Temperature Advection: Internal versus External Processes

Tong Lee Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

Search for other papers by Tong Lee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ichiro Fukumori Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

Search for other papers by Ichiro Fukumori in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Benyang Tang Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

Search for other papers by Benyang Tang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Local advection of temperature is the inner product of vector velocity and spatial gradient of temperature. This product is often integrated spatially to infer temperature advection over a region. However, the contribution along an individual direction can be dominated by internal processes that redistribute heat within the domain but do not control the heat content of the domain. A new formulation of temperature advection is introduced to elucidate external heat source and sink that control the spatially averaged temperature. It is expressed as the advection of interfacial temperature relative to the spatially averaged temperature of the domain by inflow normal to the interface. It gives a total advection of temperature that is identical to the spatial integration of local temperature advection, yet the contributions along individual directions depict external processes. The differences between the two formulations are illustrated by analyzing zonal advection of near-surface temperature in the eastern equatorial Pacific during the 1997–98 El Niño and the subsequent La Niña by an ocean general circulation model. The new formulation highlights the advection of warmer water at the western side of the Niño-3 region into (out of) the region to create part of the warming (cooling) tendency during El Niño (La Niña). In contrast, the traditional formulation is dominated by the effect of tropical instability waves within the region that redistribute heat internally. The difference between the two formulations suggests a need for caution in discerning mechanisms controlling heat content of a region. Spatial integration of local temperature advection does not explain external processes that control a domain's heat content. The conclusion applies not only to the advection of oceanic temperature, but also to that of any property in any medium.

Corresponding author address: Tong Lee, MS 300-323, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109. Email: tlee@pacific.jpl.nasa.gov

Abstract

Local advection of temperature is the inner product of vector velocity and spatial gradient of temperature. This product is often integrated spatially to infer temperature advection over a region. However, the contribution along an individual direction can be dominated by internal processes that redistribute heat within the domain but do not control the heat content of the domain. A new formulation of temperature advection is introduced to elucidate external heat source and sink that control the spatially averaged temperature. It is expressed as the advection of interfacial temperature relative to the spatially averaged temperature of the domain by inflow normal to the interface. It gives a total advection of temperature that is identical to the spatial integration of local temperature advection, yet the contributions along individual directions depict external processes. The differences between the two formulations are illustrated by analyzing zonal advection of near-surface temperature in the eastern equatorial Pacific during the 1997–98 El Niño and the subsequent La Niña by an ocean general circulation model. The new formulation highlights the advection of warmer water at the western side of the Niño-3 region into (out of) the region to create part of the warming (cooling) tendency during El Niño (La Niña). In contrast, the traditional formulation is dominated by the effect of tropical instability waves within the region that redistribute heat internally. The difference between the two formulations suggests a need for caution in discerning mechanisms controlling heat content of a region. Spatial integration of local temperature advection does not explain external processes that control a domain's heat content. The conclusion applies not only to the advection of oceanic temperature, but also to that of any property in any medium.

Corresponding author address: Tong Lee, MS 300-323, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109. Email: tlee@pacific.jpl.nasa.gov

Save
  • Foltz, G., S. A. Grodsky, J. A. Carton, and M. J. McPhaden, 2003: Seasonal mixed layer heat budget of the tropical Atlantic Ocean. J. Geophys. Res, 108 , 3146. doi:10.1029/2002JC001584.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hall, M. M., and H. L. Bryden, 1982: Direct estimates and mechanisms of ocean heat transport. Deep-Sea Res, 29 , 339359.

  • Lee, T., and I. Fukumori, 2003: Interannual-to-decadal variations of tropical–subtropical exchange in the Pacific Ocean: Boundary versus interior pycnocline transports. J. Climate, 16 , 40224042.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, T., I. Fukumori, D. Menemenlis, Z. Xing, and L-L. Fu, 2002: Effects of the Indonesian Throughflow on the Pacific and Indian Oceans. J. Phys. Oceanogr, 32 , 14041429.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marshall, J., A. Adcroft, C. Hill, L. Perelman, and C. Heisey, 1997: A finite-volume, incompressible Navier–Stokes model for studies of the ocean on parallel computers. J. Geophys. Res, 102 , 57535766.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Montgomery, R. B., 1974: Comments on “Seasonal variability of the Florida Current,” by Niiler and Richardson. J. Mar. Res, 32 , 533535.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Picaut, J., M. Ioualaen, T. Delcroix, M. J. McPhaden, and C. Menkes, 1996: Mechanism of the zonal displacements of the Pacific warm pool: Implications for ENSO. Science, 274 , 14861489.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schiller, A., J. S. Godfrey, P. C. McIntosh, G. Meyers, and R. Fiedler, 2000: Interannual dynamics and thermodynamics of the Indo– Pacific Oceans. J. Phys. Oceanogr, 30 , 9871012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stammer, D., C. Wunsch, I. Fukumori, and J. Marshall, 2002: State estimation in modern oceanographic research. Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 83 , 289 and 294295.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stevenson, J. W., and P. P. Niiler, 1983: Upper ocean heat budget during the Hawaii-to-Tahiti Shuttle Experiment. J. Phys. Oceanogr, 13 , 18941907.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vialard, J., C. Menkes, J-P. Boulanger, P. Delecluse, E. Guilyardi, M. J. McPhaden, and G. Madec, 2001: A model study of oceanic mechanisms affecting equatorial Pacific sea surface temperature during the 1997–98 El Niño. J. Phys. Oceanogr, 31 , 16491675.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, W. M., and M. J. McPhaden, 2001: Surface layer temperature balance in the equatorial Pacific during the 1997–98 El Niño and 1998–99 La Niña. J. Climate, 14 , 33933407.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 921 368 53
PDF Downloads 798 356 53