Impact of Variations in Upper-Level Shear on Simulated Supercells

Robert A. Warren School of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for other papers by Robert A. Warren in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Harald Richter Research and Development Branch, Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for other papers by Harald Richter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hamish A. Ramsay School of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment, and ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for other papers by Hamish A. Ramsay in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Steven T. Siems School of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for other papers by Steven T. Siems in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Michael J. Manton School of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for other papers by Michael J. Manton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

It has previously been suggested, based on limited observations, that vertical wind shear in the upper troposphere is a key control on supercell morphology, with the low-precipitation, high-precipitation, and classic archetypes favored under strong, weak, and moderate shear, respectively. The idea is that, with increasing upper-level shear (ULS), hydrometeors are transported farther from the updraft by stronger storm-relative anvil-level winds, limiting their growth and thereby reducing precipitation intensity. The present study represents the first attempt to test this hypothesis, using idealized simulations of supercells performed across a range of 6–12-km shear profiles.

Contrary to expectations, there is a significant increase in surface precipitation and an associated strengthening of outflow winds as ULS magnitude is increased from 0 to 20 m s−1. These changes result from an increase in storm motion, which drives stronger low-level inflow, a wider updraft, and enhanced condensation. A further increase in ULS magnitude to 30 m s−1 promotes a slight reduction in storm intensity associated with surging rear-flank outflow. However, this transition in behavior is found to be sensitive to other factors that influence cold-pool strength, such as mixed-layer depth and model microphysics. Variations in the vertical distribution and direction of ULS are also considered, but are found to have a much smaller impact on storm intensity than variations in ULS magnitude.

Suggestions for the disparity between the current results and the aforementioned observations are offered and the need for further research on supercell morphology—in particular, simulations in drier environments—is emphasized.

© 2017 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Robert A. Warren, rob.warren@monash.edu

Abstract

It has previously been suggested, based on limited observations, that vertical wind shear in the upper troposphere is a key control on supercell morphology, with the low-precipitation, high-precipitation, and classic archetypes favored under strong, weak, and moderate shear, respectively. The idea is that, with increasing upper-level shear (ULS), hydrometeors are transported farther from the updraft by stronger storm-relative anvil-level winds, limiting their growth and thereby reducing precipitation intensity. The present study represents the first attempt to test this hypothesis, using idealized simulations of supercells performed across a range of 6–12-km shear profiles.

Contrary to expectations, there is a significant increase in surface precipitation and an associated strengthening of outflow winds as ULS magnitude is increased from 0 to 20 m s−1. These changes result from an increase in storm motion, which drives stronger low-level inflow, a wider updraft, and enhanced condensation. A further increase in ULS magnitude to 30 m s−1 promotes a slight reduction in storm intensity associated with surging rear-flank outflow. However, this transition in behavior is found to be sensitive to other factors that influence cold-pool strength, such as mixed-layer depth and model microphysics. Variations in the vertical distribution and direction of ULS are also considered, but are found to have a much smaller impact on storm intensity than variations in ULS magnitude.

Suggestions for the disparity between the current results and the aforementioned observations are offered and the need for further research on supercell morphology—in particular, simulations in drier environments—is emphasized.

© 2017 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Robert A. Warren, rob.warren@monash.edu
Save
  • Adlerman, E. J., and K. K. Droegemeier, 2002: The sensitivity of numerically simulated cyclic mesocyclogenesis to variations in model physical and computational parameters. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 26712691, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<2671:TSONSC>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beatty, K., E. Rasmussen, and J. Straka, 2008: The supercell spectrum. Part I: A review of research related to supercell precipitation morphology. Electron. J. Severe Storms Meteor., 3 (4). [Available online at http://www.ejssm.org/ojs/index.php/ejssm/article/viewArticle/44/.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beatty, K., E. N. Rasmussen, J. M. Straka, and L. R. Lemon, 2009: The supercell spectrum. Part II: A semi-objective method for radar classification of supercell type. Electron. J. Severe Storms Meteor., 4 (1). [Available online at http://ejssm.org/ojs/index.php/ejssm/article/viewArticle/45.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bluestein, H. B., 1984: Further examples of low-precipitation severe thunderstorms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 112, 18851888, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1984)112<1885:FEOLPS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bluestein, H. B., and C. R. Parks, 1983: A synoptic and photographic climatology of low-precipitation severe thunderstorms in the southern plains. Mon. Wea. Rev., 111, 20342046, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1983)111<2034:ASAPCO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brooks, H. E., C. A. Doswell III, and R. B. Wilhelmson, 1994: The role of midtropospheric winds in the evolution and maintenance of low-level mesocyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 126136, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<0126:TROMWI>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Browning, K. A., 1964: Airflow and precipitation trajectories within severe local storms which travel to the right of the winds. J. Atmos. Sci., 21, 634639, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1964)021<0634:AAPTWS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bryan, G. H., 2016: The governing equations for CM1. National Center for Atmospheric Research Tech. Rep., 17 pp. [Available online at http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/people/bryan/cm1/cm1_equations.pdf.]

