The Influence of Turbulence Memory on Idealized Tornado Simulations

Aaron Wang The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Aaron Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ying Pan The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Ying Pan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Paul M. Markowski The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Paul M. Markowski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Surface friction contributes to tornado formation and maintenance by enhancing the convergence of angular momentum. The traditional lower boundary condition in atmospheric models typically assumes an instant equilibrium between the unresolved stress and the resolved shear. This assumption ignores the physics that turbulent motions are generated and dissipated at finite rates—in effect, turbulence has a memory through its lifetime. In this work, a modified lower boundary condition is proposed to account for the effect of turbulence memory. Specifically, when an air parcel moves along a curved trajectory, a normal surface-shear-stress component arises owing to turbulence memory. In the accompanying large-eddy simulation (LES) of idealized tornadoes, the normal surface-shear-stress component is a source of additional dynamic instability, which provides an extra pathway for the development of turbulent motions. The influence of turbulence memory on the intensity of quasi-steady-state tornadoes remains negligible as long as assumptions employed by the modified lower boundary condition hold over a relatively large fraction of the flow region of interest. However, tornadoes in a transient state may be especially sensitive to turbulence memory.

Significance Statement

Friction between the wind and the ground can influence atmospheric phenomena in important ways. For example, surface friction can be a significant source of rotation in some thunderstorms, and it can also help to intensify rotation when rotation is already present. Unfortunately, the representation of friction’s effects in atmospheric simulations is especially error-prone in phenomena characterized by rapid temporal evolution or strong spatial variations. Our work explores a new framework for representing friction to include the effect of the so-called turbulence memory. The approach is tested in idealized tornado simulations, but it may be applied to a wide range of atmospheric vortices.

Corresponding author: Ying Pan, yyp5033@psu.edu

© 2020 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Abstract

Surface friction contributes to tornado formation and maintenance by enhancing the convergence of angular momentum. The traditional lower boundary condition in atmospheric models typically assumes an instant equilibrium between the unresolved stress and the resolved shear. This assumption ignores the physics that turbulent motions are generated and dissipated at finite rates—in effect, turbulence has a memory through its lifetime. In this work, a modified lower boundary condition is proposed to account for the effect of turbulence memory. Specifically, when an air parcel moves along a curved trajectory, a normal surface-shear-stress component arises owing to turbulence memory. In the accompanying large-eddy simulation (LES) of idealized tornadoes, the normal surface-shear-stress component is a source of additional dynamic instability, which provides an extra pathway for the development of turbulent motions. The influence of turbulence memory on the intensity of quasi-steady-state tornadoes remains negligible as long as assumptions employed by the modified lower boundary condition hold over a relatively large fraction of the flow region of interest. However, tornadoes in a transient state may be especially sensitive to turbulence memory.

Significance Statement

Friction between the wind and the ground can influence atmospheric phenomena in important ways. For example, surface friction can be a significant source of rotation in some thunderstorms, and it can also help to intensify rotation when rotation is already present. Unfortunately, the representation of friction’s effects in atmospheric simulations is especially error-prone in phenomena characterized by rapid temporal evolution or strong spatial variations. Our work explores a new framework for representing friction to include the effect of the so-called turbulence memory. The approach is tested in idealized tornado simulations, but it may be applied to a wide range of atmospheric vortices.

Corresponding author: Ying Pan, yyp5033@psu.edu

© 2020 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Save
  • Bradshaw, P., and N. Pontikos, 1985: Measurements in the turbulent boundary layer on an ‘infinite’ swept wing. J. Fluid Mech., 159, 105130, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112085003123.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bryan, G. H., 2017: The governing equations for CM1. NCAR Doc., 24 pp., https://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/people/bryan/cm1/cm1_equations.pdf.

