Applications of the Geometry-Sensitive Ensemble Mean for Lake-Effect Snowbands and Other Weather Phenomena

Jonathan J. Seibert aDepartment of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Jonathan J. Seibert in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Steven J. Greybush aDepartment of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Steven J. Greybush in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jia Li bDepartment of Statistics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Jia Li in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Zhoumin Zhang cCollege of Information Sciences and Technology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Zhoumin Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Fuqing Zhang aDepartment of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Fuqing Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Ensembles of predictions are critical to modern weather forecasting. However, visualizing ensembles and their means in a useful way remains challenging. Existing methods of creating ensemble means do not recognize the physical structures that humans could identify within the ensemble members; therefore, visualizations for variables such as reflectivity lose important information and are difficult for human forecasters to interpret. In response, the authors create an improved ensemble mean that retains more structural information. The authors examine and expand upon the object-based Geometry-Sensitive Ensemble Mean (GEM) defined by Li and Zhang from a meteorological perspective. The authors apply low-intensity thresholding to WRF-simulated radar reflectivity images of lake-effect snowbands, tropical cyclones, and severe thunderstorms and then process them with the GEM system. Gaussian mixture model–based signatures retain the geometric structure of these phenomena and are used to compute a Wasserstein barycenter as the centroid for the ensemble; D2 clustering is employed to examine different scenarios among the ensemble members. Three types of ensemble mean image are created from the centroid of the ensemble or cluster, which each improve upon the traditional pixel-wise average in different ways, successfully capture aspects of the ensemble members’ structure, and have potential applications for future forecasting efforts. The adjusted best member is a better representative member, the Bayesian posterior mean is an improved structure-based weighted average, and the mixture density mean is an outline of the key structures in the ensemble. Each is shown to improve upon a simple arithmetic mean via quantitative comparison with observations.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

F. Zhang: Deceased.

Corresponding author: Jonathan J. Seibert, jjs5895@psu.edu

Abstract

Ensembles of predictions are critical to modern weather forecasting. However, visualizing ensembles and their means in a useful way remains challenging. Existing methods of creating ensemble means do not recognize the physical structures that humans could identify within the ensemble members; therefore, visualizations for variables such as reflectivity lose important information and are difficult for human forecasters to interpret. In response, the authors create an improved ensemble mean that retains more structural information. The authors examine and expand upon the object-based Geometry-Sensitive Ensemble Mean (GEM) defined by Li and Zhang from a meteorological perspective. The authors apply low-intensity thresholding to WRF-simulated radar reflectivity images of lake-effect snowbands, tropical cyclones, and severe thunderstorms and then process them with the GEM system. Gaussian mixture model–based signatures retain the geometric structure of these phenomena and are used to compute a Wasserstein barycenter as the centroid for the ensemble; D2 clustering is employed to examine different scenarios among the ensemble members. Three types of ensemble mean image are created from the centroid of the ensemble or cluster, which each improve upon the traditional pixel-wise average in different ways, successfully capture aspects of the ensemble members’ structure, and have potential applications for future forecasting efforts. The adjusted best member is a better representative member, the Bayesian posterior mean is an improved structure-based weighted average, and the mixture density mean is an outline of the key structures in the ensemble. Each is shown to improve upon a simple arithmetic mean via quantitative comparison with observations.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

F. Zhang: Deceased.

Corresponding author: Jonathan J. Seibert, jjs5895@psu.edu
Save
  • AMS, 2008: Enhancing weather information with probability forecasts: An information statement of the American Meteorological Society. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89, 10491053, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477-89.7.1041.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davis, C. A., B. G. Brown, R. Bullock, and J. Halley-Gotway, 2009: The Method for Object-based Diagnostic Evaluation (MODE) applied to numerical forecasts from the 2005 NSSL/SPC Spring Program. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 12521267, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009WAF2222241.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Demuth, J. L., B. H. Morrow, and J. K. Lazo, 2009: Weather forecast uncertainty information: An exploratory study with broadcast meteorologists. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 90, 16141618, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2787.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dudhia, J., 1989: Numerical study of convection observed during the Winter Monsoon Experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 30773107, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046<3077:NSOCOD>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eipper, D. T., S. J. Greybush, G. S. Young, S. Saslo, T. D. Sikora, and R. D. Clark, 2019: Lake-effect snowbands in baroclinic environments. Wea. Forecasting, 34, 16571674, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-18-0191.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ek, M. B., K. E. Mitchell, Y. Lin, E. Rogers, P. Grunmann, V. Koren, G. Gayno, and J. D. Tarpley, 2003: Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta Model. Climate Dyn., 108, 8851, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003296.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greybush, S. J., and S. Saslo, 2018: Insights from a convective-allowing ensemble data assimilation and prediction system for lake-effect snow. Eighth Conf. on Transition of Research to Operations, Austin, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., https://ams.confex.com/ams/98Annual/webprogram/Paper331262.html.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greybush, S. J., S. E. Haupt, and G. S. Young, 2008: The regime dependence of optimally weighted ensemble model consensus forecasts of surface temperature. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 11461161, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008WAF2007078.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greybush, S. J., S. Saslo, and R. Grumm, 2017: Assessing the ensemble predictability of precipitation forecasts for the January 2015 and 2016 East Coast winter storms. Wea. Forecasting, 32, 10571078, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0153.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Han, F., and I. Szunyogh, 2016: A morphing-based technique for the verification of precipitation forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 295313, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0172.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Han, F., and I. Szunyogh, 2018: A technique for the verification of precipitation forecasts and its application to a problem of predictability. Mon. Wea. Rev., 146, 13031318, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-17-0040.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hanson, G. S., 2016: Impact of assimilating surface pressure observations from smartphones on a regional, high resolution ensemble forecast: Observing system simulation experiments. M.S. thesis, Dept. of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, The Pennsylvania State University, 47 pp., https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/28709.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hirschberg, P. A., and Coauthors, 2011: A weather and climate enterprise strategic implementation plan for generating and communicating forecast uncertainty information. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 92, 16511666, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00073.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hong, S.-Y., and J. Lim, 2006: The WRF Single-Moment 6-class microphysics scheme (WSM6). J. Korean Meteor. Soc., 42, 129151.