  • Bryan, G. H., and J. M. Fritsch, 2002: A benchmark simulation for moist nonhydrostatic numerical models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 29172928, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<2917:ABSFMN>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bryan, G. H., J. C. Wyngaard, and J. M. Fritsch, 2003: Resolution requirements for the simulation of deep moist convection. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 23942416, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<2394:RRFTSO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bunkers, M. J., 2010: How midlevel horizontal humidity gradients affect simulated storm morphology. 25th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Denver, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., P7.1. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/25SLS/webprogram/Paper175623.html.]

  • Bunkers, M. J., B. A. Klimowski, J. W. Zeitler, R. L. Thompson, and M. L. Weisman, 2000: Predicting supercell motion using a new hodograph technique. Wea. Forecasting, 15, 6179, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015<0061:PSMUAN>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bunkers, M. J., D. A. Barber, R. L. Thompson, R. Edwards, and J. Garner, 2014: Choosing a universal mean wind for supercell motion prediction. J. Oper. Meteor., 2, 115129, doi:10.15191/nwajom.2014.0211.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coffer, B. E., and M. D. Parker, 2015: Impacts of increasing low-level shear on supercells during the early evening transition. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 19451969, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-14-00328.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cohen, C., and E. W. McCaul Jr., 2006: The sensitivity of simulated convective storms to variations in prescribed single-moment microphysics parameters that describe particle distributions, sizes, and numbers. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 25472565, doi:10.1175/MWR3195.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davies, J. M., 1998: On supercell motion in weaker wind environments. Preprints, 19th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Minneapolis, MN, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 685–688.

  • Davies, J. M., and R. H. Johns, 1993: Some wind and instability parameters associated with strong and violent tornadoes. Part I: Wind shear and helicity. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards, Geophys. Monogr., Vol. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 573–582.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Davies-Jones, R., 2002: Linear and nonlinear propagation of supercell storms. J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 31783205, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2003)059<3178:LANPOS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davies-Jones, R., 2003: An expression for effective buoyancy in surroundings with horizontal density gradients. J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 29222925, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<2922:AEFEBI>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dawson, D. T., II, M. Xue, J. A. Milbrandt, and M. Yau, 2010: Comparison of evaporation and cold pool development between single-moment and multimoment bulk microphysics schemes in idealized simulations of tornadic thunderstorms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 11521171, doi:10.1175/2009MWR2956.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deardorff, J. W., 1980: Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 18, 495527, doi:10.1007/BF00119502.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doswell, C. A., III, and P. M. Markowski, 2004: Is buoyancy a relative quantity? Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 853863, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0853:IBARQ>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doswell, C. A., III, A. R. Moller, and R. Przybylinski, 1990: A unified set of conceptual models for variations on the supercell theme. Preprints, 16th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Kananaskis Park, AB, Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 40–45.

  • Grant, L. D., and S. C. Van den Heever, 2014: Microphysical and dynamical characteristics of low-precipitation and classic supercells. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 26042624, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-13-0261.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hastings, R., and Y. Richardson, 2016: Long-term morphological changes in simulated supercells following mergers with nascent supercells in directionally varying shear. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 471499, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-15-0193.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • James, R. P., and P. M. Markowski, 2010: A numerical investigation of the effects of dry air aloft on deep convection. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 140161, doi:10.1175/2009MWR3018.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jeevanjee, N., and D. M. Romps, 2016: Effective buoyancy at the surface and aloft. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 811820, doi:10.1002/qj.2683.

