The Hydraulics of an Evolving Upwelling Jet Flowing around a Cape

Andrew C. Dale College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon

Search for other papers by Andrew C. Dale in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
John A. Barth College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon

Search for other papers by John A. Barth in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Upwelling jets flow alongshore in approximate geostrophic balance with the onshore pressure gradient induced by coastal upwelling. Observations of such jets have shown that they often move offshore downstream of capes, leaving a pool of upwelled water inshore. Comparisons are made between this behavior and the hydraulic transition of a potential-vorticity-conserving coastal current as it passes a topographic anomaly at which it is exactly critical to long coastal-trapped waves. An analytic 1.5-layer model of coastal hydraulics with constant potential vorticity in each layer predicts flow fields (i.e., jet separation) in critical situations that resemble observations. When scales approximate Cape Blanco on the Oregon coast, separation occurs at a jet transport of around 0.76 × 106 m3 s−1, similar to observed transports. Time-dependent, semigeostrophic calculations suggest that, during an upwelling season, the jet would evolve from a weak flow, which was subcritical everywhere and symmetric about the cape, to an exactly critical state that made a transition from subcritical to supercritical structure at the head of the cape. The predicted flow field at critical transition consists of a narrow upwelling jet upstream of the cape that moves offshore and broadens at the cape. This critical state would be accompanied by a downstream jump back to subcritical conditions. Further upwelling-favorable winds would lead to transient waves that propagated upstream and downstream, modifying the upstream and downstream conditions and restoring criticality. Thus, the head of the cape exerts hydraulic control on the flow and prevents the jet transport from increasing above its critical level.

Inherent in the hydraulic approach is the assumption that alongshore scales are large. For realistic alongshore scales, solutions modified by coastline curvature suggest that the convexity of the head of a cape slightly inhibits the transition to a strongly upwelled downstream state by increasing the required critical transport. In the presence of topographic features with finite alongshore scale, the hydraulic approach can be used to construct a flow field, although this flow field has an inherent error arising from the implicit assumptions regarding scales. Estimation of this error for topography representing Cape Blanco suggests that in places the cape is rather abrupt for hydraulic theory to be valid.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Andrew C. Dale, College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, 104 Ocean Admin. Building, Corvallis, OR 97331-5503.

Abstract

Upwelling jets flow alongshore in approximate geostrophic balance with the onshore pressure gradient induced by coastal upwelling. Observations of such jets have shown that they often move offshore downstream of capes, leaving a pool of upwelled water inshore. Comparisons are made between this behavior and the hydraulic transition of a potential-vorticity-conserving coastal current as it passes a topographic anomaly at which it is exactly critical to long coastal-trapped waves. An analytic 1.5-layer model of coastal hydraulics with constant potential vorticity in each layer predicts flow fields (i.e., jet separation) in critical situations that resemble observations. When scales approximate Cape Blanco on the Oregon coast, separation occurs at a jet transport of around 0.76 × 106 m3 s−1, similar to observed transports. Time-dependent, semigeostrophic calculations suggest that, during an upwelling season, the jet would evolve from a weak flow, which was subcritical everywhere and symmetric about the cape, to an exactly critical state that made a transition from subcritical to supercritical structure at the head of the cape. The predicted flow field at critical transition consists of a narrow upwelling jet upstream of the cape that moves offshore and broadens at the cape. This critical state would be accompanied by a downstream jump back to subcritical conditions. Further upwelling-favorable winds would lead to transient waves that propagated upstream and downstream, modifying the upstream and downstream conditions and restoring criticality. Thus, the head of the cape exerts hydraulic control on the flow and prevents the jet transport from increasing above its critical level.

Inherent in the hydraulic approach is the assumption that alongshore scales are large. For realistic alongshore scales, solutions modified by coastline curvature suggest that the convexity of the head of a cape slightly inhibits the transition to a strongly upwelled downstream state by increasing the required critical transport. In the presence of topographic features with finite alongshore scale, the hydraulic approach can be used to construct a flow field, although this flow field has an inherent error arising from the implicit assumptions regarding scales. Estimation of this error for topography representing Cape Blanco suggests that in places the cape is rather abrupt for hydraulic theory to be valid.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Andrew C. Dale, College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, 104 Ocean Admin. Building, Corvallis, OR 97331-5503.

Save
  • Allen, J. S., 1980: Models of wind-driven currents on the continental shelf. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.,12, 389–433.

  • Barth, J. A., and R. L. Smith, 1998: Separation of a coastal upwelling jet at Cape Blanco, Oregon, USA. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci.,19, 5–14.

  • ——, S. D. Pierce, and R. L. Smith, 2000: A separating coastal upwelling jet at Cape Blanco, Oregon, and its connection to the California Current system. Deep-Sea Res. II,47, 783–810.

  • Gill, A. E., and E. H. Schumann, 1979: Topographically induced changes in the structure of an inertial coastal jet: Applications to the Agulhas Current. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,9, 975–991.

  • Hughes, R. L., 1985a: On inertial currents over a sloping continental shelf. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans,9, 49–73.

  • ——, 1985b: Multiple criticalities in coastal flows. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans,9, 321–340.

  • ——, 1989: The hydraulics of local separation in a coastal current with application to the Kuroshio meander. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,19, 1809–1820.

  • Huyer, A., E. J. C. Sobey, and R. L. Smith, 1979: The spring transition in currents over the Oregon continental shelf. J. Geophys. Res.,84, 6995–7011.

  • Kelly, K. A., 1985: The influence of winds and topography on the sea surface temperature patterns over the Northern California shelf. J. Geophys. Res.,90, 11 783–11 798.

  • Long, R. R., 1972: Finite amplitude disturbances in the flow of inviscid rotating and stratified fluids over obstacles. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.,4, 69–92.

  • Luther, M. E., and J. M. Bane, 1985: Mixed instabilities in the Gulf Stream over the continental slope. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,15, 3–23.

  • Mitsudera, H., and R. Grimshaw, 1994: Capture and resonant forcing of solitary waves by the interaction of a baroclinic current with topography. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,24, 2217–2244.

  • Ou, H.-S., and P. M. De Ruijter, 1986: Separation of an inertial boundary current from a curved coastline. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,16, 280–289.

  • Peffley, M. B., and J. J. O’Brien, 1976: A three-dimensional simulation of coastal upwelling off Oregon. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,6, 164–180.

  • Roed, L. P., 1980: Curvature effects on hydraulically driven inertial boundary currents. J. Fluid Mech.,96, 395–412.

  • Smith, R. L., 1974: A description of current, wind, and sea level variations during coastal upwelling off the Oregon coast, July–August 1972. J. Geophys. Res.,79, 435–443.

  • Woods, A. W., 1988: A study of current structures in a two-layer shelf model. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans,12, 289–311.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 448 156 22
PDF Downloads 151 51 11