Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Dynamics of Remotely Forced Intraseasonal Oscillations off the Western Coast of South America

Allan J. Clarke Oceanography Department, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

Search for other papers by Allan J. Clarke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Rizwan Ahmed Oceanography Department, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

Search for other papers by Rizwan Ahmed in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Feb 1999
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1999)029<0240:DORFIO>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
240–258
Restricted access

Abstract

Six years of sea level observations at six locations along the South American coast from Peru to Chile were analyzed at intraseasonal frequencies (periodicity 1–2 months). A high-resolution, low-frequency numerical coastal model, having realistic shelf and slope topography and bottom friction and forced by an equatorial signal, was used to analyze the intraseasonal coastal dynamics at these latitudes. The following results were obtained.

  1. Lagged correlations between sea level stations imply a sea level poleward propagation of 250 km day−1. The frictionless vertical wall theory poleward phase speed was considerably less at 216 km day−1. Model runs with realistic bottom friction and shelf and slope bottom topography gave poleward phase speeds much closer to that observed. For typical parameters the phase speed was 253 km day−1. Both bottom friction and topography significantly affect the propagation speed.

  2. Past work has shown that the sea level amplitude should grow alongshore like |f| (f = Coriolis parameter). The observed amplitude is much more uniform alongshore, similar to the frictional model with shelf and slope bottom topography.

  3. The modeled intraseasonal alongshore velocity field with bottom friction and shelf and slope bottom topography differs considerably from that of the inviscid vertical wall case. Although both have negligible amplitude in the deep sea away from the coast, the velocity amplitude in the more realistic case is trapped along the upper slope with its core at about 1000–1200 m and with decreasing amplitude toward the coast and above the core. Velocity amplitudes in the core are typically about 15 cm s−1.

* Additional affiliation: Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Institute, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

†Current affiliation: Datastream Systems, Inc., Greenville, South Carolina.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Allan J. Clarke, Department of Oceanography, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4320.

Abstract

Six years of sea level observations at six locations along the South American coast from Peru to Chile were analyzed at intraseasonal frequencies (periodicity 1–2 months). A high-resolution, low-frequency numerical coastal model, having realistic shelf and slope topography and bottom friction and forced by an equatorial signal, was used to analyze the intraseasonal coastal dynamics at these latitudes. The following results were obtained.

  1. Lagged correlations between sea level stations imply a sea level poleward propagation of 250 km day−1. The frictionless vertical wall theory poleward phase speed was considerably less at 216 km day−1. Model runs with realistic bottom friction and shelf and slope bottom topography gave poleward phase speeds much closer to that observed. For typical parameters the phase speed was 253 km day−1. Both bottom friction and topography significantly affect the propagation speed.

  2. Past work has shown that the sea level amplitude should grow alongshore like |f| (f = Coriolis parameter). The observed amplitude is much more uniform alongshore, similar to the frictional model with shelf and slope bottom topography.

  3. The modeled intraseasonal alongshore velocity field with bottom friction and shelf and slope bottom topography differs considerably from that of the inviscid vertical wall case. Although both have negligible amplitude in the deep sea away from the coast, the velocity amplitude in the more realistic case is trapped along the upper slope with its core at about 1000–1200 m and with decreasing amplitude toward the coast and above the core. Velocity amplitudes in the core are typically about 15 cm s−1.

* Additional affiliation: Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Institute, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

†Current affiliation: Datastream Systems, Inc., Greenville, South Carolina.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Allan J. Clarke, Department of Oceanography, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4320.

Save
Cover Journal of Physical Oceanography
Journal of Physical Oceanography

  • Clarke, A. J., 1976: Coastal upwelling and coastally trapped long waves. Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University, 178 pp.

  • ——, 1977: Wind-forced linear and nonlinear Kelvin waves along an irregular coastline. J. Fluid Mech.,83, 337–348.

  • ——, 1983: The reflection of equatorial waves from oceanic boundaries. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,13, 1193–1207.

  • ——, 1992: Low-frequency reflections from a nonmeridional eastern ocean boundary and the use of coastal sea level to monitor eastern Pacific equatorial Kelvin waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,22, 163–183.

  • ——, and K. H. Brink, 1985: The response of stratified, frictional shelf and slope water to fluctuating large-scale low-frequency wind forcing. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,15, 439–453.

  • ——, and M. Lopez, 1987: The influence of sloping mean density surfaces on low-frequency shelf water flow. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,17, 507–517.

  • ——, and C. Shi, 1991: Critical frequencies at ocean boundaries. J. Geophys. Res.,96, 10 731–10 738.

  • ——, and S. Van Gorder, 1994: On ENSO coastal currents and sea levels. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,24, 661–680.

  • Davis, R. E., 1976: Predictability of sea surface temperature and sea level pressure anomalies over the North Pacific Ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,6, 249–266.

  • Enfield, D. B., 1987: The intraseasonal oscillation in Eastern Pacific sea levels: How is it forced? J. Phys. Oceanogr.,17, 1860–1876.

  • Gill, A. E., 1982: Atmosphere–Ocean Dynamics. Academic Press, 662 pp.

  • Grant, W. D., and O. S. Madsen, 1979: Combined wave and current interaction with a rough bottom. J. Geophys. Res.,84, 1797–1808.

  • Grimshaw, R., and J. S. Allen, 1988: Low-frequency baroclinic waves off coastal boundaries. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,18, 1124–1143.

  • Kessler, W. S., and M. J. McPhaden, 1995: Oceanic equatorial waves and the 1991–93 El Niño. J. Climate,8, 1757–1774.

  • McCreary, J. P., and S. Y. Chao, 1985: Three-dimensional shelf circulation along an eastern ocean boundary. J. Mar. Res.,43, 13–36.

  • Mitchum, G. T., and A. J. Clarke, 1986: The frictional nearshore response to forcing by synoptic scale winds. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,16, 934–946.

  • Moore, D. W., 1968: Planetary–gravity waves in an equatorial ocean. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, 201 pp.

  • Romea, R. D., and R. L. Smith, 1983: Further evidence for coastal trapped waves along the Peru coast. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,13, 1341–1356.

  • ——, and J. S. Allen, 1984: The effect of friction and topography on coastal internal Kelvin waves at low latitudes. Tellus,36A, 384–400.

  • Shaffer, G., O. Pizarro, L. Djurfeldt, S. Salinas, and J. Rutllant, 1997:Circulation and low-frequency variability near the Chilean coast:Remotely forced fluctuations during the 1991–92 El Niño. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,27, 217–235.

  • Spillane, M. C., D. B. Enfield, and J. S. Allen, 1987: Intraseasonal oscillations in sea level along the west coast of the Americas. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,17, 313–325.

  • Wong, K. C., 1987: Tidal and subtidal variability in Delaware’s inland bays. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,17, 413–422.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 260 86 29
PDF Downloads 55 20 0