  • Bryan, G. H., and H. Morrison, 2012: Sensitivity of a simulated squall line to horizontal resolution and parameterization of microphysics. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 202225, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00046.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bryan, G. H., N. A. Dahl, D. S. Nolan, and R. Rotunno, 2017: An eddy injection method for large-eddy simulations of tornado-like vortices. Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 19371961, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0339.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burggraf, O. R., K. Stewartson, and R. Belcher, 1971: Boundary layer induced by a potential vortex. Phys. Fluids, 14, 18211833, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1693691.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Church, C., J. Snow, and E. Agee, 1977: Tornado vortex simulation at Purdue University. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 58, 900908, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1977)058<0900:TVSAPU>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davidson, P. A., 2015: Turbulence: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 629 pp.

  • Davies-Jones, R., 2015: A review of supercell and tornado dynamics. Atmos. Res., 158–157, 274291, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.04.007.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davies-Jones, R., R. J. Trapp, and H. B. Bluestein, 2001: Tornadoes and tornadic storms. Severe Convective Storms, Meteor. Monogr., No. 50, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 167–221.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Deardorff, J. W., 1980: Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 18, 495527, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119502.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fiedler, B. H., 1995: On modelling tornadoes in isolation from the parent storm. Atmos.–Ocean, 33, 501512, https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.1995.9649542.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fiedler, B. H., and R. Rotunno, 1986: A theory for the maximum wind speeds in tornado-like vortices. J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 23282340, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1986)043<2328:ATOTMW>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holton, J. R., and G. J. Hakim, 2013: An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology. 5th ed. Elsevier Inc., 532 pp.

  • Kaimal, J. C., and J. J. Finnigan, 1994: Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows: Their Structure and Measurement. Oxford University Press, 289 pp.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lewellen, D., and W. Lewellen, 2007: Near-surface intensification of tornado vortices. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 21762194, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3965.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lewellen, W. S., 1976: Theoretical models of the tornado vortex. Symp. on Tornadoes: Assessment of Knowledge and Implications for Man, Lubbock, TX, Texas Tech. University, 107–143.

  • Lewellen, W. S., 1993: Tornado vortex theory. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards, Geophys. Monogr., Vol. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 19–39.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Mahrt, L., D. Vickers, J. Sun, N. O. Jensen, H. Jørgensen, E. Pardyjak, and H. Fernando, 2001: Determination of the surface drag coefficient. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 99, 249276, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018915228170.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Markowski, P. M., and G. H. Bryan, 2016: LES of laminar flow in the PBL: A potential problem for convective storm simulations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 18411850, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0439.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moin, P., T.-H. Shih, D. Driver, and N. N. Mansour, 1990: Direct numerical simulation of a three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer. Phys. Fluids, 2, 18461853, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.857658.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Monin, A. S., and A. M. Obukhov, 1954: Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface layer of the atmosphere. Tr. Akad. Nauk SSSR Geophiz. Inst., 151, 163187.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nolan, D. S., N. A. Dahl, G. H. Bryan, and R. Rotunno, 2017: Tornado vortex structure, intensity, and surface wind gusts in large-eddy simulations with fully developed turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 15731597, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0258.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pan, Y., and E. G. Patton, 2017: On determining stationary periods within time series. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 34, 22132232, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-17-0038.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Poggi, D., A. Porporato, L. Ridolfi, J. D. Albertson, and G. G. Katul, 2004: The effect of vegetation density on canopy sub-layer turbulence. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 111, 565587, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BOUN.0000016576.05621.73.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pope, S. B., 2000: Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press, 771 pp.

  • Raupach, M. R., J. J. Finnigan, and Y. Brunet, 1996: Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: The mixing-layer analogy. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 78, 351382, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120941.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rotunno, R., 2013: The fluid dynamics of tornadoes. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 45, 5984, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-011212-140639.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rotunno, R., G. H. Bryan, D. S. Nolan, and N. A. Dahl, 2016: Axisymmetric tornado simulations at high Reynolds number. J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 38433854, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0038.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schlichting, H., and K. Gersten, 2017: Boundary-Layer Theory. 9th ed. Springer, 805 pp.

  • Wyngaard, J. C., 2010: Turbulence in the Atmosphere. Cambridge University Press, 393 pp.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 479 0 0
Full Text Views 1477 829 69
PDF Downloads 780 192 23