6860–6873, doi:10.1021/jp056391r.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Janjic, Z. I., 2002: Nonsingular implementation of the Mellor–Yamada level 2.5 scheme in the NCEP Meso Model. NCEP Office Note 437, 61 pp.

  • Jiang, H., G. Feingold, and A. Sorooshian, 2010: Effect of aerosol on the susceptibility and efficiency of precipitation in warm trade cumulus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 3525–3540.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jiang, H., W. R. Cotton, J. O. Pinto, J. A. Curry, and M. J. Weissbluth, 2000: Cloud resolving simulations of mixed-phase Arctic stratus observed during BASE: Sensitivity to concentration of ice crystals and large-scale heat and moisture advection. J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 2105–2117.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Key, J. R., and J. M. Intrieri, 2000: Cloud particle phase determination with the AVHRR. J. Appl. Meteor., 39, 1797–1804.

  • Larson, V. E., D. P. Schanen, M. Wang, M. Ovchinnikov, and S. Ghan, 2012: PDF parameterization of boundary layer clouds in models with horizontal grid spacing from 2 to 16 km. Mon. Wea. Rev.,140, 285–306.

  • L'Ecuyer, T. S., W. Berg, J. Haynes, M. Lebsock, and T. Takemura, 2009: Global observations of aerosol impacts on precipitation occurrence in warm maritime clouds. J. Geophys. Res., 114, D09211, doi:10.1029/2008JD011273.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lin, Y. L., R. D. Farley, and H. D. Orville, 1983: Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 22, 1065–1092.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mace, G. G., R. Marchand, Q. Zhang, and G. Stephens, 2007: Global hydrometeor occurrence as observed by CloudSat: Initial observations from summer 2006. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L09808, doi:10.1029/2006GL029017.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mellor, G. L., and T. Yamada, 1982: Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 20, 851–875.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mlawer, E. J., S. J. Taubman, P. D. Brown, M. J. Iacono, and S. A. Clough, 1997: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmosphere: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J. Geophys. Res., 102 (D14), 16 663–16 682.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Morrison, A. E., S. T. Siems, and M. J. Manton, 2010: A modeling case study of mixed phase clouds over the Southern Ocean and Tasmania. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 839–862.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Morrison, A. E., S. T. Siems, and M. J. Manton, 2011: A three-year climatology of cloud-top phase over the Southern Ocean and North Pacific. J. Climate, 24, 2405–2418.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Morrison, H., and J. O. Pinto, 2005: Mesoscale modeling of springtime Arctic mixed-phase stratiform clouds using a new two-moment bulk microphysics scheme. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3683–3704.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Morrison, H., G. Thompson, and V. Tatarskii, 2009: Impact of cloud microphysics on the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall line: Comparison of one- and two-moment schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 991–1007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Myers, T. A., and J. R. Norris, 2013: Observational evidence that enhanced subsidence reduces subtropical marine boundary layer cloudiness. J. Climate,26, 7507–7524

  • Nakanishi, M., and H. Niino, 2004: An improved Mellor–Yamada level-3 model with condensation physics: Its design and verification. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 112, 1–13.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nakanishi, M., and H. Niino, 2006: An improved Mellor–Yamada level-3 model: Its numerical stability and application to a regional prediction of advection fog. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,119, 397–407.

  • O'Dell, C. W., F. J. Wentz, and R. Bennartz, 2008: Cloud liquid water path from satellite-based passive microwave observations: A new climatology over the global oceans. J. Climate, 21, 1721–1739.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Pan, H., and W. S. Wu, 1995: Implementing a mass flux convection parameterization package for the NMC medium-range forecast model. Office Note 409, NOAA/EMC, 40 pp.

  • Petters, J. L., J. Y. Harrington, and E. E. Clothiaux, 2012: Radiative-dynamical feedbacks in low liquid water path stratiform clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 1498–1512.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Platnick, S., M. D. King, S. A. Ackerman, W. P. Menzel, B. A. Baum, J. C. Riedi, and R. A. Frey, 2003: The MODIS cloud products: Algorithms and examples from Terra. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 41 (2), 459–473, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2002.808301.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Price, J. D., and M. R. Bush, 2004: Comparison between model forecast and observed boundary layer profiles and related comments on cloud prediction. Wea. Forecasting,19, 959–969.

