Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

The Dependence of Sea Surface Roughness on the Height and Steepness of the Waves

Peter K. Taylor Southampton Oceanography Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Peter K. Taylor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Margaret J. Yelland Southampton Oceanography Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Margaret J. Yelland in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Feb 2001
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2001)031<0572:TDOSSR>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
572–590
Restricted access

Abstract

It is proposed that the sea surface roughness zo can be predicted from the height and steepness of the waves, zo/Hs = A(Hs/Lp)B, where Hs and Lp are the significant wave height and peak wavelength for the combined sea and swell spectrum; best estimates for the coefficients are A = 1200, B = 4.5. The proposed formula is shown to predict well the magnitude and behavior of the drag coefficient as observed in wave tanks, lakes, and the open ocean, thus reconciling observations that previously had appeared disparate. Indeed, the formula suggests that changes in roughness due to limited duration or fetch are of order 10% or less. Thus all deep water, pure windseas, regardless of fetch or duration, extract momentum from the air at a rate similar to that predicted for a fully developed sea. This is confirmed using published field data for a wide range of conditions over lakes and coastal seas. Only for field data corresponding to extremely young waves (U10/cp > 3) were there appreciable differences between the predicted and observed roughness values, the latter being larger on average. Significant changes in roughness may be caused by shoaling or by swell. A large increase in roughness is predicted for shoaling waves if the depth is less than about 0.2Lp. The presence of swell in the open ocean acts, on average, to significantly decrease the effective wave steepness and hence the mean roughness compared to that for a pure windsea. Thus the predicted open ocean roughness is, at most wind speeds, significantly less than is observed for pure wind waves on lakes. Only at high wind speeds, such that the windsea dominates the swell, do the mean open ocean values reach those for a fully developed sea.

Corresponding author address: Peter K. Taylor, Southampton Oceanography Centre, Express Dock, Southampton SO14 3ZH, United Kingdom.

Email: Peter.K.Taylor@soc.soton.ac.uk

Abstract

It is proposed that the sea surface roughness zo can be predicted from the height and steepness of the waves, zo/Hs = A(Hs/Lp)B, where Hs and Lp are the significant wave height and peak wavelength for the combined sea and swell spectrum; best estimates for the coefficients are A = 1200, B = 4.5. The proposed formula is shown to predict well the magnitude and behavior of the drag coefficient as observed in wave tanks, lakes, and the open ocean, thus reconciling observations that previously had appeared disparate. Indeed, the formula suggests that changes in roughness due to limited duration or fetch are of order 10% or less. Thus all deep water, pure windseas, regardless of fetch or duration, extract momentum from the air at a rate similar to that predicted for a fully developed sea. This is confirmed using published field data for a wide range of conditions over lakes and coastal seas. Only for field data corresponding to extremely young waves (U10/cp > 3) were there appreciable differences between the predicted and observed roughness values, the latter being larger on average. Significant changes in roughness may be caused by shoaling or by swell. A large increase in roughness is predicted for shoaling waves if the depth is less than about 0.2Lp. The presence of swell in the open ocean acts, on average, to significantly decrease the effective wave steepness and hence the mean roughness compared to that for a pure windsea. Thus the predicted open ocean roughness is, at most wind speeds, significantly less than is observed for pure wind waves on lakes. Only at high wind speeds, such that the windsea dominates the swell, do the mean open ocean values reach those for a fully developed sea.

Corresponding author address: Peter K. Taylor, Southampton Oceanography Centre, Express Dock, Southampton SO14 3ZH, United Kingdom.

Email: Peter.K.Taylor@soc.soton.ac.uk

Save
Cover Journal of Physical Oceanography
Journal of Physical Oceanography

  • Anctil, F., and M. A. Donelan, 1996: Air–water momentum flux observations over shoaling waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,26, 1344–1353.

  • Ataktürk, S. S., and K. B. Katsaros, 1999: Wind stress and surface waves observed on Lake Washington. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,29, 633–650.

  • Bourassa, M. A., D. G. Vincent, and W. L. Wood, 1999: A flux parameterisation including the effects of capillary waves and sea state. J. Atmos. Sci.,56, 1123–1139.

  • Carter, D. J. T., 1982: Prediction of wave height and period for a constant wind velocity using the JONSWAP formulae. Ocean Eng.,9, 17–33.

