One-Dimensional, Ocean Surface Layer Modeling: A Problem and a Solution

George L. Mellor Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey

Search for other papers by George L. Mellor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The first part of this paper is generic; it demonstrates a problem associated with one-dimensional, ocean surface layer model comparisons with ocean observations. Unlike three-dimensional simulations or the real ocean, kinetic energy can inexorably build up in one-dimensional simulations, which artificially enhances mixing. Adding a sink term to the momentum equations counteracts this behavior. The sink term is a surrogate for energy divergence available to three-dimensional models but not to one-dimensional models.

The remainder of the paper deals with the Mellor–Yamada boundary layer model. There exists prior evidence that the model’s summertime surface temperatures are too warm due to overly shallow mixed layer depths. If one adds a sink term to approximate three-dimensional model behavior, the warming problem is exacerbated, creating added incentive to seek an appropriate model change. Guided by laboratory data, a Richardson-number-dependent dissipation is introduced and this simple modification yields a favorable improvement in the comparison of model calculations with data even with the momentum sink term in place.

Corresponding author address: Dr. George L. Mellor, Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Princeton University, Box CN710, Sayre Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544-0710.

Abstract

The first part of this paper is generic; it demonstrates a problem associated with one-dimensional, ocean surface layer model comparisons with ocean observations. Unlike three-dimensional simulations or the real ocean, kinetic energy can inexorably build up in one-dimensional simulations, which artificially enhances mixing. Adding a sink term to the momentum equations counteracts this behavior. The sink term is a surrogate for energy divergence available to three-dimensional models but not to one-dimensional models.

The remainder of the paper deals with the Mellor–Yamada boundary layer model. There exists prior evidence that the model’s summertime surface temperatures are too warm due to overly shallow mixed layer depths. If one adds a sink term to approximate three-dimensional model behavior, the warming problem is exacerbated, creating added incentive to seek an appropriate model change. Guided by laboratory data, a Richardson-number-dependent dissipation is introduced and this simple modification yields a favorable improvement in the comparison of model calculations with data even with the momentum sink term in place.

Corresponding author address: Dr. George L. Mellor, Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Princeton University, Box CN710, Sayre Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544-0710.

Save
  • Andre, J. C., and P. Lacarrere, 1985: Mean and turbulent structure of the oceanic surface layer as determined from a one-dimensional third order simulation. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,15, 121–132.

  • Asselin, R., 1972: Frequency filters for time integration. Mon. Wea. Rev.,100, 487–490.

  • Batchelor, G. K., 1956: The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence. Cambridge Press, 103 pp.

  • ——, and A. A. Townsend: 1948: Decay of isotropic turbulence in the initial period. Proc. Roy. Soc.,193A, 539–566.

  • Burchard, H., and H. Baumert: 1995: On the performance of a mixed-layer model based on the k-e(greek epsilon) turbulence closure. J. Geophys. Res.,100, 8523–8540.

  • Businger, J. A., J. C. Wyngaard, Y. Izumi, and E. F. Bradley, 1971: Flux profile relationships in the atmospheric boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,28, 181–189.

  • Celenligil, M. C., and G. L. Mellor, 1985: Numerical solutions of two-dimensional turbulent separated flows using a Reynolds stress closure model. J. Fluids Eng.,107, 467–476.

  • Craig, P. D., and M. L. Banner, 1994: Modeling wave-enhanced turbulence in the ocean surface layer. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,24, 2546–2559.

  • Dickey, T. D., 1977: An experimental study of decaying and diffusing turbulence in neutral and stratified fluids. Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University, 133 pp. [Available from Xerox University Microfilms, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.].

  • ——, and G. L. Mellor, 1980: Decaying turbulence in neutral and stratified fluids. J. Fluid Mech.,99, 13–31.

  • Domaradzki, J. A., and G. L. Mellor, 1984: A simple turbulence closure hypothesis for the triple-velocity correlation functions in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech.,140, 45–61.

  • Galperin, B., L. H. Kantha, S. Hassid, and A. Rosati: 1988: A quasi-equilibrium turbulent energy model for geophysical flows. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 55–62.

  • Garrett, C., and W. Munk, 1979: Internal waves in the ocean. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.,11, 339–369.

  • Gaspar, P., Y. Gregoris, and J.-M. Lefevre, 1990: A simple eddy kinetic energy model for simulations of the oceanic vertical mixing: Tests at station Papa and Long-Term Upper Ocean Study site. J. Geophys. Res.,95, 16 179–16 193.

