High Range Resolution Radar Measurements of the Speed Distribution of Breaking Events in Wind-Generated Ocean Waves: Surface Impulse and Wave Energy Dissipation Rates

O. M. Phillips Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

Search for other papers by O. M. Phillips in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
F. L. Posner Radar Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C.

Search for other papers by F. L. Posner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
J. P. Hansen Radar Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C.

Search for other papers by J. P. Hansen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

A set of X-band radar measurements, backscattered from the sea surface at near grazing incidence with very high spatial and temporal resolution (30 cm in range and 2000-Hz pulse repetition frequency) in moderate wind conditions, are dominated by moving discrete events (sea spikes). They have radar cross sections of up to about 1 m2 and are found to possess the characteristics of breaking wave fronts. Contributions from Bragg backscattering appear to be at least two orders of magnitude smaller. The number of events detected per unit area per unit time was of the same order as found by Ding and Farmer at almost the same wind speed, but the distribution of event speeds was narrower—the fastest breaking wave events observed had line-of-sight speeds of about 0.6 of the dominant wave speed. The measured histograms of number of events versus event speed c suggested that the smaller events with c < 3 m s−1 were only incompletely counted so that the characteristics of only the faster events (3–6 m s−1) were analyzed in detail. With the use of independent data on the average shape of broken areas, for the first time the form of the function Λ(c), the distribution with respect to speed of the length of breaking front per unit area of surface and cΛ(c), and the fraction of surface turned over per unit time per speed increment were determined. These were found to decrease monotonically with increasing event speed, indicating that these quantities are dominated by the smaller, more frequent breaking events. By making use of the Duncan–Melville expression for the dissipation rate per unit length of a breaking front, the distributions of wave energy dissipation by breaking and of momentum flux to the water by breaking wave impulses are also found for the first time. These were found to be broadband over the whole range of breaker speeds that could be measured reliably, that is, those corresponding to scales of 50%–20% of the dominant wavelength. These results offer no support to the hypothesis of a “Kolmogorov cascade” in wind-generated waves analogous to that in turbulence, with energy input from the wind at large scales and dissipation from the waves at small scales. The measurements indicate that, in contrast, dissipation is significant at the largest scales of wave breaking and is distributed widely across that spectrum. If the results are interpreted in terms of equilibrium range wave theory, a value for the numerical constant in the Duncan–Melville expression is inferred that is smaller than the range given by Melville, but a simple expression for the total rate of energy loss from the wind-driven waves is quantitatively consistent with results of upper-ocean turbulence dissipation measurements reported by Terray et al.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Owen Phillips, Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218-2687.

Email: omphil@aol.com

Abstract

A set of X-band radar measurements, backscattered from the sea surface at near grazing incidence with very high spatial and temporal resolution (30 cm in range and 2000-Hz pulse repetition frequency) in moderate wind conditions, are dominated by moving discrete events (sea spikes). They have radar cross sections of up to about 1 m2 and are found to possess the characteristics of breaking wave fronts. Contributions from Bragg backscattering appear to be at least two orders of magnitude smaller. The number of events detected per unit area per unit time was of the same order as found by Ding and Farmer at almost the same wind speed, but the distribution of event speeds was narrower—the fastest breaking wave events observed had line-of-sight speeds of about 0.6 of the dominant wave speed. The measured histograms of number of events versus event speed c suggested that the smaller events with c < 3 m s−1 were only incompletely counted so that the characteristics of only the faster events (3–6 m s−1) were analyzed in detail. With the use of independent data on the average shape of broken areas, for the first time the form of the function Λ(c), the distribution with respect to speed of the length of breaking front per unit area of surface and cΛ(c), and the fraction of surface turned over per unit time per speed increment were determined. These were found to decrease monotonically with increasing event speed, indicating that these quantities are dominated by the smaller, more frequent breaking events. By making use of the Duncan–Melville expression for the dissipation rate per unit length of a breaking front, the distributions of wave energy dissipation by breaking and of momentum flux to the water by breaking wave impulses are also found for the first time. These were found to be broadband over the whole range of breaker speeds that could be measured reliably, that is, those corresponding to scales of 50%–20% of the dominant wavelength. These results offer no support to the hypothesis of a “Kolmogorov cascade” in wind-generated waves analogous to that in turbulence, with energy input from the wind at large scales and dissipation from the waves at small scales. The measurements indicate that, in contrast, dissipation is significant at the largest scales of wave breaking and is distributed widely across that spectrum. If the results are interpreted in terms of equilibrium range wave theory, a value for the numerical constant in the Duncan–Melville expression is inferred that is smaller than the range given by Melville, but a simple expression for the total rate of energy loss from the wind-driven waves is quantitatively consistent with results of upper-ocean turbulence dissipation measurements reported by Terray et al.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Owen Phillips, Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218-2687.