  • Charnock, H., 1955: Wind stress on a water surface. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,81, 639–640.

  • Cheng, Z., and H. Mitsuyasu, 1992: Laboratory studies on the surface drift current induced by wind and swell. J. Fluid Mech.,243, 247–259.

  • Colton, M. C., W. J. Plant, W. C. Keller, and G. L. Geernaert, 1995:Tower-based measurements of normalized radar cross-section from Lake Ontario: Evidence of wind stress dependence. J. Geophys. Res.,100, 8791–8813.

  • Dobson, F. W., S. D. Smith, and R. J. Anderson, 1994: Measuring the relationship between wind stress and sea state in the open ocean in the presence of swell. Atmos.–Ocean,32, 237–256.

  • ——, R. J. Anderson, P. K. Taylor, and M. J. Yelland, 1999: Storm Wind Study II: Open ocean wind and sea state measurement. Proc. Symp. on the Wind-Driven Air–Sea Interface: Electromagnetic and Acoustic Sensing, Wave Dynamics and Turbulent Fluxes, M. L. Banner, Ed., University of New South Wales, 295–296.

  • Donelan, M. A., 1982: The dependence of the aerodynamic drag coefficient on wave parameters. First Int. Conf. on Meteorology and Air–Sea Interaction of the Coastal Zone, The Hague, Netherlands, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 381–387.

  • ——, 1990: Air–sea interaction. The Sea, Vol. 9: Ocean Engineering Science, B. Le Mehaute and D. M. Hanes, Eds., Wiley, 239–292.

  • ——, J. A. Hamilton, and W. H. Hui, 1985: Directional spectra of wind generated waves. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London,A315, 509–562.

  • ——, F. W. Dobson, S. D. Smith, and R. J. Anderson, 1993: On the dependence of sea surface roughness on wave development. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,23, 2143–2149.

  • ——, W. M. Drennan, and K. B. Katsaros, 1997: The air–sea momentum flux in conditions of wind sea and swell. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,27, 2087–2099.

  • Drennan, W. M., H. C. Graber, and M. A. Donelan, 1999a: Evidence for the effects of swell and unsteady winds on marine wind stress. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,29, 1853–1864.

  • ——, K. K. Kahma, and M. A. Donelan, 1999b: On momentum flux and velocity spectra over waves. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,92, 489–515.

  • Geernaert, G. L., 1990: Bulk parameterisations for the wind stress and heat fluxes. Surface Waves and Fluxes. Vol. 1: Current Theory, G. L. Geernaert and W. J. Plant, Eds., Kluwer, 91–172.

  • ——, K. B. Katsaros, and K. Richter, 1986: Variation of the drag coefficient and its dependence on sea state. J. Geophys. Res.,91, 7667–7679.

  • Gulev, S. K., and L. Hasse, 1998: North Atlantic wind waves and wind stress fields from voluntary observing ship data. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,28, 1107–1130.

  • Hare, J. E., P. O. G. Persson, C. W. Fairall, and J. B. Edson, 1999: Behaviour of Charnock’s relationship for high wind conditions. Preprints, 13th Symp. on Boundary Layers and Turbulence, Dallas, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 252–255.

  • Hsu, S. A., 1974: A dynamic roughness equation and its application to wind stress determination at the air–sea interface. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,4, 116–120.

  • Janssen, J. A. M., 1997: Does wind stress depend on sea-state or not?—A statistical error analysis of HEXMAX data. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,83, 479–503.

  • Johnson, H. K., J. Hoejstrup, H. J. Vested, and S. E. Larsen, 1998: Dependence of sea surface roughness on wind waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,28, 1702–1716.

  • Juszko, B. A., R. F. Marsden, and S. R. Waddell, 1995: Wind stress from wave slopes using Phillips equilibrium theory. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,25, 185–203.

  • Keller, M. R., W. C. Keller, and W. J. Plant, 1992: A wave tank study of the dependence of X band cross sections on wind speed and water temperature. J. Geophys. Res.,97, 5771–5792.

  • Komen, G., P. A. E. M. Janssen, V. Makin, and W. Oost, 1998: On the sea state dependence of the Charnock parameter. Global Ocean Atmos. Syst.,5, 367–388.

  • Kondo, J., 1975: Air–sea bulk transfer coefficients in diabatic conditions. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,9, 91–112.