  • Reisner, R., R. M. Rasmussen, and R. T. Bruintjes, 1998: Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MM5 mesoscale model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124, 1071–1107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ryan, B. F., and W. D. King, 1997: A critical review of the Australian experience in cloud seeding. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78, 239–254.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sedlar, J., M. D. Shupe, and M. Tjernström, 2012: On the relationship between thermodynamic structure and cloud top, and its climate significance in the Arctic. J. Climate, 25, 2374–2393.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Seethala, C., and Á. Horváth, 2010: Global assessment of AMSR-E and MODIS cloud liquid water path retrievals in warm oceanic clouds. J. Geophys. Res., 115, D13202, doi:10.1029/2009JD012662.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Shupe, M. D., and J. M. Intrieri, 2004: Cloud radiative forcing of the Arctic surface: The influence of cloud properties, surface albedo, and solar zenith angle. J. Climate, 17, 616–628.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Simmonds, I., and K. Keay, 2000: Mean Southern Hemisphere extratropical cyclone behavior in the 40-year NCEP–NCAR reanalysis. J. Climate, 13, 873–885.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Skamarock, W. C., and Coauthors, 2008: A description of the Advanced Research WRF version 3. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-475+STR, 113 pp.

  • Smith, E. J., L. G. Veitch, D. E. Shaw, and A. J. Miller, 1979: A cloud-seeding experiment in Tasmania. J. Appl. Meteor., 18, 804–815.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stephens, G. L., 1978: Radiation profiles in extended water clouds: 1. Theory. J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 2111–2122.

  • Stephens, G. L., and Coauthors, 2002: The CloudSat Mission and the A-Train: A new dimension of space-based observations of clouds and precipitation. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83, 1771–1790.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Storelvmo, T., J. E. Kristjánsson, and U. Lohmann, 2008: Aerosol influence on mixed-phase clouds in CAM-Oslo. J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 3214–3230.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Storelvmo, T., C. Hoose, and P. Eriksson, 2011: Global modeling of mixed phase clouds: The albedo and lifetime effects of aerosols. J. Geophys. Res., 116, D05207, doi:10.1029/2010JD014724.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Thompson, G., P. R. Field, R. M. Rasmussen, and W. D. Hall, 2008: Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part II: Implementation of a new snow parameterization. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 5095–5115.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Trenberth, K. E., and J. T. Fasullo, 2010: Simulation of present-day and twenty-first-century energy budgets of the Southern Oceans. J. Climate, 23, 440–454.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Vaillancourt, P. A., A. Tremblay, S. G. Cober, and G. A. Isaac, 2003: Comparison of aircraft observations with mixed-phase cloud simulations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 656–671.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Winker, D. M., B. H. Hunt, and M. J. McGill, 2007: Initial performance assessment of CALIOP. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L19803, doi:10.1029/2007GL030135.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wood, R., 2012: Stratocumulus clouds. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 2373–2423.

  • Wyant, M. C., and Coauthors, 2010: The PreVOCA experiment: Modeling the lower troposphere in the southeast Pacific. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4757–4774, doi:10.5194/acp-10-4757-2010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Yum, S. S., and J. G. Hudson, 2004: Wintertime/summertime contrasts of cloud condensation nuclei and cloud microphysics over the Southern Ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D06204, doi:10.1029/2003JD003864.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Yum, S. S., and J. G. Hudson, 2005: Adiabatic predictions and observations of cloud droplet spectral broadness. Atmos. Res., 73, 203–223, doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2004.10.006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zelinka, M. D., and D. L. Hartmann, 2012: Climate feedbacks and their implications for poleward energy flux changes in a warming climate. J. Climate, 25, 608–624.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 932 247 16
PDF Downloads 734 186 15