Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

The Temporal-Residual-Mean Velocity. Part II: Isopycnal Interpretation and the Tracer and Momentum Equations

Trevor J. McDougall Antarctic CRC, University of Tasmania, and CSIRO Division of Marine Research, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Search for other papers by Trevor J. McDougall in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Peter C. McIntosh Antarctic CRC, University of Tasmania, and CSIRO Division of Marine Research, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Search for other papers by Peter C. McIntosh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 May 2001
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2001)031<1222:TTRMVP>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1222–1246
Restricted access

Abstract

Mesoscale eddies mix fluid parcels in a way that is highly constrained by the stratified nature of the fluid. The temporal-residual-mean (TRM) theory provides the link between the different views that are apparent from temporally averaging these turbulent flow fields in height coordinates and in density coordinates. Here the original TRM theory is modified so that it applies to unsteady flows. This requires a modification not only to the streamfunction (and hence the velocity vector) but also a specific interpretation of the density field; it is not the Eulerian-mean density. The TRM theory reduces the problem of parameterizing the eddy flux from three dimensions to two dimensions. The three-dimensional TRM velocity is shown to be the same as is obtained by averaging with respect to instantaneous density surfaces and the averaged conservation equations in height coordinates and in density coordinates are the same except for a nondivergent flux that is identified and explained. The TRM theory demonstrates that the tracers (such as salinity and potential temperature) that are carried by an eddyless ocean model must be interpreted as the thickness-weighted tracers that result from averaging in density coordinates.

The extra streamfunction of the temporal-residual-mean flow, termed the quasi-Stokes streamfunction, has a simple interpretation that proves valuable in developing plausible boundary conditions for this streamfunction: at any height z, the quasi-Stokes streamfunction is the contribution of temporal perturbations to the horizontal transport of water that is more dense than the density of the surface having time-mean height z. Importantly, the extra three-dimensional velocity derived from the quasi-Stokes streamfunction is not the bolus transport that arises when averaging in density coordinates. Therefore the Gent and McWilliams eddy parameterization scheme is not a parameterization of the bolus velocity but rather of the quasi-Stokes velocity of the temporal-residual-mean circulation. The physical interpretation of the quasi-Stokes streamfunction implies that it must be tapered smoothly to zero at the top and bottom of the ocean rather than having delta functions of velocity against these boundaries. The common assumption of downgradient flux of potential vorticity along isopycnals is discussed and it is shown that this does not sufficiently constrain the three-dimensional quasi-Stokes advection because only the vertical derivative of the quasi-Stokes streamfunction is specified. Near-boundary uncertainty in the potential vorticity fluxes translates into uncertainty in the depth-averaged heat flux. The horizontal TRM momentum equation is derived and leads to an alternative method for including the effects of eddies in eddyless models.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Trevor J. McDougall, CSIRO Division of Marine Research, GPO Box 1538, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

Email: Trevor.McDougall@marine.csiro.au

Abstract

Mesoscale eddies mix fluid parcels in a way that is highly constrained by the stratified nature of the fluid. The temporal-residual-mean (TRM) theory provides the link between the different views that are apparent from temporally averaging these turbulent flow fields in height coordinates and in density coordinates. Here the original TRM theory is modified so that it applies to unsteady flows. This requires a modification not only to the streamfunction (and hence the velocity vector) but also a specific interpretation of the density field; it is not the Eulerian-mean density. The TRM theory reduces the problem of parameterizing the eddy flux from three dimensions to two dimensions. The three-dimensional TRM velocity is shown to be the same as is obtained by averaging with respect to instantaneous density surfaces and the averaged conservation equations in height coordinates and in density coordinates are the same except for a nondivergent flux that is identified and explained. The TRM theory demonstrates that the tracers (such as salinity and potential temperature) that are carried by an eddyless ocean model must be interpreted as the thickness-weighted tracers that result from averaging in density coordinates.

