Probabilistic Forecasting of Snowfall Amounts Using a Hybrid between a Parametric and an Analog Approach

Michael Scheuerer Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, and Physical Sciences Division, NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Michael Scheuerer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Thomas M. Hamill Physical Sciences Division, NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Thomas M. Hamill in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

Forecast uncertainty associated with the prediction of snowfall amounts is a complex superposition of the uncertainty about precipitation amounts and the uncertainty about weather variables like temperature that influence the snow-forming process. In situations with heavy precipitation, parametric, regression-based postprocessing approaches often perform very well since they can extrapolate relations between forecast and observed precipitation amounts established with data from more common events. The complexity of the relation between temperature and snowfall amounts, on the other hand, makes nonparametric techniques like the analog method an attractive choice. In this article we show how these two different methodologies can be combined in a way that leverages the respective advantages. Predictive distributions of precipitation amounts are obtained using a heteroscedastic regression approach based on censored, shifted gamma distributions, and quantile forecasts derived from them are used together with ensemble forecasts of temperature to find analog dates where both quantities were similar. The observed snowfall amounts on these dates are then used to compose an ensemble that represents the uncertainty about future snowfall. We demonstrate this approach with reforecast data from the Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS) and snowfall analyses from the National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center (NOHRSC) over an area within the northeastern United States and an area within the U.S. mountain states.

Supplemental information related to this paper is available at the Journals Online website: https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0273.s1.

© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Michael Scheuerer, michael.scheuerer@noaa.gov

Abstract

Forecast uncertainty associated with the prediction of snowfall amounts is a complex superposition of the uncertainty about precipitation amounts and the uncertainty about weather variables like temperature that influence the snow-forming process. In situations with heavy precipitation, parametric, regression-based postprocessing approaches often perform very well since they can extrapolate relations between forecast and observed precipitation amounts established with data from more common events. The complexity of the relation between temperature and snowfall amounts, on the other hand, makes nonparametric techniques like the analog method an attractive choice. In this article we show how these two different methodologies can be combined in a way that leverages the respective advantages. Predictive distributions of precipitation amounts are obtained using a heteroscedastic regression approach based on censored, shifted gamma distributions, and quantile forecasts derived from them are used together with ensemble forecasts of temperature to find analog dates where both quantities were similar. The observed snowfall amounts on these dates are then used to compose an ensemble that represents the uncertainty about future snowfall. We demonstrate this approach with reforecast data from the Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS) and snowfall analyses from the National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center (NOHRSC) over an area within the northeastern United States and an area within the U.S. mountain states.

Supplemental information related to this paper is available at the Journals Online website: https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0273.s1.

© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Michael Scheuerer, michael.scheuerer@noaa.gov

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 133.16 KB)
Save
  • Alcott, T. I., and W. J. Steenburgh, 2010: Snow-to-liquid ratio variability and prediction at a high-elevation site in Utah’s Wasatch Mountains. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 323337, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009WAF2222311.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clark, E. P., 2017: Updated NWS Technical Implementation Notice 15-05. NOAA/NWS, accessed December 2017, http://www.nws.noaa.gov/os/notification/tin15-05bigrsc_snowfall_aaa.htm.

  • Dabernig, M., G. J. Mayr, J. W. Messner, and A. Zeileis, 2017: Spatial ensemble post-processing with standardized anomalies. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 909916, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2975.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Delle Monache, L., T. Eckel, D. Rife, and B. Nagarajan, 2013: Probabilistic weather prediction with an analog ensemble. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 34983516, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00281.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gneiting, T., 2011: Making and evaluating point forecasts. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 106, 746762, https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2011.r10138.

