Cover Journal of Physical Oceanography
Journal of Physical Oceanography

  • Alverson, K., and W. B. Owens, 1996: Topographic preconditioning of open-ocean deep convection. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,26, 2196–2213.

  • Carslaw, H. S., and J. C. Jeager, 1959: Conduction of Heat in Solids. Oxford University Press, 510 pp.

  • Cessi, P., 1996: Grid-scale instability of convective-adjustment schemes. J. Mar. Res.,54, 407–420.

  • Chapman, D., and G. Gawarkiewicz, 1997: Shallow convection and buoyancy equilibration in an idealized coastal polynya. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,27, 555–566.

  • Coates, M. J., and G. N. Ivey, 1997: On convective turbulence and the influence of rotation. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans,25, 217–232.

  • ——, ——, and J. R. Taylor, 1995: Unsteady, turbulent convection into a rotating linearly stratified fluid: Modeling deep ocean convection. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,25, 3032–3050.

  • Cox, M., 1984: A primitive equation, three-dimensional model of the ocean. Tech. Rep. 1, GFDL Ocean Group, 75 pp. [Available from Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, P.O. Box 308, Princeton, NJ 08542-0308.].

  • Deardorff, J. F., 1980: Stratocumulus-capped mixed-layers derived from a three dimensional model. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,18, 495–527.

  • Eady, E. T., 1949: Long waves and cyclone waves. Tellus,1, 33–52.

  • Fernando, H. J. S., R. Chen, and D. L. Boyer, 1991: Effects of rotation on convective turbulence. J. Fluid Mech.,228, 513–547.

  • Gascard, J. C., and R. A. Clarke, 1983: The formation of labrador sea water. Part II: Mesoscale and smaller-scale processes. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,13, 1779–1797.

  • Gawarkiewicz, G., and D. Chapman, 1995: A numerical study of dense water formation and transport on a shallow, sloping continental shelf. J. Geophys. Res.,100, 4489–4507.

  • Griffiths, R. W., and P. F. Linden, 1981: The stability of vortices in a rotating, stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech.,105, 283–316.

  • Hide, R., and P. Mason, 1975: Sloping convection in a rotating fluid. Adv. Phys.,24, 45–100.

  • Johannessen, O. M., S. Sandven, and J. A. Johannessen, 1991: Eddy-related winter convection in the boreas basin. Deep Convection and Deep Water Formation in the Oceans, P. C. Chu and J. C. Gascard, Eds., Elsevier Science, 87–105.

  • Jones, H. J., and J. Marshall, 1993: Convection with rotatation in a neutral ocean: A study of open ocean deep convection. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,23, 1009–1039.

  • Killworth, P. D., 1983: Deep convection in the world ocean. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys.,21, 1–26.

  • Klinger, B. A., and J. Marshall, 1995: Regimes and scaling laws for rotating deep convection in the ocean. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans,21, 227–256.

  • ——, ——, and U. Send, 1996: Representation of convective plumes by vertical adjustment. J. Geophys. Res.,101, 18 175–18 182.

  • Legg, S., J. McWilliams, and J. Gao, 1998: Localization of deep convection by a mesoscale eddy. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,28, 944–970.

  • Lenderink, G., and H. Haarsma, 1994: Variability and multiple equilibria of the thermohaline circulation associated with deep-water formation. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,24, 1480–1493.

  • Madec, G., M. Lott, and M. Crepon, 1996: Large-scale preconditioning of deep-water formation in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,26, 1393–1408.

  • Marotzke, J., 1991: Influence of convective adjustment on the stability of the thermohaline circulation. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,21, 903–907.

  • Marshall, J., A. Adcroft, C. Hill, L. Perelman, and C. Heisey, 1997a:A finite-volume, incompressible Navier–Stokes model for studies of the ocean on parallel computers. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 5753–5766.

  • ——, C. Hill, L. Perelman, and A. Adcroft, 1997b: Hydrostatic, quasi-hydrostatic, and non-hydrostatic ocean modelling. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 5733–5752.

