Distance Velocity–Azimuth Display (DVAD)—New Interpretation and Analysis of Doppler Velocity

Wen-Chau Lee National Center for Atmospheric Research,* Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Wen-Chau Lee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Xiaowen Tang Key Laboratory for Mesoscale Severe Weather/MOE and School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China

Search for other papers by Xiaowen Tang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Ben J.-D. Jou Department of Atmospheric Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

Search for other papers by Ben J.-D. Jou in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The concept and mathematical framework of the distance velocity–azimuth display (DVAD) methodology is presented. DVAD uses rVd (Doppler velocity scaled by the distance from the radar to a gate, r) as the basis to display, interpret, and extract information from single Doppler radar observations. Both linear and nonlinear wind fields can be represented by the same Cartesian polynomial with different orders. DVAD is mathematically concise and superior to the velocity–azimuth display (VAD) in interpreting and deducing flow characteristics. The rVd pattern of a two-dimensional linear wind field is exclusively in the form of a bivariate quadratic equation representing conic sections (e.g., ellipse, parabola, and hyperbola) centered at the radar depending only on divergence and deformation. The presence of a constant background flow translates the conic sections to a different origin away from the radar. It is possible to graphically estimate the characteristics of a linear wind field from the conical sections without performing a VAD analysis. DVAD analysis can deduce quantitative flow characteristics by a least squares fitting and/or a derivative method, and is a natural way to account for nonlinearity. The rVd pattern behaves similar to a type of velocity potential in fluid mechanics where (rVd) is a proxy of the true wind vector and is used to estimate the general flow pattern in the vicinity of the radar.

The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Wen-Chau Lee, National Center for Atmospheric Research, 3450 Mitchell Ln., Boulder, CO 80303. E-mail: wenchau@ucar.edu

Abstract

The concept and mathematical framework of the distance velocity–azimuth display (DVAD) methodology is presented. DVAD uses rVd (Doppler velocity scaled by the distance from the radar to a gate, r) as the basis to display, interpret, and extract information from single Doppler radar observations. Both linear and nonlinear wind fields can be represented by the same Cartesian polynomial with different orders. DVAD is mathematically concise and superior to the velocity–azimuth display (VAD) in interpreting and deducing flow characteristics. The rVd pattern of a two-dimensional linear wind field is exclusively in the form of a bivariate quadratic equation representing conic sections (e.g., ellipse, parabola, and hyperbola) centered at the radar depending only on divergence and deformation. The presence of a constant background flow translates the conic sections to a different origin away from the radar. It is possible to graphically estimate the characteristics of a linear wind field from the conical sections without performing a VAD analysis. DVAD analysis can deduce quantitative flow characteristics by a least squares fitting and/or a derivative method, and is a natural way to account for nonlinearity. The rVd pattern behaves similar to a type of velocity potential in fluid mechanics where (rVd) is a proxy of the true wind vector and is used to estimate the general flow pattern in the vicinity of the radar.

The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Wen-Chau Lee, National Center for Atmospheric Research, 3450 Mitchell Ln., Boulder, CO 80303. E-mail: wenchau@ucar.edu
Save
  • Armijo, L., 1969: A theory for the determination of wind and precipitation velocities with Doppler radars. J. Atmos. Sci., 26, 570573.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bluestein, H. B., 1992: Synoptic-Dynamic Meteorology in Midlatitudes. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press, 431 pp.

  • Bluestein, H. B., and D. S. Hazen, 1989: Doppler radar analysis of a tropical cyclone over land: Hurricane Alicia (1983) in Oklahoma. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117, 25942611.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bluestein, H. B., S. D. Hrebenach, and C.-F. Chang, 1994: Synthetic dual-Doppler analysis of mesoscale convective systems. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 21052124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boccippio, D. J., 1995: A diagnostic analysis of the VVP single Doppler retrieval technique. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 12, 230248.

  • Browning, K. A., and R. Wexler, 1968: The determination of kinematic properties of a wind field using Doppler radar. J. Appl. Meteor., 7, 105113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Caya, D., and I. Zawadzki, 1992: VAD analysis of nonlinear wind field. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 9, 575587.

  • Donaldson, R. J., Jr., 1970: Vortex signature recognition by a Doppler radar. J. Appl. Meteor., 9, 661670.

  • Donaldson, R. J., Jr., 1991: A proposed technique for diagnosis by radar of hurricane structure. J. Appl. Meteor., 30, 16361645.

  • Gal-Chen, T., 1982: Errors in fixed and moving frame of reference: Applications for conventional and Doppler radar analysis. J. Atmos. Sci., 39, 22792300.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jou, B. J.-D., W.-C. Lee, S.-P. Liu, and Y.-C. Kao, 2008: Generalized VTD (GVTD) retrieval of atmospheric vortex kinematic structure. Part I: Formulation and error analysis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 9951012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Korn, C. A., and T. M. Korn, 1961: Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 943 pp.

  • Koscielny, A. J., R. J. Doviak, and R. Rabin, 1982: Statistical considerations in the estimation of divergence from single-Doppler radar and application to prestorm boundary-layer observations. J. Appl. Meteor., 21, 197210.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, W.-C., F. D. Marks, and R. E. Carbone, 1994: Velocity Track Display (VTD)—A technique to extract primary vortex circulation of a tropical cyclone in real time using single airborne Doppler radar data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 11, 337356.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, W.-C., B. J.-D. Jou, P.-L. Chang, and S.-M. Deng, 1999: Tropical cyclone kinematic structure retrieved from single-Doppler radar observations. Part I: Interpretation of Doppler velocity patterns and the GBVTD technique. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127, 24192439.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lhermitte, R. M., and D. Atlas, 1961: Precipitation motion by pulse Doppler radar. Preprints, Ninth Weather Radar Conf., Kansas City, KS, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 218223.

  • Matejka, T., and R. C. Srivastava, 1991: An improved version of the extended VAD analysis of single Doppler radar data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 8, 453466.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peace, R. L., Jr., R. A. Brown, and H. G. Camnitz, 1969: Horizontal motion field observations with a single pulse Doppler radar. J. Atmos. Sci., 26, 10961103.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roux, F., and F. D. Marks, 1996: Extended velocity track display (EVTD): An improved processing method for Doppler radar observations of tropical cyclones. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 13, 875899.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, A. E., 1959: Calculus with Analytic Geometry. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 762 pp.

  • Waldteufel, P., and H. Corbin, 1979: On the analysis of single-Doppler radar data. J. Appl. Meteor., 18, 532542.

  • Wood, V. T., and R. A. Brown, 1992: Effects of radar proximity on single-Doppler velocity of axisymmetric rotation and divergence. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, 27982807.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 761 316 18
PDF Downloads 324 93 2