Article Type:
Research Article

Potential Vorticity Structure across the Gulf Stream: Observations and a PV-Gradient Model

Oleg Logoutov Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, Rhode Island

Search for other papers by Oleg Logoutov in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
George Sutyrin Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, Rhode Island

Search for other papers by George Sutyrin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
D. Randolph Watts Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, Rhode Island

Search for other papers by D. Randolph Watts in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Feb 2001
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2001)031<0637:PVSATG>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
637–644
Restricted access

Abstract

Potential vorticity (PV) structure across a baroclinic front is a property that determines the stability characteristics of that front, cross-frontal exchange, and the behavior of the vortical waves that this front enables. Hence, there has been much interest in estimating PV across the Gulf Stream (GS). However, PV estimations have typically encountered two problems—the horizontal resolution of sampling has been inadequate, and noise in measurements gets amplified by differentiation when estimating PV. This paper’s approach addresses both of these problems.

The authors have used a unique set of highly resolved, simultaneous density and direct velocity measurements across the Gulf Stream, first to calculate the PV structure, and then to obtain its idealization within density layers using a PV-gradient (PVG) model. The PVG model inverts an input PV in layers to determine the isopycnal depths and velocities in isopycnal layers. By comparing the observed and PVG-modeled velocities and isopycnal positions, corrections to PV estimates can be made to improve agreement. In this way an idealized and smooth PV-gradient structure can be obtained that is dynamically consistent with the velocity and density fields and retains the correct magnitudes of the PV gradients while noise and insignificant details are filtered out.

The GS PV structure can be successfully idealized as a “3-PVG-layer” representation, which has a strong positive PV gradient in the 18°C Water layer, a weak positive PVG in the upper main thermocline, and a weak negative PVG in the lower main thermocline. The associated velocity structure captures the core velocity throughout the upper main thermocline, the width, the vertical tilt, and the asymmetry of the flow with higher lateral shear on the cyclonic side.

Corresponding author address: Mr. Oleg G. Logoutov, Graduate School of Oceanography, Box 200, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, RI 02882-1197.

Email: ologoutov@gso.uri.edu

Abstract

Potential vorticity (PV) structure across a baroclinic front is a property that determines the stability characteristics of that front, cross-frontal exchange, and the behavior of the vortical waves that this front enables. Hence, there has been much interest in estimating PV across the Gulf Stream (GS). However, PV estimations have typically encountered two problems—the horizontal resolution of sampling has been inadequate, and noise in measurements gets amplified by differentiation when estimating PV. This paper’s approach addresses both of these problems.

The authors have used a unique set of highly resolved, simultaneous density and direct velocity measurements across the Gulf Stream, first to calculate the PV structure, and then to obtain its idealization within density layers using a PV-gradient (PVG) model. The PVG model inverts an input PV in layers to determine the isopycnal depths and velocities in isopycnal layers. By comparing the observed and PVG-modeled velocities and isopycnal positions, corrections to PV estimates can be made to improve agreement. In this way an idealized and smooth PV-gradient structure can be obtained that is dynamically consistent with the velocity and density fields and retains the correct magnitudes of the PV gradients while noise and insignificant details are filtered out.

The GS PV structure can be successfully idealized as a “3-PVG-layer” representation, which has a strong positive PV gradient in the 18°C Water layer, a weak positive PVG in the upper main thermocline, and a weak negative PVG in the lower main thermocline. The associated velocity structure captures the core velocity throughout the upper main thermocline, the width, the vertical tilt, and the asymmetry of the flow with higher lateral shear on the cyclonic side.

Corresponding author address: Mr. Oleg G. Logoutov, Graduate School of Oceanography, Box 200, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, RI 02882-1197.

Email: ologoutov@gso.uri.edu

Save
Cover Journal of Physical Oceanography
Journal of Physical Oceanography

  • Bane, J. M., Jr., 1980: Coastal-trapped waves in a baroclinic western boundary current. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,10, 1652–1668.

  • Boss, E., N. Paldor, and L. Thompson, 1996: Stability of a potential vorticity front: From quasi-geostrophy to shallow water. J. Fluid Mech.,315, 65–84.

  • Bower, A. S., and M. S. Lozier, 1994: A closer look at particle exchange in the Gulf Stream. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,24, 1399–1418.

  • ——, H. T. Rossby, and J. L. Lillibridge, 1985: The Gulf Stream —Barrier or blender? J. Phys. Oceanogr.,15, 24–32.

  • Halkin, D., and H. T. Rossby, 1985: The structure and transport of the Gulf Stream at 73°W. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,15, 1439–1452.

  • Hall, M. M., 1994: Synthesizing the Gulf Stream thermal structure from XBT data. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,24, 2278–2287.

  • ——, and N. P. Fofonoff, 1993: Downstream development of the Gulf Stream from 68° to 55°W. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,23, 225–249.

  • Hoskins, B. J., M. E. McIntyre, and A. W. Robertson, 1985: On the use and significance of isentropic potential vorticity maps. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,111, 877–946.

  • Johns, E., 1984: Geostrophy and potential vorticity in the Gulf Stream northeast of Cape Hatteras, N.C. Ph.D. thesis, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, RI, 223 pp.

  • ——, D. R. Watts, and H. T. Rossby, 1989: A test of geostrophy in the Gulf Stream. J. Geophys. Res.,94, 3211–3222.

  • Johns, W. E., T. J. Shay, J. M. Bane, and D. R. Watts, 1995: Gulf Stream structure, transport, and recirculation near 68°W. J. Geophys. Res.,100, 817–838.

  • Killworth, P. D., 1980: Barotropic and baroclinic instability in rotating stratified fluids. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans,4, 143–184.

  • Leaman, K. D., E. Johns, and T. Rossby, 1989: The average distribution of volume transport and potential vorticity with temperature at three sections across the Gulf Stream. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,19, 36–51.

  • Liu, M., and T. Rossby, 1993: Observations of the velocity and vorticity structure of Gulf Stream meanders. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,23, 329–345.

  • Lozier, M. S., and D. Bercovici, 1992: Particle exchange in an unstable jet. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,22, 1506–1516.

  • Meacham, S. P., 1991: Meander evolution on quasigeostrophic jets. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,21, 1139–1170.

  • Mueller, P., 1995: Ertel’s potential vorticity theorem in physical oceanography. Rev. Geophys.,33, 67–97.

  • Pratt, L. J., and M. E. Stern, 1986: Dynamics of potential vorticity fronts and eddy detachment. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,16, 1101–1120.

  • ——, J. Earles, P. Cornillon, and J.-F. Cayula, 1991: The non-linear behavior of varicose disturbances in a simple model of the Gulf Stream. Deep-Sea Res.,38 (Suppl. 1A), S591–S622.

  • Stommel, H., 1965: The Gulf Stream: A Physical and Dynamical Description. University of California Press, 248 pp.

  • Sutyrin, G. G., and I. G. Yushina, 1989: Numerical modeling of the formation, evolution, interaction and decay of isolated vortices. Mesoscale/Synoptic Coherent Structures in Geophysical Turbulence, J. C. Nihoul and B. M. Jamart, Eds., Elsevier Oceanography Series, Vol. 50, 721–736.

  • Watts, D. R., 1983: Gulf Stream variability. Eddies in Marine Sciences, A. Robinson, Ed., Springer-Verlag, 114–144.

  • ——, K. L. Tracey, J. M. Bane, and T. J. Shay, 1995: Gulf Stream path and thermocline structure near 74°W and 68°W. J. Geophys. Res.,100, 18 291–18 312.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 230 38 5
PDF Downloads 112 34 3