Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Measurement of the Rates of Production and Dissipation of Turbulent Kinetic Energy in an Energetic Tidal Flow: Red Wharf Bay Revisited

Tom P. Rippeth School of Ocean Sciences, University of Wales Bangor, Menai Bridge, Anglesey, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Tom P. Rippeth in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
John H. Simpson School of Ocean Sciences, University of Wales Bangor, Menai Bridge, Anglesey, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by John H. Simpson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Eirwen Williams School of Ocean Sciences, University of Wales Bangor, Menai Bridge, Anglesey, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Eirwen Williams in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Mark E. Inall University of the Highlands and Islands Project, Scottish Association for Marine Science, Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory, Oban, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Mark E. Inall in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Sep 2003
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2003)033<1889:MOTROP>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1889–1901
Restricted access

Abstract

Simultaneous measurements of the rates of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) dissipation (ε) and production (P) have been made over a period of 24 h at a tidally energetic site in the northern Irish Sea in water of 25-m depth. Some ε profiles from ∼5 m below the surface to 15 cm above the seabed were obtained using a fast light yo-yo (FLY) microstructure profiler, while P profiles were determined from a bottom-mounted high-frequency acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) using the variance method. In homogeneous flow of the kind observed, the turbulence regime should approximate to local equilibrium so that, with no buoyancy forces involved, ε and P are expected to covary with mean values that are equal. The results show a close tracking of ε and P for most of the observational period. For the second tidal cycle, when there was no significant surface wave activity, a mean ratio of ε/P ≃ 0.63 ± 0.17 was obtained. Although this is a significant deviation from unity, it is within the range of uncertainty previously reported for the ε measurements. A marked phase lag of between 5 and 20 min between the maximum P and the maximum ε is interpreted using a simple model in terms of the decay rate of TKE. Consideration of inherent instrument noise has enabled an estimate of the lowest P threshold measurable using the variance technique. For the chosen averaging parameters a value of Pmin ∼ 7 × 10−5 W m−3 is estimated. Two other significant differences between the two sets of measurements are attributed to errors in the stress estimate. The first is a bias in the estimate of stress resulting from a combination of instrument tilt (1°–3.5°) and surface wave activity. The second are anomalously high stress estimates, covering nearly one-half of the water column at times, which are thought to be due to instrument noise associated with the large wave orbital velocities.

Corresponding author address: Tom Rippeth, School of Ocean Sciences, University of Wales Bangor, Menai Bridge, Anglesey LL59 5AB, United Kingdom. Email: t.p.rippeth@bangor.ac.uk

Abstract

Simultaneous measurements of the rates of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) dissipation (ε) and production (P) have been made over a period of 24 h at a tidally energetic site in the northern Irish Sea in water of 25-m depth. Some ε profiles from ∼5 m below the surface to 15 cm above the seabed were obtained using a fast light yo-yo (FLY) microstructure profiler, while P profiles were determined from a bottom-mounted high-frequency acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) using the variance method. In homogeneous flow of the kind observed, the turbulence regime should approximate to local equilibrium so that, with no buoyancy forces involved, ε and P are expected to covary with mean values that are equal. The results show a close tracking of ε and P for most of the observational period. For the second tidal cycle, when there was no significant surface wave activity, a mean ratio of ε/P ≃ 0.63 ± 0.17 was obtained. Although this is a significant deviation from unity, it is within the range of uncertainty previously reported for the ε measurements. A marked phase lag of between 5 and 20 min between the maximum P and the maximum ε is interpreted using a simple model in terms of the decay rate of TKE. Consideration of inherent instrument noise has enabled an estimate of the lowest P threshold measurable using the variance technique. For the chosen averaging parameters a value of Pmin ∼ 7 × 10−5 W m−3 is estimated. Two other significant differences between the two sets of measurements are attributed to errors in the stress estimate. The first is a bias in the estimate of stress resulting from a combination of instrument tilt (1°–3.5°) and surface wave activity. The second are anomalously high stress estimates, covering nearly one-half of the water column at times, which are thought to be due to instrument noise associated with the large wave orbital velocities.

Corresponding author address: Tom Rippeth, School of Ocean Sciences, University of Wales Bangor, Menai Bridge, Anglesey LL59 5AB, United Kingdom. Email: t.p.rippeth@bangor.ac.uk

Save
Cover Journal of Physical Oceanography
Journal of Physical Oceanography

  • Bowden, K. F., and L. A. Fairbairn, 1956: Measurements of turbulent fluctuations and Reynolds stresses in a tidal current. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A237. 422–438.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bowden, K. F., L. A. Fairbairn, and P. Hughes, 1959: The distribution of shearing stresses in a tidal current. Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc., 2 (4) 288–305.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dewey, R. K., and W. R. Crawford, 1988: Bottom stress estimates from vertical dissipation rate profiles on the continental shelf. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 18 , 1167–1177.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dewey, R. K., W. R. Crawford, A. E. Gargett, and N. S. Oakey, 1987: A microstructure instrument for profiling oceanic turbulence in coastal bottom boundary layers. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 4 , 288–297.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Etemad-Shahidi, A., and J. Imberger, 2002: Anatomy of turbulence in a narrow and strongly stratified estuary. J. Geophys. Res.,, 107 .3070, doi:10.1029/2001JC000977.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gregg, M. C., 1999: Uncertainties and limitations in measuring ε and χT. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 16 , 1483–1490.

