Formation and Propagation of Temperature Anomalies along the North Atlantic Current

Gerd Krahmann Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York
Laboratoire d’Etudes en Geophysique et Oceanographie Spatiales, Toulouse, France

Search for other papers by Gerd Krahmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Martin Visbeck Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York

Search for other papers by Martin Visbeck in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Gilles Reverdin Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York

Search for other papers by Gilles Reverdin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

A general circulation ocean model has been used to study the formation and propagation mechanisms of North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO)-generated temperature anomalies along the pathway of the North Atlantic Current (NAC). The NAO-like wind forcing generates temperature anomalies in the upper 440 m that propagate along the pathway of the NAC in general agreement with the observations. The analysis of individual components of the ocean heat budget reveals that the anomalies are primarily generated by the wind stress anomaly-induced oceanic heat transport divergence. After their generation they are advected with the mean current. Surface heat flux anomalies account for only one-third of the total temperature changes. Along the pathway of the NAC temperature anomalies of opposite signs are formed in the first and second halves of the pathway, a pattern called here the North Atlantic dipole (NAD). The response of the ocean depends fundamentally on Rt = (L/υ)/τ, the ratio between the time it takes for anomalies to propagate along the NAC [(L/υ) ∼ 10 years] compared to the forcing period τ. The authors find that for NAO periods shorter than 4 years (Rt > 1) the response in the subpolar region is mainly determined by the local forcing. For NAO periods longer than 32 years (Rt < 1); however, the SST anomalies in the northeastern part of the NAD become controlled by ocean advection. In the subpolar region maximal amplitudes of the temperature response are found for intermediate (decadal) periods (Rt ∼ 1) where the propagation of temperature anomalies constructively interferes with the local forcing. A comparison of the NAO-generated propagating temperature anomalies with those found in observations will be discussed.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Gerd Krahmann, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Oceanography 206-C, RT 9W, Palisades, NY 10964-8000.

Email: krahmann@ldeo.columbia.edu

Abstract

A general circulation ocean model has been used to study the formation and propagation mechanisms of North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO)-generated temperature anomalies along the pathway of the North Atlantic Current (NAC). The NAO-like wind forcing generates temperature anomalies in the upper 440 m that propagate along the pathway of the NAC in general agreement with the observations. The analysis of individual components of the ocean heat budget reveals that the anomalies are primarily generated by the wind stress anomaly-induced oceanic heat transport divergence. After their generation they are advected with the mean current. Surface heat flux anomalies account for only one-third of the total temperature changes. Along the pathway of the NAC temperature anomalies of opposite signs are formed in the first and second halves of the pathway, a pattern called here the North Atlantic dipole (NAD). The response of the ocean depends fundamentally on Rt = (L/υ)/τ, the ratio between the time it takes for anomalies to propagate along the NAC [(L/υ) ∼ 10 years] compared to the forcing period τ. The authors find that for NAO periods shorter than 4 years (Rt > 1) the response in the subpolar region is mainly determined by the local forcing. For NAO periods longer than 32 years (Rt < 1); however, the SST anomalies in the northeastern part of the NAD become controlled by ocean advection. In the subpolar region maximal amplitudes of the temperature response are found for intermediate (decadal) periods (Rt ∼ 1) where the propagation of temperature anomalies constructively interferes with the local forcing. A comparison of the NAO-generated propagating temperature anomalies with those found in observations will be discussed.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Gerd Krahmann, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Oceanography 206-C, RT 9W, Palisades, NY 10964-8000.

Email: krahmann@ldeo.columbia.edu

Save
  • da Silva, A. M., C. C. Young, and S. Levitus, 1994: Atlas of Surface Marine Data 1994. Vol. 1: Algorithms and Procedure, Tech. Rep. 6, NOAA, 83 pp.

  • Deser, C., and M. L. Blackmon, 1993: Surface climate variations over the North Atlantic Ocean during winter: 1900–1989. J. Climate,6, 1743–1753.

  • Hansen, D. V., and H. F. Bezdek, 1996: On the nature of decadal anomalies in the North Atlantic sea surface temperature. J. Geophys. Res.,101, 8749–8758.

  • Hellerman, S., and M. Rosenstein, 1983: Normal monthly wind stress over the World Ocean with error estimates. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,13, 1093–1104.

  • Hurrell, J. W., 1995: Decadal trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation:Regional temperatures and precipitation. Science,269, 676–679.

  • ——, and H. van Loon, 1997: Decadal variations in climate associated with the North Atlantic Oscillation. Climatic Change,36, 301–326.

  • Kaplan, R., M. Cane, Y. Kushnir, A. Clement, M. Blumenthal, and B. Rajagopalan, 1998: Analyses of global sea surface temperature 1856–1991. J. Geophys. Res.,103, 18 567–18 589.

  • Kushnir, Y., 1994: Interdecadal variations in North Atlantic sea surface temperature and associated atmospheric conditions. J. Climate,7, 141–157.

  • Latif, M., 1998: Dynamics of interdecadal variability in coupled ocean–atmosphere models. J. Climate,11, 602–624.

  • Robinson, W., 2000: Review of WETS—The Workshop on Extra-Tropical SST anomalies. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,81, 567–577.

  • Saravanan, R., and J. McWilliams, 1997: Stochasticity and spatial resonance in interdecadal climate fluctuations. J. Climate,10, 2299–2320.

  • Seager, R., M. Blumenthal, and Y. Kushnir, 1995: An advective atmospheric mixed layer model for ocean modeling purposes: Global simulation of surface heat fluxes. J. Climate,8, 1951–1964.

  • ——, Y. Kushnir, M. Visbeck, N. Naik, J. Miller, G. Krahmann, and H. Cullen, 2000: Causes of Atlantic Ocean climate variability between 1958 and 1998. J. Climate,13, 2845–2862.

  • Sutton, R., and M. Allen, 1997: Decadal predictability of North Atlantic sea surface temperature and climate. Nature,388, 563–567.

  • van Loon, H., and J. C. Rogers, 1978: Seesaw in winter temperatures between Greenland and northern Europe. Part I: Mon. Wea. Rev.,106, 296–310.

  • Visbeck, M., H. Cullen, G. Krahmann, and N. Naik, 1998: An ocean model’s response to North Atlantic Oscillation-like wind forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett.,25, 4521–4524.

  • Walker, G. T., 1924: Correlations in seasonal variations of weather. IV. Memoirs of India Meteorolgical Department Rep. 24, 275–332.

  • ——, and E. W. Bliss, 1924: World weather V. Mem. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,4, 53–84.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 368 116 4
PDF Downloads 112 35 1