Interpretations of the JEBAR Term

Gordon Mertz Science Branch, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada

Search for other papers by Gordon Mertz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Daniel G. Wright Physical and Chemical Sciences Branch, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada

Search for other papers by Daniel G. Wright in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

In diagnostic calculations of the ocean's circulation, the so-called JEBAR (joint effect of baroclinicity and relief) term may induce a significant depth-average current field, as has been noted in the oceanographic literature. Here we present two consistent interpretations of this term.

In the equation governing the vorticity of the depth-averaged current, a topographic vortex-stretching term proportional to the dot product of depth-averaged velocity and the depth gradient arises. We show that JEBAR corrects this term by removing the contribution of the geostrophic flow referenced to the bottom, which cannot generate topographic vortex stretching.

In the evolution equation for the vorticity of the depth-integrated flow, a bottom-torque term is present. We show that the JFBAR term discussed above enters here as a contribution to the bottom torque, emphasizing the role of JEBAR as a forcing term.

We also show that when a diagnostic calculation is formulated completely in terms of the transport stream-function, the procedure necessary to eliminate the bottom velocities in the friction term yields a frictional analogue of the JEBAR term.

Abstract

In diagnostic calculations of the ocean's circulation, the so-called JEBAR (joint effect of baroclinicity and relief) term may induce a significant depth-average current field, as has been noted in the oceanographic literature. Here we present two consistent interpretations of this term.

In the equation governing the vorticity of the depth-averaged current, a topographic vortex-stretching term proportional to the dot product of depth-averaged velocity and the depth gradient arises. We show that JEBAR corrects this term by removing the contribution of the geostrophic flow referenced to the bottom, which cannot generate topographic vortex stretching.

In the evolution equation for the vorticity of the depth-integrated flow, a bottom-torque term is present. We show that the JFBAR term discussed above enters here as a contribution to the bottom torque, emphasizing the role of JEBAR as a forcing term.

We also show that when a diagnostic calculation is formulated completely in terms of the transport stream-function, the procedure necessary to eliminate the bottom velocities in the friction term yields a frictional analogue of the JEBAR term.

Save