  • Gross, T. F., and A. R. M. Nowell, 1983: Mean flow and turbulence scaling in a tidal boundary layer. Cont. Shelf Res., 2 , 109–126.

  • Howarth, M. J., 1999: Wave measurements with an ADCP. Proc. IEEE Sixth Working Conf. on Current Measurement, San Diego, CA, IEEE, 41–44.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Howarth, M. J., 2003: ADCP estimation of Reynolds stress and bottom stress. Proc. IEEE/OES Seventh Working Conf. on Current Measurement, San Diego, CA, IEEE/OES, 219–224.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Inall, M. E., and T. P. Rippeth, 2002: Dissipation of tidal energy and associated mixing in a wide fjord. J. Environ. Fluid Mech., 2 , 219–240.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Inall, M. E., T. P. Rippeth, and T. J. Sherwin, 2000: The impact of non-linear waves on the dissipation of internal tidal energy at the shelf break. J. Geophys. Res., 105 (C4) 8687–8705.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lamb, H., 1932: Hydrodynamics. Cambridge University Press, 738 pp.

  • Lien, R-C., and M. C. Gregg, 2001: Observations of turbulence in a tidal beam and across a coastal ridge. J. Geophys. Res., 106 (C3) 4575–4592.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lohrmann, A., B. Hackett, and L. P. Røed, 1990: High-resolution measurements of turbulence, velocity and stress using a pulse-to-pulse coherent sonar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 7 , 19–37.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lu, Y., and R. G. Lueck, 1999: Using a broadband ADCP in a tidal channel. Part II: Turbulence. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 16 , 1568–1579.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lu, Y., R. G. Lueck, and D. Huang, 2000: Turbulence characteristics in a tidal channel. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 30 , 855–867.

  • Lueck, R. G., and Y. Lu, 1997: The logarithmic boundary layer in a tidal channel. Cont. Shelf Res., 17 , 1785–1801.

  • Lueck, R. G., and F. Wolk, 1999: An efficient method for determining the significance of covariance estimates. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 16 , 773–775.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lueck, R. G., W. R. Crawford, and T. R. Osborne, 1983: Turbulent dissipation over the continental slope off Vancouver Island. J. Phys Oceanogr., 13 , 1809–1818.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Moum, J. N., and J. D. Nash, 2000: Topographically induced drag and mixing at a small bank on the continental shelf. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 30 , 2049–2054.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Moum, J. N., M. C. Gregg, R. C. Lien, and M. E. Carr, 1995: Comparison of turbulence kinetic energy dissipation rate estimates from two ocean microstructure profilers. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 12 , 346–366.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nasmyth, P. W., 1970: Oceanic turbulence. Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia, 105 pp.

  • Ninnis, R., 1984: The effects of spacial averaging on airfoil shear probe measurements of oceanic velocity microstructure. Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 109 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Oakey, N. S., 1982: Determination of the rate of dissipation of turbulent energy from simultaneous temperature and velocity shear microstructure measurements. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 12 , 256–271.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Osborne, T. R., and W. R. Crawford, 1980: Turbulent velocity measurements with an airfoil probe. Instruments and Methods of Air-Sea Interaction, L. Hasse et al., Eds., Plenum Press, 369–386.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • RDI, 1998: Workhorse ADCP. Technical Manual P/N957-6000-00, RDI, 64 pp.

  • Rippeth, T. P., N. R. Fisher, and J. H. Simpson, 2001: The cycle of turbulent dissipation in the presence of tidal straining. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 31 , 2458–2471.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rippeth, T. P., E. Williams, and J. H. Simpson, 2002: Reynolds stress and turbulent energy production in a tidal channel. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32 , 1242–1251.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Simpson, J. H., W. R. Crawford, T. P. Rippeth, A. R. Campbell, and J. V. S. Cheok, 1996: The vertical structure of turbulent dissipation in shelf seas. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 26 , 1579–1590.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Simpson, J. H., T. P. Rippeth, and A. R. Campbell, 2000: The phase lag of turbulent dissipation in tidal flow. Interactions between Estuaries, Coastal Seas and Shelf Seas, T. Yanagi Ed., TERRAPUB, Tokyo, 57–67.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stacey, M. T., S. G. Monismith, and J. R. Burau, 1999a: Measurements of Reynolds stress profiles in unstratified tidal flow. J. Geophys. Res., 104 , 10933–10949.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stacey, M. T., S. G. Monismith, and J. R. Burau, 1999b: Observations of turbulence in a partially stratified estuary. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 29 , 1950–1970.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Tropea, C., 1981: A note concerning the use of a one-component LDA to measure shear stress terms. Exp. Fluids, 1 (10) 209–210.

  • Trowbridge, J. H., 1998: On a technique for measurement of turbulent shear stress in the presence of surface waves. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 15 , 290–298.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 964 236 29
PDF Downloads 657 155 16