Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

The Dynamics of Error Growth and Predictability in a Model of the Gulf Stream. Part I: Singular Vector Analysis

Andrew M. Moore Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Andrew M. Moore in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Arthur J. Mariano Department of Meteorology and Physical Oceanography, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Arthur J. Mariano in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Feb 1999
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1999)029<0158:TDOEGA>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
158–176
Restricted access

Abstract

The recently developed ideas of generalized linear stability theory for dynamical systems are applied to time evolving flows of the Gulf Stream using a quasigeostrophic numerical model. The potential for the growth of perturbations arising from errors and uncertainties in forecasts of the Gulf Stream is investigated by computing the singular vectors, or so-called optimal perturbations, of time evolving flows using a linearized model and its adjoint. The authors’ calculations reveal that the potential for rapid perturbation growth is greatest in regions of developing straining and shearing flows. Such regions include developing meanders and regions where eddies form and where existing eddies interact with the main Gulf Stream. It is found that the optimal perturbations of the Gulf Stream share many features in common with those of the jet streams in the atmosphere. The ideas and techniques developed in this paper have been applied to the problem of ensemble prediction of the Gulf Stream in Part II.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Andrew M. Moore, Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado, Campus Box 311, Boulder, CO 80309-0311.

Abstract

The recently developed ideas of generalized linear stability theory for dynamical systems are applied to time evolving flows of the Gulf Stream using a quasigeostrophic numerical model. The potential for the growth of perturbations arising from errors and uncertainties in forecasts of the Gulf Stream is investigated by computing the singular vectors, or so-called optimal perturbations, of time evolving flows using a linearized model and its adjoint. The authors’ calculations reveal that the potential for rapid perturbation growth is greatest in regions of developing straining and shearing flows. Such regions include developing meanders and regions where eddies form and where existing eddies interact with the main Gulf Stream. It is found that the optimal perturbations of the Gulf Stream share many features in common with those of the jet streams in the atmosphere. The ideas and techniques developed in this paper have been applied to the problem of ensemble prediction of the Gulf Stream in Part II.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Andrew M. Moore, Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado, Campus Box 311, Boulder, CO 80309-0311.

Save
Cover Journal of Physical Oceanography
Journal of Physical Oceanography

  • Bretherton, F. P., and C. J. R. Garrett, 1968: Wavetrains in inhomogeneous moving media. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A,302, 529–554.

  • Buizza, R., and T. N. Palmer, 1995: The singular-vector structure of the atmospheric global circulation. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 1434–1456.

  • Charney, J. G., R. Fjortoft, and J. von Neumann, 1950: Numerical integrations of the barotropic vorticity equation. Tellus,2, 237–254.

  • Chin, T. M., and A. J. Mariano, 1997: Space–time interpolation of oceanic fronts. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.,35, 734–746.

  • Farrell, B. F., 1990: Small error dynamics and the predictability of flows. J. Atmos. Sci.,47, 2409–2416.

  • ——, and A. M. Moore, 1992: An adjoint method for obtaining the most rapidly growing perturbation to oceanic flows. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,22, 338–349.

  • ——, and P. J. Ioannou, 1993a: Stochastic forcing of the linearized Navier-Stokes equations. Phys. Fluids,5, 2600–2609.

  • ——, and ——, 1993b: Stochastic dynamics of baroclinic waves. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 4044–4057.

  • ——, and ——, 1994: Variance maintained by stochastic forcing of non-normal dynamical systems associated with linearly stable shear flows. Phys. Rev. Lett.,72, 1188–1191.

  • ——, and ——, 1996a: Generalized stability theory. Part I: Autonomous operators. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 2025–2040.

  • ——, and ——, 1996b: Generalized stability theory. Part II: Nonautonomous operators. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 2041–2053.

  • Frederiksen, J. S., 1997: Adjoint sensitivity and finite-time normal mode disturbances during blocking. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 1144–1165.

  • Haidvogel, D. B., A. R. Robinson, and E. E. Schulman, 1980: The accuracy, efficiency and stability of three numerical models with application to open ocean problems. J. Comput. Phys.,34, 1–53.

  • Hartmann, D. L., R. Buizza, and T. N. Palmer, 1995: Singular vectors: The effect of spatial scale on linear growth of disturbances. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 3885–3894.

  • Holloway, G., and B. J. West, 1984: Predictability of fluid motions. AIP Conf. Proc. No. 106, Amer. Inst. Phys., 612 pp.

  • Kelvin, 1887: Stability of fluid motions: Rectilinear motion of a viscous fluid between two parallel plates. Philos. Mag.,24, 188–196.

  • Kleeman, R., and A. M. Moore, 1997: A theory for the limitations of ENSO predictability due to stochastic atmospheric transients. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 753–767.

