Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Nonequilibrium Response of the Global Ocean to the 5-Day Rossby–Haurwitz Wave in Atmospheric Surface Pressure

Rui M. Ponte Groupe de Recherche de Géodésie Spatiale, UMR 5566, Laboratoire CNRS-CNES-UPS, Toulouse, France

Search for other papers by Rui M. Ponte in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Oct 1997
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(0)027<2158:NROTGO>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
2158–2168
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

The response of the global ocean to the surface pressure signal associated with the well-known 5-day Rossby–Haurwitz atmospheric mode is explored using analytical and numerical tools. Solutions of the Laplace tidal equations for a flat-bottom, globe-covering ocean, point to a depth-independent nonequilibrium response related to the near-resonant excitation of the barotropic oceanic mode. Numerical experiments with a shallow-water model illustrate the effects of realistic continental boundaries, topography, and dissipation on the solutions. The character of the oceanic adjustment and the structure of resonances changes substantially, but a nonequilibrium response occurs in all cases studied. Besides the excitation of large-scale vorticity modes or waves, which becomes less important when topography and strong dissipation are present, basin-scale nonequilibrium signals are associated with gravity wave dynamics and the process of interbasin mass adjustment in the presence of global-scale forcing and continents that require interbasin mass fluxes to occur through the Southern Ocean. Solutions with forcing most representative of the observed atmospheric wave agree qualitatively with the results of analyses of Pacific and Atlantic tide gauge records by Luther and Woodworth et al. The observed nonequilibrium signals thus seem related to the Rossby–Haurwitz forcing mode.

* On leave from Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc., Cambridge, MA.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Rui M. Ponte, Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc., 840 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA 02139-3794.

Abstract

The response of the global ocean to the surface pressure signal associated with the well-known 5-day Rossby–Haurwitz atmospheric mode is explored using analytical and numerical tools. Solutions of the Laplace tidal equations for a flat-bottom, globe-covering ocean, point to a depth-independent nonequilibrium response related to the near-resonant excitation of the barotropic oceanic mode. Numerical experiments with a shallow-water model illustrate the effects of realistic continental boundaries, topography, and dissipation on the solutions. The character of the oceanic adjustment and the structure of resonances changes substantially, but a nonequilibrium response occurs in all cases studied. Besides the excitation of large-scale vorticity modes or waves, which becomes less important when topography and strong dissipation are present, basin-scale nonequilibrium signals are associated with gravity wave dynamics and the process of interbasin mass adjustment in the presence of global-scale forcing and continents that require interbasin mass fluxes to occur through the Southern Ocean. Solutions with forcing most representative of the observed atmospheric wave agree qualitatively with the results of analyses of Pacific and Atlantic tide gauge records by Luther and Woodworth et al. The observed nonequilibrium signals thus seem related to the Rossby–Haurwitz forcing mode.

* On leave from Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc., Cambridge, MA.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Rui M. Ponte, Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc., 840 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA 02139-3794.

Save
Cover Journal of Physical Oceanography
Journal of Physical Oceanography

  • Fu, L.-L., and G. Pihos, 1994: Determining the response of sea level to atmospheric pressure forcing using TOPEX/POSEIDON data. J. Geophys. Res.,99, 24633–24642.

  • Gaspar, P., and R. M. Ponte, 1997: Relation between sea level and barometric pressure determined from altimeter data and model simulations. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 961–971.

  • Gill, A. E., 1982: Atmosphere–Ocean Dynamics. Academic Press, 662 pp.

  • Gotlib, V. Yu., B. A. Kagan, and G. A. Kivman, 1987: On the lowest gravitational mode of eigen oscillations in the world ocean: Part 2. Sov. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,1, 11–16.

  • Groves, G. W., and E. J. Hannan, 1968: Time series regressions of sea level on weather. Rev. Geophys.,6, 129–174.

  • Holton, J. R., 1975: The Dynamic Meteorology of the Stratosphere and Mesosphere. Meteor. Monogr., No. 37, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 218 pp.

  • LeBlond, P. H., and L. A. Mysak, 1989: Waves in the Ocean. 3d ed. Elsevier, 602 pp.

  • Longuet-Higgins, M. S., 1968: The eigenfunctions of Laplace’s tidal equations over a sphere. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A,262, 511–607.

  • Luther, D. S., 1982: Evidence of a 4–6 day barotropic, planetary oscillation of the Pacific Ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,12, 644–657.

  • ——, 1983: Why haven’t you seen an ocean mode lately? Ocean Modelling, (unpublished manuscript), 50, 1–6.

  • Madden, R. A., and P. R. Julian, 1972: Further evidence of global-scale, 5-day pressure waves. J. Atmos. Sci.,29, 1464–1469.

  • Marchuk, G. I., and B. A. Kagan, 1989. Dynamics of Ocean Tides (translated from Russian). Kluwer, 327 pp.

  • Miller, A. J., 1986: Nondivergent planetary oscillations in midlatitude ocean basins with continental shelves. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,16, 1914–1928.

  • ——, 1989: On the barotropic oscillations of the Pacific. J. Mar. Res.,47, 569–594.

  • ——, D. S. Luther, and M. C. Hendershott, 1993: The fortnightly and monthly tides: Resonant Rossby waves or nearly equilibrium gravity waves? J. Phys. Oceanogr.,23, 879–897.

  • Munk, W. H., and G. J. F. MacDonald, 1960: The Rotation of the Earth. Cambridge University Press, 323 pp.

  • Ponte, R. M., 1992: The sea level response of a stratified ocean to barometric pressure forcing. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,22, 109–113.

  • ——, 1993: Variability in a homogeneous global ocean forced by barometric pressure. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans,18, 209–234.

  • ——, D. A. Salstein, and R. D. Rosen, 1991: Sea level response to pressure forcing in a barotropic numerical model. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,21, 1043–1057.

  • Pugh, D., 1979: Sea levels at Aldabra Atoll, Mombasa and Mahé, western equatorial Indian Ocean, related to tides, meteorology and ocean circulation. Deep-Sea Res.,26A, 237–258.

  • Weber, R., and R. A. Madden, 1993: Evidence of traveling external Rossby waves in the ECMWF analyses. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 2994–3007.

  • Willebrand, J., S. G. H. Philander, and R. C. Pacanowski, 1980: The oceanic response to large-scale atmospheric disturbances. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,10, 411–429.

  • Woodworth, P. L., S. A. Windle, and J. M. Vassie, 1995: Departures from the local inverse barometer model at periods of 5 days in the central South Atlantic. J. Geophys. Res.,100, 18281–18290.

  • Wunsch, C., and D. Stammer, 1997: Atmospheric loading and the oceanic “inverted barometer” effect. Rev. Geophys.,35, 79–107.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 636 311 171
PDF Downloads 64 15 2