Evolution of Near-Inertial Waves during an Upwelling Event on the New Jersey Inner Shelf

Robert J. Chant Institute for Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Robert J. Chant in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

A 1996 field program provided a nearly three-dimensional view of the temporal evolution of near-inertial motion toward the end of an upwelling event on New Jersey’s inner shelf. The appearance of near-inertial motion is marked by a rapid rise in kinetic energy at the surface that is of the same magnitude and temporal structure of the work done by the wind, indicating that the inertial motions are forced by local winds. The incipient near-inertial motion is surface intensified and spatially coherent. It has a horizontal wavelength of 300 km and a mean kinetic energy of 0.04 m2 s−2, both of which decrease to less than 100 km and 0.01 m2 s−2 within two inertial periods. An energy budget suggests that the rapid decline in surface kinetic energy is primarily due to vertical propagation into the thermocline. Near-inertial motion in the thermocline is heterogeneous suggesting interaction between near-inertial motion and subinertial shears. The heterogeneous nature of near-inertial waves poses a practical problem for shipborne acoustic Doppler current profiler surveys of the subtidal velocity field.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Robert J. Chant, IMCS, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901.

Abstract

A 1996 field program provided a nearly three-dimensional view of the temporal evolution of near-inertial motion toward the end of an upwelling event on New Jersey’s inner shelf. The appearance of near-inertial motion is marked by a rapid rise in kinetic energy at the surface that is of the same magnitude and temporal structure of the work done by the wind, indicating that the inertial motions are forced by local winds. The incipient near-inertial motion is surface intensified and spatially coherent. It has a horizontal wavelength of 300 km and a mean kinetic energy of 0.04 m2 s−2, both of which decrease to less than 100 km and 0.01 m2 s−2 within two inertial periods. An energy budget suggests that the rapid decline in surface kinetic energy is primarily due to vertical propagation into the thermocline. Near-inertial motion in the thermocline is heterogeneous suggesting interaction between near-inertial motion and subinertial shears. The heterogeneous nature of near-inertial waves poses a practical problem for shipborne acoustic Doppler current profiler surveys of the subtidal velocity field.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Robert J. Chant, IMCS, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901.

Save
  • Barrick, D. E., M. W. Evans, and B. L. Wever, 1977: Ocean surface currents mapped by radar. Science,198, 138–144.

  • Candala, J., R. C. Beardsley, and R. Limeburner, 1992: Separation of tidal and subtidal currents in ship-mounted acoustic Doppler current profiler observations. J. Geophys. Res.,97 (C1), 769–788.

  • Chapman, R. D., L. K. Shay, H. C. Graber, J. B. Edson, A. Karachintsev, C. L. Trump, and D. B. Ross., 1997: On the accuracy of HF radar surface current measurements: Intercomparison with ship-based sensors. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 18 737–18 748.

  • D’Asaro, E. A., 1995a: A collection of papers on the Ocean Storms Experiment. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,25, 2817–2818.

  • ——, 1995b: Upper-ocean inertial currents forced by a strong storm. Part II: Modeling. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,25, 2937–2952.

  • ——, C. C. Eriksen, M. D. Levine, P. P. Niiler, C. A. Paulson, and P. V. Meurs, 1995: Upper-ocean inertial currents forced by a strong storm. Part I: Data and comparison. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,25, 2909–2936.

  • Federiuk, J., and J. S. Allen, 1996: Model studies of near-inertial waves in flow over the Oregon continental shelf. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,26, 2053–2075.

  • Glenn, S. M., M. F. Crowley, D. B. Haidvogel, and T. Y. Song, 1996:Underwater observatory captures coastal upwelling events off New Jersey. Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union,77, 233 and 236.

  • Graber, H. C., B. K. Haus, R. D. Chapman, and L. K. Shay, 1997: HF radar comparisons with moored estimates of current speed and direction: Expected differences and implications. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 18 749–18 766.

  • Gregg, M. C., E. A. D’Asaro, T. J. Shay, and N. Larson, 1986: Observations of persistent mixing and near-inertial internal waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,16, 856–885.