  • Lacarra, J. F., and O. Talagrand, 1988: Short range evolution of small perturbations in a barotropic model. Tellus,40A, 81–95.

  • Lai, C.-C. A, W. Qian, and S. M. Glenn, 1994: Data Assimilation and Model Evaluation Experiment datasets. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,75, 793–809.

  • Lorenz, E. N., 1965: A study of the predictability of a 28-variable atmospheric model. Tellus,17, 321–333.

  • Mariano, A. J., 1990: Contour analysis: A new approach to melding geophysical fields. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,7, 285–295.

  • Miller, R. N., A. R. Robinson, and D. B. Haidvogel, 1981: A baroclinic quasi-geostrophic open ocean model. J. Comput. Phys.,50, 38–70.

  • Molteni, F., and T. N. Palmer, 1993: Predictability and finite-time instability of the northern winter circulation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,119, 269–298.

  • ——, R. Buizza, T. N. Palmer, and T. Petroliagis, 1996: The ECMWF ensemble prediction system: Methodology and validation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,122, 73–120.

  • Moore, A. M., 1991: Data assimilation in a quasigeostrophic open ocean model of the Gulf Stream region using the adjoint method. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,21, 398–427.

  • ——, 1999: The dynamics of error growth and predictability in a model of the Gulf Stream. Part II: Ensemble prediction. J. Phys. Oceanogr., in press.

  • ——, and B. F. Farrell, 1993: Rapid perturbation growth on spatially and temporally varying oceanic flows determined using an adjoint method: Application to the Gulf Stream. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,23, 1682–1702.

  • ——, and ——, 1996: The dynamics of error growth and predictability in a coupled model of ENSO. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,122, 1405–1446.

  • ——, and ——, 1997a: The singular vectors of a coupled ocean–atmosphere model of ENSO. Part I: Thermodynamics, energetics and error growth. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,123, 953–981.

  • ——, and ——, 1997b: The singular vectors of a coupled ocean–atmosphere model of ENSO. Part II: Sensitivity studies and dynamical interpretation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,123, 983–1006.

  • ——, and ——, 1998: Skill assessment for ENSO using ensemble prediction. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,124, 557–584.

  • ——, and ——, 1999: Stochastic forcing of ENSO by the intraseasonal oscillation. J. Climate, in press.

  • Mureau, R., F. Molteni, and T. N. Palmer, 1993: Ensemble prediction using dynamically conditioned perturbations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,119, 299–323.

  • Orr, W. M., 1907: Stability or instability of the steady motions of a perfect liquid. Proc. Roy. Irish. Acad.,27, 9–69.

  • Pedlosky, J., 1987: Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. 2d ed. Springer-Verlag, 710 pp.

  • Penland, M. C., 1996: A stochastic model of IndoPacific sea surface temperature anomalies. Physica D,98, 534–558.

  • Raleigh, J. W. S., 1880: On the stability, or instability, of certain fluid motions. Proc. London Math. Soc.,9, 57–70.

  • Robinson, A. R., M. A. Spall, and N. Pinardi, 1988: Gulf Stream simulations and the dynamics of ring and meander processes. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,18, 1811–1853.

  • ——, ——, L. J. Walstad, and W. G. Leslie, 1989a: Data assimilation and dynamical interpolation in GULFCAST experiments. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans,13, 301–316.

  • ——, S. M. Glenn, M. A. Spall, L. J. Walstad, G. M. Gardiner, and W. G. Leslie, 1989b: Forecasting Gulf Stream meanders and rings. Eos, The Oceanography Report,70 (45), 1464–1473.

  • Shapiro, R., 1970: Smoothing, filtering and boundary effects. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys.,8, 359–386.

  • Spall, M. A., and A. R. Robinson, 1990: Regional primitive equation studies of the Gulf Stream meander and ring formation. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,20, 985–1016.

  • Sorensen, D. C., 1992: Implicit application of polynomial filters in a k-step Arnoldi method. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl.,13, 357–385.

  • Toth, Z., and E. Kalnay, 1993: Ensemble prediction at NMC: The generation of perturbations. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,74, 2317–2330.

  • Tracton, M. S., and E. Kalnay, 1993: Operational ensemble prediction at the National Meteorological Center: Practical aspects. Wea. Forecasting,8, 379–398.

  • Watts, D. R., and W. E. Johns, 1982: Gulf Stream meanders: Observations of propagation and growth. J. Geophys. Res.,87, 9467–9476.

  • Willems, R. C., and Coauthors, 1994: Experiment evaluates ocean models and data assimilation in the Gulf Stream. Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union,75, 385.

  • Zeng, Q.-C., 1983: The evolution of a Rossby-wave packet in a three-dimensional baroclinic atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci.,40, 73–84.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 346 127 66
PDF Downloads 55 21 0