  • Kunishi, H., and N. Imasato, 1966: On the growth of wind waves by high-speed wind flume (in Japanese). Ann. Disaster Prev. Res. Inst. Kyoto Univ.,9, 667–676.

  • Maat, N., C. Kraan, and W. A. Oost, 1991: The roughness of wind waves. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,54, 89–103.

  • Mahrt, L., D. Vickers, J. Howell, J. Hojstrup, J. M. Wilczak, J. Edson, and J. Hare, 1996: Sea surface drag coefficients in the Risø Air Sea Experiment. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans,101, 14 327–14 335.

  • Monbaliu, J., 1994: On the use of the Donelan wave spectral parameter as a measure for the roughness of wind waves. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,67, 277–291.

  • Nordeng, T. E., 1991: On the wave age dependent drag coefficient and roughness length at sea. J. Geophys. Res.,96, 7164–7174.

  • Oost, W. A., 1991: The wind profile in a wave flume. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.,37, 113–121.

  • ——, 1998: The KNMI HEXMAX stress data—A reanalysis. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,86, 447–468.

  • Rieder, K. F., 1997: Analysis of sea-surface drag parameterizations in open ocean conditions. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,82, 355–377.

  • ——, and J. A. Smith, 1998: Removing wave effects from the wind stress vector. J. Geophys. Res.,103, 1363–1374.

  • Smith, S. D., 1980: Wind stress and heat flux over the ocean in gale force winds. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,10, 709–726.

  • ——, 1988: Coefficients for sea surface wind stress, heat flux and wind profiles as a function of wind speed and temperature. J. Geophys. Res.,93, 15 467–15 474.

  • ——, K. B. Katsaros, W. A. Oost, and P. G. Mestayer, 1990: Two major experiments in the Humidity Exchange over the Sea (HEXOS) Program. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,71, 161–172.

  • ——, and Coauthors, 1992: Sea surface wind stress and drag coefficients: The HEXOS results. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,60, 109–142.

  • ——, K. B. Katsaros, W. A. Oost, and P. G. Mestayer, 1996: The impact of the HEXOS programme. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,78, 121–141.

  • Taylor, P. K., and M. J. Yelland, 2000: A note on the apparent “imbalance” term in the turbulent kinetic energy budget. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,17, 82–89.

  • ——, ——, F. W. Dobson, and R. J. Anderson, 1999: Storm Wind Study II: Wind stress estimates from buoy and ship. Proc. Symp. on the Wind-Driven Air–sea Interface: Electromagnetic and Acoustic Sensing, Wave Dynamics and Turbulent Fluxes, M. L. Banner, Ed., University of New South Wales, 353–354.

  • Terray, E. A., M. A. Donelan, Y. C. Agrawal, W. M. Drennan, K. K. Kahma, A. J. Williams III, P. A. Hwang, and S. A. Kitaigorodskii, 1996: Estimates of kinetic energy dissipation under breaking waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,26, 792–807.

  • Toba, Y., H. Iida, H. Kawamura, N. Ebuchi, and I. S. F. Jones, 1990:Wave dependence of sea-surface wind stress. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,20, 705–721.

  • Tucker, M. J., 1991: Waves in Ocean Engineering—Measurement, Analysis, Interpretation. Ellis Horwood, 431 pp.

  • Vickers, D., and L. Mahrt, 1997a: Fetch limited drag coefficients. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,85, 53–79.

  • ——, and ——, 1997b: Quality control and flux sampling problems for tower and aircraft data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,14, 512–526.

  • ——, and ——, 1999: Observations of non-dimensional wind shear in the coastal zone. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,125, 2685–2702.

  • Yelland, M. J., and P. K. Taylor, 1996: Wind stress measurements from the open ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,26, 541–558.

  • ——, and ——, 1999: Does the wind stress depend on the sea state? Wind over Wave Couplings: Perspectives and Prospects, S. G. Sajjadi, Ed., Oxford University Press, 107–117.

  • ——, ——, I. E. Consterdine, and M. H. Smith, 1994: The use of the inertial dissipation technique for shipboard wind stress determination. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,11, 1093–1108.

  • ——, B. I. Moat, P. K. Taylor, R. W. Pascal, J. Hutchings, and V. C. Cornell, 1998: Measurements of the open ocean drag coefficient corrected for air flow disturbance by the ship. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,28, 1511–1526.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2411 667 44
PDF Downloads 1928 635 41