  • Hong, S.-Y., Y. Noh, and J. Dudhia, 2006: A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 23182341, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Janjić, Z. I., 1990: The step-mountain coordinate: Physical package. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118, 14291443, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<1429:TSMCPP>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Joslyn, S., K. Pak, D. Jones, J. Pyles, and E. Hunt, 2007: The effect of probabilistic information on threshold forecasts. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 804812, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF1020.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kalnay, E., 2002: Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation and Predictability. Cambridge University Press, 341 pp.

  • Karstens, C. D., and Coauthors, 2015: Evaluation of a probabilistic forecasting methodology for severe convective weather in the 2014 Hazardous Weather Testbed. Wea. Forecasting, 30, 15511570, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-14-00163.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kowaleski, A. M., and J. L. Evans, 2016: Regression mixture model clustering of multimodel ensemble forecasts of Hurricane Sandy: Partition characteristics. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 38253846, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0099.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, J. A., L. J. Peltier, S. E. Haupt, J. C. Wyngaard, D. R. Stauffer, and A. Deng, 2009: Improving SCIPUFF dispersion forecasts with NWP ensembles. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 48, 23052319, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC2171.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li, J., and F. Zhang, 2018: Geometry-sensitive ensemble mean based on Wasserstein barycenters: Proof-of-concept on cloud simulations. J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 27, 785797, https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2018.1448831.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li, J., S. Ray, and B. G. Lindsay, 2007: A nonparametric statistical approach to clustering via mode identification. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 8, 16871723, https://doi.org/10.5555/1314498.1314555.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Minamide, M., 2018: On the predictability of tropical cyclones through all-sky infrared satellite radiance assimilation. Ph.D. dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, 202 pp., https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/15449mum373.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mlawer, E. J., S. J. Taubman, P. D. Brown, M. J. Iacono, and S. A. Clough, 1997: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16 66316 682, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • National Research Council, 2006: Completing the Forecast: Characterizing and Communicating Uncertainty for Better Decisions Using Weather and Climate Forecasts. National Academies Press, 124 pp., https://doi.org/10.17226/11699.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nehrkorn, T., B. Woods, T. Auligné, and R. N. Hoffman, 2014: Application of feature calibration and alignment to high-resolution analysis: Examples using observations sensitive to cloud and water vapor. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 686702, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00164.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Novak, D. R., D. R. Bright, and M. J. Brennan, 2008: Operational forecaster uncertainty needs and future roles. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 10691084, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008WAF2222142.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rachev, S.-T., 1985: The Monge–Kantorovich mass transference problem and its stochastic applications. Theory Probab. Appl., 29, 647676, https://doi.org/10.1137/1129093.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Raftery, A. E., T. Gneiting, F. Balabdaoui, and M. Polakowski, 2005: Using Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 11551174, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2906.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roberts, B., I. L. Jirak, A. J. Clark, S. J. Weiss, and J. S. Kain, 2019: Postprocessing and visualization techniques for convection-allowing ensembles. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 100, 12451258, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0041.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saslo, S., and S. J. Greybush, 2017: Prediction of lake-effect snow using convection-allowing ensemble forecasts and regional data assimilation. Wea. Forecasting, 32, 17271744, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0206.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sivillo, J. K., J. E. Ahlquist, and Z. Toth, 1997: An ensemble forecasting primer. Wea. Forecasting, 12, 809818, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1997)012<0809:AEFP>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Skamarock, W. C., and Coauthors, 2008: A description of the Advanced Research WRF version 3. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-475+STR, 113 pp., https://doi.org/10.5065/D68S4MVH.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thompson, G., P. R. Field, R. M. Rasmussen, and W. D. Hall, 2008: Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part II: Implementation of a new snow parameterization. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 50955115, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2387.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wernli, H., M. Paulat, M. Hagen, and C. Frei, 2008: SAL—A novel quality measure for the verification of quantitative precipitation forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 44704487, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2415.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Woodcock, F., and C. Engel, 2005: Operational consensus forecasts. Wea. Forecasting, 20, 101111, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-831.1.

  • Wu, C.-C., G.-Y. Lien, J.-H. Chen, and F. Zhang, 2010: Assimilation of tropical cyclone track and structure based on the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF). J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 38063822, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3444.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ye, J., and J. Li, 2014: Scaling up discrete distribution clustering using ADMM. Proc. Int. Conf. Image Processing (ICIP), Paris, France, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 52675271, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2014.7026066.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ye, J., P. Wu, J. Z. Wang, and J. Li, 2017: Fast discrete distribution clustering using Wasserstein barycenter with sparse support. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 65, 23172332, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2017.2659647.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 498 0 0
Full Text Views 319 118 8
PDF Downloads 286 98 9