The extra streamfunction of the temporal-residual-mean flow, termed the quasi-Stokes streamfunction, has a simple interpretation that proves valuable in developing plausible boundary conditions for this streamfunction: at any height z, the quasi-Stokes streamfunction is the contribution of temporal perturbations to the horizontal transport of water that is more dense than the density of the surface having time-mean height z. Importantly, the extra three-dimensional velocity derived from the quasi-Stokes streamfunction is not the bolus transport that arises when averaging in density coordinates. Therefore the Gent and McWilliams eddy parameterization scheme is not a parameterization of the bolus velocity but rather of the quasi-Stokes velocity of the temporal-residual-mean circulation. The physical interpretation of the quasi-Stokes streamfunction implies that it must be tapered smoothly to zero at the top and bottom of the ocean rather than having delta functions of velocity against these boundaries. The common assumption of downgradient flux of potential vorticity along isopycnals is discussed and it is shown that this does not sufficiently constrain the three-dimensional quasi-Stokes advection because only the vertical derivative of the quasi-Stokes streamfunction is specified. Near-boundary uncertainty in the potential vorticity fluxes translates into uncertainty in the depth-averaged heat flux. The horizontal TRM momentum equation is derived and leads to an alternative method for including the effects of eddies in eddyless models.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Trevor J. McDougall, CSIRO Division of Marine Research, GPO Box 1538, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

Email: Trevor.McDougall@marine.csiro.au

Save
Cover Journal of Physical Oceanography
Journal of Physical Oceanography

  • Andrews, D. G., and M. E. McIntyre, 1976: Planetary waves in horizontal and vertical shear: The generalized Eliassen–Palm relation and the zonal mean acceleration. J. Atmos. Sci.,33, 2031–2048.

  • ——, and ——, 1978: An exact theory of nonlinear waves on a Lagrangian-mean flow. J. Fluid Mech.,89, 609–646.

  • Bleck, R., 1978: Finite difference equations in generalized vertical coordinates. I. Total energy conservation. Contrib. Atmos. Phys.,51, 360–372.

  • Danabasoglu, G., and J. C. McWilliams, 1995: Sensitivity of the global ocean circulation to parameterizations of mesoscale tracer transports. J. Climate,8, 2967–2987.

  • Davis, R. E., 1994: Diapycnal mixing in the ocean: Equations for large-scale budgets. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,24, 777–800.

  • de Szoeke, R. A., and A. F. Bennett, 1993: Microstructure fluxes across density surfaces. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,23, 2254–2264.

  • Edmon, H. J., Jr., B. J. Hoskins, and M. E. McIntyre, 1980: Eliassen–Palm cross sections for the troposphere. J. Atmos. Sci.,37, 2600–2616.

  • Gent, P. R., and J. C. McWilliams, 1990: Isopycnal mixing in ocean circulation models. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,20, 150–155.

  • ——, and ——, 1996: Eliassen–Palm fluxes and the momentum equations in non-eddy-resolving ocean circulation models. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,26, 2539–2546.

  • ——, J. Willebrand, T. J. McDougall, and J. C. McWilliams, 1995: Parameterizing eddy-induced tracer transports in ocean circulation models. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,25, 463–474.

  • Gille, S. T., and R. E. Davis, 1999: The influence of mesoscale eddies on coarsely resolved density: An examination of subgrid-scale parameterization. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,29, 1109–1123.

  • Greatbatch, R. J., 1998: Exploring the relationship between eddy-induced transport velocity, vertical momentum transfer and the isopycnal flux of potential vorticity. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,28, 422–432.

  • ——, and K. G. Lamb, 1990: On parameterizing vertical mixing of momentum in non-eddy-resolving ocean models. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,20, 1634–1637.

  • Griffies, S. M., 1998: The Gent–McWilliams skew-flux. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,28, 831–841.

  • ——, A. Gnanadesikan, R. C. Pacanowski, V. Larichev, J. K. Dukowicz, and R. D. Smith, 1998: Isoneutral diffusion in a z-coordinate ocean model. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,28, 805–830.

  • Held, I. M., and T. Schneider, 1999: The surface branch of the zonally averaged mass transport circulation in the troposphere. J. Atmos. Sci.,56, 1688–1697.