  • Kirkpatrick, C., E. W. McCaul Jr., and C. Cohen, 2011: Sensitivities of simulated convective storms to environmental CAPE. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 35143532, doi:10.1175/2011MWR3631.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klemp, J. B., and R. B. Wilhelmson, 1978: The simulation of three-dimensional convective storm dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 10701096, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035<1070:TSOTDC>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lakshmanan, V., B. Herzog, and D. Kingfield, 2015: A method for extracting postevent storm tracks. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 54, 451462, doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-14-0132.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lebo, Z., and H. Morrison, 2015: Effects of horizontal and vertical grid spacing on mixing in simulated squall lines and implications for convective strength and structure. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 43554375, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-15-0154.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lemon, L. R., and C. A. Doswell III, 1979: Severe thunderstorm evolution and mesocyclone structure as related to tornadogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 107, 11841197, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1979)107<1184:STEAMS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lin, Y.-L., R. D. Farley, and H. D. Orville, 1983: Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 22, 10651092, doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<1065:BPOTSF>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Loftus, A. M., D. B. Weber, and C. A. Doswell III, 2008: Parameterized mesoscale forcing mechanisms for initiating numerically simulated isolated multicellular convection. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 24082421, doi:10.1175/2007MWR2133.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Markowski, P., and Y. Richardson, 2010: Mesoscale Meteorology in Midlatitudes. Wiley-Blackwell, 407 pp.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Markowski, P., and Y. Richardson, 2014: The influence of environmental low-level shear and cold pools on tornadogenesis: Insights from idealized simulations. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 243275, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-13-0159.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCaul, E. W., Jr., and M. L. Weisman, 2001: The sensitivity of simulated supercell structure and intensity to variations in the shapes of environmental buoyancy and shear profiles. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 664687, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0664:TSOSSS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCaul, E. W., Jr., and C. Cohen, 2002: The impact on simulated storm structure and intensity of variations in the mixed layer and moist layer depths. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 17221748, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<1722:TIOSSS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCaul, E. W., Jr., and C. Cohen, 2004: The initiation, longevity, and morphology of simulated convective storms as a function of free-tropospheric relative humidity. 11th Conf. on Aviation, Range, and Aerospace/22nd Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Hyannis, MA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 8A.5. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/11aram22sls/webprogram/Paper81251.html.]

  • McCaul, E. W., Jr., C. Cohen, and C. Kirkpatrick, 2005: The sensitivity of simulated storm structure, intensity, and precipitation efficiency to environmental temperature. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 30153037, doi:10.1175/MWR3015.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moller, A. R., C. A. Doswell III, and R. Przybylinski, 1990: High precipitation supercells: A conceptual model and documentation. Preprints, 16th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Kananaskis Park, AB, Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 52–57.

  • Moller, A. R., C. A. Doswell III, M. P. Foster, and G. R. Woodall, 1994: The operational recognition of supercell thunderstorm environments and storm structures. Wea. Forecasting, 9, 327347, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(1994)009<0327:TOROST>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morrison, H., 2016a: Impacts of updraft size and dimensionality on the perturbation pressure and vertical velocity in cumulus convection. Part I: Simple, generalized analytic solutions. J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 14411454, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-15-0040.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morrison, H., 2016b: Impacts of updraft size and dimensionality on the perturbation pressure and vertical velocity in cumulus convection. Part II: Comparison of theoretical and numerical solutions and fully dynamical simulations. J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 14551480, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-15-0041.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morrison, H., and J. Milbrandt, 2011: Comparison of two-moment bulk microphysics schemes in idealized supercell thunderstorm simulations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 11031130, doi:10.1175/2010MWR3433.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morrison, H., J. Curry, and V. Khvorostyanov, 2005: A new double-moment microphysics parameterization for application in cloud and climate models. Part I: Description. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 16651677, doi:10.1175/JAS3446.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Naylor, J., and M. S. Gilmore, 2012: Convective initiation in an idealized cloud model using an updraft nudging technique. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 36993705, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-12-00163.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nelson, S. P., 1987: The hybrid multicellular–supercellular storm—An efficient hail producer. Part II. General characteristics and implications for hail growth. J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 20602073, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<2060:THMSEH>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nowotarski, C. J., P. M. Markowski, and Y. P. Richardson, 2011: The characteristics of numerically simulated supercell storms situated over statically stable boundary layers. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 31393162, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-10-05087.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parker, M. D., 2010: Relationship between system slope and updraft intensity in squall lines. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 35723578, doi:10.1175/2010MWR3441.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Petch, J., 2006: Sensitivity studies of developing convection in a cloud-resolving model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 132, 345358, doi:10.1256/qj.05.71.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ramsay, H. A., and C. A. Doswell III, 2005: A sensitivity study of hodograph-based methods for estimating supercell motion. Wea. Forecasting, 20, 954970, doi:10.1175/WAF889.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rasmussen, E. N., and D. O. Blanchard, 1998: A baseline climatology of sounding-derived supercell and tornado forecast parameters. Wea. Forecasting, 13, 11481164, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(1998)013<1148:ABCOSD>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rasmussen, E. N., and J. M. Straka, 1998: Variations in supercell morphology. Part I: Observations of the role of upper-level storm-relative flow. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126, 24062421, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<2406:VISMPI>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rotunno, R., and J. B. Klemp, 1982: The influence of the shear-induced pressure gradient on thunderstorm motion. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, 136151, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1982)110<0136:TIOTSI>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rotunno, R., and J. B. Klemp, 1985: On the rotation and propagation of simulated supercell thunderstorms. J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 271292, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1985)042<0271:OTRAPO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schultz, D. M., C. C. Weiss, and P. M. Hoffman, 2007: The synoptic regulation of dryline intensity. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 16991709, doi:10.1175/MWR3376.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Snook, N., Y. Jung, J. Brotzge, B. Putnam, and M. Xue, 2016: Prediction and ensemble forecast verification of hail in the supercell storms of 20 May 2013. Wea. Forecasting, 31, 811825, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-15-0152.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Supinie, T. A., N. Yussouf, Y. Jung, M. Xue, and J. Cheng, 2016: An evaluation of the the utility of the WRT phased array radar observations as compared to WSR-88D in the analyses and forecasts of a tornadic supercell storm. 28th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Portland, OR, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 12B.3. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/28SLS/webprogram/Paper301958.html.]