  • Maxworthy, T., and S. Narimousa, 1994: Unsteady turbulent convection into a homogeneous, rotating fluid, with oceanographic applications. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,24, 865–887.

  • Pedlosky, J., 1985: The instability of a continuous heton cloud. J. Atmos. Sci.,42, 1477–1486.

  • Rahmstorf, S., 1995: Multiple convection patterns and thermohaline flow in an idealized OGCM. J. Climate,8, 3028–3039.

  • Saunders, P. M., 1973: The instability of a baroclinic vortex. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,3, 61–65.

  • Schott, F., and K. D. Leaman, 1991: Observations with moored acoustic doppler current profilers in the convection regime in the Golfe du Lion. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,21, 558–574.

  • ——, M. Visbeck, and J. Fischer, 1993: Observations of vertical currents and convection in the central Greenland Sea during the winter of 1988–1989. J. Geophys. Res.,98, 14 401–14 421.

  • Send, U., and J. Marshall, 1995: Integral effects of deep convection. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,25, 855–872.

  • Stull, R. B., 1988: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Kluwer Academic, 666 pp.

  • Vellinga, M., 1998: Multiple equilibria of the thermohaline circulation as a side effect of convective adjustment. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,28, 305–319.

  • Visbeck, M. J., J. Marshall, and H. Jones, 1996: Dynamics of isolated convective regions in the oceans. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,26, 1721–1734.

  • Yin, F. L., and E. S. Sarachik, 1994: An efficient convective adjustment scheme for ocean general circulation models. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,24, 1425–1430.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 158 23 0
PDF Downloads 21 8 0
Editorial Type:
Article

Stability of a Cold Core Eddy in the Presence of Convection: Hydrostatic versus Nonhydrostatic Modeling

M. Jeroen Molemaker1 and Henk A. Dijkstra1
View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
Print Publication:
01 Mar 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1999)029<0475:SOACCE>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
475–494
© Get Permissions Rent on DeepDyve
Restricted access

Abstract

Geostrophic eddies in a stratified liquid are susceptible to baroclinic instabilities. In this paper, the authors consider these instabilities when such an eddy is simultaneously cooled homogeneously from above. As a linear stability analysis shows, the developing convection modifies the background stratification, the stability boundaries, and the patterns of the dominant modes. The coupling between the effects of convection and the large-scale flow development of the eddy is studied through high-resolution numerical simulations, using both nonhydrostatic and hydrostatic models. In the latter models, several forms of convective adjustment are used to model convection. Both types of models confirm the development of the dominant modes and indicate that their nonlinear interaction leads to localized intense convection. By comparing nonhydrostatic and hydrostatic simulations of the flow development carefully, it is shown that convective adjustment may lead to erroneous small-scale variability. A simple alternative formulation of convective adjustment is able to give a substantial improvement.

* Current affiliation: Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Corresponding author address: Dr. M. Jeroen Molemaker, Institution for Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90015.

Email: nmolem@atmos.ucla.edu

Abstract

Geostrophic eddies in a stratified liquid are susceptible to baroclinic instabilities. In this paper, the authors consider these instabilities when such an eddy is simultaneously cooled homogeneously from above. As a linear stability analysis shows, the developing convection modifies the background stratification, the stability boundaries, and the patterns of the dominant modes. The coupling between the effects of convection and the large-scale flow development of the eddy is studied through high-resolution numerical simulations, using both nonhydrostatic and hydrostatic models. In the latter models, several forms of convective adjustment are used to model convection. Both types of models confirm the development of the dominant modes and indicate that their nonlinear interaction leads to localized intense convection. By comparing nonhydrostatic and hydrostatic simulations of the flow development carefully, it is shown that convective adjustment may lead to erroneous small-scale variability. A simple alternative formulation of convective adjustment is able to give a substantial improvement.

* Current affiliation: Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Corresponding author address: Dr. M. Jeroen Molemaker, Institution for Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90015.

Email: nmolem@atmos.ucla.edu

Save