  • Gneiting, T., and A. E. Raftery, 2007: Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 102, 359378, https://doi.org/10.1198/016214506000001437.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gowan, T. M., W. J. Steenburgh, and C. S. Schwartz, 2018: Validation of mountain precipitation forecasts from the convection-permitting NCAR ensemble and operational forecast systems over the western United States. Wea. Forecasting, 33, 739765, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-17-0144.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grimit, E. P., T. Gneiting, V. J. Berrocal, and N. A. Johnson, 2006: The continuous ranked probability score for circular variables and its application to mesoscale forecast ensemble verification. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 132, 29252942, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.235.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hamill, T. M., 1999: Hypothesis tests for evaluating numerical precipitation forecasts. Wea. Forecasting, 14, 155167, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1999)014<0155:HTFENP>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hamill, T. M., and J. S. Whitaker, 2006: Probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts based on reforecast analogs: Theory and application. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 32093229, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3237.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hamill, T. M., and M. Scheuerer, 2018: Probabilistic precipitation forecast postprocessing using quantile mapping and rank-weighted best-member dressing. Mon. Wea. Rev., 146, 4079–4098, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0147.1.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Hamill, T. M., J. S. Whitaker, and S. L. Mullen, 2006: Reforecasts: An important dataset for improving weather predictions. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 87, 3346, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-87-1-33.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hamill, T. M., G. T. Bates, J. S. Whitaker, D. R. Murray, M. Fiorino, T. J. Galarneau, Y. Zhu, and W. Lapenta, 2013: NOAA’s second-generation global medium-range ensemble reforecast dataset. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 94, 15531565, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00014.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hamill, T. M., M. Scheuerer, and G. Bates, 2015: Analog probabilistic precipitation forecasts using GEFS reforecasts and climatology-calibrated precipitation analyses. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 33003309, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0004.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Junk, C., L. Delle Monache, S. Alessandrini, G. Cervone, and L. Bremen, 2015: Predictor-weighting strategies for probabilistic wind power forecasting with an analog ensemble. Meteor. Z., 24, 361379, https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2015/0659.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lerch, S., and S. Baran, 2017: Similarity-based semilocal estimation of post-processing models. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. C, 66, 2951, https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12153.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lin, Y., 2011: GCIP/EOP surface: Precipitation NCEP/EMC 4KM Gridded Data (GRIB) Stage IV data (version 1.0). NCAR/UCAR, accessed December 2017, https://doi.org/10.5065/d6pg1qdd.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • R Core Team, 2017: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, https://www.R-project.org/.

  • Roebber, P. J., S. L. Bruening, D. M. Schultz, and J. V. Cortinas Jr., 2003: Improving snowfall forecasting by diagnosing snow density. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 264287, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2003)018<0264:ISFBDS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rogers, E., and Coauthors, 2017: Mesoscale modeling development at the National Centers for Environmental Prediction: Version 4 of the NAM forecast system and scenarios for the evolution to a high-resolution ensemble forecast system. 28th Conf. on Weather and Forecasting/24th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Seattle, WA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 3B.4, https://ams.confex.com/ams/97Annual/webprogram/Paper311212.html.

  • Scheuerer, M., and T. M. Hamill, 2015: Statistical postprocessing of ensemble precipitation forecasts by fitting censored, shifted gamma distributions. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 45784596, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0061.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scheuerer, M., and T. M. Hamill, 2018: Generating calibrated ensembles of physically realistic, high-resolution precipitation forecast fields based on GEFS model output. J. Hydrometeor., 19, 16511670, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-18-0067.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scheuerer, M., S. Gregory, T. M. Hamill, and P. E. Shafer, 2017a: Probabilistic precipitation type forecasting based on GEFS ensemble forecasts of vertical temperature profiles. Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 14011412, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0321.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scheuerer, M., T. M. Hamill, B. Whitin, M. He, and A. Henkel, 2017b: A method for preferential selection of dates in the Schaake shuffle approach to constructing spatio-temporal forecast fields of temperature and precipitation. Water Resour. Res., 53, 30293046, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020133.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sievers, O., K. Fraedrich, and C. Raible, 2000: Improving snowfall forecasting by accounting for the climatological variability of snow density. Wea. Forecasting, 15, 623629, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015<0623:SAAEPO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stauffer, R., G. J. Mayr, J. W. Messner, and A. Zeileis, 2018: Hourly probabilistic snow forecasts over complex terrain: A hybrid ensemble postprocessing approach. Adv. Stat. Climatol. Meteor. Oceanogr., 4, 65–86, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-4-65-2018.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Ware, E. C., D. M. Schultz, H. E. Brooks, P. J. Roebber, and S. L. Bruening, 2006: Improving snowfall forecasting by accounting for the climatological variability of snow density. Wea. Forecasting, 21, 94103, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF903.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilks, D. S., 2011: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences. 3rd ed. Academic Press, 704 pp.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Zhao, Q., and F. H. Carr, 1997: A prognostic cloud scheme for operational NWP models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 19311953, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<1931:APCSFO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhou, X., Y. Zhu, D. Hou, Y. Luo, J. Peng, and R. Wobus, 2017: Performance of the new NCEP Global Ensemble Forecast System in a parallel experiment. Wea. Forecasting, 32, 19892004, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-17-0023.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2512 1921 914
PDF Downloads 819 195 13