  • Tao, W.-K., and J. Simpson, 1993: The Goddard Cumulus Ensemble Model. Part I: Model description. Terr. Atmos. Oceanic Sci., 4, 3572, doi:10.3319/TAO.1993.4.1.35(A).

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thompson, R. L., C. M. Mead, and R. Edwards, 2007: Effective storm-relative helicity and bulk shear in supercell thunderstorm environments. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 102115, doi:10.1175/WAF969.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thompson, R. L., B. T. Smith, J. S. Grams, A. R. Dean, and C. Broyles, 2012: Convective modes for significant severe thunderstorms in the contiguous United States. Part II: Supercell and QLCS tornado environments. Wea. Forecasting, 27, 11361154, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-11-00116.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Uccellini, L. W., and D. R. Johnson, 1979: The coupling of upper and lower tropospheric jet streaks and implications for the development of severe convective storms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 107, 682703, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1979)107<0682:TCOUAL>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van den Heever, S. C., and W. R. Cotton, 2004: The impact of hail size on simulated supercell storms. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 15961609, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<1596:TIOHSO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van Weverberg, K., A. M. Vogelmann, H. Morrison, and J. A. Milbrandt, 2012: Sensitivity of idealized squall-line simulations to the level of complexity used in two-moment bulk microphysics schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 18831907, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-11-00120.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Verrelle, A., D. Ricard, and C. Lac, 2015: Sensitivity of high-resolution idealized simulations of thunderstorms to horizontal resolution and turbulence parametrization. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 433448, doi:10.1002/qj.2363.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weisman, M. L., and J. B. Klemp, 1982: The dependence of numerically simulated convective storms on vertical wind shear and buoyancy. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, 504520, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1982)110<0504:TDONSC>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weisman, M. L., and J. B. Klemp, 1984: The structure and classification of numerically simulated convective storms in directionally varying wind shears. Mon. Wea. Rev., 112, 24792498, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1984)112<2479:TSACON>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weisman, M. L., and R. Rotunno, 2000: The use of vertical wind shear versus helicity in interpreting supercell dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 14521472, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<1452:TUOVWS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yussouf, N., D. C. Dowell, L. J. Wicker, K. H. Knopfmeier, and D. M. Wheatley, 2015: Storm-scale data assimilation and ensemble forecasts for the 27 April 2011 severe weather outbreak in Alabama. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 30443066, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-14-00268.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zeitler, J. W., and M. J. Bunkers, 2005: Operational forecasting of supercell motion: Review and case studies using multiple datasets. Natl. Wea. Dig., 29 (1), 8197.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2543 940 185
PDF Downloads 949 187 15