  • Herbert, D., and J. N. Moum, 1994: Decay of near-inertial wave. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,24, 2334–2531.

  • Kundu, P. J., 1976: An analysis of inertial oscillations observed near Oregon coast. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,6, 880–893.

  • Kunze, E., 1985: Near-inertial wave propagation in geostrophic shear. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,15, 544–565.

  • ——, 1986: The mean and near-inertial velocity fields in a warm-core ring. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,16, 1444–1461.

  • ——, and T. B. Sanford, 1984: Observations of near-inertial waves in a front. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,14, 566–581.

  • ——, R. W. Schmitt, and J. M. Toole, 1995: The energy balance in a warm core ring’s near-inertial critical layer. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,25, 942–957.

  • Lee, C. M., and C. C. Eriksen, 1997: Near-inertial wave interactions with mesoscale fronts: Observations and models. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 3237–3253.

  • Mass, L. R. M., and J. J. van Haren, 1987: Observations on the vertical structure of tidal and inertial currents in the central North Sea. J. Mar. Res.,45, 293–318.

  • Mied, R. P, C. Y. Shen, C. L. Trump, and G. J. Lindermann, 1986: Internal inertial waves in a Sargasso Sea front. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,16, 1751–1762.

  • Munchow, A., and R. J. Chant, 2000: Kinematics of inner shelf motions during the summer stratified season off New Jersey. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,30, 247–268.

  • Munk, W., and N. Phillips, 1968: Coherence and band structure of inertial motion in the sea. Rev. Geophys.,6, 447–472.

  • Olbers, D. J., 1981: The propagation of internal waves in a geostrophic current. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,11, 1224–1233.

  • Paduan, J. D., and L. K. Rosenfield, 1996: Remotely sensed surface currents in Monterrey Bay from shore-based HF radar (Coastal Ocean Dynamics Application Radar). J. Geophys. Res.,101, 20 669–20 686.

  • Pollard, R. T., 1970: On the generation by winds of inertial waves in the ocean. Deep-Sea Res.,17, 795–812.

  • Rosenfeld, K. K., 1990: Baroclinic semi-diurnal tidal currents over the continental shelf off Northern California. J. Geophys. Res.,95, 22 153–22 172.

  • Schmitt, R. W., J. M. Tolle, R. L. Koehler, E. C. Mellinger, and K. W. Doherty, 1988: The development of a fine- and microstructure profiler. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,5, 484–500.

  • Shay, L. K., T. N. Lee, E. J. Williams, H. G. Graber, and C. G. H. Rooth, 1998: Effects of low-frequency current variability on near-inertial submesoscale vortices. J. Geophys. Res.,103, 18 691–18 714.

  • Styles, R. B., and S. M. Glenn, 2000: Modeling stratified wave and current bottom boundary layers on the Continental Shelf. J. Geophys. Res.,105, 24 119–24 139.

  • van Meurs, P., 1998: Interaction between near-inertial mixed layer currents and the mesoscale: The importance of spatial variabilities in the vorticity field. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,28, 1363–1388.

  • Wang, D. P., 1991: Generation and propagation of inertial waves in the subtropical front. J. Mar. Res., 49, 619–633.

  • ——, and C. N. K. Mooers, 1977: Evidence for interior dissipation and mixing during a coastal upwelling event off Oregon. J. Mar. Res.,35, 697–713.

  • Webster, F., 1968: Observations of inertial-period motion in the deep sea. Rev. Geophys.,6, 473–490.

  • Weller, R. A., D. L. Rudnick, C. C. Eriksen, K. L. Polzin, N. S. Oakey, J. W. Toole, R. W. Schmitt, and R. T. Pollard, 1991: Forced ocean response during the frontal air–sea exchange experiment. J. Geophys. Res.,96, 8611–8638.

  • Yankovsky, A. E., and R. W. Garvine, 1998: Subinertial dynamics on the inner New Jersey shelf during the upwelling season. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,28, 2444–2458.

  • Young, W., and M. Ben Jelloul, 1997: Propagation of near-inertial oscillations through a geostropic flow. J. Mar. Res.,55, 735–766.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 917 646 21
PDF Downloads 200 47 0