Email: omphil@aol.com

Save
  • Banner, M. L., and W. L. Peirson, 1998: Tangential stress beneath wind-driven air-water interfaces. J. Fluid Mech.,364, 115–146.

  • Bortkovskii, R. S., 1987: Air–Sea Exchange of Heat and Moisture during Storms. D. Reidel, 194 pp.

  • Ding, L., and D. M. Farmer, 1994: Observations of breaking surface wave statistics. J.Phys. Oceanogr.,24, 1368–1387.

  • Duncan, J. H., 1981: An experimental investigation of breaking waves produced by a towed hydrofoil. Proc. Roy. Soc. London,377A, 331–348.

  • Gemmrich, J. R., T. D. Mudge, and V. D. Polonchicko. 1994: On the energy input from wind to surface waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,24, 2413–2417.

  • Hasselmann, K., 1974: On the spectral dissipation of ocean waves due to whitecapping. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,6, 107–127.

  • Kahma, K. K., 1981: A study of the growth of the wave spectrum with fetch. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,11, 1503–1515.

  • Kitaigorodskii, S. A., 1983: On the theory of the equilibrium range in the spectrum of wind-generated gravity waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,13, 816–827.

  • ——, 1992: The dissipation subrange of wind-wave spectra. Breaking Waves. Proc. IUTAM Symposium, M. L. Banner and R. Grimshaw, Eds., Springer-Verlag, 200–206.

  • Komen, G. J., L. Cavalieri, M. Donelan, K. Hasselmann, S. Hasselmann, and P. Janssen, 1994: Dynamics and Modelling of Ocean Waves. Cambridge University Press, 532 pp.

  • Melville, W. K., 1994: Energy dissipation by breaking waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,24, 2041–2049.

  • Monahan, E. C., 1971: Oceanic whitecaps. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,1, 139–144.

  • ——, and I. O’Muircheartaich, 1980: Optimal power-law description of oceanic whitecap coverage dependence on wind speed. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,10, 2094–2099.

  • Phillips, O. M., 1985: Statistical and spectral properties of the equilibrium range in the spectrum of wind-generated gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech.,156, 505–531.

  • Posner, F. L., 1998: Experimental observations at very low grazing angles of high range resolution microwave backscatter from the sea. U.S. Naval Research Laboratory Rep. NRL/MR/5310-98-8326, 53 pp.

  • Rapp, R. J., and W. K. Melville, 1990: Laboratory measurements of deep-water breaking waves. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London,A331, 735–800.

  • Snyder, R. L., I. Smith, and R. M. Kennedy, 1983: On the formation of whitecaps by a threshhold mechanism. Part III: Field experiments and comparison with theory. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,13, 1505–1518.

  • SWAMP Group, 1985: Ocean Wave Modeling. Plenum Press, 2561 pp.

  • Terray, E. A., M. A. Donelan, Y. C. Agrawal, W. M. Drennan, K. K. Kahma, A. J. Williams, P. A. Hwang, and S. A. Kitaigorodskii, 1996: Estimates of kinetic energy dissipation under breaking waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,26, 792–807.

  • Thorpe, S. A., 1982: On the clouds of bubbles formed by breaking wind-waves in deep water and their role in air–sea gas transfer. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London,304A, 155–210.

  • ——, 1986: Measurements with an automatically recording inverted echo sounder, ARIES, and the bubble clouds. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,16, 1462–1478.

  • ——, and A. J. Hall, 1983: The characteristics of breaking waves, bubble clouds and near-surface currents observed using side-scan sonar. Contin. Shelf Res.,6, 353–384.

  • Wetzel, L., 1986: On microwave scattering by breaking waves. Wave Dynamics and Radio Probing of the Ocean Surface, O. M. Phillips and K. Hasselman, Eds., Plenum Press, 273–284.

  • Wu, J., 1988: Variations of whitecap coverage with wind stress and water temperature. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,18, 1448–1453.

  • Zakharoff, V. E., 1992: Inverse and direct cascade in the wind-driven and surface wave turbulence and wave breaking. Breaking Waves. Proc. IUTAM Symposium, M. L. Banner and R. Grimshaw, Eds., Springer-Verlag, 70–91.

  • ——, and M. M. Zaslavskii, 1982: The kinetic equation and Kolmogorov spectra in the weak turbulence theory of wind waves. Izv. Atmos. Oceanic Phys.,18, 747–753.

  • ——, and ——, 1983: Shape of the spectrum of energy-carrying components of a water surface in the weak-turbulence theory of wind waves (English translation). Izv. Atmos. Oceanic Phys., 19 (3), 207–212.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 409 107 5
PDF Downloads 241 92 4