Sensitivity of the ECMWF Model to Semi-Lagrangian Departure Point Iterations

Michail Diamantakis ECMWF, Reading, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Michail Diamantakis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Linus Magnusson ECMWF, Reading, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Linus Magnusson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Accurate estimation of the position of the departure points (d.p.) is crucial for the accuracy of a semi-Lagrangian NWP model. This calculation is often performed applying an implicit discretization to a kinematic equation solved by a fixed-point iteration scheme. A small number of iterations is typically used, assuming that this is sufficient for convergence. This assumption, derived from a past theoretical analysis, is revisited here. Analyzing the convergence of a generic d.p. iteration scheme and testing the ECMWF Integrated Forecast System (IFS) model, it is demonstrated that 2–3 iterations may not be sufficient for convergence to satisfactory accuracy in a modern high-resolution global model. Large forecast improvements can be seen by increasing the number of iterations. The extratropical geopotential error decreases and the simulated vertical structure of tropical cyclones improves. These findings prompted the implementation of an algorithm in which stopping criteria based on estimated convergence rates are used to “dynamically” stop d.p. iterations when an error tolerance criterion is satisfied. This is applied consistently to the nonlinear forecast, tangent linear, and adjoint models used by the ECMWF data assimilation system (4DVAR). Although the additional benefit of dynamic iteration is small, its testing reinforces the conclusion that a larger number of iterations is needed in regions of strong winds and shear. Furthermore, experiments suggest that dynamic iteration may prevent occasional 4DVAR failures in cases of strong stratospheric cross-polar flow in which the tangent linear model becomes unstable.

Corresponding author address: Michail Diamantakis, ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading, RG2 9AX, United Kingdom. E-mail: michail.diamantakis@ecmwf.int

Abstract

Accurate estimation of the position of the departure points (d.p.) is crucial for the accuracy of a semi-Lagrangian NWP model. This calculation is often performed applying an implicit discretization to a kinematic equation solved by a fixed-point iteration scheme. A small number of iterations is typically used, assuming that this is sufficient for convergence. This assumption, derived from a past theoretical analysis, is revisited here. Analyzing the convergence of a generic d.p. iteration scheme and testing the ECMWF Integrated Forecast System (IFS) model, it is demonstrated that 2–3 iterations may not be sufficient for convergence to satisfactory accuracy in a modern high-resolution global model. Large forecast improvements can be seen by increasing the number of iterations. The extratropical geopotential error decreases and the simulated vertical structure of tropical cyclones improves. These findings prompted the implementation of an algorithm in which stopping criteria based on estimated convergence rates are used to “dynamically” stop d.p. iterations when an error tolerance criterion is satisfied. This is applied consistently to the nonlinear forecast, tangent linear, and adjoint models used by the ECMWF data assimilation system (4DVAR). Although the additional benefit of dynamic iteration is small, its testing reinforces the conclusion that a larger number of iterations is needed in regions of strong winds and shear. Furthermore, experiments suggest that dynamic iteration may prevent occasional 4DVAR failures in cases of strong stratospheric cross-polar flow in which the tangent linear model becomes unstable.

Corresponding author address: Michail Diamantakis, ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading, RG2 9AX, United Kingdom. E-mail: michail.diamantakis@ecmwf.int
Save
  • Bates, J., and A. McDonald, 1982: Multiply-upstream, semi-Lagrangian advective schemes: Analysis and application to a multi-level primitive equation model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, 18311842, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1982)110<1831:MUSLAS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bénard, P., 2003: Stability of semi-implicit and iterative centered-implicit time discretizations for various equation systems used in NWP. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 24792491, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<2479:SOSAIC>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cullen, M., 2001: Alternative implementations of the semi-Lagrangian semi-implicit schemes in the ECMWF model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127, 27872802, doi:10.1002/qj.49712757814.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diamantakis, M., 2014: Improving ECMWF forecasts of sudden stratospheric warmings. ECMWF Newsletter, No. 141, ECMWF, Reading, United Kingdom, 30–36.

  • Hortal, M., 2002: The development and testing of a new two-time-level semi-Lagrangian scheme (SETTLS) in the ECMWF forecast model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 16711687, doi:10.1002/qj.200212858314.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Janiskova, M., and P. Lopez, 2012: Linearized physics for data assimilation at ECMWF. Data Assimilation for Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Hydrologic Applications, S. K. Park and L. Xu, Eds., Vol. II, Springer-Verlag, 251–286.

  • Li, Y., I. M. Navon, P. Courtier, and P. Gauthier, 1993: Variational data assimilation with a semi-Lagrangian semi-implicit global shallow-water equation model and its adjoint. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 17591769, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1993)121<1759:VDAWAS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Polavarapu, S., M. Tanguay, R. Menard, and A. Staniforth, 1996: The tangent linear model for semi-Lagrangian schemes: Linearizing the process of interpolation. Tellus, 48A, 7495, doi:10.1034/j.1600-0870.1996.00005.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pudykiewicz, J., and A. Staniforth, 1984: Some properties and comparative performance of the semi-Lagrangian method of Robert in the solution of the advection-diffusion equation. Atmos.–Ocean, 22, 283308, doi:10.1080/07055900.1984.9649200.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rabier, F., H. Järvinen, E. Klinker, J. Mahfouf, and A. Simmons, 2000: The ECMWF operational implementation of four-dimensional variational assimilation. Part I: Experimental results with simplified physics. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126, 11431170, doi:10.1002/qj.49712656415.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ritchie, H., 1987: Semi-Lagrangian advection on a Gaussian grid. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115, 608619, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<0608:SLAOAG>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smolarkiewicz, P., and J. Pudykiewicz, 1992: A class of semi-Lagrangian approximations for fluids. J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 20822096, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1992)049<2082:ACOSLA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Staniforth, A., and J. Côté, 1991: Semi-Lagrangian integration schemes for atmospheric models—A review. Mon. Wea. Rev., 119, 22062223, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119<2206:SLISFA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Temperton, C., M. Hortal, and A. Simmons, 2001: A two-time-level semi-Lagrangian global spectral model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127, 111127, doi:10.1002/qj.49712757107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Untch, A., and M. Hortal, 2004: A finite-element scheme for the vertical discretization of the semi-Lagrangian version of the ECMWF forecast model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130, 15051530, doi:10.1256/qj.03.173.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wedi, N., and Coauthors, 2015: The modelling infrastructure of the Integrated Forecasting System: Recent advances and future challenges. ECMWF Tech. Rep. 760, 50 pp.

  • Wood, N., and Coauthors, 2014: An inherently mass-conserving semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian discretization of the deep-atmosphere global non-hydrostatic equations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 15051520, doi:10.1002/qj.2235.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 939 208 20
PDF Downloads 359 103 3