  • Jerlov, N. G., 1976: Marine Optics 14. Elsevier Science, 231 pp.

  • Kantha, L. H., and C. A. Clayson, 1994: An improved mixed layer model for geophysical applications. J. Geophys. Res.,99, 25 235–25 266.

  • Kolmogorov, A. N., 1941: The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds number (in Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR,30, 301–310.

  • Large, W. G., J. C. McWilliams, and S. C. Doney, 1994: Oceanic vertical mixing: A review and a model with a nonlocal boundary layer parameterization. Rev. Geophys.,32, 363–403.

  • Lewellen, W. S., and M. E. Teske, 1973: Prediction of the Monin–Obukhov similarity functions from an invariant model of turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci.,30, 1340–1345.

  • Lumley, J. L., O. Zeman, and J. Seiss, 1978: The influence of buoyancy on turbulent transport. J. Fluid Mech.,84, 581–597.

  • Martin, P. J., 1985: Simulation of the mixed layer at OWS November and Papa with several models. J. Geophys. Res.,90, 903–916.

  • Mellor, G. L., 1973: Analytic prediction of the properties of stratified planetary boundary layers. J. Atmos. Sci.,30, 1061–1069.

  • ——, 1975: A comparative study of curved flow and density stratified flow. J. Atmos. Sci.,32, 1278–1282.

  • ——, 1996: User’s guide for a three-dimensional, primitive equation, numerical ocean model. Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Princeton University, 41 pp. [Available online at http://www.aos.princeton.edu/WWWPUBLIC/htdocs.pom/.].

  • ——, and T. Yamada, 1974: An hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers. J. Atmos. Sci.,13, 1791–1806.

  • ——, and P. A. Durbin, 1975: The structure and dynamics of the ocean surface mixed layer. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,5, 718–728.

  • ——, and T. Yamada, 1982: Development of a turbulent closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev. Geophys.,20, 851–875.

  • Moeng, C.-H., and J. C. Wyngaard, 1986: An analysis of closures for pressure–scalar covariances in the convective boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 2499–2513.

  • ——, and ——, 1989: Evaluation of turbulent transport and dissipation closures in second-order modeling. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 2311–2330.

  • Mofjeld, H. O., and J. W. Lavelle, 1984: Setting the length scale in a second order closure model of the unstratified bottom boundary layer. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,14, 833–839.

  • Paulson, C. A., and J. J. Simpson, 1977: Irradiance measurements in the upper ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,7, 952–956.

  • Pollard, R. T., 1970: On the generation of inertial waves in the ocean. Deep-Sea Res.,17, 795–812.

  • ——, and R. C. Millard, 1970: Comparison between observed and simulated wind-generated inertial oscillations. Deep-Sea Res.,17, 813–821.

  • Price, J. F., R. A. Weller, C. M. Bowers, and M. G. Briscoe, 1987: Diurnal response of sea surface temperature observed at the Long-Term Upper Ocean Study (34°N, 70°W) in the Sargasso Sea. J. Geophys. Res.,92, 14 480–14 490.

  • Rodi, W., 1987: Examples of calculation methods for flow and mixing in stratified flows. J. Geophys. Res.,92, 5305–5328.

  • Rotta, J. C., 1951a: Statistische Theorie nichthomogener Turbulenz. Z. Phys.,129, 547–572.

  • ——, 1951b: Statistische Theorie nichthomogener Turbulenz. Z. Phys.,131, 51–77.

  • Stacey, M. W., and S. Pond, 1997: On the Mellor–Yamada turbulence closure scheme: The surface boundary conditions for q2. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,27, 2081–2086.

  • Stramma, L. P., P. Cornillon, R. A. Weller, J. F. Price, and M. G. Briscoe, 1986: Large diurnal sea surface temperature variability: Satellite and in situ measurements. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,16, 827–837.

  • Sun, W.-Y., and Y. Ogura, 1980: Modeling the evolution of the convective planetary boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,37, 1558–1572.

  • Taylor, G. I., 1921: Diffusion by continuous movement. Proc. London Math. Soc.,20, 196–211.

  • Therry, G., and P. Lacarrere, 1986: Improving the eddy-kinetic energy model for boundary layer description. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,37, 129–148.

  • Yamada, T., 1983: Simulations of nocturnal drainage flows by a q2−1 turbulence closure model. J. Atmos. Sci.,40, 90–106.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1341 441 45
PDF Downloads 599 153 16