  • Hirst, A. C., and T. J. McDougall, 1996: Deep water properties and surface buoyancy flux as simulated by a z-coordinate model including eddy-induced advection. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,26, 1320–1343.

  • ——, and ——, 1998: Meridional overturning and dianeutral motion in a z-coordinate ocean model including eddy-induced advection. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,28, 1205–1223.

  • ——, H. B. Gordon, and S. P. O’Farrell, 1996: Global warming in a coupled climate model including oceanic eddy-induced advection. Geophys. Res. Lett.,23, 3361–3364.

  • Holloway, G., 1997: Eddy transport of thickness and momentum in layer and level models. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,27, 1153–1157.

  • Killworth, P. D., 1997: On the parameterization of eddy transfer. Part I: Theory. J. Mar. Res.,55, 1171–1197.

  • ——, 2001: Boundary conditions on quasi-Stokes velocities in parameterizations. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,31, 1132–1155.

  • Kushner, P. J., and I. M. Held, 1999: Potential vorticity thickness fluxes and wave–mean flow interactions. J. Atmos. Sci.,56, 948–958.

  • Large, W. G., G. Danabasoglu, S. C. Doney, and J. C. McWilliams, 1997: Sensitivity to surface forcing and boundary layer mixing in a global ocean model: Annual-mean climatology. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,27, 2418–2447.

  • Lee, M.-M., and H. Leach, 1996: Eliassen–Palm flux and eddy potential vorticity flux for a nonquasigeostrohic time-mean flow. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,26, 1304–1319.

  • Lozier, M. S., M. S. McCartney, and W. B. Owens, 1994: Anomalous anomalies in averaged hydrographic data. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,24, 2624–2638.

  • Marshall, D. P., R. G. Williams, and M.-M. Lee, 1999: The relation between eddy-induced transport and isopycnic gradients of potential vorticity. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,29, 1571–1578.

  • Marshall, J., and G. Shutts, 1981: A note on rotational and divergent eddy fluxes. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,11, 1677–1680.

  • McDougall, T. J., 1987: Thermobaricity, cabbeling and water-mass conversion. J. Geophys. Res.,92, 5448–5464.

  • ——, 1995: The influence of ocean mixing on the absolute velocity vector. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,25, 705–725.

  • ——, 1998: Three-dimensional residual-mean theory. Ocean Modelling and Parameterization, E. P. Chassignet and J. Veron, Eds., Kluwer Academic, 269–302.

  • ——, and P. C. McIntosh, 1996: The temporal-residual-mean velocity. Part I: Derivation and the scalar conservation equations. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,26, 2653–2665.

  • McIntosh, P. C., and T. J. McDougall, 1996: Isopycnal averaging and the residual mean circulation. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,26, 1655–1660.

  • McWilliams, J. C., and P. R. Gent, 1994: The wind-driven ocean circulation with an isopycnal-thickness mixing parameterization. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,24, 46–65.

  • Plumb, R. A., 1979: Eddy fluxes of conserved quantities by small-amplitude waves. J. Atmos. Sci.,36, 1699–1704.

  • Redi, M. H., 1982: Oceanic isopycnal mixing by coordinate rotation. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,12, 1154–1158.

  • Rhines, P. B., 1982: Basic dynamics of the large-scale geostrophic circulation. Summer Study Program in Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 1–47.

  • Smith, R. D., 1999: The primitive equations in the stochastic theory of adiabatic stratified turbulence. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,29, 1865–1880.

  • Tandon, A., and C. Garrett, 1996: On a recent parameterization of mesoscale eddies. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,26, 406–411.

  • Treguier, A. M., I. M. Held, and V. D. Larichev, 1997: Parameterization of quasi-geostrophic eddies in primitive equation ocean models. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,27, 567–580.

  • Veronis, G., 1975: The role of ocean models in tracer studies. Numerical Models of Ocean Circulation, Natl. Acad. Sci., 133–146.

  • Wardle, R. M., 1999: Representation of eddies in climate models by a potential vorticity flux. Ph.D. thesis, MIT/WHOI, 99-04, 177 pp.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 586 198 9
PDF Downloads 347 148 8